---This is really great news. Hope something comes of it soon.
My Grandaughter 14 needs to get fillings and they want to do
merc.This is sooooo sick. I am still chelating merc and I know its
a BIG part of me being ill. The critters love to hide in it. Thanks for
posting this. In lymestrategies@yahoogroups.com, RRM
<rmor67@...> wrote:
>
>
>
> chrisgupta@... wrote: "Gone is the old ADA braggadocio about
the Food & Drug Administration finding mercury fillings to be
safe. Gone is the time-worn assurance to its members that the
good old ADA will take care of any problems those
"anti-amalgamists" are stirring up. Instead, the ADA meekly
advises its members that warnings are likely, and a ban is
conceivable."
> This all too transparent shell game is continually used to
disregard solid toxicology science.
> Here among many is a perfect example, another is Fluoride,
that is the raison d'être for the existence of most regulatory
bodies. They are primarily created as industry shields under the
pretense of protecting the constituents. Essentially these
pseudo bodies are next to useless other than providing token lip
service while they are essentially created and needed to protect
the industry... The industry love's bureaucracy while providing lip
service against it, essentially conning the masses to clamour for
more and more government - A perfect scam!
> Listen to Attorney Charlie Brown's half hour interview with Dr.
Stan Monteith who took on this this rogue agency is here.
>
> Chris Gupta
> http://tinyurl.com/35msby
> -----------------
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: ADA warns members: Trouble ahead for mercury
fillings
> Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 16:27:40 -0500
> From: FACT <moderator@...>
>
> Read the fine print, the ADA sees that the FDA is no longer
able to pretend amalgam fillings are safe. The end is in sight for
mercury fillings!!
> Garry F. Gordon MD,DO,MD(H) President, Gordon Research
Institute www.gordonresearch.com
> From: Terry J. Lee D.D.S. Ph. 480-545-8237 tjleedds@...
> ADA warns members: Trouble ahead for mercury fillings.
> The American Dental Association sends out an ADA Update to
its members only, but of course we have several Fifth
Columnists who wheel it on to us.
> Gone is the old ADA braggadocio about the Food & Drug
Administration finding mercury fillings to be safe. Gone is the
time-worn assurance to its members that the good old ADA will
take care of any problems those "anti-amalgamists" are stirring
up. Instead, the ADA meekly advises its members that warnings
are likely, and a ban is conceivable.
> Below is their entire message on this issue. Note the
quotations ? again, folks, this is straight from the American
Dental Association:
> We don't know the direction the FDA will take," FDA could
issue "a mandatory brochure or even limited warnings," FDA
could even issue "a ban," though "we don't expect the latter."
> Charlie Brown 7/8/07 Note our new address & ph # Charles G.
Brown, National Counsel Consumers for Dental Choice 316 F
St., N.E., Suite 210, Washington, DC 20002 Ph. 202.544-6333;
fax 544-6331 charlie@..., www.toxicteeth.org
> Paragraph from ADA Update, July 1, 2007 The FDA has been
contemplating regulatory action for several years to reclassify
dental amalgam as either a class 2 or 3 material. (Components
of encapsulated amalgam currently are classified separately.)
The ADA has supported classifying dental amalgam as a Class
2 device in the past. We expect the FDA will issue an advanced
notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPR) this summer, seeking
input from interested parties. An ANPR is the beginning of the
regulatory process. After consideration of input generated by the
ANPR, the FDA will likely issue a notice of proposed rulemaking,
setting forth a specific proposal for public comment. Only after
that would a new regulation be issued. At this point, we don't
know the direction the FDA will take. The agency could simply
reclassify amalgam as a Class 2 material, adding special
controls to its use, such as a mandatory brochure or even limited
warnings, or classify it as a Class 3 material, which
> could result in a ban. We don't expect the latter. We're closely
monitoring these developments and of course will offer
appropriate advocacy comments and develop strategies for
addressing the ANPR. We'll also keep you updated as this
process plays out."
> Access the FACT website here.
>
>
> To subscribe / unsubscribe: chrisgupta@...
> List information is at: http://tinyurl.com/2xohw
> ARCHIVES:
http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/chris/archives.htm
> Share The Wealth: http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/chris/
> Communication Agents:
http://www.communicationagents.com/
> Council Member: Friends of Freedom -
http://www.friendsoffreedom.org
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Shape Yahoo! in your own image. Join our Network Research
Panel today!
>