In a message dated 3/22/2006 12:00:39 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, GSOwatch@yahoogroups.com writes:
More and more groups are folding every day. What happened?
+++++++++++++++
That's a bold and dire statement that is probably wildly inaccurate.
Meetings are like accordions . . . compressing and expanding regularly. A lot depends on where you are. Here in Sarasota and Manatee counties (yearound population of about 500,000 that doubles in season) on the west coast of Florida, we have 131 meetings a week and more that aren't listed in our directory. We have some meetings with 3 or 4 attendees, lots with 20 to 50 and had 700 on hand last Saturday for a circuit speaker.
I think the real question is whether "attraction" really works, and whether it isn't time to rethink "promotion." After all, with a population of 300 million, and estimating 10 per cent are alkies, that makes a universe of 30 million members, and AA has never had more than a couple of million, by best estimates.
I have sat through hours of personal diatribe and thanking of everyone under the sun (both present and not present) at service structure assemblies to hear the 30 minutes of what I was there for - to serve my group. I find it frustrating as I hate to waste valuable time, but to say so (and I have) is to be considered heartless. wolfhawk
So…. What do we do in this discussion? For me it is a place to share my experience, strength and hope pointing out where we deviate from our pursuit of spiritual progress via various temptations – particularly those temptations so liberally strewn in our path by something commonly known as the "AAWS Service Structure," that serves The General Service Conference – a device owned by AAWS Inc. The temptations?…Titles, compensation, recognition, and applause; material rewards that stand in the way of spiritual progress.
John G.
PS: This discussion is about "AA" it is not "AA" the "G" is used to minimize confusion.
I was busy reviewing the past postings on certain subjects looking
for my part in the demise of our old group…. And then access was no
longer available. I refreshed and was informed that the group had
moved. This reminded me of the time I was hitchhiking across the USA
and when I returned home at the age of 17, I found that my family
had moved without telling me. At least there was some discussion
here.
I read all the posts and learned that this new home is by invitation
only…. Uh oh….. I went back that familiar old idea that I would be
left out. Checked the email and found my invitation ---- whew ---..
But what to post? My review of past posts to the old group had
revealed that I posted way less than once per day – on average --.
Now with my self-suggestion still in the air – accountability loomed.
I will miss the instant accountability the search box in the old
site provided – and I wonder if that search engine was part of the
demise. It did not take long to spot an agenda – and the contortions
it spawned. Misstatements, mischaracterizations, and downright lies
were becoming easier to spot as the searchable archive of past posts
grew.
So… how to begin anew. This is the first post of the rest of my
life. This is the post that someday I will not regret in the past
and see how my experience with it can be useful to others.
I am powerless over alcohol and I know of no scheme that can cause
sobriety for alcoholics of "our" kind. A careful read of the book
ALCOHOLICS ANONYMOUS describes no path to sobriety, makes no claims
that there is any method to avoid the next drink. Everyone I know
within AA says they practice the Steps of Recovery. Rigorous honesty
agreeing with the notion of powerlessness.
Anyone/anything suggesting anything that is suggestive or
instructive on how to avoid that first drink --- is IMO not
powerless and is promoting something that stands in the way of the
spiritual progress/awakening/experience promised in the 12 Step
Program of Recovery.
Alcoholics Anonymous is a fellowship of men and women. Obviously
corporations/businesses and organized service groups are not AA. IMO
the majority of the membership of AA embraces the 12 Traditions of
AA. Again, rigorous honesty requires that anyone/anything acting in
a manner contradictory to those Traditions is engaged in an activity
contrary to the unity of AA --- this is particularly so if that
entity uses or includes the name AA in their name or activity.
- "Voluntary" means --- without compensation for time or expenses.
- "Freely given" --- without compensation for time or expenses.
- AA members voluntarily carry a message that is free – without
expectation – or compensation.
- Self-support by our own group members ---- precludes funding from
ANY source other than the group's individual members.
- No dues or fees --- no fee for attending any meeting/event using
the AA name.
- The AA name should not be used in a corporate name --- exactly.
- There is no authority higher than a group conscience within AA ----
it matters not what may appear in any publication or occurs in any
other group – an AA group chooses for itself – period.
- "Anonymity" is ½ of our name --- for excellent reason – until it
is changed – than we all agree on it – all the time --. Posting a
name such as John D. from Doetown OH for any reason is not
anonymous – if it were there would be no need for "D." or "Doetown
OH."
- All alcoholics' stories reflect powerlessness – no speaker can
possibly convey something more "powerful" or "inspiring" than
another. We tell our stories for our own benefit. If we speak out
for any other reason – than it is with an expectation of result -----
and that means it is not free. Any committee choosing an "AA"
speaker is in apparent disagreement with this concept.
- AA has no spokesperson on any matter, at any time, for any reason.
- Alcoholism is a requirement for membership in AA.
You may have discerned from my observations that I consider any non
self-supported organization or any entity using the name Alcoholics
Anonymous, or that uses the AA name as part of its own corporate
name, is not Alcoholics Anonymous. These entities include The
General Service Conference, The General Service Board of Alcoholics
Anonymous Inc., Alcoholics Anonymous World Service Inc., Alcoholics
Anonymous Grapevine Inc., central offices, intergroups and all other
self proclaimed secondary aids to AA .The Fellowship of Alcoholics
Anonymous owns nothing – and nothing includes: the name "AA,"
archives, books, program, Steps, Traditions, ideas, --- yes, it is
all-inclusive – we either do or don't.
It is not possible to expend our vital time and interest to protect
something we do not own.
So…. What do we do in this discussion? For me it is a place to share
my experience, strength and hope pointing out where we deviate from
our pursuit of spiritual progress via various temptations –
particularly those temptations so liberally strewn in our path by
something commonly known as the "AAWS Service Structure," that
serves The General Service Conference – a device owned by AAWS Inc.
The temptations?…Titles, compensation, recognition, and applause;
material rewards that stand in the way of spiritual progress.
John G.
PS: This discussion is about "AA" it is not "AA" the "G" is used to
minimize confusion.
