I got to talk to the eye doctor a bit this morning when I took Dad in.
  What she did to lower the eye pressure was not the electric
stimulation or the frequencies, but color therapy!!!  She shined
particular colors into his eyes--actually, just in his face.  It was
almost just like spectro-chrome therapy!!  I asked her if it was the
same but she had not heard of S-C, but said that her method was from
the 1920's.  I talked to her about the S-C method, which is shining
the light directly on the 'bad' area.  Like if a person broke their
wrist the light would be put directly to shine on the wrist.  But she
said that, in her opinion and that of the method she follows, that it
is better to shine the color into the eyes, because that's where the
healing takes place.  She said the blood flows past the eyes every 20
minutes so in 20 minutes you get a full circulation throughout the
body of the healing color.  Kind of makes sense.  Next time I get to
try the S-C I'll try the eye method rather than shining the light on
the body.

She said where she learned the eye cone color is
www.syntonicphototherapy.com  You can find practitioners of this
method by going to the site and looking at the practitioner list.
Also, if you look at the info for the conference in May they list a
doctor that has written a book on electric stimulation for the eyes!
They give his contact number, too.  She said they have a
non-professional course and a course for doctors.  I see that both are
presented at their yearly conference.

Dad's pressure has gone down into the 20's from the 40's with this
color and the electric stimulation.  I asked her if it would stay, and
of course she said each person is individual and there's no way to say
yes or no for sure.  But his held from the first visit over to the
second visit, where the pressure went down some more.  I'll find out
tomorrow whether that held for the 24 hours.

This is exciting.  Though Dad says he doesn't feel any different, at
least his pressure is measurable.  She still doesn't have his
homeopathic remedies figured out yet, so his results are just from the
color therapy and the stimulation machine, which is the ScyFix 600.  I
googled it and a few sites come up.

This machine uses 4 pads.  I've never seen the reusable sticky TENS
pads, but I'm assuming these are the same thing.  Two pads are hooked
into one line that plugs into the machine.  One pad has a red line
which goes on the eye, and the other pad has a black line that goes on
the eye's corresponding hand, like right eye/right hand, left eye/left
hand.  Then you turn the machine on and it automatically runs for 20
minutes.

The instruction book says it uses a painless, non-invasive therapy
that has barely perceptible impulses of square wave DC at low
voltages.  It has an intensity knob, 2 actually, that you turn both at
the same time until the person says they feel the current, then you
turn both knobs back to the point where they say they can't feel it.

The 4 freq are 1 minute at 292Hz, 2 minutes at 31Hz, 7 minutes at 8.9
Hz and 10 minutes at 0.28Hz.  The Technical Specifications say
Channels--dual channels (this is the 2 leads to the eye/hand) Carrier
Freq is 10 KHz, 0-4 volt, 500 (upside down U, can't figure out how to
get the computer to make that symbol) load, Output current-max.8mA,
500 (upside down u) load, Output freq-the above mentioned, timer-20
minutes auto off, sound alarm after the change of each freq, power
supply either a 9 volt battery or wall plug in, polarity
change--polarity change (+/-)in 0.5 seconds.  Tolerance (+/-)20%.

Hope this helps.

samala,
Renee

The

Yes the rock gives off FIR when heated and so does sand.The heating pad is made
of plastic cloth and wire so it does not have much material there to give off
fir. It probably gives off some but not as much as rock does, If you look at all
the mineral lamps on the market they all have a heating source and then a
mineral plate of some sort that gives off the FIR. Granite is good for this as
it contains several different minerals in it.


> V; Thanks for your reply. What is the difference between putting your
> feet on the heating pad and putting your feet on the heated rock ? Does
> the rock change something ? Thanks , Frank Mc

V; Thanks for your reply. What is the difference between putting your
feet on the heating pad and putting your feet on the heated rock ? Does
the rock change something ? Thanks , Frank Mc

Hi Frank,
I have not seen any LEDs that extend into that range, I beleve FIR starts at
2000 nm or 2 microns and the furthest I have seen LEDs go is about 1000 nm.
I made a thing that heats rocks to give off fir also, All I did is get a granite
tile and a small heating pad, I put the heating pad on the carpeted floor and
put the granite tile on top of it and set it on low or medium. Viola! a nice FIR
emmiter to put my feet on when its chilly out. I suggest to check under the
heating pad occasionally to see of it is getting too hot. Mine is oK I have it
on all the time 24 hrs a day,


> Hi V, while we are on the subject of  colors and wavelength could you
> tell me if it is possible to get FIR with LED's ? It seems that Donna
> Crow sells something that heats rocks and emits FIR heat . All the LED's
> I've seen only go into the NIR wavelength . Thanks, Frank Mc

Hi V, while we are on the subject of  colors and wavelength could you
tell me if it is possible to get FIR with LED's ? It seems that Donna
Crow sells something that heats rocks and emits FIR heat . All the LED's
I've seen only go into the NIR wavelength . Thanks, Frank Mc

V, Please post any results and wavelengths with
the purple.  I know that when I 'charge' 3/4 cup
of water for an hour using an incandescent black
light bulb and then drink the water, the
swelling, tingling, etc, of my lips (due to
cancer I am pretty sure) is greatly benefitted.
I can also soak a paper towel or washcloth with
the water and keep it on the mouth area for a
while and that works too.  So any info you have
will be appreciated.  tia  pj

Yeah I wonder also because I have some LEDs that are purple and right on the border of UV. maybe I should do some more resaerch on that and see. I know that some people use the red at the wrist and navel to get to the blood. I would have to see if the purple can penetrate to the blood in the body anywhere. Usually the blue and purple colors dont penetrate very well.
Hows it going with your LED unit?
V

> Wonder what the wavelength on this thing is. I bet V can make an LED
> that does it if wavelength is the issue rather than light coherency. (do
> I have that terminology right? But how do we know where the viruses are
> in the body and then zap them? Not quite the same as a petrie dish.

> OTOH there is mention of pulsing blood during dialysis to kill stuff.
> Sounds a lot like what Dr. Douglass called "Photoluminescence" where a
> few ccs of blood is removed, exposed to UV light then put back in the
> body. The last place I knew that did that was put out of biz.

