Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
Hitdigest · The HIT Digest is a service of Cyberpump! and is a place to discuss weight training in a moderated environment.
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Want to share photos of your group with the world? Add a group photo to Flickr.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
This max contraction thing....   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #19962 of 20123 |
Hello, Sarn here!

I went down into a book shoppe called "DYMOCKS" in Wellington, because I know
that they have a great sports books section, and I managed to pick up an
interesting book written by two authors, one of the was a descendant of Mike
Mentzer called "John Little".

Now, this bloke, well, he seems of above average intelligence, and he wrote
about an interesting method of training that he had been working on since the
year 1984, called "Max contraction" training.

I was, actually impressed with this, as I was with Stewart McRoberts book BRAWN,
but there are some things about this which puzzle and perplex me.

Mr.Little gives a method of training called the "Omega Set", and I supposse that
this is sacred, so I should call it the "OMEGA set".

With this "OMEGA set" training, you hold the heaviest weight possible, for
1---->6 seconds, until failure, and then you get a couple of partners to catch
it, and to return it to full contraction, after a breif rest.

What I can't seem to understand, it HOW a fully contracted muscle would
"translate" to a fuller range of motion.

Mr.Little tells me/us that the "OMEGA set", it a primary way to stimulate fast
twitch fibers, but I was under the impression that there were actually only two
ways to do this, with:

a)Light weights lifter explosively (but of course, controlled),

and....

b)Heavy weights lifter slowly, (with, of course, the intent to move them fast).

So, supposedly, if I used ONLY the lower half of the range of motion, with
light-and-explosive weights, or ONLY the lower half of the range of motion with
heavy and slow weights, then this would NOT stimulate fast fiber.

So, the more muscle fiber, AND the more fast muscle fiber I stimulate is related
to how close to max contraction I am lifting, AND how heavy a load I am using.

What about light-and-explosive weights at or near max contraction?

So, we then, thus have THREE things;

1.Load, 2.Lifting speed, 3.Proportion of max contraction in a lift, and a
combination of these things to stimulate fast (or slow fiber)?

Yes?

Thus, the heavier the load, the closer to max contraction, and the faster the
lift, the more fast fiber I'd be stimulateing?

Right?

I look foward to further thoughts on this matter...

------Sarn.

Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





Sat Nov 4, 2006 4:07 am

polyverse2002@...
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #19962 of 20123 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

Hello, Sarn here! I went down into a book shoppe called "DYMOCKS" in Wellington, because I know that they have a great sports books section, and I managed to...
Sarn Ursell
polyverse2002@...
Send Email
Nov 6, 2006
2:55 am

Hi Sarn I have never really done "power factor training" I have used heavy partials and I did find in the squats especially that when I whent back to my old...
hmmmhmmhm
Offline Send Email
Nov 9, 2006
7:22 am
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help