HOW TO AVOID FLUORIDATION CONTROVERSY and/or LITIGATION:

 

"Double-blind" test those for whom this public health theory is presumed to benefit before a major portion of the public's health, the entire public water system and the public purse are devastated. 

 

Few are aware insurance providers will not indemnify a municipality for harm resulting from water fluoridation; in fact, a community/municipality is generally required to sign a "hold harmless" clause for everyone involved in this form of public health quackery. 

 

No manufacturer/producer/supplier of the fluoride-containing waste product has ever been able  nor willing to guarantee the safety/efficacy of their fluoridation products. 

 

No supporter of fluoridation, including any health authority, state health department or trade association (American Dental Association, et al) has ever been willing to provide in writing that a specific fluoridation product from a specific producer or manufacturer, when added to water at the recommended dose, will effectively reduce dental caries and will neither cause nor contribute to adverse health affects "at the full expected range of human water consumption."

 

"Some are as sensitive to fluorides as others are to penicillin" ---E. D. Foreman, DMD, Ret.

 

So, who is accountable, who will be responsible when harm occurs to that subset of the population (including infants, diabetics, kidney and heart patients, et al) for whom the U.S. CDC states fluoridated water is contraindicated? 

 

George L. Waldbott, the MD hailed as a life-saver in the fifties for alerting health authorities to penicillin allergy was ignored, then blackballed and slanderously vilified when he observed and reported the same truth re fluoride.

 

Historically, the fluoridation theory was nothing more than a WW2 military/industrial camouflage for the (now) infamous "Manhattan Project" ---the research/development of the Atomic bomb--- which, without their fully-informed consent, used the entire populations of Grand Rapids, Michigan and Newburgh, NY as "test animals" to determine whether and to what degree radioactive fluorine-containing wastes (fluorides) could be tolerated when diluted by disposal (recycled) into a public's water system.

 

Now that the A-bomb is no longer significant to U.S. national security, examining recently declassified WW2 documents relating to the Manhattan Project should precede any fluoridation advocacy.

 

I am double-blind tested "toxic/allergic to fluorine-bearing compounds (fluorides)."   I recommend reading "FLUORIDE THE AGING FACTOR," c 1993 by my friend, the late John Yiamouyiannis, PhD (biochemistry) as well as "THE FLUORIDE DECEPTION," c 2004 by award-winning investigative reporter, Christopher Bryson, former BBC TV producer.

 

Respectfully submitted in good faith I am,

 

Rose Marie Waldram

(Mrs. T. M. Larson)

A CITIZEN ALLERGIC TO FLUORIDE

POB 457,  Greenacres SVC, Washington 99016

Ph/Fax/Voicemail:  509-927-2559

 

Copies:  et al

 

P.S. Few also are aware Dr. Waldbott successfully brought charges against certain public health significants who'd unjustly vilified his professional ethics and moral integrity by claiming he falsely testified re fluoride poisoning/allergy.  (If he were the money-grubber they'd unjustly claimed, why did he request only that his court costs be paid and they give him a public apology?)  

 

Rose Marie Waldram-Larson

---

Park yourself in front of a world of choices in alternative vehicles.
Visit the Yahoo! Auto Green Center.