> Saralou

> ----------------------------------------------------------

> http://www.newscientisttech.com/article.ns?id=dn12368&feedId=online-news_rss20

> he researchers applied pulses of purple-coloured light lasting just 100
> femtoseconds (10^-15 seconds) to viruses called M13 bacteriophages
> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M13_phage>. It takes just a single pulse
> to destroy the viruses completely, say the researchers.

> The "power density" of the laser is just 5 microjoules per square
> centimetre, which is low enough to leave surrounding human cells and
> tissue undamaged, but high enough to produce large-amplitude vibrations
> in a virus's capsid. It is also too low to cause genetic mutations,
> meaning the virus will not build up resistant to the treatment over time.

> ----------------------------------------------------------

> Teams from three U.S. universities and medical schools have discovered a
> novel way of killing viruses by using an intense pulse of visible light.

> A pulse of purple-colored laser-light applied to viruses, called M13
> bacteriophages, destroyed the viruses completely.

> The power density of the light is low enough that it does not damage
> surrounding cells and tissue, but high enough to produce large-amplitude
> vibrations in the virus' shell, which causes it to disintegrate.

> Scientists believe there are significant advantages to this method,
> compared to conventional techniques like UV irradiation, and microwaves.
> UV irradiation can cause mutations, which eventually makes the
> micro-organism resistant to treatment, and UV light can also damage the
> DNA of surrounding healthy cells.

> Plans are underway to test the efficacy of the technique on a variety of
> deadly viruses, including the HIV virus, and hepatitis C, in the hopes
> of designing new treatments for blood-borne viral diseases.

> New Scientist July 27, 2007
> Source: Light Pulses Knock Out Viruses
> Address :
> <http://v.mercola.com/blogs/public_blog/Light-Pulses-Knock-Out-Viruses-30740.aspx>

Yeah I wonder also because I have some LEDs that are purple and right on the
border of UV. maybe I should do some more resaerch on that and see. I know that
some people use the red at the wrist and navel to get to the blood. I would have
to see if the purple can penetrate to the blood in the body anywhere. Usually
the blue and purple colors dont penetrate very well.
Hows it going with your LED unit?
V


> Wonder what the wavelength on this thing is.  I bet V can make an LED
> that does it if wavelength is the issue rather than light coherency. (do
> I have that terminology right?  But how do we know where the viruses are
> in the body and then zap them? Not quite the same as a petrie dish.

> OTOH there is mention of pulsing blood during dialysis to kill stuff.
> Sounds a lot like what Dr. Douglass called  "Photoluminescence" where a
> few ccs of blood is removed, exposed to UV light then put back in the
> body.  The last place I knew that did that was put out of biz.

> Saralou

> ------------------------------------------------------------------------


> http://www.newscientisttech.com/article.ns?id=dn12368&feedId=online-news_rss20


> he researchers applied pulses of purple-coloured light lasting just 100
> femtoseconds (10^-15 seconds) to viruses called M13 bacteriophages
> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M13_phage>. It takes just a single pulse
> to destroy the viruses completely, say the researchers.

> The "power density" of the laser is just 5 microjoules per square
> centimetre, which is low enough to leave surrounding human cells and
> tissue undamaged, but high enough to produce large-amplitude vibrations
> in a virus's capsid. It is also too low to cause genetic mutations,
> meaning the virus will not build up resistant to the treatment over time.


> ------------------------------------------------------------------------

> Teams from three U.S. universities and medical schools have discovered a
> novel way of killing viruses by using an intense pulse of visible light.

> A pulse of purple-colored laser-light applied to viruses, called M13
> bacteriophages, destroyed the viruses completely.

> The power density of the light is low enough that it does not damage
> surrounding cells and tissue, but high enough to produce large-amplitude
> vibrations in the virus' shell, which causes it to disintegrate.

> Scientists believe there are significant advantages to this method,
> compared to conventional techniques like UV irradiation, and microwaves.
> UV irradiation can cause mutations, which eventually makes the
> micro-organism resistant to treatment, and UV light can also damage the
> DNA of surrounding healthy cells.

> Plans are underway to test the efficacy of the technique on a variety of
> deadly viruses, including the HIV virus, and hepatitis C, in the hopes
> of designing new treatments for blood-borne viral diseases.

> New Scientist July 27, 2007
> Source: Light Pulses Knock Out Viruses
> Address :
>
<http://v.mercola.com/blogs/public_blog/Light-Pulses-Knock-Out-Viruses-30740.asp\
x>

The "power density" of the laser is just 5 microjoules per square centimetre, which is low enough to leave surrounding human cells and tissue undamaged, but high enough to produce large-amplitude vibrations in a virus's capsid. It is also too low to cause genetic mutations, meaning the virus will not build up resistant to the treatment over time.

1.  how do you hold it so it doesn't burn?
   I find myself holding it by it's little cord down my back under my shirt, moving it from place to place often and finally giving up because it's too hot  to hold and too hot to leave lay on my skin.  What kind of holders have you all come up with?
2.  What about the literature and the archives that mention  pulsing.  Does pulsing just make the lasers more effective and this is LED so it doesn't  matter?
3. Why do the articles in the archives say that it's UV rays magnified through glasses or lasers that hurt the eyeball yet the instructions say not to shine the UV near the eyes even when they're closed?  How'm I ever going to get those wrinkles  ;-?
4. Haven't had time to read the carpal tunnel article(s) yet but if any of you have had success, where did you shine/aim it?  The tingling/burning/numbness in my thumbs and index fingers IMO is from a disc problem at C5 or C6 since I have zero wrist pain anyplace and when I change back  positions I can make the symptoms go away.  I held the light on my spine in lots of places.
5. Any protocols you all will share of what worked for you with an LED array?  Please make sure you say the type of array you used and how you held it as well as how long x how many times.
6. Is the blue just pretty or does it actually add something significant.  If I don't have acne, why would I use it for inflammation when I can use the other two more effectively--as I understand the research.

