Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
FuzeonSupport
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Want your group to be featured on the Yahoo! Groups website? Add a group photo to Flickr.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Raltegravir (Integrase just approved) 24 week Combined Efficacy   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #1173 of 1195 |
These are definitely the best results we have ever seen in history. It was good for Merck to show a breakdown  of efficacy with all drugs used with raltegravir. Most companies in the past have not done so for several marketing reasons.
 
Read on

Regards,

Nelson Vergel
powerusa dot org




See what's new at AOL.com and Make AOL Your Homepage.


Thu Oct 25, 2007 6:38 pm

PoWeRTX@...
Send Email Send Email

NATAP http://natap.org/
_______________________________________________


Thu Oct 25, 2007 5:11 pm

nataphcvhiv@...
Send Email Send Email
Combined 24-Week Efficacy Data on the Integrase Inhibitor Raltegravir

11th European AIDS Conference
October 24-27, 2007
Madrid

Mark Mascolini

Raltegravir, the integrase inhibitor recently licensed in the US as Isentress, passed a 24-week double-trial efficacy test with flying colors, BENCHMRK-1 and -2 investigators reported at the European AIDS Conference in Madrid [1]. The only bad news for Merck, raltegravir's maker, in this 667-person analysis is that most people with triple-class resistance who can start active enfuvirtide and darunavir can probably save raltegravir for another day. Or they may opt for the twice-daily raltegravir pill right away instead of using the twice-daily enfuvirtide shots.

Because the two BENCHMRK trials follow the same format, researchers could combine 24-week results to afford a more robust look at how to use this muscular new med. These double-blind trials enrolled people with virus resistant to some drugs in the first three antiretroviral classes, a viral load above 1000 copies, and any CD4 count. BENCHMRK 1 took place in Europe, Peru, and the Asia/Pacific region, and BENCHMRK-2 in North and South America. Study participants got randomized to 400 mg of raltegravir twice daily or placebo plus a background regimen tailored for potential potency against each person's resistant virus.

After 24 weeks a noncompleter-equals-failure analysis determined that 75% taking raltegravir had a viral load under 400 copies (versus 40% with placebo) and 63% on raltegravir had fewer than 50 copies (versus 34% with placebo). While the raltegravir group gained an average 84 CD4 cells, the placebo group gained an average 37 (
P < 0.001 for all three of these primary endpoint comparisons).

Raltegravir-based salvage regimens outpaced rescue regimens without raltegravir regardless of which other potent drugs a person took (Table). A virologic-failure-carried-forward analysis showed that 4 in 5 people who started the integrase inhibitor with first-time enfuvirtide and first-time darunavir reached a viral load below 50 copies in 24 weeks. That looked slightly better than the 74% sub-50 response rate among people starting enfuvirtide and darunavir for the first time without raltegravir, but the difference probably lacks statistical significance. (Note that numbers of people in some of these subgroups are small, especially for placebo.)

Response to Raltegravir at 24 Weeks With Various Background Drugs




Among people who started only enfuvirtide or only darunavir for the first time in the BENCHMRK trials, raltegravir easily outshone placebo (Table). Study participants with tipranavir-sensitive virus who started that protease inhibitor with raltegravir did just as well as people who started darunavir with raltegravir (and without enfuvirtide), at least through 24 weeks (Table). CD4 gains also proved superior with raltegravir than with placebo, even when placebo takers had a relatively good virologic response at week 24 (Table).

Even among people with a genotypic sensitivity score (GSS) of 0, indicating little or no activity of background drugs, 44% notched a 24-week viral load below 50 copies, compared with 6% for placebo. When the GSS rose to 1, 71% had a sub-50 response to raltegravir versus 37% for placebo. With a GSS of 2 or more, 71% responded to the raltegravir regimen and 56% to the placebo regimen.

This report did not compare side effects in the raltegravir and placebo groups--or between different raltegravir backgrounds such as darunavir versus tipranavir.

Reference
1. Kumar P, Cooper D, Steigbigel R, et al. Efficacy of raltegravir, an HIV integrase inhibitor, in combination with regimens containing enfuvirtide, darunavir, or tipranavir in patients with triple-class resistant virus: combined results from Benchmrk-1 and Benchmrk-2. European AIDS Conference. October 24-27, 2007. Madrid. Abstract P7.2/06.






**************************************
See what's new at http://www.aol.com


_______________________________________________
NATAP nataphcvhiv mailing list -- nataphcvhiv@...

This is an annoucement-only mailing list. Do not reply.

To unsubscribe: send a blank email to nataphcvhiv-request@... with a
subject of unsubscribe.


For more information, see http://seven.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/nataphcvhiv

_______________________________________________


Forward
Message #1173 of 1195 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

These are definitely the best results we have ever seen in history. It was good for Merck to show a breakdown of efficacy with all drugs used with ...
PoWeRTX@...
Send Email
Oct 26, 2007
7:04 pm
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help