Hi, all,
The story goes deeper into crime. Remember in 1976, the swine flu
vaccine killed 2,300 people in 2 weeks after the government paid
billions for the "free"-to-public vaccine? The vaccine was pulled and is
still in the vaults.
Virus are not alive; they have no nucleus, respiratory or digestive
systems. Virus are protein wastes in solvent solutions. They are as
contagious as Tide soap. It is impossible for one animal tissue in
solvent solution to appear in another animal because those tissue are
not part of another animals cellular structures.
Have they been distributing the old swine flu vaccine as other
medication in pockets in Mexico because they know it causes swine flu
residues in people. The stories about it appearing in other countries
are fictitious stories because I have not been able to get any
laboratory confirmation. Were those stories planted by US government and
the pharmaceutical house that vaults the vaccine? Do the laboratory and
government want to resell the vaccine and get rid of it for profit. The
government is still paying for it to be vaulted and that is very
expensive. Why didn't they dump it?
For the same reason they did not dump AZT when it was discovered by
independent observers in 1969 that AZT was too toxic for chemotherapy?
But when the government created the AIDS epidemic by contaminating
Hepatitis B Vaccines and, in Africa the Smallpox Vaccines, they brought
AZT out of the vaults and claimed it was good to treat AIDS. They
treated AIDS patients with it and it killed most of them and they made a
big profit as well as taking over 27 African countries resources.
Research the work of Dr. Leonard Horowitz and read the book Bio-Attack
Alert.
With the swine flu, they are creating an imaginary "pandemic" and viola,
people will flock to take the swine flu vaccine. With the Geneva
Convention articles, they cannot force vaccine on anyone but they may be
able to quarantine people for a few days.
Remember that no vaccine has proved to be effective, including polio.
Many such diseases have cycles and polio was down to less than 1% the
year before the polio vaccine was issued in 1958. All vaccines are issue
after the diseases have diminished and big pharma takes credit for
riding the planet of the diseases. If polio were a problem, why isn't it
an epidemic amongst third world people who cannot afford and do not take
polio vaccines? Why is polio non-existent in Amish and Mennonite
communities where they don't take vaccines?
To help you avoid any forced vaccine here or in any other country, I
have given you 2 pages below to be kept and taken with you. The first
is the letter that the person requiring you to take a vaccine must sign
before you take it. The second page is instructions on how to handle the
situation.
.
healthfully,
aajonus
____________________________________________\
page 1
ACCEPTANCE OF RESPONSIBILITY
I, the undersigned, having assumed decision making power independently,
or having been appointed to such, by a government bureaucracy or
corporation controlled by such, do require the following individual(s):
_______________________________________________________________
to receive the following vaccination(s):
_______________________________________________________________
contrary to laws of this state that provide religious and philosophical
exemptions.
I further agree that the stated individual(s) are in
excellent to perfect health prior to the administration of such
immunization(s).
Consistent with this demand, is my personal acceptance of
full responsibility for any and all damages resulting from such
immunizations. As a result, I agree to provide compensation amounting to
$1,000,000 to the family(s) of the persons you are requiring to receive
the aforementioned vaccinations for each resulting vaccine related
injury(s) and/or disease(s) as follows:
Death:
http://www.909shot.com/Kids/richie.htm
Sudden infant death syndrome:
http://www.909shot.com/Kids/nicky.htm
Shaken baby syndrome:
http://www.vaclib.org/basic/sbsindex.htm
<
http://www.vaclib.org/basic/sbsindex.htm>
Cerebral bleeding:
http://www.vaclib.org/basic/sbsrebut.htm
Cancer:
http://www.sv40cancer.com/
Tumors:
http://www.gulfwarvets.com/virus.htm
Asthma:
http://vaccines.net/Asthma/allergie.htm
Auto-immune disease(s):
http://healthresearchtoday.com/lupus/whatislupus.htm
Polio:
http://www.909shot.com/Diseases/rotavirus.htm
Bowel blockage:
http://www.909shot.com/rotaviru.htm
Autism:
http://www.909shot.com/Diseases/Autism.htm
Brain damage:
http://www.vaclib.org/news/2006/pentacel.htm
Mental retardation:
http://www.vaclib.org/news/2006/pentacel.htm
Crippling arthritis:
http://www.vaclib.org/intro/hepbinfo.htm
<
http://www.vaclib.org/intro/hepbinfo.htm>
Paralysis:
http://www.909shot.com/Kids/terry.htm
Mercury poisoning:
http://www.gulfwarvets.com/kids.htm
Diabetes:
http://vaccines.net/diabetes.htm
Blindness:
http://www.vaclib.org/email/lymefda.htm
Loss of IQ:
http://www.vaclib.org/email/autismviera.htm
Pain:
http://www.909shot.com/Diseases/hepbcasereports.htm
Seizures:
http://www.vaclib.org/email/seizures.htm
Chronic fatigue syndrome:
http://healthresearchtoday.com/fibromyalgia/book_104.htm
*Note that virtually all of these conditions /diseases are incurable by
modern medicine, but easily prevented by abstinence!
Name (print):___________________________________Position:__________________
Signature:___________________________________________Date:__________
page 2
INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE ACCEPTANCE OF RESPONSIBILITY DOCUMENT
When you receive your passport, it might be wise to request a copy of
Foreign Rules and Regulations, Part 71, Title 42, on immunizations. The
World Health Organization (WHO) in Geneva grants American visitors the
right to refuse vaccinations when traveling internationally. Remember
the basic rule:
No one may vaccinate against an individual?s will unless, by so doing,
the enforcer assumes full responsibility for consequences, both legal
and medical.
When traveling abroad, you may secure exemptions from vaccines by using
Clause 83 of the International Sanitary Code, issued by the WHO and
adopted by all its members. It states, in effect, that only when coming
from an infected area are vaccinations necessary or the traveler could
be quarantined for up to 14 days from the time he left the infected area
if the health department deems it necessary. If you come from an area
where there has been an epidemic, you will probably be put under
surveillance (close watch). This simply means that together with the
local health officer you must keep a close watch for any suspicious
signs or symptoms. You will probably be required to report periodically
to your local health officer for a period of up to 14 days from the time
of departure from the infected area. If you notice an outbreak or
symptom, you must immediately turn yourself in and submit to quarantine
or isolation.
In actual practice, not only is this possibility very remote, but if it
should occur, the vaccinated person may be required to submit to the
same surveillance as the vaccinated! Remember, every year, thousands of
'unimmunized' tourists travel in and out of the United States with
little or no inconvenience or embarrassment.
It is quite obvious that no individual in his right mind will sign this
document. The intention is not to get an individual to accept
responsibility in this way, but to: Realize that there is a considerable
risk. Realize that they themselves could care less that someone else is
injured. Realize that they will accept no responsibility for vaccine
related injuries. Become acquainted with the risks and to accept
responsibility by not forcing compliance to some bogus rule, standard or
guideline that is not the law at all. It is intended to put the official
on the defensive that is a substantially weakened posture. Furthermore,
it is a response to the intimidation that is often encountered. If an
individual refuses to sign on, ask the following question:
"Why not? Am I supposed to accept all of the responsibility and my child
to accept all of the health risks?"
Then offer to negotiate the potential settlement, and ask: "How does
one establish the monetary value of suffering?" "Is it worth nothing to
you?" "What is the law and what does it state?" "Who benefits
financially from this program?"
---answer: The school district gets federal money if there is 100%
compliance. ?How does this present a risk to others?"
He or she should start to get the message.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]