Remember, living in a pure and unadulterated environment free of entraining electromagnetic frequencies, attuned to Earth, the lunar rhythms, and to the other natural astronomical cycles of life, is essential for our health, well being and evolutionary fulfilment. (See also Planetary Harmonics.)

Radiofrequency Antennas & Towers Across the U.S.

This map visually demonstrates the spatial magnitude of the wireless RF interference we live in, not to mention the 50/60 Hz power-grid and other EM fields.

Map used with permission:
Michael R. Meuser
www.MapCruzin.com

Synthetic drugs, clothes, and environments constructed of non-organic materials and diss-proportunate geometries also have a negative effect that suppress our emotions and our ablity to breath with the unfolding cycles of life and which maintains the crystallized patterns we hold in our cellular makeup. When we are not willing to experience, we feel physical pain (which is an emotion). When we suppress pain (or any other emotion)--in any variety of ways--we push ourselves down-scale vibrationally--down the emotional scale (from enthusiasm, into pain, anger, fear, grief, apathy, unconsciousness, and degenerative death). When we are willing to embrace emotion in unconditional acceptance, we move upward through the emotional scale (unconsciousness, apathy, grief, fear, anger, pain, to enthusiasm). When we are willing to feel (unconditionally embrace) one emotion, we move up to the next until the underlying pain (resistance to past experience) that we hold surfaces. When we are willing to embrace the pain, the pattern releases, the pain dissolves, and cellular and molecular recoding occurs. This is how to move through a Healing Crisis. When this recoding occurs we can draw (create) new experience based on the new subtle-energy patterns we radiate from our cellular makeup. If we do not clear the pattern by moving through the entire healing crisis, by getting to the suppressed pain, we continue to draw experience reflecting the pattern we are holding. Once we learn this process of unconditional self-love, we can live it moment-by-moment, thus integrating experience from a place of personal empowerment rather than continuing to building a psychic battery of suppressed trauma.

As stated, many people have been taught to suppress emotion or to project it outward (in blame) on others or on life's experience rather than to embrace it and own it as their own. Once the body learns the reverse process, the way to move through a healing crisis properly, it becomes a natural way of life. The healing crisis can occur rapidly or over a longer period depending on our personal cycles. Antiquated patterns overlaid upon patterns are emerging at an increasing rate during this phenomenal evolutionary transition. Learning to allow the movement of energy within self through the process of unconditional acceptance (Love) is the way to the place within the heart that most of us seek. To go to a place of Love is to choose Love. To choose Love is to tip the scales so our dreams become real.

E-motion (pain) is the resistance to the motion (the movement) of experience through our bodies. To become a light body is to release our resistance to the experience of life. When we have no more resistance, we super-conduct consciousness and illuminate. To illuminate is to embrace the totality that we already are.

Are You Addicted to Your Laptop? Beware…of EMF's… April 4, 2007

There is increasing concern being voiced from scientists around the world, that we are being flooded with Electromagnetic radiation caused by the recent advances in wireless communication technologies. According to some, there is no way of knowing what the impact will be and we will find out in 20-30 years! Some governments and world organisations that are supposedly there to provide safeguards, at this time are more clearly focused on economic considerations. There is a major issue with variations in standards between countries, in what is deemed to be a safe level of exposure for the general public. However, there have been thousands of studies and anecdotal evidence that suggested that there is a limit to how much we can tolerate of this electromagnetic smog and some portions of the populace are far more vulnerable. The following is a flavour of the concerns that are being voiced.

" The U.S. standards and those proposed by WHO are 100 times more lenient, depending on frequency range, than the Russian standards, which are based on the observed biological effects of chronic EM exposure. There are a lot of gaps in EM safety standards in other countries, too. It indicates that standards should be harmonized; people are equal in their wish to be in a healthy environment."

"Unfortunately, in many countries people are 100-fold exposed to electromagnetic fields in comparison to low-level standards, within the confines of the law and before the final scientific knowledge is obtained. "Harmonization implies common motion in a right direction. which one is right is a purely scientific question and should not be considered in connection with trade interests. The only right idea to rely on is human health." [1]

A secret British report has raised fresh fears of a link between power lines and cancer.

The confidential study urges government officials in Britain to consider banning the building of homes and schools close to overhead high-voltage power cables because of possible health risks.

It says a ban is the best way to reduce significantly exposure to electromagnetic fields from the electricity grid system.

The report was drawn up by scientists, electricity company bosses, the British National Grid, government officials and campaigners over two years after the Health Protection Agency accepted there was a weak statistical "association" between prolonged exposure to power fields and childhood leukemia.

But the 40 members of the panel have clashed over the final details and conclusions.

