So, if I'm following you correctly, you're saying that the A/B
workouts are a form of HIT workouts, and don't really work that well,
or they just don't work that well on this XF7000 machine, or both ?
Thx.


--- In Explosive_Fitness@yahoogroups.com, Anthony Bowyer
<adb1x1@y...> wrote:
>
> I've come to realize that HIT (High Intensity
> Training) has some real flaws in many of it's basic
> concepts (as far a building muscle is concerned). By
> extension, anything derived from these basic concepts
> is flawed.
> I was once a firm believer in HIT ideas
> until I began to research the research (The good that
> is! Quite a bit is biased)! And to look over the data
> from years of workouts and try to pinpoint where
> actual growth occurred and why. It took me a while to
> build a frame of reference for what I was reading and
> to get a handle on the bigger picture. Not that I've
> arrived by any means, but looking at the 'mechanics'
> of hypertrophy on a 'microscopic' level, and seeing
> what actually causes it to happen, sheds a great deal
> of light on the subject.
>
> Anthony
>
>
> --- rule1red <mikemusk1@o...> wrote:
>
> > When you say the protocol, are you talking about the
> > A/B workouts
> > they say you should use with the machine? Thx.
> >
> >
> > --- In Explosive_Fitness@yahoogroups.com, Anthony
> > Bowyer
> > <adb1x1@y...> wrote:
> > >
> > > This really doesn't surprise me, since results
> > (at
> > > least in building muscle) will be far below what
> > is
> > > hyped. Not just because of the machine, but
> > becuase
> > > the protocol itself.
> > >
> > > Anthony
> > >
> > > --- "William Holt Penninger, Jr."
> > > <artmusik@s...> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Still using the old equipment. You're right, a
> > 30%
> > > > return rate does
> > > > sound high.
> > > >
> > > > Bill
> > > >
> > > > Strictly speaking, there is no such thing as an
> > > > enlightened person.
> > > > There is only enlightened activity.
> > > >
> > > > SHUNRYU SUZUKI
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Explosive_Fitness@yahoogroups.com
> > > > [mailto:Explosive_Fitness@yahoogroups.com] On
> > Behalf
> > > > Of rule1red
> > > > Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2005 8:59 PM
> > > > To: Explosive_Fitness@yahoogroups.com
> > > > Subject: [Explosive_Fitness] Re: New XF7000 Pro
> > > > Question
> > > >
> > > > I'm just relaying exactly what was told to me.
> > His
> > > > quote, "We're seeing
> > > > about 3 out of every 10 machines returned
> > currently,
> > > > which we do
> > > > consider a little high."
> > > >
> > > > So how's your experience with this machine so
> > far ?
> > > > Thx.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --- In Explosive_Fitness@yahoogroups.com,
> > "William
> > > > Holt Penninger, Jr."
> > > > <artmusik@s...> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > " By the end of the conversation, the only
> > > > question he
> > > > > did answer was admitting that approx. 3 1/2 %
> > of
> > > > the machines were
> > > > > being returned for a refund, which he said
> > himself
> > > > was kind of higher
> > > > > than they expected. (That's more than 3 out of
> > > > every 10 machines
> > > > > sold !)"
> > > > >
> > > > > No, it's more than 3 out of every 100 machines
> > > > sold. Unless you meant
> > > > > that 35% of the machines were returned.
> > > > >
> > > > > From the beginning you are enlightened.
> > > > > SOEN NAKAGAWA
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > __________________________________
> > > Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
> > > http://mail.yahoo.com
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>