JCT: I just got the response from the Crown about our desire
to have sections we are going to be appealing, 166 and 170,
reflected in the short version Order of the big Judgment.

We asked that the law be declared dead on Terry Parker day.
The Court declared it dead on Terry Parker Day and then
alive again on Alan Young Day. After all, without the Alan
Young Hitzig case, the court wouldn't have been able to
grant their demand to fix the MMAR and claim that the law is
now alive.
The Court declared they were dismissing our appeal.

The Crown just wants to Order to read that we asked that the
prohibition be declared invalid and that our request was
dismissed. That way, the Crown can mislead everyone into
thinking that the motion to declare the law dead was not
granted.

So we want the Order to reflect that we asked for the death
of the law and that they killed the law so we can appeal the
objectionable bringing it back to life. The Crown lawyers
want to mislead Canadians. I guess they want to get the
chance to apologize again for wrong busting tens of
thousands again:

Department of Justice
Canada
Ontario Regional Office
Exchange Tower, 130 King St. W. #3400
Tel: 416-973-9638 Fax: 416-952-0298

Our File: 2-493443-2

April 30, 2004

VIA REGISTERED MAIL

JOHN C. TURMEL TERRANCE PARKER J.J. MARC PAQUETTE
8-37 Colborne E. 2209-55 Triller 162-A Atlantic Ave.
Brantford Toronto Hawkesbury
N3T 2G3 M6R 2H6 K6A 1V6


Dear Sirs:

Re: Parker v. HMQ, Turmel and Paquette v. HMQ
Court File No: C39738 and C39740

We recently received Mr. Turmel's letter dated April 27 2004
enclosing his version of the draft orders of the October 7
2003 decision of the Court of Appeal for Ontario regarding
the above-mentioned matters.

We will not approve Mr. Turmel's draft orders as to form and
content. They do not accurately reflect the Court of Appeal
judgment and are not in the proper form. .

Therefore we ask again that you approve as to form and
content our original version of the draft orders sent to you
with our letter of April 22 2004. Otherwise, you will need
to arrange for an appointment to settle the orders with the
Registrar at the Ontario Court of Appeal.

Yours truly,

Vanita Goela
Counsel Public Law Section

JCT: Anyway, I've had enough trying to get through to these
crooked government lawyers who say that my draft orders "do
not accurately reflect the Court of Appeal judgment."

I thought I had accurately reflected the Court judgment and
challenged Vanita to come up with a better reflection of
paragraphs 166 and 170. She couldn't but still persists in
the false statement that mine doesn't too.

Actually, mine does accurately reflect paragraphs 166 & 170.

And any problems with the form, that can be fixed.

So Marc, Terry, our victory is contained in paragraphs 166
and 170 and the Crown don't want it on the record.

I'm tired of corresponding with legal prostitutes trading
their ethics for their pay. So Terry and Marc, before I
waste everyone's time and book an appointment to go to see
the Registrar, I'll give you the chance to ask again how
Vanita wants to reflect paragraphs 166 and 170 and if not,
why doesn't the Crown want to reflect them in the Order.

Remember, if worse comes to worse, I'll include the whole
judgment with paragraghs 166 and 170 with my proposed Order
and explain how the Crown didn't think it properly reflected
what was said in those paragraphs. I'll also mention how
they were offered the chance to propose their own version of
what the Court said and could not.

Which shows that their purpose was not to reflect what we
won in the judgment but to "not reflect" our win in the
order. Pure intransigence at accepting what transpired in
paragraphs 166 and 170.

And of course, we should expect the Registrar to be as
crooked as the Crown in all this. So I will provide both my
original Order and the Order with the verbatim paragraphs
166 and 170 so that if it's refused, then it's clear that
paragraphs 166 and 170 are the words the establishment
fears.

But they can't keep the issue out. They can only look sleazy
in their tactics.

And we're going to be needing the Orders soon because the
Paul "Beagle" Burstein's Hitzig boner should be thrown out
Thursday May 6 which lets us file our Big 7 Applications to
the Supreme Court of Canada with no fear of being linked to
Alan Young's stinker.

So Marc and Terry, you write to
VGoela@... and get those paragraphs in.




--
Abolitionist Slave Leader John C."The Banking Systems Engineer" Turmel
for UNILETS interest-free time-based currency in U.N. resolution C6
to Governments in the http://www.un.org/millennium/declaration.htm
http://www.cyberclass.net/turmel 519-753-0645 USENET: can.politics