So am I right in saying that in changing the sets and reps around you
did find it helped you on the one set of twenty?
It sounds like it would give your body a good shock.
Id imagine judging it so the last rep is the one to failure would be
tricky.

> Hello HITTERS!
>
> Recently I attempted 122.5 kilograms for the 20 repition squat, with
the longer term goal of being able to squat 140 kilograms for 20
repitions.
>
> I could perhaps call this sort of workout, (that is, 1*20), an
endurance-strength workout, but then it actually occurred to me that I
could, sort of, "reverse" the order of sets and repitions, thus doing
NOT 1*20, but 20*1.
>
> This would be called, I think, strength-endurance.
>
> When I tried this, the weight that I could use to twenty singles,
was considerable heavier, so I used "only" 120 kilograms for 30*1.
>
> This style of training is also called "rest-pause training".
>
> Perhaps this is something new that we all could try, that is,
REVERSEING the order of repitions and sets, this x sets of y repitions
becomes y sets of x repitions.
>
> You could try 4*5 and 5*4, but with the whole idea in mind to fail
ONLY ONCE (in the true nature of HIT style training), AND on the last
repition of the last set.
>
> Any thoughts on this matter and on this style of training?
>
> ----Sarn.
>
>
>
>
________________________________________________________________________________\
_

>
> How would you spend $50,000 to create a more sustainable environment
in Australia? Go to Yahoo!7 Answers and share your idea.
>
http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/aunz/lifestyle/answers/y7ans-babp_reg.html
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>