In the USA, there has been suggestions that such childhood illnesses as leukemia and brain cancer might be linked to power lines where communities with a higher than average rate of sickness were located near power lines and transformer stations. Also, amateur radio operators have known that they have an increased risk for leukemia, thought to be associated with exposure to electro-magnetic waves.

The British secret report stops short of specifically recommending a ban on new homes and schools within 60 metres of power lines, or vice versa, which could wipe a total of 4 billion dollars worth off property prices across Britain and limit land for housing developments.

But the report concludes that the British Government should consider such a move, stating: "We urge government to make a clear decision on whether to implement this option or not."

The report, to be signed off by panel members next week, has sparked conflict at a series of hearings, according to a Whitehall source.

Two members of the panel, regulator Ofgem and Scottish & Southern Energy, are understood to have quit.

Some members of the panel took the view - adopted by the Government's health advisers and the World Health Organisation (WHO) - that childhood leukemia is the only adverse health effect where evidence is strong enough for precautionary measures to be considered.

According to this view, if there is a link, the building ban would cut just one case of childhood leukemia every year or two and the costs would outweigh the benefits by a factor of at least 20.

The second group generally backed views highlighted by the California Department of Health Services which suggested electromagnetic fields are "possibly carcinogenic" in terms of childhood leukemia and placed four other health effects in this risk category. They were adult leukemia, adult brain tumours, miscarriages and a form of motor neurone disease, although some scientists believe there are links with more diseases.

"The advice to government from following this 'California' view would therefore be to tend to favour implementing the 'corridors for new build' option," (safe zones well away from power lines) SAGE added, stressing that in this scenario the costs and benefits would be at least comparable.

The panel is set to recommend that the Health Protection Agency should issue more information about how to reduce the impact of exposure to electromagnetic fields. It will also call for a change to the working of overhead lines to reduce the radius of intense electromagnetic fields.

This study and many more replicated in America could shed light on the cause of various cancer "clusters" in certain communities located near power lines and could prompt legislation in the future.

Mobile Phones & Vanishing Birds

Birds near mobile phone base stations do not breed well Dr. Mae-Wan Ho

Where did all the sparrows go?

The sparrows have disappeared completely from the cities at least four years ago in Britain, as mobile phones grew in popularity. Third generation (3G) mobile phones were introduced in 2003, and there were over 65 million users in the UK by the end of 2005, more phones than people [1]. Did mobile phone transmitters cause the sparrows to disappear [2]?

Scientists at the Research Institute for Nature and Forests in Brussels, Belgium, have produced the first evidence that mobile phone base stations are affecting the reproductive behaviour of wild sparrows [3]. This finding comes as mobile phones are held suspect in the massive collapse of bee colonies all over the United States and Europe [4] ( Mobile Phones and Vanishing Bees , SiS 34).

Joris Everaert and Dirk Bauwens wanted to know if the low intensity microwave radiation from mobile phone base stations has any effect on the number of house sparrows during the breeding season. They identified 150 locations distributed over six residential districts in Gent, Sint and Niklaas in the province of East Flanders, where they counted the number of male house sparrows and measured the strength of electromagnetic radiation from base stations.

The study areas were similar, with abundant hedges, bushes, and other vegetation between the houses, and one or more GSM (Global System for Mobile Communications) base stations nearby. All locations were along small roads within the residential areas and at variable distances from the nearest GSM (mean 352 m, range 91-903 m, about 90 percent at 100-600 m). On days when the weather was favourable, so male sparrows would be out singing, the researchers went to each location between 7 and 11 am, and using binoculars, counted the number of male sparrows within a radius of about 30 m for a period of five minutes.

Simultaneously, they measured the maximum value of the electric field strength (in V/m) from the GSM 900 MHz and GSM 1800 MHz base station antennas during 2 minutes for each frequency band, using a portable calibrated high-frequency spectrum analyser.

Everaert and Bauwens found that the number of house sparrow males varied between zero and four at the different locations. The measured electric field strengths were seldom higher than 1V/m, and most often well below that value. Nevertheless, the spatial variation in the number of house sparrow males was negatively and highly significantly correlated to the strength of electric fields from both the 900 and 1800 MHz frequency bands and from the sum of these bands. This negative correlation was very similar within each of the six districts, despite differences in both the number of birds and radiation levels.

Fewer house sparrow males were seen at locations within relatively high electric field strengths of GSM base stations. For example, the mean number of male sparrows varied from 1.9 at the combined field intensity of 0.13 V/m to 0.8 at a combined field intensity of 0.247 V/m.

The results, though preliminary, do support the hypothesis that long-term exposure to higher levels of radiation negatively affects the abundance or behaviour of house sparrows in the wild. Fewer males singing would mean less breeding success.

