once again - Floyd - it's much better if you leave...either address
the concerns raised in Darlene's letter, or just shut up...say - do
you EVER think?..doesn't look like it. jay

--- In FluoridePoisoning@yahoogroups.com, Floyd Maxwell <floyd@...> wrote:
>
> At 05:44 AM 7/31/2007, you wrote:
> >The following message was sent this morning to FAN's attorney. If you
> >are at all concerned about the quantity of fluoride in your foods and
> >beverages, you might want to read it.
> >.
> >SUBJECT: sulfuryl fluoride pesticide residues
>
> As usual, Darlene misrepresents FAN, and for some
> reason continues to offer FAN "advice" in this forum
> instead of by private email.
>
>
> From FAN's web site, here is their report on "The Campaign
> Against Sulfuryl Fluoride":
> http://www.fluorideaction.net/sf/index.html
>
> Today's featured paragraph from that page:
> "The good news is that EPA's "gift to DOW" is being rigorously
challenged by three environmental groups: Fluoride Action Network,
Environmental Working Group, and Beyond Pesticides. In June of 2006,
the three groups filed a petition to EPA calling for a "stay", or
immediate suspension, of all food-uses of sulfuryl fluoride pending a
full evidentiary hearing. The environmental groups' are represented by
attorney Perry Wallace, of the international law firm, Zelle, Hofmann,
Voebel, Mason and Gette."
>
>
> From my reading of that page, FAN is completely, utterly and
> entirely against Sulfuryl Fluoride. There is no need to be
> throwing around numbers and terms, Darlene. They do not appear
> to need quack remarks from the West Indies to bolster their
> viewpoint, and their ongoing public service work. Leave them,
> and us, alone.
>
> Floyd
> http://www.just-think-it.com
>