Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
MedPot · Medicinal Pot (Hemp Cannabis Marijuana) Legal Challenges
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Hear how Yahoo! Groups has changed the lives of others. Take me there.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
TURMEL: Judge Nadeau tells Drouin Krieger no good   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #1750 of 2509 |

JCT: Pierre Drouin and Real Martin had their motions to
quash their S.7 cultivation charges and S.5(2) purpose of
trafficking charges on the basis that the Krieger decision
struck down the law dismissed by Justice Denis Nadeau in
Cochrane. Pierre's hearing was in English and Real had a
translator for French.

The Crown Bill Matwichuk argued that marijuana is only legal
for sick people since Parker and Krieger were sick. It's
hard to believe that professional lawyers can be so dense
but it's nothing new. The whole profession is dense to the
Krieger decision. After all, the Crown didn't put the
Supreme Court of Canada decision in the Criminal Code so it
doesn't count.

The hearing ran from 10am to 1pm and Pierre isn't sure why
the judge ruled that Krieger doesn't count in his 20 minute
ruling but is going to order the transcript of the decision.
Their pre-trials have been set for June 25.

His next step following in the same footsteps as the
Nielsens is his motion to prohibit the charges which can
then be appealed.

But since the Crown has used their own confusion when we
challenge all marijuana laws based on Krieger that Pierre's
going to start with only a challenge to the S.7 cultivation
section. There's no 30 days notice necessary so Pierre
should be booked well before his pre-trial in June.

I wonder how they judges who have heard of Krieger feel as
they condemn innocent people to improper convictions. Of
course, the judges who have heard of the Krieger decision
are the ones who'll have to someday be dismissed for
incompetence or corruption. After all, the wording of the
Supreme Court clear enough that S.7 has been declared
inconsistent with the Charter that corruption or cowardice
is easily argued.

Then again, haven't lawyers (all Canadian judges are
lawyers) been thoroughly discredited throughout most of
history? What's new when lawyers are found to be crooked?

Our own Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin was on the Krieger
panel and let 100,000 be charged without speaking up. If
your top judges are bent, what can you expect from below?



--
Abolitionist Slave Leader John C."The Banking Systems Engineer" Turmel
for UNILETS interest-free time-based currency in U.N. resolution C6
to Governments in the http://www.un.org/millennium/declaration.htm
http://www.cyberclass.net/turmel 519-753-0645 USENET: can.politics



Thu May 26, 2005 5:20 pm

johnturmel
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #1750 of 2509 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

JCT: Pierre Drouin and Real Martin had their motions to quash their S.7 cultivation charges and S.5(2) purpose of trafficking charges on the basis that the...
turmel@...
johnturmel
Offline Send Email
May 26, 2005
5:21 pm
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help