Though heat production is responsible for some of the response in "target
tissue", most of the effect that one gets with the various types of phototherapy
reported is due to direct photoactivation of cells. I have spent several months
now collecting and reviewing multiple published articles on low level light
therapy - 20-30 years worth - hundreds and hundreds of articles. It most
instances, the light source can be anything - laser, LED, incandescent,
fluorescent - if it is properly filtered/managed to produce the desired
treatment result. We have multiple lasers in our office - excimer, diode, YAG -
and multiple LED based devices - Gentlewaves, Max7, numerous prototypes of our
own construction. The latter devices have been used for everything from wound
healing, to pain relief, to various ophthalmic conditions...

   There are all manner of variables, of course, but the response of biologic
cells is amazingly constant to certain wavelengths (red and near IR = most
common active wavelengths - thought, others are also active for various things)
and power levels (typically 1-4 J/cm2, rarely higher levels in the 7-9 J/cm2 may
give added benefit). There is almost no added benefit to laser light sources
over LED, for instance, except for higher power levels which can translate into
shorter treatment times and - maybe - deeper penetration in some tissue.
Polarized light sources come close to matching laser sources in many instances.
There seems to be little benefit between pulsed or continuous wave sources in
most applications. Multiple different wavelengths may be of benefit in some
applications.

   We can assert these things about photobiomodulation (the most proper term for
what we are attempting to do) - with the proper light therapy "code" we can get:

   *Mitochondrial activation
   *Non-mitochondrial activation (cell walls, cytoplasm)

   *Some common photoacceptor  molecules are: nnHemoglobin, nMyoglobin,
nCytochrome c oxidase, nNADH-dehydrogenase

   *Gene UP-regulation (nIntegrins, nidogens, laminin, actin, kinesin motor
proteins, semaphorins/collapsins)

   *Gene DOWN-regulation (nCytokine receptors: nInterleukin-1, interleukin-10,
macrophage inflammatory protein-2; nProapoptotic proteins:nApoptosis activator
Harikiri (HRK), programmed cell death1 protein precursor (PDCD-1; PD-1),
receptor-interacting protein (RIP)

   n*ATP production can be increased/decreased

   n*DNA/RNA production can be increased/decreased
   n*Cells "re-set" genetically to be more "normal"
   n*Cell proliferation can be increased/decreased
   n*Cell adhesiveness can be increased/decreased
   n*Pathogens can be killed
   n*Bone growth can be stimulated
   *Pain can be reduced (as effective as NSAIDS)
   n*MMP enzymes can be down-regulated
   *nFibroblasts can be increased - numbers and activity
   n*ECM can be increased
   n*Neuro-protection and neuro-regeneration
   n*Bioregulatory/hormonal systems can be modulated
   n*Mental states/conditions can be modulated
   n*Protection against toxins - chemical, radiation
   n*Blood flow can be increased
   n*Tissue swelling can be reduced
   *nVEGF can be down-regulated
   n*Collagen and pro-collagen promoted
   n*Angiogenesis promoted
   n*Macrophage activity can be increased/decreased
   n*Lymphocvte activity can be increased/decreased
   n*Apoptosis decreased
   n*Production of Growth Factors promoted - such as  nKGF (Keratinocyte), nTGF
(Transforming), nPDGF (Platelet-derived)

   nWhat does this mean? Proven.
   n*Significant reductions in healing times (50-80%)
   n*Significant improvement in wound strength (nSoft tissue and bone)
   n*Improved bone to implant adhesion
   n*Significant reductions in pain (as effective as oral NSAIDs)
   n*Significant temporal effects (up to months)
   When one hears claims about the superiority of one particular device, one
needs to be very careful about falling for sales hype. One can achieve similar
therapeutic results with a wide array of devices, I believe. The wattage of a
particular laser is really a "so what" and often translates into nothing more
than "I've got a bigger you-know-what than you do!" Unless, a company can
produce real, supportive research data that is independly verified, then all
claims are suspect.

   The photobio effect of low level light is tremendously powerful if it is the
right "dose" (wavelength, power, etc.). One FDA approved device, for instance,
the Gentlewaves by Light Bioscience, is a double panel of 590nm yellow LEDs. It
emits about 0.1J/cm2 (!) in its 40 second treatment time. 8 of these treatments
over one month will result in visible wrinkle reduction and obvious skin
rejuvenation. The effect continues for 6-12 months! This treatment is proven to
reduce inflammation (the MMP cascade), reduce collagenase production (what gives
us wrinkles), and switches on new collagen production. We have had one in my
office for nearly three years and it is very real

   Hopefully some of this will be of help to a few out there. I just don't know
how productive it is to endlessly debate the power output or superiority of some
particular "laser" device. ...And, we are not just after heat generation -
therefore, do not need microwave or u/s devices!

   Robert S. Dotson, M.D.
   Refractive Surgery Center
   Oak Ridge, Tennessee
   USA

Ok, let's have more research info.

A normal human body luminesces mainly from the head; the color of the
luminescence is orange-red tinted with a little bluish-green. Red light is
emitted from all over the body of a man who is getting angry and forms a thick
halo. The inventor suggests that this is due to leakage of the internal energy
of the body. When the angry man is irradiated for 15 minutes with the apparatus
of the present invention, he will feel relaxed and the anger is relieved. At
this time, the red light around the body disappears from the photograph and the
status of normal luminescence is resumed.
(http://www.freepatentsonline.com/5814078.html)

From http://www.stopgettingsick.com/Condtemplate.cfm-1224-50-1

One provocative study found that when some people with allergic rhinitis were
treated with intranasal exposure to low-energy, narrow-band red light, their
congestion was significantly, although not completely, relieved. Light therapy
may help suppress oxygen radicals and have a positive effect on calcium channels
in the immune system.

Dr. Brunler felt that flooding the body with red light helped rid the body of
excessive uric acid deposits and dissolved uric acid crystals in joints.



The eyelids are translucent to light transmitting about 10% (or 25 lux) in the
red end of the visible spectrum (above 700 nm), with the transmittance declining
to to 1%-2% in the green and blue end (below 500 nm).



