Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
MedPot · Medicinal Pot (Hemp Cannabis Marijuana) Legal Challenges
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Message search is now enhanced, find messages faster. Take it for a spin.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
TURMEL: CHOT-TVA Gilles Mailloux breaks "S.7 is dead" story!!   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #1644 of 2500 |

JCT: It's official. Quebec knows that Dominic Gravel is
challenging the his incarceration on the grounds that the
S.7 cultivation prohibition is dead!

I left him with all the documents and Mailloux mentioned how
he was relying on the Ontario Court of Appeal ruling (Parker
unappealed) and the Supreme Court of Canada ruling (Krieger
with Crown denied leave to appeal)! Heart King (presumed
Ace) of Parker on S.4 and Ace of Krieger on S.7.

And I described this as a two-part scandal. I love pointing
out my Court of Appeal Order to my Terry Parker Day motion
noting Oct 7 2003. And then the 4000 charges dropped since
Terry Parker Day and the date of my motion when they say
they fixed it but had to let everyone in the window off.

Then I point out the 100,000 who got criminal records while
the law was dead, my demand they erase them and the Justice
Ministry's cover-up. That's the Parker Scandal. Charges that
should have been erased due to Parker.

Then I point out the 100,000 who have been charged since
Frankel knew the Alberta court killed S.7 cultivation too.
That's the Frankel Scandal.

Now the two issues are clearly defined if you make the
distinction between the criminal record erasure victims and
the new criminal record soon-to-be-erasures victims.

They had footage from his initial appearance in court so it
was a pretty widely-covered case. And now Turmel slid him a
couple Aces to play and he's going to turn the tables on the
Attorney General.

As long as he concentrates on the abuse of process for S.
David Frankel to know there was no law and let the cops bust
him.

They also had an interview with him by telephone today where
he specified he was asking to be released on his own
recognizance if it looks like the is dead!!! He's got the
right attitude.

Hasn't he suffered enough it looks like the law's been dead
and the Crown knew all along?

You can bet CHOT(10)-TVA will carry tomorrow's story,
probably everyone else but you know who to watch for sure.
They're the only media with the documents in hand to
appreciate the immensity of what's going on.

And it's not that amazing for the guy who beat the 4000
charges and probably has the winningest legal record in
Canadian history (most lawyers lose their drug cases, I've
most of mine) to now be claiming I'm going after even bigger
numbers.

Especially when they understand the Parker Scandal so
easily. If they admitted the law was dead since 2001 and
dropped all pending charges, why not erase the invalid
convictions too?

Then it's not so hard to believe the Krieger Scandal with
the Supreme Court of Canada order and Note staring them in
the face.

Anyway, kudos to Gilles Mailloux for being the first
television network in Canada to have reported on the
Krieger Supreme Court of Canada decision challenges to S.7
cultivation prohibition that entails all the rest of the
sections with cultivation.

About time someone showed some nose for news.

As a native-born Quebecker, I'm pleased to think the French
media was the last controlled and the most competent.

Tomorrow should start the debacle of the Frankel gang even
though we're not even going into the merits of the Krieger
challenge, only the serious nature and likelihood of the
challenge, to rationalize his release on his own
recognizance.

Demanding "own recognizance" accepts that he's been
victimized by the Frankel Gang who didn't tell the cops that
the law had died.

There's a good chance that it will be on the late version of
the news so my next post will take a closer look at
Frankel's timeline between the Alberta strike-down and the
May Memorandum.

Keep in mind that if the Minister of Justice Cauchon had
reintroduced the new legislation in May, no one would have
noticed that Alberta had killed the old law in December once
they had a new law.

And then one day before the new law was introduced,
something unexpected happened to derail the introduction of
the new prohibition that would have gotten the Frankel Gang
off the Krieger hook.

They didn't even appeal Krieger within 30 days by Jan 4
2003. David and Harvey were waiting to hear the results of
Harvey's Parker-Hitzig-Turmel Lederman decision on Jan 9. So
they missed their deadline to apply for leave to appeal.

Krieger ruled with no appeal just like Parker on Jan 5 2003.
And no one knew. And they waited and waited and waited
hoping Parliament would pass the new prohibition and no
would notice the glitch of a few months where S.7 happened
to have died. And since those charged in that window would
have been guilty before the window and after the window,
there was no real injustice in letting them get nailed if no
one noticed the window.

The legislation was coming on May 15 and you can see from
the http://www.cyberclass.net/turmel/kriegsc2.htm note that
they got a 60-day extension of time to file leave to appeal
on March 25 so that if the new law came in, they wouldn't
have to even file since it's now moot with the new law back.

Except, just as the new prohibition was about to be
introduced on May 15, the legislation got jokered. Something
deterred Prime Minister Chretien from being responsible for
new legislation when he wanted to try it before he died.

So on May 16, David signed his infamous Memorandum and they
filed their Application for Leave to appeal on May 20 2003.

So there's David Frankel's timeline and how he almost
escaped anyone ever finding that S.7 had been declared of no
force and effect by Alberta highest court had the new
legislation been introduced.

Har har har har. Can you imagine how he must have implored
Cauchon to go ahead and it must have really blown him away
to have Chretien and the Liberals order the legislation put
off.

So David hid the death of the old law hoping the gap would
disappear with the new law and ended up with no new law and
a bigger and bigger gap. Always praying no one finds out.

And heal most got away with it when his rejection by the
Supreme Court got buried by the Clay-Caine-Malmo-Levine
recreational use losses! What a perfect cover for his loss.
Except Turmel noticed the fourth case on the list, dug out
Frankel's memorandum admitting S.7 was dead and dug out that
no one knew because it didn't make the news. And the rest of
his nightmare is history.

Oh, if only the new legislation had been brought in, all
their problems would have been solved.

And it was only that one weird event that intimidated the
Liberal Party into calling off the intro of the legislation.

What was that weird event?

Anyway, tomorrow, Frankel's Krieger Scandal makes the news
in the Nation of Quebec. And don't try to throw no Anglo
Hitzig at these Franco judges. Anglo-Hitzig may influence
some Anglo-judge in BC or Manitoba but Anglo-Hitzig
creating penal sanctions in Franco-Quebec shouldn't go over
all that well.



--
Abolitionist Slave Leader John C."The Banking Systems Engineer" Turmel
for UNILETS interest-free time-based currency in U.N. resolution C6
to Governments in the http://www.un.org/millennium/declaration.htm
http://www.cyberclass.net/turmel 519-753-0645 USENET: can.politics



Wed Jan 26, 2005 11:52 pm

johnturmel
Online Now Online Now
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #1644 of 2500 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

JCT: It's official. Quebec knows that Dominic Gravel is challenging the his incarceration on the grounds that the S.7 cultivation prohibition is dead! I left...
turmel@...
johnturmel
Online Now Send Email
Jan 26, 2005
11:52 pm
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help