JCT: Ron drew the slimy Prefessewer out of his hole:

>Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 15:23:03 -0500
>From: sdali@... (Master Bates)
>Subject: [MedPot-discuss] From Alan Young True or False

Read on and see why and who screwed Terry Parker.

>Young. First, I am really tired of responding to the
>ancient Turmel rant about me railroading Terry Parker's
>motion to invalidate in 2002. I worked closely with Terry
>and his lawyer on his famous case and have helped Parker
>with many other legal problems.

JCT: Ducking the railroading event.

>When Terry teamed up with Turmel, they launched a case to
>invalidate the possession offence in 2002, without any
>credible supporting material.

JCT: We won on just two aces. Seemed credible enough to Pitt
if not Alan Young.

The point is, once we had won a declaration from Pitt that
the MMAR had failed like he got from Lederman, why did he
help set it aside. Sure, his beef about materials may have
had some credence before Pitt but once we won, how could he
say there was insufficient materials.

And notice that it's again ducking the issue of why he
helped get Pitt set aside. Not what materials we were
showing the court.

And of course, we and Pitt were eventually proven right that
it had died on Terry Parker Day. Young's interference cost
the delay of the declaration from April 17 2002 to Oct 7
2003. 18 months x 120 dead epileptics = 2160 extra corpses
due to Young being not thinking two aces could win.

>I intervened to delay his case until the evidentiary record
>in Hitzig had been completed (a few months) so that Terry's
>case would also have some compelling evidence to use to
>support his claim (beyond Turmel's bizarre and alienating
>argument about genocide). Everyone got their day in court
>and nothing was lost. Now on to more important questions.

JCT: Once we had already won, why did we need better
materials?

So the shyster-meister's excuses fall flat. We ask: Why'd
you stab Parker in the back to take away his win? and he
responds: I didn't think he had the materials to win. Once
he'd won? That's ducking the question he cannot face.

How obvious. It's his Achilles heel. Once Pitt had ruled
that the MMAR had not worked, why did Young help the Crown
have that ruling set aside?

>Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 12:17:09 -0800
>From: bcsasquatch@... (Scotland Summersby)
>Subject: Cannasat & Alan Young

SS: Dear Mr. Turmel, I just started reading your threads,
and I must thank you for your diligence. If I understand the
conspiracy so far; Alan Young intentionally sold out Parker
& Hitzig and the rest of the MedPot movement

JCT: Either he's the Professeur Saboteur or the most inept
lawyer in history. In trying to end prohibition, not knowing it
had already ended, he brought it back to life. Oops.

SS: Alan Young is responsible for the continuation of
prohibition for not moving to quash

JCT: Worse, by moving to fix the flaws that had repealed it.

SS: Cannasat is only viable while prohibition exists, and
government involvement mitigates the usual financial risks
facing a pharmaceutical start-up
Alan Young is one of the principals in Cannasat, as well as
the VP of NORML

JCT: Alan re-started NORML as a front to push for continued
prohibition. Remember how Judas Jody Pressman diverted the
discussion away from the law still being dead by saying it
should be left up to Alan and the lawyers?

SS: NORML is pushing for Medical Users to register for the
MMAR

JCT: No kidding. What to expect?

SS: The money behind Cannasat are Moses Znaimer (CHUM), Hill
& Gertner and Joseph Mimran (Club Monaco)

JCT: Moses is the media mogul who tried to smear me as a
racist on his MuchMusic network when I ran for Prime
Minister in 1993 on their "Talk me to our leader" show.
Imagine, me who sits at the poker table with all races and
colors being called a prejudiced person! I beat them all up
over it, though. One of the wildest shows in Canadian
political history, some have said.

SS: Am I on the right track? Scott

JCT: Sure sounds like it.



--
Abolitionist Slave Leader John C."The Banking Systems Engineer" Turmel
for UNILETS interest-free time-based currency in U.N. resolution C6
to Governments in the http://www.un.org/millennium/declaration.htm
http://www.cyberclass.net/turmel 519-753-0645 USENET: can.politics