Red light tends to increase EEG amplitude most efficiently at higher beta
frequencies, and the color itself seems to increase vigilance. Its efficiency
also varies as a function of certain aspects of cognitive style and ability to
visualize. It therefore appears to be the most appropriate color to use if beta
stimulation and increased vigilance are the desired result.



Red light was emitted onto the knees of 50 patients with osteoarthritis of the
knees. Those who received the red light therapy reported that their pain was
significantly reduced as compared to the group that had placebo light therapy



The depth of penetration is defined as the depth at which 60% of the light is
absorbed by the tissue.

There is little penetration up to 600nm, due to absorption by the various
peptide bonds, chromophores, porphyrins, haemoglobin, oxyhaemoglobin, and
photo-inducible components such as urocanic acid and melanin (Wilson and Jaques
1990). From 600nm to 700nm there is a steep rise in penetration (about 2.5 times
the distance), due to decreasing haemoglobin absorption, and then penetration is
roughly constant above this region to about 1300nm, with a small dip at 960nm
due the high absorption at this level by water (Smith 1991).

Visible red light, at a wavelength of 660 nanometers, penetrates tissue to a
depth of about 8-10 mm. It is very beneficial in treating problems close to the
surface such as wounds, cuts, scars and trigger and is particularly effective in
treating infections.

Infrared light (904nm) penetrates to a depth of about 30-40 mm, which makes it
more effective in the treatment of joints, deep muscle, etc



Calcium intake was also shown to be wavelength dependent. The most effective of
the wavelengths tested were 660, 820 and 870 nm. (Young, S. et. al. Effect of
light on Calcium Uptake by Macrophages. Original Articles. Lasers in Surgery and
Medicine. Supplement 1991 by John Wiley & Sons Ltd)
(http://www.infratherapy.com/sciedata.htm)



670-nm LED light  therapy decreased the embryonic mortality rate by 41%,
resulting in increased embryonic survival and improved hatching success in eggs
exposed to 200 ppt dioxin. The eggs were treated once per day from embryonic
days 0-20 with 670-nm LED light at a fluence of 4 J/cm2
(http://www.liebertonline.com/doi/abs/10.1089/pho.2006.24.29)

There was observed a substantial decrease in overall and third-week mortality
rates in the light-treated chickens eggs. Overall, there was approximately a
41.5% decrease in mortality rate in the light-treated embryos (NL: 20%; L:
11.8%). During the third week of development, there was a 68.8% decrease in the
mortality rate in light-treated chickens (NL: 20%; L: 6.25%). In addition, body
weight, crown-rump length, and liver weight increased as a result of the 670-nm
phototherapy. Light-treated chickens pipped (broke shell) earlier and had a
shorter duration between pip and hatch.
(http://www.liebertonline.com/doi/abs/10.1089/pho.2005.23.268)

Petre

Ok, let's have more research info.

A normal human body luminesces mainly from the head; the color of the luminescence is orange-red tinted with a little bluish-green. Red light is emitted from all over the body of a man who is getting angry and forms a thick halo. The inventor suggests that this is due to leakage of the internal energy of the body. When the angry man is irradiated for 15 minutes with the apparatus of the present invention, he will feel relaxed and the anger is relieved. At this time, the red light around the body disappears from the photograph and the status of normal luminescence is resumed. (http://www.freepatentsonline.com/5814078.html)

From http://www.stopgettingsick.com/Condtemplate.cfm-1224-50-1

One provocative study found that when some people with allergic rhinitis were treated with intranasal exposure to low-energy, narrow-band red light, their congestion was significantly, although not completely, relieved. Light therapy may help suppress oxygen radicals and have a positive effect on calcium channels in the immune system.

Dr. Brunler felt that flooding the body with red light helped rid the body of excessive uric acid deposits and dissolved uric acid crystals in joints.

The eyelids are translucent to light transmitting about 10% (or 25 lux) in the red end of the visible spectrum (above 700 nm), with the transmittance declining to to 1%-2% in the green and blue end (below 500 nm).

Red light tends to increase EEG amplitude most efficiently at higher beta frequencies, and the color itself seems to increase vigilance. Its efficiency also varies as a function of certain aspects of cognitive style and ability to visualize. It therefore appears to be the most appropriate color to use if beta stimulation and increased vigilance are the desired result.

Red light was emitted onto the knees of 50 patients with osteoarthritis of the knees. Those who received the red light therapy reported that their pain was significantly reduced as compared to the group that had placebo light therapy

The depth of penetration is defined as the depth at which 60% of the light is absorbed by the tissue.

There is little penetration up to 600nm, due to absorption by the various peptide bonds, chromophores, porphyrins, haemoglobin, oxyhaemoglobin, and photo-inducible components such as urocanic acid and melanin (Wilson and Jaques 1990). From 600nm to 700nm there is a steep rise in penetration (about 2.5 times the distance), due to decreasing haemoglobin absorption, and then penetration is roughly constant above this region to about 1300nm, with a small dip at 960nm due the high absorption at this level by water (Smith 1991).

Visible red light, at a wavelength of 660 nanometers, penetrates tissue to a depth of about 8-10 mm. It is very beneficial in treating problems close to the surface such as wounds, cuts, scars and trigger and is particularly effective in treating infections.

Infrared light (904nm) penetrates to a depth of about 30-40 mm, which makes it more effective in the treatment of joints, deep muscle, etc

Calcium intake was also shown to be wavelength dependent. The most effective of the wavelengths tested were 660, 820 and 870 nm. (Young, S. et. al. Effect of light on Calcium Uptake by Macrophages. Original Articles. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine. Supplement 1991 by John Wiley & Sons Ltd) (http://www.infratherapy.com/sciedata.htm)

670-nm LED light  therapy decreased the embryonic mortality rate by 41%, resulting in increased embryonic survival and improved hatching success in eggs exposed to 200 ppt dioxin. The eggs were treated once per day from embryonic days 0–20 with 670-nm LED light at a fluence of 4 J/cm² (http://www.liebertonline.com/doi/abs/10.1089/pho.2006.24.29)

There was observed a substantial decrease in overall and third-week mortality rates in the light-treated chickens eggs. Overall, there was approximately a 41.5% decrease in mortality rate in the light-treated embryos (NL: 20%; L: 11.8%). During the third week of development, there was a 68.8% decrease in the mortality rate in light-treated chickens (NL: 20%; L: 6.25%). In addition, body weight, crown–rump length, and liver weight increased as a result of the 670-nm phototherapy. Light-treated chickens pipped (broke shell) earlier and had a shorter duration between pip and hatch. (http://www.liebertonline.com/doi/abs/10.1089/pho.2005.23.268)

Petre

has anyone seen any of these LEDS (60,000mcd at 630 nm) and does this have an effect on wounds?  Here's the link.

