ESSENTIAL OILS ONLINE #041

This is a re-send. The first attempt did not transmit correctly.

The greatest single crisis facing mankind in the opening years
of the 21st Century is medical fraud. What will this Century
record at its end about this fraud and cover-up? Will it report
this fraud was exposed and replaced by tried and true medicine
that heals, or will this madness continue on?

Ultimately, all natural health publications (like EOO) must
address this issue. The public must know the truth behind
modern medicine, how it perpetuates itself, and what to do
to restore healing within this corrupted medical community.
Natural healing modalities like essential oils are nature's
marvel. But what good can they do when an unknowing
public continues to rely a medical system more interested
in disease management than healing.

In this issue of EOO, we bring you three articles exposing
the truth behind so-called medical research. As you read,
remember that healing is not a matter of chance, it is
everyone's birthright. But healing cannot be found in
medicine whose interest lies in disease management.
If we want healing, we must go where healing is honored
and practiced by those who know healing.

ееееееееееееееееееееееееееееееееееееееееееееееееееее
Essential Oils Online
Published by LynnGroup Int'l
E-mail: EOOhealth-owner@yahoogroups.com
********************************************
Number 041 February 2001
********************************************
IN THIS ISSUE:

1. Editorial:
- Using Humans as Guinea Pigs For Drug Studies

2. Book Review:
- The Controlled Clinical Trial: An Analysis

3. Feature Article:
- Cancer Research - A Super Fraud?

4. Special Offer:
- Tissue Mineral Analysis

********************************************
BACK ISSUE DIRECTORY

Our back issue directory will point you to every
article we've published, along with instructions
for getting a copy. Send requests to:

EOO@...

In the Subject line of the header write:

Send EOO Directory

********************************************
SUBSCRIBE EOO
EOOhealth-subscribe@yahoogroups.com

UNSUBSCRIBE EOO
EOOhealth-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

********************************************
THE PROVERBIAL DISCLAIMER:

Opinions expressed here are those of individual contributors,
and not necessarily those of authorized distributors of EOO.
This publication does not verify or endorse the claims of
contributing writers. EOO does not endorse any one company
or product, but we do endorse quality.

The information provided in EOO is for educational purposes
only and is not intended as diagnosis, treatment, or
prescription of any kind. The decision to use, or not to use,
any information is the sole responsibility of the reader.

THE ABOVE DISCLAIMER is made to protect the editor's
gluteus maximus from the wrath of pharmaceutical and
medical cartels protected by regulatory law. For what it's
worth, Essential Oil related therapy predates the American
Medical Association and Food and Drug Administration by at
least 6,000 years. You decide!

PHARMACEUTICAL dispensed drugs are toxic failures not fit
for human consumption. According to JAMA (Journal of the
American Medical Association), Prescribed drug-caused
deaths rank 4th on the mortality table list. 1994 statistics
show 106,000 people died from unintended drug side-effects.
This would be considered criminal by any other civilized
standard.

Dr. Julian Whitaker, M.D., Medical Editor for "Health and
Healing," estimates 18 million more people have survived toxic
side effects from these same drugs prescribed by their
doctors...Over 2 million of them were bad enough to be
hospitalized in 1994 alone. Chemical Drugs and the so-called
"health" system that promotes using them are part of the
problem, not the solution.

YOU ARE RESPONSIBLE for your own health, not the AMA,
FDA or your physician. If your physician prescribes a drug for
"treatment," ask him or her what known side-effects exist.
If he or she downplays any risk, ask yourself this question...
Is playing Russian roulette with drugs worth risking your life?
It can and does happen...106,000 deaths every year!!

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
1. Editorial:

Using Humans as Guinea Pigs For Drug Studies

The headline in my Sunday paper read: "Physicians debate
ethics of dangerous 'superaspirin' study." The problem arises
over the development of what is being called a super aspirin
created to ward off heart attacks, strokes and death.

The super aspirin drugs, technically known as IIb/IIIa antagonists,
have killed an estimated 150 to 200 people in controlled studies.
A growing number of doctors involved in the program want the
program stopped. However, drug companies, who are money
motivated and can only see a potential huge market, want to
continue the study.

What struck me as I read this article are the people who are
drawn into these potentially lethal schemes as human guinea
pigs. Tens of thousands of people end up going into these
new drug study programs. They literally are playing Russian
roulette with unknown drugs that can kill them. But that doesn't
stop the drug companies. Even with the known results to date,
new studies for this super aspirin are underway.

What are the test subjects being told about the potential hazards
of these drugs? What compels them to volunteer their very lives
for something so uncertain?

The greatest fraud in the medical industry being perpetrated
on the public is something secular modern medicine calls
"acceptable risk." That is, the known number of people who
have subscribed to any particular drug treatment is weighed
against the number of people who have suffered adverse reactions
from the same drug. The ratio between the two numbers establishes
the level of acceptable risk or percentage for people considering
to take the drug/s. I find it interesting there is no ratio
established for the number of people healed from taking these
drugs.

You know, I grew up thinking that modern medicine was about
healing, not taking risks with potentially lethal drugs. But
modern medicine today is all about risks, and nothing about healing.
If taking a pill could heal, wonderful. The sad truth is, there is
not one patented, chemical pharmaceutical drug the drug companies
can claim heals anything. Most drugs are inhibitors. That is to say,
they cover-up or mask body functions in such a way that the person
ends up feeling better, or gets relief. The initial problem remains.