From: GSOwatch@yahoogroups.com [mailto:GSOwatch@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Ed Chambley Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 23:08PM To: GSOwatch@yahoogroups.com Subject: [GSOwatch] Inside Out
Hi All,
Is our objective just to watch and complain? We know AAWS, Inc. does not act, or spend as the majority of this forum believes they should. Are there any solutions to this. [Al C said: ] AAWS is "supposed" to represent the Fellowship. The "solution" (to me) is as obvious as my reflection in the mirror.
Is it possible to correct the problems through the power of the purse? [Al C said: ] I don't think that this is the only way to correct ALL the problems by a long-shot, but it would tend to get "their" attention.
If they don’t have money could they continue in ways which are not agreeable? [Al C said: ] The sad fact is that they do have the money, and until it's drawn down to a realistic level, they'll continue to ignore (in my opinion) whatever they choose to ignore, and the Fellowship be damned, with very few exceptions (my view only).
Are the masses in AA today stupid or ill informed? [Al C said: ] I've belatedly come to realize that, at least in my former home group, folks seem to have gotten into a "comfort zone", and don't wish to, either actively or inactively, hear about the activities of our/their trusted servants.
Is the service structure so broken it cannot be repaired? [Al C said: ] My opinion only, but I believe it not only can be repaired, but that we're a part of the problem if we DON'T go about some method of participation IN the repair. Service...I'm old enough to remember when the place that you got gasoline for your car was normally called a "Service Station". That's my analogy. The attendants seem to be poking holes in the tires while they're cleaning the windshield...now...yes, you ARE getting service, but you're also being provided with a great DIS-service in the process. We need to get rid of those who're poking holes in the (our "customer's") tires.
Is there a need for AAWS, Inc.? [Al C said: ] Yet another analogy..."But SIR!!!!!...we've ALWAYS issued cavalry swords!!!!!". 'Nough said.
I'm hoping that this group won't get too narrow, or indeed too broad in what I hope to be our purpose. The use of "GSOwatch" (NON-copyrighted by HP's will) I think, should be a forum for discussion of the successes of the corporations (and "supporting cast") as well as the fairly obvious short-comings.
There are probably thousands of web sites that have good to great information. Being a bit biased, I'd suggest the https://www.aagso.org as an excellent starting point. Other sites MAY be "anti-AA", but STILL contain some good information...documented as well as speculative. I've found Google® to be a great tool for locating that "hard to find" information, but it can be a bit tiresome to narrow things down at times.
Thanks for joining and being a part of the group.
G'bless,
Al C.
From: GSOwatch@yahoogroups.com [mailto:GSOwatch@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of david_chenoweth Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 23:00PM To: GSOwatch@yahoogroups.com Subject: [GSOwatch] Re: Rule by "anarchy"
Hello All,
Thank you Norm, and all others involved for insuring GSOwatch continues.
My AA way of life would not be the same with out all of you.
My some of my home group members are interested in hosting a "GSOwatch" work shop here in the San Diego-Imperial Area. Something like a week-end of seminars presenting what "GSOwatch" has learned about the New York power base. Is this something our more experienced members would consider helpful to the Minority Opinion Movement?
Also, would we consider widening the scope of this newsgroup's discussion to include the activities of GSO, GSC, GSB, AAWS and AAGV?
Fresh starts are what drunks do best,
David Chenoweth
--- In GSOwatch@yahoogroups.com, "Al Cooper" <coopera@...> wrote: > > Rule by anarchy? What the heck IS "anarchy"? > > NOUN: > pl. an.ar.chies > > 1. Absence of any form of political authority. > > Ed C. has made some suggestions. > > G'bless, > > Al C. >
First Norm, THANK YOU, from MANY others as well as myself for being the conduit of what I feel to be HP's work and ACTION. Others and I know that the things you've done in establishing the parent of this group have been done self-lessly, and with much tolerance and love, and a very great deal of personal expense and sacrifice of the time you could have used doing other things. WE (and I freely use the term WE) gratefully appreciate all these things and more, which I've (unintentionally) left unexpressed.
Norm's doing a bit of "tap dancing" when he says he wasn't asked to moderate. Thinking back, I might not have asked directly "Norm, will you moderate for the new group?", but the IMPLICATION was most definitely expressed, and the "Thanks, but NO thanks!" was also expressed either directly of through "implication".
I just kinda "fell" into the GSO_Watch forum sometime back, and can't truthfully say when or why. I feel a bit grandiose, being one of the relatively new guys on the block, in starting a spin-off of a group with a long and very honorable history of oversight for our corporate entities. I'm not pulling out the "look at how humble I am" mantle when I say that this IS HP's will. LOL, it certainly IS NOT mine. Having in the past, shirking responsibility as much as I could, I still tend to back away from any major commitments whenever possible. I've played the "moderator" game in another forum (Undernet MIRC for those interested), and didn't particularly care for what I became as a result of the experience, which is why I'm asking that others step up and, at the very least, co-moderate this group to keep US "on course".
Even trains, following a set of rails, come to junctures where a choice must be made, and engineers with more experience than I, will know which path needs to be taken to arrive at the desired destination.
That being said, I invite each and every one of you to read Norm's posting and the suggestions (left entirely intact below) that have been placed before us. I want US, as a GROUP, to make the decisions. I want each of us to have the have the right, which we're trying to represent, of minority opinion even WITHIN the minority opinion. BUT, this IS...YOUR...GROUP!
What I'm looking for right now, is a "Statement Of Purpose" for those who might be interested in joining the group, and a set of guide-lines (a FAQ for lack of better words) that we can use. Ed C., has suggested the 12 Steps for personal guidelines, and the 12 Traditions for group guidelines to give things a start.
I'm considering keeping the other group (GSO_Holding) open for (unmoderated) topics which may be of great interest to others, but not really applicable for our GSOwatch group. I'm picturing instances when it's more of the "sharing the experience, strength and hope" nature, and someone being told "GREAT idea, GOOD sharing! Please take those worthy thoughts, and continue in the GSO_Holding area!".
