JCT: I finally got to see the 3-part series called "The
Corporation" on TVO and promised myself I'd comment on the
"revolutionary" video of our time. It's a wonderful
description of commercial death-gamble combat, of the forced
predator nature of the corporation mortgaged to maximize
profits for its owners.

John Von Neumann reminds us that "Economic questions arise
in a more elementary fashion in the theory of games" so
always keep in mind that everyone, corporations too, pledge
their collateral to borrow 10 units (pails) of financial
liquidity from the bank-pumphouse with which to play in the
economic pool and must return 11 units of financial
liquidity to retain their collateral pledged. Call this the
basic "mort-gage" death-gamble. Everyone is betting they'll
come up with 11 pails out of the pool after they all got in
the game with 10 pails knowing someone always comes up
short.

Many of my readers have already seen the video and were no
doubt as wowed by the destruction wreaked upon poorer areas.
People who are kept fighting "water privatisation" where
they ban the collection of rain-water for being a restraint-
of-trade for the water company. Of course, it's not the
corporations to blame, it's the law-makers, but it's still
terrible.

Of course, it has all the major known (played-up) anti-
poverty darlings, Vandana Shiva, Maude Barlow, who have no
excuse for not having found the online solution the banking
system engineering malfunction. So I always assume they're
"Alan Youngs," Judas Goats, leading the sheople astray with
close, but never on target moves.

The first segment asks "If a corporation is a person, what
kind of person is it?" then shows that the corporation is a
selfish immoral monster serving only the interests of its
owners. At some point, some judges declare it a legal
person, just like a real person, with all the rights to
legal person to own.

They mention that sweat-shop labor is paid 3/10ths of 1% of
retail price of the product! And they've got the Fraser
Institute pointing out that they're loving it, compared to
the alternative of no jobs at all.

The theory is that luring investment will have a trickle
down effect for the poor. Luring loan-shark will help the
poor.

It is criticized as a profit machine and they repeatedly
condemn the notion of profit, always just off target.

This is incredibly similar to the difference between Shift A
inflation and Shift B inflation. People who believe that
there is only one kind of inflation, too much money chasing
the collateral, Shift A, can never see how things are
different if it's the same money chasing less collateral,
Shift B. See: http://www.cyberclass.net/turmel/biglie.htm or
my bigger http://www.cyberclass.net/turmel/bankmath.htm for
the two different inflation shifts.

Here too, they keep saying that it's paradox how these
companies can be so greedy for profit. Why will no one cut
back on their profit? Why are they all so greedy? Why can't
they give up just a little profit to do things cleaner? Why?

Because it's not a quest for too much, it's a quest to
survive the mort-gage with the pumphouse.
Everyone has no choice but to maximize profit to survive,
not to be greedy. So this whole movie explains the battles
in the economic pool without noticing the motive provided to
the participants by the pumphouse. It's a paradox how
corporations are killing our whole planet. They can't stop
the death of birth. They can't stop the extinction. All
without ever explaining what threat is worse than extinction
of the planet.

Extinction of the business when the pumphouse forecloses.
That's the threat they all face that makes them act so
mindlessly, that makes them sell their morals for the
highest price, that makes what the Bible calls the Great
Prostitution, the selling of one's integrity.

So on to the movie with speakers who should have heard The
Engineer with the white hard-hat shouting "The problem's the
interest positive feedback" at all the TOES conferences and
globalisation protests where I attended but they got the
chance to speak. All the media darlings trotted out to
explain the criminal nature of these immoral monsters. But
if there's any major difference between Turmel and all the
rest of the world's anti-poverty activists, it's that they
blame the irrational behavior on excessive profit motive, I
blame it on mere survival motive.

Corporations are merely monstrous robots allowed to compete
for money in the economic pool with humans for the benefit
of their masters. A living wage just isn't enough for this
type. One CEO says that he realized that he was a plunderer
and that someday, it would be illegal. Of course, they never
find the real motive for such irrational genocidal behavior,
they pin the blame on irrational profit rather than rational
survival.

Once, the land was owned in common and give the Tudor reign
credit for privatizing land for the wealthy few.

One chant repeated at all demos drives me up a wall because
every time I hear it, I think of an armada full of Roman
galley slaves straining at their oars to the chant: "We, the
people, will never be defeated." They will until they
identify the key to their chains.

Corporations foster fascist regimes. No kidding. Someone's
got to provide cops to keep your wage demands down below
what's needed to survive. To help you take your financial
death quietly.

American IBM technicians handled in-house servicing of the
punch card computers at all the great Nazi death camps:
Auschwitz, Dachau, Buchenwald.

It's no wonder that people will prostitute themselves to do
anything when it's all really the responsibility of the
person paying them, isn't it. People are just surviving to
feed their families. It's the person paying for the job who
bears the final judgment. "I feed my family doing this."

Footage from the
http://yahoogroups.com/group/medpot/message/83
http://yahoogroups.com/group/medpot/message/88
http://yahoogroups.com/group/medpot/message/105 which is
"How I led the FTAA Protest March in Quebec City."

So they were there and they missed the guy who took the lead
of the people's parade and then past me as people all filed
into the park and catch any of it. Too bad I was one act
they missed. They must have been filming the stage.

Shell's Project Manager eventually wants 50% renewal energy
too. What a half-vast idea.

Mark Kingwell was a bright note throughout. Seemed to be
aware we'd have to find a way so minimizing profit can be
done for some reason. Not until survival is guaranteed with
the threat of their debts removed.

