Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
JewishInsulinPumpers · Jewish Insulin Pumpers
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Want your group to be featured on the Yahoo! Groups website? Add a group photo to Flickr.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Low-carb options cause confusion .... Many dieters forget about port   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #64 of 246 |
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3979332/

Low-carb options cause confusion
Many dieters forget about portion size, balance

By Karen Collins
Updated: 2:49 p.m. ET Jan. 16, 2004

Hundreds of newly available low-carb foods are actually making weight loss more
difficult. Dieters are falling into the trap of thinking that low-carb foods
automatically cause pounds to drop off. In grocery stores, they try to make
sense of the variety of low-carb claims on packages. Many consumers have lost
track of the basics of healthy eating, like portion control and balanced food
choices. What’s more: Sometimes people even gain weight eating low-carb foods.

Research news about insulin may be part of the problem. Insulin is a hormone
that allows blood sugar to enter cells to be used for fuel, but it can also
promote energy storage, according to a widely accepted theory. Changes in
insulin levels may make it easier for the body to store more fat or to lose it.
Low-carb foods appear to affect insulin levels less.

Focus on fewer calories
But even if this theory about changing insulin levels is verified, energy
balance is still the crucial factor in weight control. If you eat more calories
than you burn up, your body has no choice but to store the extra as fat,
regardless of whether those calories are carbohydrate, fat or protein.

advertisement
People who consume more calories in food and drink than they burn up need to
become more active, reduce calorie consumption, or do both. Some people have
grown accustomed to large servings of grain products: double- or triple-size
bowls of cereal, bagels that are equivalent to four slices of bread, pasta
platters that equal anywhere from four to eight “standard” half-cup servings.
For these people, cutting back on carbohydrates is a smart weight loss strategy.
But any consequent weight loss will be due to reducing excessive calorie
consumption, not metabolic mysteries.

Related story

A bunless diet revolution? Fat chance

Don’t let food package claims deceive you. Grocery shelves are now filled with
“low carb” muffins, protein bars, brownies and cheesecake. Package fronts might
announce one or two grams of carb, but check the full nutrition label. For
instance, a 2 gram carb protein bar could have 240 calories.

No legal definition of 'low carb'
You should be aware that no legal definition exists for the term “low carb.”
Food companies use it at their own discretion. Food companies – not nutrition
experts or government sources – have also generated terms like “net carb” or
“effective carb” to promote new products.

Many of these products use sugar alcohols (including sorbitol, mannitol and
xylitol) instead of sugar. Because sugar alcohols are absorbed more slowly from
the digestive tract than sugar, blood sugars do rise more slowly. However, some
companies subtract the grams of sugar alcohols, along with the grams of dietary
fiber, from the total carbohydrate count to get “effective” or “net” carbs. But
sugar alcohols still bring all their calories along, no matter how slowly
they’re absorbed. And it’s the total number of calories that affect fat storage.
Besides, too much of sugar alcohols can cause uncomfortable gas and diarrhea.

If you look at calorie balance, it’s clear that some foods on popular diets’
“no-no” lists make more health sense than low-carb “diet” foods. You have the
potential to lose more weight with a snack of 80 calories from popcorn, grapes,
apples or carrots, which are filling and supply important nutrients, than with
150 or 250 calories of low-carb diet foods. People mistakenly gobble multiple
servings of low-carb products because they’re called “diet food.”

If you want to lose weight, remember that successful weight loss comes with
eating fewer calories, not just fewer carbs. Long-term habits of regular
exercise and eating only to satisfy hunger will help your results come sooner
and endure.
Nutrition Notes is provided by the American Institute for Cancer Research in
Washington, D.C.© 2004 MSNBC Interactive

Yerachmiel Bruchya haLevi Altman

-----


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




Thu Jan 22, 2004 4:49 pm

yerachml
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #64 of 246 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3979332/ Low-carb options cause confusion Many dieters forget about portion size, balance By Karen Collins Updated: 2:49 p.m. ET...
Yerachml@...
yerachml
Offline Send Email
Jan 22, 2004
5:26 pm
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help