Now...I'm trying to keep this short, so as not to bore the hell out of everyone with all the reading. For a nomination for co-moderator, I'd like to propose Magaretha H., for "this side of the planet", since she's in roughly the same time-zone as I am, and would thus be able to take timely action whenever anything crops up that needs to be addressed "over here".
In closing, I'd again like to express my MOST SINCERE appreciation to Norm. That same sentiment applies to all of you who have unselfishly given of yourselves, and can, and WILL make the "transition". Now, as one of MY childhood "heroes", Red Skelton, used to always say at the end of each show.....
G'bless,
Al C.
From: GSOwatch@yahoogroups.com [mailto:GSOwatch@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Norm Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 19:46PM To: GSOwatch@yahoogroups.com Subject: [GSOwatch] I've joined. Wisdom from our past....
4 pages long…. Sorry. It is me. Norm. Thanks for your patience.
Al and I, and others have discussed this new newsgroup for some time now. Well, a week or so. Thank you so much, Al, for all your hard work and thank everyone else for the many suggestions and for volunteering to help.
Who wants to elect me moderator? Good!!!!! No nominations! Nominations closed! Thank you! Thank you all! Thank God! And thank goodness I don't have to decline a nomination and hurt anyone's feelings. (See I did learn a thing or two at gso_watch)
Before I respond to the ONLY post I see so far, Coffee Hell, from Ed C., I have some info from the old group. It comes in the form of suggestions or recommendations based on experience.
> A proposal for rules > -no minority opinion member should be assaulted, injured or otherwise put down > -member's postings should stick to the purpose of the list, no so- called ESH or psycho babble > -reports on documents and actions rather than merely talking > -one posting per day or less > > perhaps (depends on the moderators' time) > - moderation on new members or members that ignore the rules > > Statement of purpose should be similar to gso, but shorter. > Should come quick. >
Get it?
Good advice. And I've heard some other good advice offline as well. I hope Al and others will bring them up and insist on discussion of these items.
*My opinion*,... the one post a day thing. <shrug> I don't follow it. But many of you do know I send most my posts to my drafts folder and after reading the next day almost never send them. That's just me. Another -- if you don't like the one post rule – it is just an _idea_ (not rule yet) -- at least recognize when you are angry or frustrated, and wait a bit to compose a reply to that jackass that is pissing you off. Please trust me on this. If you don't trust me on this, everyone _will_ see that you ARE a jackass, rude, insulting, sarcastic, obnoxious, and boring. You probably don't really want that. You probably don't want the members or thousands of non-member readers to know this about you. You'll probably create the opposite effect from what your heart intends.
My dear friends, I've told folks I love very dearly this. They didn't hear a word of what I said. Please, if anything --- hear this point. Anything short of love.... is short of love. You probably don't want to go there no matter how much the proverbial asshole is pissing you off.
I promised the folks willing to risk themselves in starting and running this group I would provide some 'advise, and consulting' and assured them the support I had as moderator at gsowatch was almost as easily available if I asked for it. In the spirit of that cooperation, anyone may email me at any time and vent. Tell me anything. Ask me to kick some tird's ass (Gary B would probably be my choice for that job) but the fact is I have been given enough influence here that I can make a difference.
So if my last story of Betty A. bored you silly, or the weather in Kansas is a good reason to spike your coffee with a something a little more potent than sunshine. Email me.
Folks, with me stepping out, I'm the last of the old time folks who started these newsgroups for a very good reason. Well, ok, John G and Sherry will likely be around but I'm still the last active ancient who volunteered -- willing to work.
Make this your group. Lots of folks emailed me privately and publicly expressing why gsowatch was so valuable and important, why it should continue and why I should be involved.
The torch is passing. Don't let it's purpose or meaning get lost.
My opinion is all new members ought to be approved by the moderator (s). When I moderated it was pretty much automatic. Ask to join, you were in. If you said something about AA is was a certainty. (I'm two weeks sober and like AA, I'm the delegate from area Z)
We had a time when several newcomers were trouble makers so for a while I moderated the first several posts of all newcomers. Alternately, getting an application from a newcomer with handles like eatshitanddieyouaanazis is probably a pretty good indication they aren't interested in the real purpose of the group.
I think the statement of purpose is essential. All kinds of folks have emailed all kinds of suggestions for rules and such and in my view they are all pretty good or at least well intentioned.
While no one nominated me to moderate, thank you, and since I'd decline anyway, some folks have asked I hang around as a sort of consultant to help make sure the group gets off on its maiden voyage ok.
I can't say it any better than Bill did. Our job is to educate AA members and the general public how AAWS et al screws up in regard to our own self confessed principles.
Bill K's recent money begging letter could not have made our success more clear. ...."...they soon find their deviations to be unprofitable and unwise..."
I think something like this should be adopted as the statement of purpose of this group. There are good reasons why. How can anyone moderate if anyone can just say anything? Folks, just go to RecoveryFirst on MSN is that's your thing. There are plenty of places set up for endless babble.
During the last 1000 post fiasco on gsowatch dozens of folks were downright rude to each other, one claiming they were provoked -- the other claiming the other started it.... blah, blah, blah. If there are rules against "-no minority opinion member should be assaulted, injured or otherwise put down" that is easy to deal with. Moderate both of em. Send them a private email. My favorite when moderating was "Is this really necessary?" Folks aren't stupid; they know when they are being assholes -- although I have recent experiences that suggest my faith in folk's intelligence may be premature.
This posting of ES&H stuff is absolutely the hardest to moderate. We all love each other a great deal -- in most cases, even when we haven't met. Even knowing the weather in Japan or New Zealand can be a little dose of 'connection' and joy for us sometimes. Who doesn't want to share in the joy of an upcoming marriage or grandchild of one of the folks we communicate daily with?
Like I said.... very hard to moderate but if we are going to do what we came to do, we need to do the ES&H, psychobabble, and weather channel somewhere else. Hey... we have a chat room here. We can probably activate it 24/7/365 with a touch of a button. Much better place to socialize... and it is real time... Hell, at the group's decisions we could have regular meetings of whatever kind the group wanted....
