Yeah very sad he was very good and seemed like a real nice guy. He
had pace with raw power. In the interviews Ive seen he seemed like he
had a really positive mind set for reaching his goals. I could see him
winning strongman one day. Very sad must be really hard on his family.
Jeremy
>
> Thanks!
>
> Wow, I just read that strongman Jesse Marunde died.
> He was just 27.
>
> --- hmmmhmmhm <hmmmhmmhm@...> escribió:
>
> > Miguel,
> > Well done on making those serious! lifts. Hope the
> > higher frequency
> > works well.
> > Jeremy
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In Hitdigest@yahoogroups.com, Miguel Angel Perez
> > <metalhead2_mx@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Jeremy,
> > >
> > > Actually I was reading a Chad Waterbury article
> > today
> > > (I had a printout with me on the plane; I'm up in
> > Salt
> > > Lake City right now) and the program that he
> > outlined
> > > was somewhat similar to what you mention. I, like
> > > you, am coming off several weeks of strength
> > training.
> > > I used an extremely-low-freq program not unlike
> > Clint
> > > Michels's, or Mentzer's consolidation routine. For
> > > strength, man does it work! I finished that
> > four-week
> > > phase with my stiff-legged deadlift up to 315x12
> > easy,
> > > my leg press at 900x8 and 1000x6, my dumbbell row
> > at
> > > 110x12, and my weighted dip at +75x9. I improved
> > my
> > > numbers vastly in all four lifts, and now it's
> > time to
> > > put those strength gains to the test with a higher
> > > frequency and volume (as well as more calories).
> > >
> > > Now Waterbury says that when on a high-freq
> > program
> > > you just hit the muscle very often and do not
> > focus on
> > > strength increases. You just pound the muscle
> > several
> > > times a week with different exercises and
> > parameters,
> > > and then you back off for a few days and let the
> > body
> > > catch up. Supposedly, this is when you grow,
> > provided
> > > you're eating correctly.
> > >
> > > He has you do a heavy, a medium, and a light day
> > on
> > > this program. So what I'd like to do is to take
> > for
> > > example my leg press and do 1000x6 on the heavy
> > day,
> > > 750x10 on the medium day, and 600x16-20 on the
> > light
> > > day. If nothing else, it's an interesting change,
> > so
> > > I might give it a shot.
> > >
> > > Cheerio,
> > >
> > > Miguel
> > >
> > > --- hmmmhmmhm <hmmmhmmhm@> escribió:
> > >
> > > > Cheers Miguel.
> > > > I have just started a more volume based workout
> > that
> > > > a friend has had
> > > > great results from. I am doing 4 sets sometimes
> > 3
> > > > per exercise .Two or
> > > > 3 exercises a body part 3 times a week [3 way
> > split]
> > > > but trying to
> > > > resist the temptation of going to failure. I
> > have
> > > > not been on a
> > > > program that doesn't include reps to failure
> > before.
> > > > I am hoping the
> > > > change in pace and extra sets work.
> > > > The increased number of sets has resulted in
> > baking
> > > > off the intensity
> > > > a while as you suggested.
> > > > Jeremy
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Jeremy,
> > > > >
> > > > > That sucks that you didn't gain any size from
> > all
> > > > that work.
> > > > Anyway, you did gain a lot of strength, and that
> > > > will eventually lead
> > > > you to mass gains if you consolidate your
> > strength
> > > > increases and don't
> > > > let them disappear. Maybe you could now drop
> > back
> > > > into a less
> > > > demanding maintenance routine with the heavier
> > > > weights you can now
> > > > move, and stay with that routine for awhile just
> > > > maintaining. I've
> > > > always felt that real strength gains mean that
> > not
> > > > only can you move
> > > > heavier weights now, but you can handle them
> > with
> > > > the same level of
> > > > effort it took to handle the lighter weights you
> > > > were using before,
> > > > with the same quality of execution.
> > > > >
> > > > > That kind of gains will stay with you, as
> > opposed
> > > > to going from 110
> > > > kilos with good form and focus to 140 kilos with
> > a
> > > > shortened ROM,
> > > > choppy form, fewer reps, and no quad focus.
> > Nope
> > > > -- that 140 kilos
> > > > should feel just as manageable as did the 110
> > kilos
> > > > before. If it
> > > > doesn't you didn't get stronger, you're just
> > > > straining more.
> > > > >
> > > > > I think you need to keep eating well, rest,
> > and
> > > > back off on the
> > > > training for a little while, either in intensity
> > or
> > > > training
> > > > frequency, maybe even lighten the loads or do
> > fewer
> > > > sets temporarily
> > > > while your body catches up. You're burned out.
