Summary and Comment
Who Will Benefit from CCR5 Inhibitors?
More-advanced disease is correlated with a higher probability of mixed viral populations or dual-tropic virus.
When CCR5 inhibitors enter the marketplace in the near future, clinicians will need some guidance for selecting patients likely to benefit from these drugs. To this end, researchers evaluated clinical and epidemiologic data from patients screened for enrollment in a phase IIb trial of the CCR5 inhibitor vicriviroc.
The 391 subjects who provided samples for HIV coreceptor phenotype testing were all heavily treatment-experienced; 197 (50%) had virus that used CCR5 only, 16 (4%) had virus that used CXCR4 only, and 178 (46%) had dual-tropic virus or a mixed population. Median age was higher in the CCR5-tropic group than in the dual/mixed group (46 vs. 44 years), and white subjects were more likely than blacks to have CCR5-tropic virus; no differences were seen by sex. The CCR5 group had higher current CD4 counts (median, 170 vs. 103 cells/mm3), higher nadir CD4 counts (61 vs. 44 cells/mm3), and slightly lower viral loads (median, 4.5 vs. 4.7 log copies/mL) than did the dual/mixed group. On multivariate analysis, only current CD4-cell count remained a significant predictor of coreceptor phenotype.
The small group of patients with virus that used CXCR4 alone had significantly lower viral loads than did either of the other two groups, but no other epidemiologic or clinical factors were significantly associated with this phenotype. Number and pattern of resistance mutations did not vary among groups.
Comment: The presence of some CXCR4 tropism in an individual’s viral population is thought to reflect more-aggressive disease. The data presented here (which are consistent with those of similar analyses) confirm this association, but they do not prove that the CXCR4 viruses are the cause of progressive HIV disease. Importantly, a sizable proportion of patients retain pure CCR5 tropism even in advanced HIV infection.
— Abigail Zuger, MD
Published in AIDS Clinical Care March 12, 2007
| 1: Clin Infect Dis. 2007 Feb 15;44(4):591-5. Epub 2007 Jan 17. | Related Articles, Links |
Comment in:
HIV type 1 chemokine coreceptor use among antiretroviral-experienced patients screened for a clinical trial of a CCR5 inhibitor: AIDS Clinical Trial Group A5211.
Wilkin TJ, Su Z, Kuritzkes DR, Hughes M, Flexner C, Gross R, Coakley E, Greaves W, Godfrey C, Skolnik PR, Timpone J, Rodriguez B, Gulick RM.
Division of International Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Weill-Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA. tiw2001@...
BACKGROUND: Chemokine coreceptor use impacts both the natural history of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) disease and the potential use of a new class of antiretroviral agents, the CCR5 inhibitors. METHODS: We analyzed HIV-infected patients who were screened for participation in Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS) Clinical Trial Group protocol A5211, a phase 2b study of the investigational CCR5 inhibitor vicriviroc involving antiretroviral-experienced subjects. Screening CD4(+) cell count, HIV-1 plasma RNA level, HIV-1 genotype, and chemokine coreceptor use phenotype were determined. The univariate and multivariate association of subject characteristics with coreceptor use was assessed by logistic regression. RESULTS: Coreceptor use was determined for 391 subjects: 197 (50%) had virus that used the CCR5 coreceptor (the R5 group), 176 (46%) had dual-tropic or mixed HIV-1 populations that used both CCR5 and CXCR4 coreceptors (the D/M group), and 16 (4%) had virus that used the CXCR4 coreceptor (the X4 group). The D/M group had a significantly lower median CD4(+) cell count than the R5 virus group (103 cells/ micro L vs. 170 cells/ mu L; P<.001). No other characteristics were independently associated. Among 118 subjects who entered A5211 having R5 virus, 12 (10%) had D/M virus according to the results of a second coreceptor test conducted prior to starting treatment with the study drug. CONCLUSIONS: Infection with dual-tropic or mixed HIV-1 populations that use both CCR5 and CXCR4 is common among highly treatment-experienced patients, but infection with virus using CXCR4 alone is uncommon. Subjects in the D/M group had significantly lower CD4(+) cell counts than subjects in the R5 group. Evaluating coreceptor use will be important in the clinical development of CCR5 and CXCR4 inhibitors.
Nelson Vergel
powerusa dot org
AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at AOL.com.