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=7604482309&ssPageName=MERC_VI_ReBay_Pr8_PcY_BIN_Stores_IT#ebayphotohosting

Let me add that the oxygenated blood absorbs light at 660nm (red light), whereas
deoxygenated blood absorbs light preferentially at 940nm (infra-red). Based on
this particularity were made the pulse oximeters, consisting of two light
emitting diodes, at 600nm and 940nm, and two light collecting sensors, which
measure the amount of red and infra-red light emerging from tissues traversed by
the light rays. The relative absorption of light by oxyhemoglobin (HbO) and
deoxyhemoglobin is processed by the device and an oxygen saturation level is
reported.

Petre

"Blood absorbs light energy from the sun," proposes Dr. Oren, whose research
is funded by a career development award from the U.S. Department of Veterans
Affairs. "The blood can then regulate our biological clocks, our physiology
and our behavior. My theory is that in people who get SAD, the blood isn't
absorbing enough light."



Great find Ramon!



I expected such thing to be revealed since I learned that the only difference
between hemin, from blood, and chlorophyll, from plants, is that chlorophyll is
bound by an atom of magnesium and hemin is bound by iron.



Petre

HEALING WITH SINGLE FREQUENCY LIGHT by: Olszewski, David, E.E., I.E.

EARLY EXPERIMENTS In 1965, the Russians and Czechs were trying to standardize
colour therapy, which is the use of colours to treat the body. When they used a
single colour on a number of people, they got different reactions because colour
affects emotions and produces different effects. The Russians wanted to have a
standard treatment, so they theorized that if they isolated one frequency of
blue, or red, they could duplicate colour therapy on a regulated basis. They
started separating different frequencies with lasers, and they discovered a lot
more than they expected to find. They discovered that a single frequency light
in a laser can stimulate DNA in damaged cell tissue. They used a low power laser
under 50-milliwatts because higher lasers can cut tissue.

PULSED VS.CONTINUOUS LASER They discovered that if they used a pulsed laser
light, the tissue healed rapidly. On the other hand, if they gave a continuous
beam, it sedated the cell and killed the pain. When a single frequency pulsed
light hit the cell, it actually stimulated the cell to start producing more
protein than it normally does, and as a result, the cell would heal. Even when
they took the light away, the cell continued its healing. The continuous beam
had a reverse effect. It actually caused the cell membrane to relax; it killed
pain, reduced inflammation and made muscle tissue relax.

INCREASED HEALING IN THE 660 nm WAVELENGTH It didn't matter what the frequency
was. It could be infrared, red, blue, or green, as long as it was single
although, as you move toward the red end of the spectrum, the rate of cellular
regeneration increased. For instance, a single frequency in the green range
might affect the kidney 40 times better than a normal base-line study, whereas a
red would be about 4,000 times faster. So over the years they migrated to
infrared, red and eventually the 660 nanometer wavelength because it was the
fastest way to regenerate tissue. So if you have an injury you would normally
recover from in ten days, you can actually recover that tissue in two days by
treating it with light.

WAVELENGTH OF CELL TISSUE About ten years later at the University of Chicago,
researchers discovered that the average wavelength of cell tissue in the human
body ranged between 600 nanometers and 720 nm;

660 is the mid-point. So in essence, the reason a 660 nm works better than any
other single frequency is because it is closer to the resonant frequency of cell
tissue. The other reason is that 660 nm absorbs better in hemoglobin.

LASER LIGHT VS LIGHT EMITTING DIODES (LED) When this therapy reached the U.S.
and Canada, both lasers and light-emitting diodes at 660 nanometers were being
used. The LED diffuses; the single frequency laser does not. With this
diffusion, the cell can actually be in control of the treatment and shut off the
molecules when it was done. But with the laser, the cells are no longer in
control; the doctor or the practitioner applying the laser is in control. If he
does it too long or with too much strength, you would not only heal the tissue,
but you would start a deterioration again. So basically, the use of
light-emitting diodes eliminated the draw back of lasers, and light could be
applied into such sensitive areas as the eyes and around the face. LEDs allowed
this whole area to blossom into a much larger usage by average people in their
homes. Tiina Karu, Ph.D. of the Laser Technology Center in Russia, and
affiliated with the University of California at Berkely, probably the top
researcher in the world on the use of lasers and light emitting diodes published
a study in Health and Physics Digest called "Photobiological Effects of Lasers"
which discusses photobiological stimulation without laser light. The article
explains that you can do laser treatment without using laser light, by using
light emitting diodes which are much safer. Since the cells are basically in
control of the process, there is no way to overuse light.

THE MERIDIAN SYSTEM Acupuncturists discovered that single frequency light could
activate acupressure points. Pulse light could stimulate it; continuous light
could sedate the acupuncture points. But they also discovered that light applied
to a meridian end-point can actually be traced flowing through the meridian to
the organ acupuncture points. The meridian system is a useful pathway for
getting light deeper into the body, so if you are treating things like asthma in
the lungs, there is an alternate method of getting light into the lungs.

DEPTH OF LIGHT PENETRATION As we developed more types of lights with different
geometrical shapes, we were able to actually get light deeper into the body
without going through the meridians. Initially, single frequency light
penetrated approximately an inch and a half, but today, larger units can
penetrate up to eight inches. It will go through the skull. We use it on
strokes, concussions and internal problems in the brain. Excellent studies have
been done using light for pain relief, degenerative osteoarthritis, carpal
tunnel tendonitis, skin ailments, acne, psoriasis, healing of the sinus cells,
throat and ear problems, whiplash and lower back problems.