Maude Barlow, Canadian who has heard Turmel and should know,
says she it's only a few simple steps to fix. Turn off one
bad positive feedback in several steps?

Noam Chomsky: "Corporations can be dismantled." They don't
have to be if the kill-or-be-killed motive is removed at the
pumphouse. Noam's never shown himself to be aware of how the
banking systems engineering at the pumphouse affects the
behavior of the debtors in the pool. None of them have.

Corporate Crime gets away with murder. Over and over.
Justice is always stymied.

Michael Moore had a man dying for lack of insurance to get a
pancreas and shamed the company into paying. Now let's send
him the other thousand cases they've turned down. Still,
score him 1 life saved by his effort. He wants to work to
hold them "more accountable," to have more "say" in what
corporations do. Of course, without eliminating the threat
by debt death motive, let the town decide whether cutting a
thousand jobs might help the company survive its debts. It's
the greatest joke of all when the slaves are allowed in on
the debate of how to best effect their continued debt
slavery.

The CEO says they should have the motto: "do no harm," which
isn't possible while their debts threaten kill-or-be-killed
in the commercial mort-gage death-gamble.

"If a label protects a company in the international market,
it should protect the worker." Catchy slogan. Let's organize
all those workers to fight for their rights. Some more. It's
worked we well throughout history. Not. When the worker is
an owner of the machine, then the slogan will be valid.

Vandana Shiva seems a nice lady who's been a speaker at many
conferences I attended so I can only cite that she never
found my info and her ignorance of the true motive may be
even worse. After having Canada's greatest pro-medpot lawyer
turn into a narc mole and stab Canada's greatest medpot
victim in the back, I can believe that the Judases are
everywhere.

And sadly, if they want to opine on the malfunction in the
banking systems engineering and they haven't found the best
info on the subject, then I have to be leery of their
motives. Still, Jesus said that people would be forever
brain-washed about interest so I can never sure whether a
reformer's just slow on usury or another Alan Young leading
the cast of actors ready to sabotage the ship if it ever
comes close to victory.

Michael Moore asked why the corporations would him on
national TV when he was criticizing them, he used the old
Kruschev line "the capitalists will sell us the rope to hang
them with." Because there was money in it and that's all
they cared about. Notice how the "survival motive" explains
everything that the "profit motive" does not. Michael said
"I'm the rope, or part of it." Part, maybe.

Still, they also let Michael Moore on the news because he's
not hitting the nail on the head and anytime you have an
honest man leading them astray, they'll let him have his
piece. I'm almost completely suppressed in the national
media. Just read Frank magazine explaining how Ottawa
mayoral candidates busted on Parliament Hill with 3.3Kg of
marijuana was suppressed in the Ottawa media at
http://www.cyberclass.net/turmel/frankmag.txt to find out
how media don't cover the really important political action.
Whenever I see the big media building up someone, I always
wonder if it's another Alan Young covering the story of the
true fight really going on.

So Michael's final message is "Do something, anything, to
get power back in our hands." What "something, anything"
does he have in mind. I ran for office 57 times. I used the
courts hundreds of times, I've promoted escaping their
control with local barter trading. I've put the Time
Standard of Money on the Millennium Declaration.

And what something, anything have Michael, Vandana, Maude,
done? Protested, documented, resisted the genocidal
splashings of the monster robot in the pool. Without ever
having understood that the robot was playing mort-gage at
the pumphouse too.

And corporations, like most humans, will prostitute their
morals to survive when it's the only way to escape the
pumphouse.

Keep in mind that in olden days, debtors were executed
making your mort-gage death-gamble a real death-gamble.

And of course, no regulation or attenuation of the splashing
in the pool has any effect at all on the debts that must be
paid at the pumphouse.

So, if you've seen the movie, watch it again realizing
every time they speak of the paradox of irrational profit,
they're really speaking of rational survival, and laugh
every time that suggest that their tinkering with how things
work in the financial pool when we know the threat presented
by the pumphouse that seem oblivious to.

The question is whether these anti-poverty activist heroes
focus on too-profitable splashing in the pool and are
oblivious to the threat from the pumphouse or are they
working for the pumphouse by pinning the blame on robots
that have been unleashed in the pool.

Anyway, should I feel snubbed, insulted, etc., when I hear
about all the "social currencies" conferences going on
around the world to which I never get invited and I can't
help thinking that I won't be the butt of the jokes
eventually. Having a meeting of social currency activists
and not inviting John The Engineer Turmel is like the
throwing a party for the nuclear industry and not inviting
the Einstein who figured out the equation first. He figured
out the Energy Equation = m*c^2 and I figured out the
banking system Laplace Transform: 1/(s-i) and the LETS
Transform: 1/s.

And of course, as the most efficient model emerges, people
will come to the realization that one big simple one works
best and that Turmel's been there, done that, for the whole
world, already.

So no, being shunned by the people taking charge of the
community currency movement is not a joke on me, I think
it's going to be a joke on them. Because once it's fixed and
I get to retire, there won't be any more such parties I
might attend.



--
Abolitionist Slave Leader John C."The Banking Systems Engineer" Turmel
for UNILETS interest-free time-based currency in U.N. resolution C6
to Governments in the http://www.un.org/millennium/declaration.htm
http://www.cyberclass.net/turmel 519-753-0645 USENET: can.politics