> > > > >
> > > > > Miguel
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail and any
> > > > attachments are
> > > > intended only for the use of those to whom it is
> > > > addressed and may
> > > > contain information that is confidential and
> > > > prohibited from further
> > > > disclosure under law. If you have received this
> > > > e-mail in error, its
> > > > review, use, retention and/or distribution is
> > > > strictly prohibited. If
> > > > you are not the intended recipient, please
> > contact
> > > > the sender by reply
> > > > e-mail and destroy all copies of the original
> > > > message and any
> > > > attachments.[v1.0]
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > >
> > > > > From: Miguel Angel Perez
> > > > [mailto:metalhead2_mx@]
> > > > > Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 8:58 AM
> > > > > To: Perez, Miguel
> > > > > Subject: Rv: [HIT Digest] Re: Results of my
> > new
> > > > workout correction
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --- hmmmhmmhm <hmmmhmmhm@ escribió:
> > > > >
> > > > > Para: Hitdigest@yahoogroups.com
> > > > > De: "hmmmhmmhm" <hmmmhmmhm@
> > > > > Fecha: Sun, 13 May 2007 18:32:59 -0000
> > > > > Asunto: [HIT Digest] Re: Results of my new
> > > > workout
> > > > > correction
> > > > >
> > > > > I read this and realized it comes across as
> > if I
> > > > > have put on muscle
> > > > > when I was trying to say I haven't, apart
> > from
> > > > > perhaps a bit on my
> > > > > back. I put on no weight apart from when like
> > I
> > > > said
> > > > > I ate more nuts
> > > > > etc and that was fat.
> > > > >
> > > > > Jeremy
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Well thought Id mention how I got on with
> > my
> > > > new
> > > > > workout which was
> > > > > Casler style [three work sets 20r/10r/5r]
> > > > >
> > > > > I started properly early November and on
> > nearly
> > > > > every workout since
> > > > > [3 times a week] I have gotten stronger on
> > at
> > > > > least one set often
> > > > > every set of a exercise and sometimes all
> > > > > exercises.
> > > > > As I expected I was getting a rep or two
> > more
> > > > > usually. I do recall
> > > > > occasionally adding weight and reps.
> > > > > I added 30 kilos to my 5 rep squat set it
> > has to
> > > > > be noted though that
> > > > > half way through the cycle I went up a pin.
> > On
> > > > the
> > > > > big exercises I
> > > > > added about 10 or twelve kilos per set.
> > > > > I really enjoyed the extra time in the gym
> > and
> > > > > working in different
> > > > > rep ranges.
> > > > >
> > > > > The strange thing is have put on much muscle
> > but
> > > > I
> > > > > do feel my back has
> > > > > grown [thickened] and has a bit more detail,
> > but
> > > > > my arms and legs are
> > > > > the same as before. I have had problems with
> > > > > injury so I haven't
> > > > > trained my triceps throughout and when I
> > have
> > > > its
> > > > > been a low ROM. I
> > > > > also was only able to train my chest and
> > > > > shoulders for a few months
> > > > > due to injury. But the leg and back work
> > have
> > > > been
> > > > > used constantly. I
> > > > > did have a few weeks off training
> > altogether.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I was taking in more protein than I normally
> > > > would
> > > > > do.
> > > > > I haven't been able to get my hands on
> > protein
> > > > for
> > > > > a few weeks so I
> > > > > have tended to eat more nuts etc. This has
> > led
> > > > to
> > > > > a weight increase
> > > > > but it seems to be fat.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thinking about it my back had the most
> > constant
> > > > > volume and seems to
> > > > > have improved which is interesting.
> > > > >
> > > > > I am still getting a rep here and there
> > more on
> > > > > the workout but feel
> > > > > its starting to run its course as I will
> > improve
> > > > > on one set then the
> > > > > next one I will lose a few reps.
> > > > >
> > > > > I would have thought strength increases
> > without
> > > > > resulting growth can
> > > > > happen to a point and its individual but I
> > must
> > > > > have had enough
> > > > > calories if I put on some fat. And surely
> > > > strength
> > > > > increases require a
> > > > > good amount of calories to be consumed?
> > > > >
> > > > > Any thoughts welcome
> > > > > Jeremy
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > __________________________________________________
> > > Correo Yahoo!
> > > Espacio para todos tus mensajes, antivirus y
> > antispam ¡gratis!
> > > Regístrate ya - http://correo.espanol.yahoo.com/
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Correo Yahoo!
> Espacio para todos tus mensajes, antivirus y antispam ¡gratis!
> Regístrate ya - http://correo.espanol.yahoo.com/
>