PENETRATING THROUGH THE BLOOD STREAM You can even get light into the blood
stream. One of the best ways is through your belly button, because the aorta
artery is behind the belly button. So if you insert the light there for 20
minutes, every drop of blood in the body will pass in front of the light,
increasing the activity of your white cells, red cells, B-cells and T-cells, so
you can boost your whole immune system.

ACUTE VS CHRONIC CONDITIONS If you use lasers or light-emitting diodes, it will
actually speed up healing by a factor of five. If you have chronic conditions
like osteoarthritis or whiplash from 15 years ago, conditions that are not
responding or are deteriorating, the use of laser and LED light has actually
stimulated regeneration. I believe light is going to play the biggest part in
chronic conditions for people who have already explored a lot of other
modalities and have found no solution.

BRAIN WAVE STUDIES We were studying the diagnosis of illnesses like leukemia,
etc through brainwave patterns. We were surprised to find that when we treat the
person with light, or with heat, that when the body starts healing, it shifts
into what is called a healing profile where beta waves disappear, and alpha,
theta and delta appear like you wouldn't even find in a yogi.

"I oppose sunglasses. Sunglasses are the main reason why the UV light destroys
the eyes. This occurs because your pupils expand when you wear sunglasses, and
the exposure can destroy your eyes even quicker". - Meier Schneider

Be Well and Prosper,

--Chuck

Low Level Laser Therapy Tomorrow's Health Care...Today!

Dr. Larry Lytle's Healing Light

"SHEDDING LIGHT on DIABETES"

Treating Diabetes with Low Level Laser Therapy Is a New and Exciting
Alternative

Diabetes is a serious disorder and during 2002, 224,092 deaths in the
United States were directly related to complications from diabetes.
Many people (nearly 1 in 3) are not even aware they have diabetes until
they develop one of the serious and sometimes life-threatening
complications, including:
High blood pressure; Heart disease; Stroke; Blindness (diabetic
retinopathy causes 12,000 to 24,000 new cases of blindness each year
making diabetes the leading cause of new cases of blindness in adults
20-74 years of age); Kidney disease (an estimated 175,000 people are
living on chronic dialysis or with a kidney transplant); Nervous system
disease; Amputations; Dental Disease; Complications in pregnancy; Sexual
dysfunction; And various other complications.

Diabetes is more common in African Americans, Latinos, Asian Americans
and Pacific Islanders and Native Americans.  Nearly 15% of Native
Americans older than 20 have been diagnosed with diabetes.
There are two major types of diabetes, Type 1 and Type 2.  Type 1
results from the body's failure to produce insulin, the hormone that
"unlocks" the cells of the body, allowing glucose to enter and fuel
them.  It is estimated that 5-10% of the over 20 million Americans who
are diagnosed with diabetes have Type 1 diabetes.
Type 2 diabetes results from insulin resistance (a condition in which
the body fails to properly use insulin), combined with relative insulin
deficiency.  Insulin is the hormone that is needed to convert sugar,
starches and other food into energy needed for daily life.
Fortunately most Americans who are diagnosed with diabetes have Type 2
diabetes which is easier to treat than Type 1.  The cause of diabetes
continues to be a mystery to orthodox medicine.  Genetic factors,
environmental factors, poor diet, obesity, and lack of exercise appear
to play roles.
Usually diabetes is diagnosed with either the Fasting Plasma Glucose
Test (FPG) or an Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT).  Either test can be
used to diagnose pre-diabetes or diabetes.  The American Diabetes
Association recommends the FPG because it is easier, faster, and less
expensive to perform.
Fasting blood glucose levels between 100 and 125 mg/dl, are a red flag
and over 41 million Americans are estimated to have this pre-diabetic
condition.  A person with fasting blood glucose level of 126 mg/dl or
higher has diabetes.
In the OGTT test, a person's blood glucose level is measured after a
fast and two hours after drinking a glucose-rich beverage.  If the
two-hour blood glucose level is between 140 and 199 mg/dl, the person
tested has pre-diabetes.  If the two-hour blood glucose level is at 200
mg/dl or higher, the person tested has diabetes.
There is a big push, particularly in the Native American communities for
early screening.  Testing includes blood pressure, weight, blood and
urine tests, eye, dental and foot exams.  Education to change life
styles is the treatment of choice.
Unfortunately, orthodox medical cures have not proven very effective for
either type of diabetes.  Type I diabetes is treated with insulin.
Controlling the insulin amount is difficult but has been improved with
various time released insulin pump techniques.  Type 2 treatments
consist of various drugs to lower high blood pressure and glucose
levels.  But these drugs have a long list of detrimental side effects -
many of which are worse than the disease.
Alternative medicine offers different methods of diagnosis and
treatments that include many nutritional and homeopathic remedies.  Of
all the available alternative medical options available, low level laser
therapy may be the most promising.
Just how low level laser therapy can be used for either Type 1 or Type 2
diabetes is rather interesting.  Research has shown that our cells emit
low level infrared light called biophotons.  Biophotons allow for
inter-cellular communication.  When two exact biophotons cross they form
a wave called the soliton wave.  A soliton wave has higher amplitude
than the waves from the two original biophotons and moves through the
body rather easily.  Soliton waves carry information and energy.  The
type of information they carry is dependent on many factors which are
too lengthy to discuss in this short paper.
All cells are composed of atoms which have a nucleus composed of a
protons and neutrons with electrons moving around the nucleus.  When
electrons leave the atom - the atom is negatively altered and you now
have disease.  The new altered atoms and cells are reproduced via DNA
and the disease becomes chronic.
Low level lasers such as the Q1000 that produce soliton waves carry
electrons back to the damaged atoms and cells, helping to restore normal
DNA composition and normal, positive soliton wave communications between
cells.
This process is how low level laser therapy can be effective for
diabetes.  Remember that Type II diabetes results when cellular receptor
sites have been altered and will not allow insulin to attach.  This
reduces the cell's ability to produce adequate ATP - the cells energy
blocks.  When this damaged cell is reproduced millions of times, the
result is Type II diabetes.
Low level laser therapy and particularly the patented Q1000 laser
produces soliton waves that carry electrons to the damaged cells,
restoring their capability to function normally.  Mode 3 of the Q1000
has 29 pre-programmed frequencies that have proven effective at
restoring intercellular communication and helping to reduce blood sugar
levels for Type II diabetics.
Robert a 76 year old rancher had been treating his Type II diabetes for
twenty five years with various oral drugs and diet, and still his blood
sugar levels were over 250, and he was facing the unpleasant (to him)
option of being required to start an insulin program.  Instead of
following the traditional medical insulin model (which he believes had
caused the death of two of his friends), he bought a Q1000 low level
laser and began treating himself.  The following is an interview between
Dr Lytle and Robert:
We came home and I started using the laser on my back, and my blood
sugar started dropping about 20 points every day!  It went from 245 to
220, down to 210, down to 180.  On January 1 it was 184, then dropped to
161 and then again to 153, then to 136, then to 133.  Today it was 96 on
one machine and 121 on the other.  That's down from 254 in a week's
time!  I test my blood with two different instruments - a One Touch and
a Dex machine.  The One Touch is supposed to be accurate, but you have
to handle the glucose strip with your fingers, which can possibly
contaminate the strip.
Dr Larry.  How long did you use it?
I just used it one 3-minute cycle per day on Mode 3 on the lower left
side of my back beneath the 1st and 2nd rib.  My daughters have been
buying me everything they can think of to help with my diabetes - none
of that garbage worked!  I'm going to stop using this other garbage and
will continue to use the laser.

