Having problems with message search?
Sean this is wonderful encouragement - thanks for posting it.
As you may know, the Lillie Center filed a legal ethics complaint against the Centers for Disease Control in the US, and we are filing similar ethics complaints here against Health Canada. We are also going after local health authorities who are misusing their positions to control local councils through intimidation and misinformation on fluoride safety and effectiveness. The councillors are supposed to answer to their electorate and to the laws, and the water plant operators hired by the elected council must uphold environmental regulations and provincial laws that are currently being violated by the addition of silicofluoride chemicals. Health officials can no longer order the poisoning of Canadian residents with untested, unapproved for human ingestion toxic fluoride waste, and get away with it.
Here in Canada, there was a recent Human Rights ruling that has officially recognized multiple chemical sensitivity syndrome as a disability that is now protected from discrimination. Public water fluoridation discriminates against those of us with fluoride illness and hypersensitivity and we have the recent National Research Council report providing the evidence of harm at low doses. I think it is only a matter of time and persuading a non profit agency to do the legal stuff for us. The Canadian Human Rights laws supersede all other laws except War Measures.
Even if fluoridation policy can not be touched, the chemical in use violates the Canadian environmental law. We are going for the jugular. No more Mrs. Fluffy Bunny approach of politely pleading with them to see reason, observe precautionary principles, be nicer to those of us with fluoride poisoning, reduce the dental fluorosis in children, look at the real science, look at the Nobel Prize winners signing the petitions etc. If they continue to flout the environmental and human rights laws, they are going to get charged with those crimes.
Aliss
Hi,
you may be interested to learn that here in Ireland, the Donegal Democrat ran a front page article on Donegal residents being over-exposed to fluoride. Urine samples were collected from people in three areas in the county... 72% of the sample were found to have higher than supposed 'safe' levels of fluoride.The survey was initiated by VOICE Ireland and so you can read the article on their website here: http://voiceireland.org/articles/ 1610_Donegalstor y.html I can e-mail you a pdf of the front page of the paper if you wish (1.5MB - and the paper misspelled fluoride!). Or it can be uploaded to the site here if people are interested.A local radio station picked up on the story and that got attention on Google... so someone in Australia has been on to the radio station about the dangers of fluoride and how we're being overexposed to it. Now if that kind of networking can happen from one survey of a few people in the NW corner of Ireland... I wonder what would happen if several other communities here (and maybe in fluoridated areas of other countries?) were to have urine levels checked?As far as I can see scientific or moral reasons are not going to convince our Minister of Sickness to end fluoridation here. It will come down to public opinion... or perhaps legal action. And repeating this kind of urine sampling in different locations could be a very good way to go about shifting public opinion.Best wishes,Sean
Offline 
Send Email