Hi Mileva:
One can break abusers, targets, or abusive relationships down into select groups: heterosexual women who abuse heterosexual men; heterosexual men who abuse heterosexual women; lesbian women who abuse lesbian women; homosexual men who abuse homosexual men; Fathers who abuse children; Mothers who abuse children, et cetera.
One could take this a step further and be even more discriminating; expressly examining Hispanic heterosexual men who abuse Caucasian heterosexual women, as many Caucasian women who are abused by Hispanic men assert that they have to contend with the supplementary variable of such abusers' alleged "cultural" chauvinism against women.
A woman being abused by a Christian man can claim, "Christian husbands think they are superior to their wives because the Bible tells them so," whereas, a man being abused by an African-American woman can claim, "African-American women think they are superior to white men because African-American men tell them so." Bias for each. Same difference.
An abused lesbian can claim, "Lesbians are afraid to get help for the abuse when their families don't know they're gay. They are petrified of being outed," whereas, an abused heterosexual man can claim, "Men are afraid to get help for the abuse because their families will think they're not real men for allowing this to happen to them. They are petrified of being humiliated." Trepidation for each. Same difference.
An abused heterosexual woman can claim, "It's so much harder for women to leave abusive relationships because they depend on men financially," whereas, an abused heterosexual man can claim, "It's so much harder for men to leave abusive relationships because the majority of the time child custody is granted to the Mother." Sense of inequality for each. Same difference.
It never ends! There are so many persons who think that they, or their situation, is so unique when they or it is not. Abuse is not complicated in this regard, unless you choose to make it so.
Over the years I have posted volumes of articles and website links on an array of abusers, targets, and abusive relationships so that those who want to become further "educated" on issues they believe pertain primarily or exclusively to themselves can do so. For instance, this is one of the few verbal abuse/domestic violence Internet groups that actually incorporates information on lesbian/homosexual abusers with that of heterosexual male AND heterosexual female abusers. Many other groups seem to be of the notion that women being abused by men is of solitary consequence.
Even so, encouraging each EVA member to analyze their particular group of abuser, target, and abusive relationship on list serves no justifiable purpose when it comes to conquering abuse and recovering from victimization in general. Once members start writing posts to the effect of, "It's so much tougher for female victims to leave their abusers than it is for male victims to leave their abusers. Men don’t have to face the same issues that women do when leaving," and the like - the group just turns into muck.
One, this is insensate commentary to make in front of male targets of abuse. Victimization is not a “competition,” and it doesn’t profit anyone to compare their plight with others in this capacity. Two, this is just not a factual state for all women. Many women these days - abused or not - are the breadwinners in the family or, at the least, employed and capable of taking care of themselves financially should the need arise. Three, this does nothing to help that target extricate herself from her abuser. Therefore, it would prove a lot more productive for such a target to ask, "I feel it's hard for ME to leave my abusive husband because I am so dependent on him financially. How can I overcome this?"
When I permitted certain posts a long while back it cumulated in nothing more than a bunch of angry, defensive, and bashing debates. E.g., “That's such BS! I am a Hispanic male and my Caucasian wife is the one who hates men and abuses me!" and "I don't think it's any easier for men! I am the one who depends on my wife financially!" Ad nauseam. Members were more interested in arguing over such trivialities than working on their own issues and extricating themselves from the abusive unions they were in. Some members even felt very un empowered by such observations, "Here I was all ready to leave my abuser but according to what that woman wrote it's going to be so much harder for me to reestablish myself since I am a WOMAN! Now I am afraid to try!"
This is why I have a rule against members attempting to turn abuse/victimization into a gender specific, sexual orientation specific, religious specific, race specific, or cultural specific debate despite any articles/website links posted which are geared toward certain groups. I also have a rule against members behaving as abusers themselves and boasting about attacking their abuser, calling their abuser names, yelling at their abuser, et al because this does not promote healthy liberation from abuse or healthy recovery from victimization.
It is much more beneficial in this kind of forum for members to simply keep in mind that abuse is about power, control, and sense of entitlement no matter WHO the abuser may be, and that ALL targets of abuse have their crosses to bear. In addition to this, if any member wants to post about/request aid with their individual situation they are more than welcome to. This is completely distinct from members dissecting how heterosexual male abusers supposedly differ from lesbian female abusers, for instance, as if these differences have any impact on the one being abused. Abuse is abuse. And abuse hurts. Period.
Regarding Katrina and whomever else I spoke up to more recently: my goal was not to educate in a gentle and compassionate manner but, rather, to set a firm boundary by making certain rules of the group abundantly clear. After running EVA for over five years now, I have absolutely no desire, time, or energy to coddle or illuminate those who are the prisoners and purveyors of bogus notions (i.e., those who are convinced that abused women have it so much worse in this way and that than abused men, and who are determined to sell this concept to the general public).
Nor do I have any tolerance for those women who KNOW that EVA is not a podium for their radical feministic views, but who attempt to interject said into their posts nonetheless, declaring “Freedom of speech!” My intent was solely to nip this nonsense in the bud because I do NOT want to read it here. So, here is fair warning for all: any more of the above described posts won't be sent through to the group.