Dr. Larry.  I might suggest that you to stop using the laser for a week
or 10 days and see if your blood sugar goes back up.
Oh, I know it would.
Dr. Larry.  You could really be a big help to a lot of people with
diabetes if you could set some type of standard for how many times per
week you have to use the laser to keep your blood sugar under control.
Is 2x's per week all I'm going to need to use it?
Dr. Larry.  I don't think you're going to need to use it everyday to
keep your sugar level down.  I would ask you to help us out by stop
using it for a week and document the results.  If it goes back up, then
use the laser twice a week and record the results.
I want to run it down a little lower.
Dr. Larry.  Anything under 120 is pretty normal.  Have you changed
anything on your diet?
No, I haven't really changed anything, but have pretty much the same
diet as always.
In follow-up communication with Robert, it was learned he was able to
maintain normal blood sugar levels by using the Q1000 just a couple of
times per week for over a year. The Robert admitted he "kind of forgot
to use it" as often as he did when he first got his Q1000 laser.
Then he got pneumonia and his blood sugar got out of control so his
doctor put him on insulin and at the time of publication of this
article, he uses insulin daily. (Apparently Robert was not aware that
the Q1000 is effective on pneumonia).
Chinese Medicine teaches that there is a certain life force that wanes
with age, and is affected not only by the way you think, but is affected
by the thinking of those around you including doctors and family. It is
a fact that negative thinking suppresses the quality and quantity of
your own biophotons. And thus reduces intercellular communication.
Type I Diabetes is even harder to treat but following is a testimonial
showing good results using Mode 3 of the Q1000 along with the 660 Probe
Enhancer on acupoints.
A 16-year-old girl with Type I Diabetes was on 22 units of insulin per
day.  In just two treatments using Mode 3 of the Q1000 laser on the
pancreas plus the 660 Enhancer Probe on acupoints on her hand, she only
required 2 units of insulin per day. She reports that she continues to
use the laser once a week because it makes her feel so good.
Clinical research from Africa has demonstrated rehabilitation of Type I
diabetes using a combination of low level laser frequencies on the
pancreas. These frequencies can be programmed into one of the empty
modes on the Q1000.  This feature makes the Q1000 the most advanced
laser system available in the market place today.
In summary, the best approach for controlling diabetes is to alter life
style and prevent it.   More research is needed on the effect of laser
light on diabetes, but the Q1000 and 660 Enhancer Probe appears to offer
a safe alternative method of using light to treat your own diabetes.

For more information on the Q1000
low level laser please call (605) 342-5669
or visit www.laserinformation.com

Its finally here. I now have finished the V Pulse LED pulser.
So now anybody that wants to pulse their LED Arrays can do so. It is a simple to
operate device. You can run any audio frequency with it. There are some pre-made
frequencies included on a CD to get you started. You can view it here at the
website. All owners af the LED arrays made by me can get a discount on the first
LED pulser. Just let me know by email.

http://www.theledman.net/


Any questions let me know.
V

----- Original Message -----

From: marjie

To: LEDeffects@yahoogroups.com

Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2005 10:34 AM

Subject: [LEDeffects] LED's

http://tinyurl.com/aowno

http://tinyurl.com/dd2ab

Cough up $279.90 + Shipping and you too can have one of these.  Notice the
small area it covers with it's infarred.  Not many visible lights on in the
"used by NASA" photo.  Plus you've got to hold on to this one - no just
laying it on the area.  I much prefer V's.  CU - Marjie

http://tinyurl.com/aowno

http://tinyurl.com/dd2ab

Cough up $279.90 + Shipping and you too can have one of these.  Notice the
small area it covers with it's infarred.  Not many visible lights on in the
"used by NASA" photo.  Plus you've got to hold on to this one - no just
laying it on the area.  I much prefer V's.  CU - Marjie

>I will be attaching it with only a little paper
tape next time.<

I meant to say attaching it TO MY WRIST.

Yes- the velcro idea sounds good.

BTW- I'll post a copy of something I posted to the DMSO group 'cause I'm
using this unit to treat  something else, too.

DB

Yup.p if you cover it in clothe too much it tends to bulid up heat. One idea I
had was to get some of thet self adhesive velrco at the hardware store. then you
can stick a strip of it acros the back and then make one strap that gose all the
way around and use it to fasten. that leaves moset of it exposed te air. the
holes will help also. your model has 1/2 inch of space under the circuit board
not includnig the resistor so if you drilled the holes along th ebottom edge you
sholud be fine. If you screw it up Ill make you another one with the holes
already in place.