I recommended several moderators and that they meet regularly in the chat room at a designated time and share with each other. <shrug> Worked at Microsoft when I worked there as a moderator of multiple groups and chat rooms.
To me.... this would be the biggest challenge of this group. Keeping the ES&H and other similar stuff moderated. Do I really care your sponsor was Clarence Snyder? Maybe.... but now we are talking about several off topic things. Sponsorship out of context, envy, false pride.... fill in some other blanks yourself.
Folks think about this personal ES&H stuff. Maybe keep gso_holding open for that stuff. Anything, but I'd like to see gsowatch stick close to its foundations and founder's intentions… to share information, inform and educate AA members and the public.
A simple example Gary B shared with me today: AAWS conference report says we spent 227K on lawsuits. Service manual essay says we never sue anyone.
How do you not sue anyone and have a lawsuit that cost $200K?
Huh? Concise. To the point, appealing to us "duh" guys and attractive, inviting interested folks to learn more.
But the answers are actually funny. AAWS ought to have their own show on Comedy Central because they are funnier than old Steve Martin skits with the arrow through the head.
Learn a little first then watch for catch phrases like, "protecting the fellowship" "protecting the message" "our fiduciary responsibility" If you know the real backgrounds…, well I hope you don't have a bladder problem. You'll either piss yourself laughing or piss yourself in disgust and disbelief.
That is what we have always been about at the minority opinion newsgroups. We've never hated AA or the corporations. Some of us have come to believe them irrelevant or even worse, but there is no "beat them up" thing going on that is driven by any passion of hatred. We know they mean well. We just also know they are very wrong on very many things. So our job isn't to chnge the minds of folks who may argue opposing views here. WE ought to focus on just a few things. First, love our fellow member. We may disagree, but in the end we share a singleness of purpose. I hope this is the course this group will take. There are plenty of groups who can have a great morning `over coffee' chat. I just think this one, in honor of those that went before us, ought to stay focused on issues.
Strange comment Tim, Local Politics as in A.A. Service Structure aspirations, or some other aspect of "Politics-Clubs"?
As you note though, at least it was read.
sch
-----Original Message----- From: GSOwatch@yahoogroups.com [mailto:GSOwatch@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of timderan Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 10:54 AM To: gsowatch@yahoogroups.com Subject: [GSOwatch] Spirituality vs. Legalism In Alcoholics Anonymous
I forwarded copies of this paper to our delegate, alternate delegate and several past delegates in our area.
I talked to the alternate delegate the other night as illustrated in a previous post.
This morning I got an e-mail reply from our delegate. He noted a kind of a slant in some of the opinions in the paper. But, his one comment I found most interesting was that he thought the author might be involved in clubs or politics. Hmmmmm…..?????
Anyway, both were glad to get the paper and actually read it.
Hello to all in group, and thank you for the invitation to the new
site. I do not share that much but do like to read the knowledge and
wisdom that so many share. I hope to keep learning, and thank you all
for the opportunity to do so. Thanks Jay and Maryann for your post
and I agree with them both. Also thanks to all in this group for
being here. God bless to all, Mike :) .. -
-- In GSOwatch@yahoogroups.com, "Jay Lawyer" <ejlawyer@...> wrote:
>
> Yes I would like to second Maryann's concern. We have finally heard
the
> reason(s) why we had to shutdown and reopen. So if any of us think
this
> is a joke think of Matthew and the restrictions they (AAWS) have
put on
> him. So let us keep the minority opinion in the forefront of our
thoughts
> when we post.
> And let us always remember to keep in prayer those, that our
discussions
> and work here at GSOwatch are helping. Those that are being or have
been
> taken to court for standing for God and our principles.
> Thank you.
>
>
> God bless us all....
> as we trudge this Road of Happy Destiny
>
>
Jay
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Maryann W.
> To: GSOwatch@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 10:17 AM
> Subject: [GSOwatch] New Site
>
>
> I hope all who join this site are willing to keep it to the
principals
> that were set down on the old site. Because of this site and the
> individuals who have done so much work on it I am much more
> knowledgable than I could have possibly been otherwise.
> May God be with us.
> Maryann
>
I forwarded copies of this paper to our delegate, alternate
delegate and several past delegates in our area.
I talked to the alternate delegate the other night as
illustrated in a previous post.
This morning I got an e-mail reply from our delegate. He
noted a kind of a slant in some of the opinions in the paper. But, his one
comment I found most interesting was that he thought the author might be
involved in clubs or politics. Hmmmmm…..?????
Anyway, both were glad to get the paper and actually read
it.
I also agree with both Jay and Maryann.
This is how I want this group to be,
keeping the mandate of the original group.
Blessings,
mae
--- In GSOwatch@yahoogroups.com, "Jay Lawyer" <ejlawyer@...> wrote:
>
> Yes I would like to second Maryann's concern. We have finally heard
the
> reason(s) why we had to shutdown and reopen. So if any of us think
this
>
I hope all who join this site are willing to keep it to the principals that were set down on the old site. Because of this site and the individuals who have done so much work on it I am much more knowledgable than I could have possibly been otherwise. May God be with us. Maryann
I hope all who join this site are willing to keep it to the principals
that were set down on the old site. Because of this site and the
individuals who have done so much work on it I am much more
knowledgable than I could have possibly been otherwise.
May God be with us.
Maryann
We're alcoholics. Rules won't work.
The spiritual principles we live by - the Steps, Traditions, and Concepts -
should be the only guiding factors necessary. [Note that "flaming" and other
troll behavior violate these guidelines.]
In Service, wolfhawk
----- Original Message ----- (edited for brevity)
From: "Norm" <kohl@...>
To: <gso@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 7:29 AM
Subject: [gso_watch] Initial notice. Shutting down.
The new newsgroup is at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/GSOwatch .
It is a PUBLIC newsgroup, has no moderation of membership at all. Is still
willing to listen to anything about how the newsgroup operates. Make your
voice heard over there because soon the rules, standards, purposes, etc.,
will all be set and maybe your position will not get initially heard.
Is our objective just to watch and complain?
