Before I continue, let me make it clear that this next discussion is not
meant to degrade any systems in any way. We are simply trying to understand
the underlying strength of each system using my theoretical analysis for
roulette. If I should unintentionally put anybody down, I would like
apologise in advance because while we are trying to look at the facts, a few
may take offence when I say a system is weaker than the other. And once
again I'm here not to sell my system or anybody else's, so here we go.....

First let's look at the SI. In decreasing order of Survival Index:
1) Rambler's Sure Win: SI=4.26 (strongest)
2) Dr Lim's Difference System: SI=3.89
3) MYaz's Trickle Win: SI=3.08
4) Serena's 14# Group: SI=1.89 (weakest)
Here you will see that Rambler's system is the one that will survive the
longest. In other words it will experience the most number of winning
sessions compared to the other systems before failing. Put through any spin
tests & Rambler's most likely fail last. So based on the SI figure alone,
his system stands out from the rest.

Next I will list the Doubling Recovery Factor in decreasing order:
1) MYaz's Trickle Win: DRF=21 (best)
2) Serena's 14# Group: DRF=21 (best)
3) Dr Lim's Difference System: DRF=98.3
4) Rambler's Sure Win: DRF=165.7 (worst)
What you seeing here is the opposite result. While Sure Win has the
strongest SI, you really don't want it to fail on you because this will take
you back by more than 165 winning sessions to recover your losses! This
means that the journey time to recovery is a long one. For those who don't
have the patience, go for the lower value DRFs.

Session Bankroll in increasing order:
1) Serena's 14# Group: TBR=15 (best)
2) MYaz's Trickle Win: TBR=50
3) Dr Lim's Difference System: TBR=273
4) Rambler's Sure Win: TBR=488 (worst)
Both the bankroll for Serena's & Dr Lim's systems have been scaled down
(factored) to the equivalent of 1 unit starting bet since they bet on inside
numbers. Although you would normally need 210 units for Serena's system,
this is actually the same as using a total of 15 units accumulative bet
(progression: 1-2-3-4-5). This makes the 14# System as the most prefered
choice.

Average unit gain in decreasing order:
1) Rambler's Sure Win: AVG=2.94 (best)
2) Dr Lim's Difference System: AVG=2.78
3) MYaz's Trickle Win: AVG=2.38
3) Serena's 14# Group: AVG=0.71 (worst)
Assuming that you did not lose playing all the systems, you will make the
most gain per session using Rambler's system for the same unit bet.

Key Performance Index in decreasing order:
1) MYaz's Trickle Win: KPI=6.83 (best)
2) Serena's 14# Group: KPI=11.10
3) Dr Lim's Difference System: KPI=25.25
4) Rambler's Sure Win: KPI=38.90 (worst)
KPI takes into account all the previous parameters & will show you the
overall strength of each system. Since the score says it all, I don't need
to explain this part in detail.

Conclusion: When you carry out a roulette test be it on real or RNG spins,
EVERY system above will fail in the long run. What we have done so far is
comparing the characteristics of each systems according to their given
parameters. As you can see there is no one system that will shine in every
parameter. It all depends on what you want. My KPI score may not be the
ultimate indicator for comparing roulette systems but with it you can make a
better judgement in deciding which system to use in the casino.

MYaz


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]