Take care,
  V


> After burning myself last night, I'm now qualified to pontificate upon this
> matter.

> I wrapped the 660 unit to my right wrist with an Ace Bandage last night and
> went to sleep. After about 75 minutes I woke up with it burning and I
> hastily removed it. I got up and put Emu oil on the afflicted area.

> Today I can see reddened impressions of the LED's and it's a little sore but
> not bad.

> My idea is to use this thing in a manner like the Beck Device, since I have
> a good idea that I've got calcifying nanobacteria flowing through my blood
> again.

> Here's what won't work:
> Despite the fact that V has the lights recessed in the box, in a pressed
> situation the skin comes into too tight contact with them. An Ace bandage is
> the WRONG way to do this.

> Here's what might work:
> There is enough room along the top edges of the box to drill 1/8"
> ventilation holes around the sides. I will see if I can also safely drill a
> few holes in the back side. There is enough flange on the top to attach some
> kind of buffer around it so it won't touch the skin, maybe self-adhering
> weatherstripping pieces. I will be attaching it with only a little paper
> tape next time.

> When I get it worked out I'll send a photo.

> More later, Daddybob



--

After burning myself last night, I'm now qualified to pontificate upon this
matter.

I wrapped the 660 unit to my right wrist with an Ace Bandage last night and
went to sleep. After about 75 minutes I woke up with it burning and I
hastily removed it. I got up and put Emu oil on the afflicted area.

Today I can see reddened impressions of the LED's and it's a little sore but
not bad.

My idea is to use this thing in a manner like the Beck Device, since I have
a good idea that I've got calcifying nanobacteria flowing through my blood
again.

Here's what won't work:
Despite the fact that V has the lights recessed in the box, in a pressed
situation the skin comes into too tight contact with them. An Ace bandage is
the WRONG way to do this.

Here's what might work:
There is enough room along the top edges of the box to drill 1/8"
ventilation holes around the sides. I will see if I can also safely drill a
few holes in the back side. There is enough flange on the top to attach some
kind of buffer around it so it won't touch the skin, maybe self-adhering
weatherstripping pieces. I will be attaching it with only a little paper
tape next time.

When I get it worked out I'll send a photo.

More later, Daddybob

>I am not sure about ones with big bellies however<

Rules me out on that way HA.

DB

Hi Ron,

it wolud only damage the skin if it got too hot. the damage wolud be from heat
not from the light. there is also another place some people shine it to get the
blood and that is at the navel as there is a main artery that comes close to the
surface there on most people. I am not sure about ones with big bellies however
:-)




Take care,
  V


> Hey Daddybob,
> I'd like to hear from V on that too.
> I wonder, though, if it would get too hot and damage
> the skin some.

> Ron

> --- ransley <ransley@...> wrote:

>> V-
>> Is there a limit? Are there ill effects to the skin
>> from over-exposure of
>> 660 light?
>>
>> I read a while back that we could use this therapy
>> on the wrist in a
>> Beck-like manner to kill pathogens in the blood. I'm
>> thinking about lashing
>> my box to a wrist with an Ace bandage and going
>> sleep. I would probably wake
>> up 3-5 hours later and take it off.
>>
>> What do you think?
>>
>> Daddybob
>>
>>



>
> __________________________________
> Yahoo! FareChase: Search multiple travel sites in one click.
> http://farechase.yahoo.com


--

Hi Dadybob

there is no time limit for the 660, you can leave it on as long as you like I
wolud do a test period with you being awake and run it for at least an hour to
see what happens first. If you strap it on try not to cover it completely with
cloth or if you do see how warm it gets after about an hour before sleeping with
it.

Take care,
  V


> V-
> Is there a limit? Are there ill effects to the skin from over-exposure of
> 660 light?

> I read a while back that we could use this therapy on the wrist in a
> Beck-like manner to kill pathogens in the blood. I'm thinking about lashing
> my box to a wrist with an Ace bandage and going sleep. I would probably wake
> up 3-5 hours later and take it off.

> What do you think?

> Daddybob



--

Hey Daddybob,
I'd like to hear from V on that too.
I wonder, though, if it would get too hot and damage
the skin some.

Ron

--- ransley <ransley@...> wrote:

> V-
> Is there a limit? Are there ill effects to the skin
> from over-exposure of
> 660 light?
>
> I read a while back that we could use this therapy
> on the wrist in a
> Beck-like manner to kill pathogens in the blood. I'm
> thinking about lashing
> my box to a wrist with an Ace bandage and going
> sleep. I would probably wake
> up 3-5 hours later and take it off.
>
> What do you think?
>
> Daddybob
>
>




__________________________________
Yahoo! FareChase: Search multiple travel sites in one click.
http://farechase.yahoo.com

V-
Is there a limit? Are there ill effects to the skin from over-exposure of
660 light?

I read a while back that we could use this therapy on the wrist in a
Beck-like manner to kill pathogens in the blood. I'm thinking about lashing
my box to a wrist with an Ace bandage and going sleep. I would probably wake
up 3-5 hours later and take it off.

What do you think?

Daddybob

Hi daddybob52954,

Good to hear from you. hey taht is pretty good results on the leg there. thanks
for lettnig me know. I will have to try that myself if i get sometnhing like
that. let me know how it goes with the ears.




Take care,
  V


> Hey V- here I am!

> Ok, I bought it to use it on my ears and neck, and both of those will
> be longterm so there's nothing to say about that yet.

> But- Saturday I scraped my lower left shin on something, and by Sunday
> morning it was bothersome. It had scabbed over but there was soreness.
> I had to get out the door, but I took about two minutes to shine the
> lights on it. It stopped hurting right away. It has not hurt since.

> Daddybob





--

Hey V- here I am!

Ok, I bought it to use it on my ears and neck, and both of those will
be longterm so there's nothing to say about that yet.

But- Saturday I scraped my lower left shin on something, and by Sunday
morning it was bothersome. It had scabbed over but there was soreness.
I had to get out the door, but I took about two minutes to shine the
lights on it. It stopped hurting right away. It has not hurt since.

Daddybob