We know AAWS, Inc. does not act, or spend as the majority of this forum
believes they should. Are there any solutions to this.
Is it possible to correct the problems
through the power of the purse?
If they don’t have money could they
continue in ways which are not agreeable?
Are the masses in AA today stupid or ill
informed?
Is the service structure so broken it
cannot be repaired?
Hello All,
Thank you Norm, and all others involved for insuring GSOwatch
continues.
My AA way of life would not be the same with out all of you.
My some of my home group members are interested in hosting a
"GSOwatch" work shop here in the San Diego-Imperial Area. Something
like a week-end of seminars presenting what "GSOwatch" has learned
about the New York power base. Is this something our more experienced
members would consider helpful to the Minority Opinion Movement?
Also, would we consider widening the scope of this newsgroup's
discussion to include the activities of GSO, GSC, GSB, AAWS and AAGV?
Fresh starts are what drunks do best,
David Chenoweth
--- In GSOwatch@yahoogroups.com, "Al Cooper" <coopera@...> wrote:
>
> Rule by anarchy? What the heck IS "anarchy"?
>
> NOUN:
> pl. an.ar.chies
>
> 1. Absence of any form of political authority.
>
> Ed C. has made some suggestions.
>
> G'bless,
>
> Al C.
>
I have heard that the pamphlet "AA and the Native North American" is up for
revisement at the GSC in April. Any truth to this? Does anyone have any
details? wolfhawk
It is just my dingbat opinion but this is
gsowatch (or perhaps more correctly aawswatch) not aa meeting watch.
The numbers are all questionable as is the
whole opinion piece. It is full of generalizations that are not necessarily true
such as the demise of groups. The demise of groups can only be ascertained from
GSO registrations. Not all groups register, as is their right, such as the
Nicollet Group in Minneapolis
which started around 1941 (I did read they did register with the intergroup within
the last 10 years). Even where I live I have helped start three groups and we
do not register and there are two more that have been in existence for about
eight years that have not registered. And since we are not registered we certainly
are not going to fill out any GSO or Grapevine survey. The numbers at meetings
is very misleading. I know for a fact there are still meetings through out the
country that still pull in those large numbers and yet for us in my area to
ever attain those numbers we would have to bus them in from Minneapolis,
Milwaukee and Chicago. (lol)
BAJ
"One of the symptoms of an
approaching nervous breakdown is the belief that one's work is terribly
important"
From:
GSOwatch@yahoogroups.com [mailto:GSOwatch@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Ed Chambley Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2006 4:13
PM To: GSOwatch@yahoogroups.com Subject: [GSOwatch] Coffee Hell
Lets get this thing going.
I read this the other day, It is long
(sorry)
That
question is being asked by a lot of alcoholics lately. What happened to
our high success rate? 30 & 40 years ago, we were keeping 75% or more
of the alcoholics who came to us for help. Today, we aren’t keeping
even 5%. What happened?
What
happened to that wonderful A.A. Group that was around for 20, 30 or 40
years? There used to be 50, 75, 100 or more at every meeting. It is
now a matter of history; gone! More and more groups are folding every
day. What happened?
We
hear a lot of ideas, opinions and excuses as to what happened but things are
not improving. They continue to get worse. What is happening?
Bill
W. wrote,
“In the years ahead A.A. will, of course, make mistakes. Experience
has taught us that we need have no fear of doing this, providing that we always remain willing to admit our
faults and to correct them promptly. Our growth as individuals
has depended upon this healthy process of trial and error. So will our
growth as a fellowship.
Let us always remember that any society of men and women that cannot freely
correct its own faults must surely fall into decay if not into
collapse. Such is the universal penalty for the failure to go
on growing. Just as each A.A. must continue to take his moral inventory
and act upon it, so must our whole Society if we are to survive and if we are
to serve usefully and well.” (A.A. Comes of Age, pg 231)
With so very few finding lasting sobriety and the continued demise of AA
groups, it is obvious that we have not remained
willing to admit our faults and to correct them promptly.
Seems to me that the Delegate of the Northeast Ohio Area, Bob Bacon, identified
our mistakes and our faults when he talked to a group of AA’s in
1976. He said, in essence, we are no longer showing the newcomer that we
have a solution for alcoholism. We are not telling them about the Big Book
and how very important that Book is to our long term sobriety. We are not
telling them about our Traditions and how very important they are to the
individual groups and to Alcoholics Anonymous as a whole. Rather, we are
using our meeting time for drunkalogs, a discussion of our problems, ideas and
opinions or “my day” or “my way”.
Having been around for a few years, and reflecting on what Bob Bacon had to
say, it would appear that we have permitted newcomers to convince the
old-timers that they had a better idea. They had just spent 30 or more
days in a treatment facility where they had been impressed with the need to
talk about their problems in Group Therapy Sessions. They had been told
that it didn’t make any difference what their real problem was, A.A. had
the “best program”. They were told that they should go to an
A.A. meeting every day for the 1st 90 days out of treatment. They were
told that they shouldn’t make any major decisions for the 1st year of
their sobriety. And what they were told goes on and on, most of which are
contrary to the Program of Alcoholics Anonymous!
Apparently, what they were told sounded pretty good to the A.A. members who
were here when the TC clients started showing up at our meetings. And a
lot of the A.A. members liked the idea of the treatment centers because the
centers provided a place where they could drop off a serious drinker, if he/she
had insurance. That eliminated some of the inconveniences we had been
plagued with before; having to pour orange juice and honey or a shot of booze
down a vibrating alky to help them “de-tox”.
When A.A. was very successful, the folks who did the talking in meetings
were recovered alcoholics. The suffering and untreated alcoholics
listened. After hearing what it takes to recover, the newcomer was faced
with a decision; “Are you going to take the Steps and recover or are you
going to get back out there and finish the job?”. If they said they
“were willing to go to any length”, they were given a sponsor, a Big
Book and began the process of recovery by taking the Steps and experiencing the
Promises that result from that course of action. This process kept the
newcomer involved in working with others and continued the growth of our
Fellowship. Our growth rate was approximately 7% and the number of sober
members of Alcoholics Anonymous doubled every 10 years.
