Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
MasterYazdani · Numerology, Timing, Luck & Roulette
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Real people. Real stories. See how Yahoo! Groups impacts members worldwide.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
System comparison explained   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #239 of 784 |
I have ranked a few well known systems according to my theoretical analysis
formula. This will give you a big picture on how well a system will compare
against others in theory. Within the uploaded file, you can clearly see from
the table layout that there is ABSOLUTELY no reason to use an 8 step
Martingale (255 chips) or higher anymore since all the other systems listed
inside have better performance.

People who have bought Serena's original system will now understand why
they've won so many times. The proof is in the pudding - look at her low KPI
score which represents a good system to play. Also notice her DRF=21 which
means that a session loss is non-catastrophic.

So how do you read the table? Do you just look at the KPI value? Well you
must take in all the information into account because the KPI alone can be
misleading. Have a look at the 2 or 3-step Martingale. While they show very
low KPI scores, their SI is also not very attractive given such a short
progression.

Take any existing system & try to lower its KPI value. What you want is to
increase the SI value using the same amount of TBR. Perhaps you need to
relook at the total step progressions as well. From this formula you will
learn not to design a system using a steep progression. It is perfectly okay
to use a long progression as I have demonstrated in my Trickle Win system as
long as is not steep.

I think too many of you have wasted your time in testing a few hundred
thousands roulette spins when you should have applied this theoretical
analysis first, which is so much more easier!

Let's see if anybody can come out with a better system. Within this group,
I'm sure there are smart individuals who can reverse engineer this process
to maximize the potential of a system now that I've provided the criteria of
a powerful system. But remember this is only a theoretical analysis. Once
you've got the right specs, you must try it out in the casino to make sure
that it is playable.

This table is only version 1. If some of you could contribute the parameters
for more systems, I would be glad to include it in & update this systems
comparison list.

MYaz


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





Mon Sep 13, 2004 9:21 am

azmiay2000
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #239 of 784 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

I have ranked a few well known systems according to my theoretical analysis formula. This will give you a big picture on how well a system will compare against...
Azmi Adil Yazdani
azmiay2000
Offline Send Email
Sep 13, 2004
9:22 am
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help