This really doesn't surprise me, since results (at
least in building muscle) will be far below what is
hyped. Not just because of the machine, but becuase
the protocol itself.

Anthony

--- "William Holt Penninger, Jr."
<artmusik@...> wrote:

> Still using the old equipment. You're right, a 30%
> return rate does
> sound high.
>
> Bill
>
> Strictly speaking, there is no such thing as an
> enlightened person.
> There is only enlightened activity.
>
> SHUNRYU SUZUKI
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Explosive_Fitness@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:Explosive_Fitness@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
> Of rule1red
> Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2005 8:59 PM
> To: Explosive_Fitness@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Explosive_Fitness] Re: New XF7000 Pro
> Question
>
> I'm just relaying exactly what was told to me. His
> quote, "We're seeing
> about 3 out of every 10 machines returned currently,
> which we do
> consider a little high."
>
> So how's your experience with this machine so far ?
> Thx.
>
>
> --- In Explosive_Fitness@yahoogroups.com, "William
> Holt Penninger, Jr."
> <artmusik@s...> wrote:
> >
> > " By the end of the conversation, the only
> question he
> > did answer was admitting that approx. 3 1/2 % of
> the machines were
> > being returned for a refund, which he said himself
> was kind of higher
> > than they expected. (That's more than 3 out of
> every 10 machines
> > sold !)"
> >
> > No, it's more than 3 out of every 100 machines
> sold. Unless you meant
> > that 35% of the machines were returned.
> >
> > From the beginning you are enlightened.
> > SOEN NAKAGAWA
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>





__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
http://mail.yahoo.com