With the advent of the rapid growth of the Treatment Industry, the acceptance
of our success with alcoholics by the judicial system and endorsement of
physicians, psychiatrist, psychologist, etc. all kinds of people were pouring
into A.A. at a rate greater than we had ever dreamed possible. Almost
without realizing what was happening, our meetings began changing from ones
that focused on recovery from alcoholism to “discussion or
participation” types of meetings that invited everyone to talk about
whatever was on their mind. The meetings evolved from a program of
spiritual development to the group therapy type of meeting where we heard more
and more about “our problems” and less and less about the Program
of Recovery by the Big Book and the preservation of our Fellowship by adhering
to our Traditions.
What has been the result of all this? Well, never have we had so many
coming to us for help. But never have we had such a slow growth rate
which has now started to decline. For the first time in our history,
Alcoholics Anonymous is losing members faster than they are coming in and our
success rate is unbelievably low. (Statistics from the Inter-Group Office
of some major cities indicate less than 5% of those expressing a desire to stop
drinking are successful for more than 5 years; a far cry form the 75% reported
by Bill W. in the Forward to Second Edition). The change in the content
of our meetings is proving to be death-traps for the newcomer and in turn,
death-traps for the groups that depend on the “discussion or
participation” type meetings.
Why is this? The answer is very simple. When meetings were opened
so that untreated alcoholics & non-alcoholics were given the opportunity to
express their ideas, their opinions, air their problems and tell how they were
told to do it where they came from, the confused newcomer became more confused
with the diversity of information that was being presented. More
and more they were encouraged to “just go to meetings and don’t
drink” or worse yet, “go to 90 meetings in 90
days”. The newcomer no longer was told to take the Steps or
get back out there and finish the job. In fact, they are often told,
“Don’t rush into taking the Steps. Take your
time.” The alcoholics who participated in the writing of the
Big Book didn’t wait. They took the Steps in the first few days
following their last drink
Thank God, there are those in our Fellowship, like Joe
& Charlie, Wally, etc., who have recognized the problem and have started
doing something about it. They are placing the focus back on the Big
Book. There have always been a few groups that would not yield to the
group therapy trend. They stayed firm to their commitment to try to carry
a single message to the suffering alcoholic. That is to tell the newcomer
that “we have had a spiritual awakening as the result of these Steps and
if you want to recover, we will see that you have a sponsor who has recovered
and will lead you along the path the 1st 100 laid down for
us”. Recovered alcoholics have begun founding groups that
have a single purpose and inform the newcomer that until they have taken the steps
and recovered, they will not be permitted to say anything in meetings.
They will listen to recovered alcoholics, they will take the Steps, they will
recover and then they will try to pass their experience and knowledge on to the
ones who are seeking the kind of help we provide in Alcoholics Anonymous.
As this movement spreads, as it is beginning to, Alcoholics Anonymous will
again be very successful in doing the one thing God intended for us to do and
that is to help the suffering alcoholic recover, if he has decided he wants
what we have and is willing to go to any length to recover, to take and apply
our Twelve Steps to our lives and protect our Fellowship by honoring our Twelve
Traditions.
There is a tendency to want to place the blame for our predicament on the
treatment industry and professionals. They do what they do and it has
nothing to do with what we in Alcoholics Anonymous do. That is their
business. That is not where to place the blame and also is in violation
of our Tenth Tradition. The real problem is that the members of
Alcoholics Anonymous, who were here when the “clients” began coming
to our Fellowship did not help the “clients” understand that our
Program had been firmly established since April 1939. And that the
guidelines for the preservation and growth of our Fellowship were adopted in
1950. That they must get rid of their new “old ideas” and
start practicing the Twelve Step Program of Alcoholics Anonymous as it was
given to us. That until they had taken the Steps and recovered, they had
nothing to say that needed to be heard except by their sponsor. But that
didn’t happen. To the contrary, the old timers failed in their
responsibility to the newcomer to remind them of a vital truth, “Rarely
have we seen a person fail who has thoroughly followed our path. Those
who do not recover are people who cannot or will not completely give themselves
to this simple program.” We have permitted untreated alcoholics and
non-alcoholics to sit in our meetings and lay out their problems, ideas
and opinions. We have gone from, “Rarely have we seen a person
fail” to “Seldom do we see a person recover”.
So there we are. We have had 30 years of unbelievable success by
following the directions in the Big Book. We have had 30 years of disappointing
failure by wanting to hear from everyone. We now have something to
compare.
We now know what the problem is and we know what the solution is.
Unfortunately, we have not been prompt to correct the faults and mistakes which
have been created by what would appear to be large doses of apathy and
complacency. The problem we are trying to live with is needlessly killing
alcoholics. The Solution? The Power, greater than ourselves, that
we find through our Twelve Steps promises recovery for those who are willing to
follow the clear-cut directions in the Big Book.
Do you want to be a part of the problem or a part of the solution?
Simple, but not easy; A price has to be paid.
From:
GSOwatch@yahoogroups.com [mailto:GSOwatch@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Al Cooper Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2006 5:05
PM To: GSOwatch@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [GSOwatch] Where's
the coffee?
Yes SIR!
(__)P ~~~~~~ large
cup, or \_/p ``````` demi-tasse? Full octane or lead-free? Just
a bit of service work <wink>
Al (at the pot) C.
From:
GSOwatch@yahoogroups.com [mailto:GSOwatch@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of John C. Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006
06:59AM To: GSOwatch@yahoogroups.com Subject: [GSOwatch] Where's the
coffee?
I came looking for coffee?
LOL
__________ NOD32 1.1454 (20060321) Information __________
I uploaded the Gary K letter, the Charlie Bishop paper and the AAWS
tax returns. We might want to delete the tax returns as it takes a lot
of space and instead just furnish links
BAJ
Memory just keeps tugging at me...the soberlady is VERY familiar to me, and the connection I'm mentally making has something to do with lamps and lighting. LOL, am I even CLOSE on this one?
Al C.