White storks breeding success plummets near mobile phone transmitters

Sparrows are not the only wild birds affected. Phone masts were found to actually reduce the breeding success of white storks in Spain.

Alfonso Balmori, a conservation biologist in Valladolid, Spain, reported a significantly lower number of white stork ( Ciconia ciconia ) fledglings in nests close to mobile phone transmitters compared to nests further away [5].

To monitor the breeding success of the white stork population, 60 nests were selected and visited from May to June of 2003. The selected nests had similar characteristics. They were located on the roof of churches and buildings inside urban centres in Valladolid. As the cell phone transmitters are everywhere, very few places had zero background intensity. So nests were chosen that were exposed at very high or very low levels of EMR, depending on the distance from the nests to the antennas.

Thirty nests were located within 200 m of one or several antennae (GSM-900 MHz and DCS-1800 MHz) placed on masts and on the roof of the buildings at a height of 15-30 m. Another 30 chosen were located further than 300 m from any transmitter. The nests were observed with telescopes and the number of young counted. The electric field intensity in V/m was measured.

The average number of fledgling produced per nest in nests located within 200 m of phone antennae was 0.86 + 0.16. For nests located further than 300 m, the number was 1.6 + 0.14. Twelve nests (40 percent) close to the antennae were without young, as opposed to one nest (3.3 percent) among those further than 300 m.

The mean electric field of nests within 200 m was 2.36 + 0.82V/m compared to 0.53 + 0.82V/m for nests further than 300 m.

Balmori also found difference in how the birds behaved close to the phone antennae. Young birds died from unknown causes, and bird couples frequently fought while constructing their nests. Sticks fell to the ground, and the couple failed to make any headway. Some nests were never completed and the storks remained passively in front of the antennae.

Laboratory studies show bird embryos die when exposed to microwaves

The observations in urban sparrows and the white stork population suggest that microwave radiation interferes with reproductive behaviour and breeding success, which would have decimated the wild populations. But that's not the whole story.

Several million birds of 230 species die each year from collisions with telecommunications masts in the United States during migration [6]. Accidents happen mainly in the night, in fog, or bad weather, when birds might be using the earth's magnetic field for navigation, and could be seriously disoriented by the microwave radiation from telecommunication masts.

In the UK, where the allowed radiation level is 20 times higher than in Spain, a decline of several species of urban birds has occurred [2], coinciding with the increasing installation of mobile phone masts.

Birds are good candidates as biological indicators for low-intensity electromagnetic radiation (EMR); they have thin skulls, their feathers can act as dielectric receptors of microwave radiation, many species use magnetic navigation, they are very mobile and possible psychosomatic effects are absent, as Everaert and Bauwens [3] point out.

Another important factor is that chicken embryos subjected to the radiation from a cell phone in the laboratory suffered much higher mortalities than non-exposed controls. Some years ago researchers in Russia showed that continuous exposure of the chick embryos during the 21 days of embryonic development resulted in 75 percent of the embryos dying, compared with 16 percent in the controls [7].

References

1. History of cellular mobile communications. Mobile Operators Association, http://www.mobilemastinfo.com/information/history.htm
2. Raven JU, Nobel DG and Baillie SR. The breeding bird survey 2002. BTO Research Report 334, British Trust for Ornithology, Thetford, 2003.
3. Everaert J and Bauwens D. A possible effect of electromagnetic radiation from mobile phone base stations on the number of breeding house sparrows ( Passer domesticus ). Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine 2007, 26, 63-72.
4. Ho MW. Mobile phones and vanishing bees. Science in Society 34 (in press).
5. Balmori A. Possible effects of electromagnetic fields from phone masts on a population of White Stork ( Ciconia ciconia ). Electromag. Biol. Med. 2005, 24:109–119.
6. Shire GG. Brown K, Winegrad G. Communication towers. A deadly hazard to birds. American Bird Conservancy, 2000.
7. Grigor'ev IuG. Biological effects of mobile phone electromagnetic field on chick embryo (risk assessment using the mortality rate. Radiat. Biol Radioecol. 2003, 43, 541-3. (in Russian).

Recommend this article...

However when asked about the Bio Pro chip, they responded in two words "Dead Technology". They seem to be neutral in some cases about its use of application on your laptops/refrigerators or phone….

Taking a beautiful crystal, cleared and harmonized to your consciousness and programmed for this EMF balancing purpose to be aligned with your personal energetic signature is something they prefer. Or using flower essences and the EMF calibration command in your own voice.

Join in HealthGroup @ http://ehealthedu.blogspot.com

Scientists have no idea what the impact is going to be to electronic and electromagnetic power grids. But even more, they don't know what it means to human immune systems. Alternative healing modalities have shown a connection between magnetics and the immune system, which also would imply that our immune systems could very well be keyed into the magnetic fields of the earth.