for all those interested in later health effects of lead (and pesticides and
mercury, etc) please refer to the website below. I have also pasted the text
of the article at the end.
Kind regards
Elizabeth O'Brien

----- Original Message -----
From: "Ralph Scott" <rscott@...>
To: <leadnet@...>
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 6:12 AM
Subject: [Leadnet] "Is lead linked to mental decline?"


A June 15 news story that reviews some research on lead exposure in
childhood and mental decline later in life:

www.orlandosentinel.com/orl-leadbrain08jun15,0,3574316.story
----------
Ralph Scott
Community Projects Director
Alliance for Healthy Homes
50 F St., NW, Suite 300
Washington, DC 20001

phone - 202-347-7610
fax - 202-347-0058
rscott@...; www.afhh.org

Working for affordable healthy housing for all.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
A blank message to these addresses performs the following -
Leadnet-on@... subscribes you to the list.
Leadnet-off@... unsubscribes you from the list.
Leadnet-switch@... toggles you to/from the fancy digest version.
Leadnet-vacation@... toggles you to/from the vacation list.

Post your message to the list by sending it to Leadnet@....

To contact the list owner, send your message to
Leadnet-list-owner@....



To unsubscribe your email address, click on the following web page.
http://cgi.mail-list.com/u?ln=leadnet&nm=egroup@lead.org.au

www.orlandosentinel.com/orl-leadbrain08jun15,0,3574316.story
[LID 9565]

OrlandoSentinel.com
YOUR TIME: WELLNESS
Is lead linked to mental decline?
Some experts say long-ago exposure to the toxin adversely affects the brain
later in life, but more study is necessary.
Malcolm Ritter

The Associated Press June 15, 2008

Could it be that the "natural" mental decline that afflicts many older
people is related to how much lead they absorbed decades before?

That's the provocative idea emerging from some studies, part of a broader
area of new research that suggests some pollutants can cause harm that shows
up only years after someone is exposed.

The work suggests long-ago lead exposure can make an aging person's brain
work as if it's five years older than it really is. If that's verified by
more research, it means that sharp cuts in environmental lead levels more
than 20 years ago didn't stop its widespread effects.

"We're trying to offer a caution that a portion of what has been called
normal aging might in fact be due to ubiquitous environmental exposures like
lead," says Dr. Brian Schwartz of Johns Hopkins University.

"The fact that it's happening with lead is the first proof of principle that
it's possible," says Schwartz, a leader in the study of lead's delayed
effects. Other pollutants such as mercury and pesticides may do the same
thing, he says.

In fact, some recent research does suggest that being exposed to pesticides
raises the risk of getting Parkinson's disease a decade or more later.
Experts say such studies in mercury are lacking.

The notion of long-delayed effects is familiar; tobacco and asbestos, for
example, can lead to cancer. But in recent years, scientists are coming to
appreciate that exposure to other pollutants in early life also may promote
disease much later on.

"It's an emerging area" for research, says Dr. Philip Landrigan of the Mount
Sinai School of Medicine in New York. It certainly makes sense that if a
substance destroys brain cells in early life, the brain may cope by drawing
on its reserve capacity until it loses still more cells with aging, he said.
Only then would symptoms such as forgetfulness or tremors appear.

Linda Birnbaum, director of experimental toxicology at the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, says infant mice exposed to chemicals such
as PCBs show only very subtle effects in young adulthood. But more dramatic
harm in areas such as movement and learning appears when they reach old age.

Animal studies also show clear evidence that being exposed to harmful
substances in the womb can harm health later on, she says. For example,
rodents that encounter PCBs or dioxins before birth are more susceptible to
cancer once they grow up.

Studying delayed effects in people is difficult because they generally must
be followed for a long time. Research with lead is easier because scientists
can measure the amount that has accumulated in the shinbone over decades and
get a read on how much lead a person has been exposed to in the past.

Lead in the blood, by contrast, reflects recent exposure. Virtually all
Americans have lead in their blood, but the amounts are far lower today than
in the past.

The big reason for the drop: the phasing out of lead in gasoline from 1976
to 1991. Because of that and accompanying measures, the average lead level
in the blood of American adults fell 30 percent by 1980 and about 80 percent
by 1990.

That's a major success story for environmentalists. But work by Schwartz and
Dr. Howard Hu of the University of Michigan suggests that the long-term
effects of the high-lead era are still being felt.

In 2006, Schwartz and his colleagues published a study of about 1,000
Baltimore residents. They were ages 50 to 70, old enough to have absorbed
plenty of lead before it disappeared from gasoline. They probably got their
peak doses in the 1960s and 1970s, Schwartz says, mostly by inhaling air
pollution from vehicle exhaust and from other sources in the environment.

The researchers estimated each person's lifetime dose by scanning their
shinbones for lead. Then they gave each one a battery of mental-ability
tests.

In brief, the scientists found that the higher the lifetime lead dose, the
poorer the performance across a wide variety of mental functions, such as
verbal and visual memory and language ability. From low to high dose, the
difference in mental functioning was about the equivalent of aging by two to
six years.

"We think that's a large effect," Schwartz says.

Hu and his colleagues took a slightly different approach in a 2004 study of
466 men with an average age of 67. Those men took a mental-ability test
twice, about four years apart on average. Those with the highest bone lead
levels showed more decline between exams than those with smaller levels,
with the effect of the lead equal to about five years of aging.

Nobody is claiming that lead is the sole cause of age-related mental
decline, but it appears to be one of several factors involved, Hu stresses.

If so, it would join such possible influences as high blood pressure,
diabetes, stroke, emotional stress and maybe education level, said Bradley
Wise of the National Institute on Aging. Nobody knows exactly what causes
mental decline with age, he says.

Although the studies by Hu and Schwartz suggest lead is involved, Wise and
others say they don't prove the link.

"I think many things impact how we age, but I think right now it's maybe
premature to be giving lead a huge role in our age-related cognitive
decline," says Dr. Margit L. Bleecker, director of the Center for
Occupational and Environmental Neurology in Baltimore. Still, she calls the
lead hypothesis "a very interesting idea" deserving more study.

Others are more impressed.

"The new evidence from these studies should concern people" says
epidemiologist Andrew Rowland of the University of New Mexico. "These two
research groups are finding adverse effects on the aging brain at low levels
of lead exposure. More work needs to be done, but these studies are raising
important questions."




Copyright © 2008, Orlando Sentinel