From:GSOwatch@yahoogroups.com [mailto:GSOwatch@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Linda E. Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 06:11AM To: GSOwatch@yahoogroups.com Subject: [GSOwatch] I'm in
Here to learn and do as needed.
AA Hugs, Linda
No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.2.6/287 - Release Date: 3/21/2006
That
question is being asked by a lot of alcoholics lately. What happened to
our high success rate? 30 & 40 years ago, we were keeping 75% or more
of the alcoholics who came to us for help. Today, we aren’t keeping
even 5%. What happened?
What
happened to that wonderful A.A. Group that was around for 20, 30 or 40
years? There used to be 50, 75, 100 or more at every meeting. It is
now a matter of history; gone! More and more groups are folding every
day. What happened?
We
hear a lot of ideas, opinions and excuses as to what happened but things are
not improving. They continue to get worse. What is happening?
Bill
W. wrote,
“In
the years ahead A.A. will, of course, make mistakes. Experience has
taught us that we need have no fear of doing this, providing that we always remain willing to admit our faults and to
correct them promptly. Our growth as individuals has depended
upon this healthy process of trial and error. So will our growth as a
fellowship.
Let
us always remember that any society of men and women that cannot freely correct
its own faults must surely fall into decay if not into
collapse. Such is the universal penalty for the failure to go
on growing. Just as each A.A. must continue to take his moral inventory
and act upon it, so must our whole Society if we are to survive and if we are
to serve usefully and well.” (A.A. Comes of Age, pg 231)
With
so very few finding lasting sobriety and the continued demise of AA groups, it
is obvious that we have not remained willing
to admit our faults and to correct them promptly.
Seems
to me that the Delegate of the Northeast Ohio Area, Bob Bacon, identified our
mistakes and our faults when he talked to a group of AA’s in 1976.
He said, in essence, we are no longer showing the newcomer that we have a
solution for alcoholism. We are not telling them about the Big Book and
how very important that Book is to our long term sobriety. We are not
telling them about our Traditions and how very important they are to the
individual groups and to Alcoholics Anonymous as a whole. Rather, we are
using our meeting time for drunkalogs, a discussion of our problems, ideas and
opinions or “my day” or “my way”.
Having
been around for a few years, and reflecting on what Bob Bacon had to say, it
would appear that we have permitted newcomers to convince the old-timers that
they had a better idea. They had just spent 30 or more days in a
treatment facility where they had been impressed with the need to talk about
their problems in Group Therapy Sessions. They had been told that it
didn’t make any difference what their real problem was, A.A. had the
“best program”. They were told that they should go to an A.A.
meeting every day for the 1st 90 days out of treatment. They were told
that they shouldn’t make any major decisions for the 1st year of their
sobriety. And what they were told goes on and on, most of which are
contrary to the Program of Alcoholics Anonymous!
Apparently,
what they were told sounded pretty good to the A.A. members who were here when the
TC clients started showing up at our meetings. And a lot of the A.A.
members liked the idea of the treatment centers because the centers provided a
place where they could drop off a serious drinker, if he/she had
insurance. That eliminated some of the inconveniences we had been plagued
with before; having to pour orange juice and honey or a shot of booze down a
vibrating alky to help them “de-tox”.
When
A.A. was very successful, the folks who did the talking in meetings were
recovered alcoholics. The suffering and untreated alcoholics
listened. After hearing what it takes to recover, the newcomer was faced
with a decision; “Are you going to take the Steps and recover or are you
going to get back out there and finish the job?”. If they said they
“were willing to go to any length”, they were given a sponsor, a
Big Book and began the process of recovery by taking the Steps and experiencing
the Promises that result from that course of action. This process kept
the newcomer involved in working with others and continued the growth of our
Fellowship. Our growth rate was approximately 7% and the number of sober
members of Alcoholics Anonymous doubled every 10 years.
With
the advent of the rapid growth of the Treatment Industry, the acceptance of our
success with alcoholics by the judicial system and endorsement of physicians,
psychiatrist, psychologist, etc. all kinds of people were pouring into A.A. at
a rate greater than we had ever dreamed possible. Almost without
realizing what was happening, our meetings began changing from ones that
focused on recovery from alcoholism to “discussion or
participation” types of meetings that invited everyone to talk about
whatever was on their mind. The meetings evolved from a program of
spiritual development to the group therapy type of meeting where we heard more
and more about “our problems” and less and less about the Program
of Recovery by the Big Book and the preservation of our Fellowship by adhering
to our Traditions.
What
has been the result of all this? Well, never have we had so many coming
to us for help. But never have we had such a slow growth rate which has
now started to decline. For the first time in our history, Alcoholics
Anonymous is losing members faster than they are coming in and our success rate
is unbelievably low. (Statistics from the Inter-Group Office of some
major cities indicate less than 5% of those expressing a desire to stop
drinking are successful for more than 5 years; a far cry form the 75% reported
by Bill W. in the Forward to Second Edition). The change in the content
of our meetings is proving to be death-traps for the newcomer and in turn,
death-traps for the groups that depend on the “discussion or
participation” type meetings.
Why
is this? The answer is very simple. When meetings were opened so
that untreated alcoholics & non-alcoholics were given the opportunity to
express their ideas, their opinions, air their problems and tell how they were
told to do it where they came from, the confused newcomer became more confused
with the diversity of information that was being presented. More
and more they were encouraged to “just go to meetings and don’t
drink” or worse yet, “go to 90 meetings in 90
days”. The newcomer no longer was told to take the Steps or
get back out there and finish the job. In fact, they are often told,
“Don’t rush into taking the Steps. Take your
time.” The alcoholics who participated in the writing of the
Big Book didn’t wait. They took the Steps in the first few days
following their last drink
Thank
God, there are those in our Fellowship, like Joe & Charlie, Wally, etc.,
who have recognized the problem and have started doing something about
it. They are placing the focus back on the Big Book. There have
always been a few groups that would not yield to the group therapy trend.