If such individuals genuinely want to become enlightened, and that option would be entirely their own, they can accomplish this by just reading the articles/websites/posts on EVA. If they are receptive to the truth, they will quickly discover for themselves that when it really comes down to it abusers are very similar and targets are very similar, irrespective of all these other variables.
Free Terri
In a message dated 5/15/2006 10:53:38 AM US Mountain Standard Time, milevaeinst@... writes:
Hi Terri,
I think you made some good points that furthered the
idea I was trying to get across. That is, when you
get down to the details there are both common and
unique characteristics to abusive relationships.
I'm not sure, it may be something more appropriate to
be addressed in a different forum, but I do feel it is
all worth discussing in an effort to understand abuse
in its various forms and how we can become educated
about it and end it for all. I, personally, don't
wish to simply focus on a feminist agenda to the
exclusion of other abuse aspects (I can do that in
other woman-focused places if I want); I'm interested
in being exposed to knowledge about the details of all
kinds of abuse situations. I wrote more about aspects
of the form that I am most familiar with
(male-->female), but that doesn't mean that I don't
also want to learn about and wouldn't be receptive to
the details of other forms, too, and how they are
similar or different to the one I have personal
experience with.
I absolutely agree with your comments (thank you for
pointing it out and giving the examples) that women
have been supplied their own specific sense of
entitlement by society in relation to child-bearing
decision making and physical assault on men (and maybe
other things, too). They have a sense of entitlement,
it's just a different kind, and it IS also an
additional supportive mechanism that they may apply to
their abusive behavior. It is one, for instance, that
can not be utilized in an abusive relationship between
two gay men. It is unique to women because (so far)
women are the only ones who can give birth and they
are the ones who could try to take advantage of the
perception of being 'the weaker sex'.
I think your following comment is informative about
abuse:
"...ALL abusers feel entitled to abuse. Whether they
be women, men, heterosexual, homosexual, young, or old
and the abusive behavior of ALL is supported by
society to some degree."
You wrote that you failed to comprehend the purpose of
my post. It is two-fold. The first reason is that I
hope people here will be allowed to analyze and
discuss specific aspects of ALL kinds of abusive
relationships. I personally would be interested to
read more about the specific dynamics of abuse in
parent-->child and homosexual relationships just
because I have no experience with it, find it
interesting and would like to accummulate the
knowledge much like the reason for climbing Mt.
Everest: because it is there. (I wish more of it WAS
there to read and learn from) Only being able to
speak in certain generalities "ALL abusers feel
entitled to abuse." is limiting, in my opinion, but I
certainly do also understand your goal that this list
not become a forum for 'male bashing' (or any other
kind of person bashing). I haven't forgotten that you
have also allowed people to vent about the details of
their own personal situations, too, me included.
The second reason is a little more delicate. I'm not
sure if I can properly articulate it without prompting
defensiveness or bad feelings, but I will try. I
think, as a person on the outside looking in, the
various writings between you and Katrina were a
real-life example of interpersonal communications gone
wrong. It could be said that both of you could have
taken a brief amount of time to further consider where
the other might be coming from and factor that into
your responses in order to come to a more harmonious
conclusion that wouldn't have required a sacrifice of
anything important on either side. Things were
progressively written on both sides that ultimately
discouraged and made a positive outcome for both
people together nearly impossible. Surely this wasn't
the initial intention nor the desirable outcome. I
think what I saw was unfortunate miscommunication and
missteps that kept getting ratcheted up to higher
levels between two good people who in general,
probably mean no harm to others.
I hope what I've just written can be considered with
an open mind. I hesitate to send this because I think
a lot of people don't have the desire to pursue
self-analysis, introspection, improving interpersonal
communications and attempting to understand human
nature and psychology to the extent that I do. Unless
a person is motivated to seek out and request
constructive criticism and the opinions of others, it
probably won't be well received. Essentially, a
message that perhaps I should keep to myself (only
worry about my own situation) may fall on deaf ears
anyway and may cause another to think negatively of ME
to boot. I guess any responses to this post may bear
that out (or not) and can also be a learning
experience for me as far as when I ought to simply
mind my own business and move along. I can accept
that because, goodness knows, I have enough things
about myself that I still need to 'fix' and perhaps I
ought not to go around trying to 'fix' others when I
haven't been asked to and haven't reached a level in
my own life to be really qualified to do it. I am
still learning, learning, learning how to live this
life.
Mileva
“Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate.
Our deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure.
It is our light, not our darkness, that most frightens us.
We ask ourselves: who am I to be brilliant, gorgeous,
talented and fabulous? Actually, who are you not to be?
You are a child of God.
Your playing small doesn't serve the world.
There's nothing enlightened about shrinking
so that other people wont feel insecure around you.
We are born to make manifest the glory of God that is within us.
Its not just in some of us, it is in everyone." - Marianne Williamson
Fallen Officer Kenneth Collings
http://hometown.aol.com/azterri/kenny.html