They stayed firm to their commitment to try to carry a single message to the
suffering alcoholic. That is to tell the newcomer that “we have had
a spiritual awakening as the result of these Steps and if you want to recover,
we will see that you have a sponsor who has recovered and will lead you along
the path the 1st 100 laid down for us”. Recovered alcoholics
have begun founding groups that have a single purpose and inform the newcomer
that until they have taken the steps and recovered, they will not be permitted
to say anything in meetings. They will listen to recovered alcoholics,
they will take the Steps, they will recover and then they will try to pass
their experience and knowledge on to the ones who are seeking the kind of help
we provide in Alcoholics Anonymous. As this movement spreads, as it is
beginning to, Alcoholics Anonymous will again be very successful in doing the
one thing God intended for us to do and that is to help the suffering alcoholic
recover, if he has decided he wants what we have and is willing to go to any
length to recover, to take and apply our Twelve Steps to our lives and protect
our Fellowship by honoring our Twelve Traditions.
There
is a tendency to want to place the blame for our predicament on the treatment
industry and professionals. They do what they do and it has nothing to do
with what we in Alcoholics Anonymous do. That is their business.
That is not where to place the blame and also is in violation of our Tenth
Tradition. The real problem is that the members of Alcoholics Anonymous,
who were here when the “clients” began coming to our Fellowship did
not help the “clients” understand that our Program had been firmly
established since April 1939. And that the guidelines for the
preservation and growth of our Fellowship were adopted in 1950. That they
must get rid of their new “old ideas” and start practicing the
Twelve Step Program of Alcoholics Anonymous as it was given to us. That
until they had taken the Steps and recovered, they had nothing to say that
needed to be heard except by their sponsor. But that didn’t
happen. To the contrary, the old timers failed in their responsibility to
the newcomer to remind them of a vital truth, “Rarely have we seen a
person fail who has thoroughly followed our path. Those who do not
recover are people who cannot or will not completely give themselves to this
simple program.” We have permitted untreated alcoholics and
non-alcoholics to sit in our meetings and lay out their problems, ideas
and opinions. We have gone from, “Rarely have we seen a person
fail” to “Seldom do we see a person recover”.
So
there we are. We have had 30 years of unbelievable success by following
the directions in the Big Book. We have had 30 years of disappointing
failure by wanting to hear from everyone. We now have something to
compare.
We
now know what the problem is and we know what the solution is. Unfortunately,
we have not been prompt to correct the faults and mistakes which have been
created by what would appear to be large doses of apathy and complacency.
The problem we are trying to live with is needlessly killing alcoholics.
The Solution? The Power, greater than ourselves, that we find through our
Twelve Steps promises recovery for those who are willing to follow the
clear-cut directions in the Big Book.
Do
you want to be a part of the problem or a part of the solution? Simple,
but not easy; A price has to be paid.
From:
GSOwatch@yahoogroups.com [mailto:GSOwatch@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Al Cooper Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2006 5:05
PM To: GSOwatch@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [GSOwatch] Where's
the coffee?
Yes SIR!
(__)P ~~~~~~ large
cup, or \_/p ``````` demi-tasse? Full octane or lead-free?
Just a bit of service work <wink>
Al (at the pot) C.
From:
GSOwatch@yahoogroups.com [mailto:GSOwatch@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of John C. Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006
06:59AM To: GSOwatch@yahoogroups.com Subject: [GSOwatch] Where's the
coffee?
(__)P ~~~~~~ large cup, or \_/p ``````` demi-tasse? Full octane or lead-free? Just a bit of service work <wink>
Al (at the pot) C.
From: GSOwatch@yahoogroups.com [mailto:GSOwatch@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of John C. Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 06:59AM To: GSOwatch@yahoogroups.com Subject: [GSOwatch] Where's the coffee?
Memory just keeps tugging at me...the soberlady is VERY familiar to me, and the connection I'm mentally making has something to do with lamps and lighting. LOL, am I even CLOSE on this one?
Al C.
From: GSOwatch@yahoogroups.com [mailto:GSOwatch@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Linda E. Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 06:11AM To: GSOwatch@yahoogroups.com Subject: [GSOwatch] I'm in
From: GSO_Holding@yahoogroups.com [mailto:GSO_Holding@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Ed Chambley Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 04:34AM To: GSO_Holding@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [GSO_Holding] Home-warming
How about using the steps as a personal guideline and the traditions for the group guideline? How about the members not being afraid to correct those who get away from this?
Are these ground rules?
From:GSO_Holding@yahoogroups.com [mailto:GSO_Holding@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Al Cooper Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2006 2:22 PM To:GSO_Holding@yahoogroups.com Subject: [GSO_Holding] Home-warming
Hello ALL!
As of a short time ago, our "renovated" home opened it's doors. The "new" home has been re-named to GSOwatch (much in honor and tribute to our "old" home of GSO_Watch). As of right now, there aren't any "ground rules" in place. It's a public forum, and joining the group is "at your pleasure". If ANYONE has problems in getting a membership, please let Norm, Ted, or myself know, and you'll promptly be issued a quote formal invitation unquote. I'll be keeping the GSO_Holding group open for a few more days until the word gets out, and the plans made known to as many as possible. After that...WE can decide to dissolve the GSO_Holding (delete the group), or anything that's decided on as a group.
Apology for the proliferation of forums by my adding the GSO_Holding, and now the GSOwatch areas, but things should rapidly condense down to just the GSOwatch. The floor is open for volunteers for moderator(s) IF that's the way the majority of joiners want to have things ran. WE also need suggestions for a description of the new group, plus (or minus) any suggestions for "rules".
Yahoo indeed! You're the inaugural REAL first message Paul! Welcome (back) aboard the GSOwatch train! Buckle your seat-belts please Ladies and Gentlemen, the ride MAY get "bumpy" from time to time, and we wouldn't want any one injured in any way, LOL.
G'bless,
Al C.
From: GSOwatch@yahoogroups.com [mailto:GSOwatch@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of soberfinn Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 05:37AM To: GSOwatch@yahoogroups.com Subject: [GSOwatch] Re: First Message
Hi
"And they say we Finns are shy and slow"
Paul S aka soberfinn
--- In GSOwatch@yahoogroups.com, "gsowatch" <gsowatch@...> wrote: > > Test >