So why would anyone be willing to be injected with or to ingest
one of these drugs to begin with? They are not being told the
truth and are acting out of desperation.

Drug companies could care less about the death rate caused by
their drugs, so long as they can get them approved. They most
assuredly, do not care about the "human guinea pigs" they
muster into their trials.

Honest medicine is about healing, not about taking acceptable
risks or masking symptoms. In real medicine, there is no such
thing as "acceptable risks," only healing.

But modern medicine in the U.S. has long ago lost sight of
doing no harm to its patients. Today the goal is pain management
and controlling the symptoms caused by chronic illness.
Healing is rarely seen. And in most cases, what healing
occurs is more the result of the body healing itself rather
than from any medical intervention.

Do you suffer from chronic illness? If so, would you prefer
to be healed, or are you satisfied in taking treatments the rest
of your life to control the illness?

Healing is not a matter of chance, it is everyone's birthright.
But healing cannot be found in substances that kill. If we want
healing, we must go where healing is honored and practiced
by those who know healing.

Meanwhile, the super aspirin study continues to search for
new guinea pigs. They do not have to look far.
Jim Lynn - Editor, Essential Oils Online

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
2. Book Review:

The Controlled Clinical Trial: An Analysis
by Harris L. Coulter, Ph.D.

In THE CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL: AN ANALYSIS, Harris
Coulter, author of DIVIDED LEGACY: A HISTORY OF THE
SCHISM IN MEDICAL THOUGHT and DPT: A SHOT IN THE
DARK, critically examines the usefulness of randomized clinical
trials. His thorough research, based almost exclusively on medical
literature, reveals why the "controlled clinical trial" (CCT)
cannot guarantee drug safety and efficacy.

Coulter argues that while allopaths talk pompously about this so-
called "gold standard" of medicine, no controlled clinical trial
matching the textbook definition has ever been performed.
"Because the theoretical requirements are unrealistic and
unscientific. How can you test a drug on 12 or 100 or 1,000
identical or 'homogenous' people all with the same thing wrong with
them? Allopaths can't even find five homogenous patients. You'll
always find things that are different between people, because we
are all chemically, physically, structurally, and emotionally
unique. The CCT can never tell a doctor how a given patient will
react to a given drug at any given time. The findings from the so-
called controlled clinical trial are useless in one-on-one doctor
patient interactions."

THE CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL not only investigates the
science behind the CCT, but also delves into its history and
politics. According to Coulter, the CCT has become popular
primarily for political reasons. "It's used as a stick to beat
alternative medicine with for failing to perform these trials.
Since these trials are very expensive it costs about $200 million
today to get a new drug on the market the controlled clinical trial
is really an instrument for limiting competition in medicine,
and for raising the costs of medicines to the public."

He asserts that monopolistic objectives are not the only built-in
fraud feature of the CCT. Fraud in safety testing of drugs is a
strong likelihood. The clinical investigator is paid enormous
sums of money by the very manufacturer of the drug, and financial
temptation to perform dishonest trials is strong. It's a very
lucrative business - many of them receive more than $1 million
annually from their testing programs. Coulter dedicates a chapter
of the book to demonstrate the extent of fraudulent drug
testing. "Frightful examples of dishonesty, fraud, negligence,
and other kinds of wrongdoing in clinical trials have been staple
fare for readers of the [US] daily press since the 1970s, when
Congressional committees and subcommittees renewed their interest
in the topic." One typical example cited is that in the United
States in 1976 the General Accounting Office found that trials of
a drug designed to prevent rejection of kidney transplants had led
to 85 deaths in the 650 patients participating, and not one of
these deaths was reported to the Food and Drug Administration.

Senator Edward Kennedy, conducting a Hearing of the Senate
Health Subcommittee, noted that if only 10% of the data from
ongoing clinical trials is defective, the problem is enormous.
"When you consider the potential cumulative effect of faulty
animal data coupled with faulty human data, you have the elements
of a regulatory nightmare."

While Coulter doesn't dismiss the CCT outright - saying that if it's
properly conducted it may have some role - he offers an alternative
that helps overcome the problem of biological and physiological
differences among patients.

Where to order The Controlled Clinical Trial: An Analysis.
American Media - P.O. Box 4646, Westlake Village,
California 91359, United States. Phone (800) 282-2873.
Email: griffin@...

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
3. Feature Article:

Cancer Research - A Super Fraud?
by Robert Ryan, B.Sc.

"Everyone should know that most cancer research is largely
a fraud and that the major cancer research organizations are
derelict in their duties to the people who support them."
- Linus Pauling PhD (Two-time Nobel Prize winner)

Have you ever wondered why, despite the billions of dollars spent
on cancer research over many decades, and the constant promise
of a cure which is forever "just around the corner", cancer
continues to increase?

Cancer Is Increasing:
Once quite rare, cancer is now the second major cause of death in
Western countries such as Australia, the U.S.A. and the United
Kingdom. In the early 1940s cancer accounted for 12% of
Australian deaths. (1) By 1992 this figure had climbed to 25.9% of
Australian deaths. (2) The increasing trend of cancer deaths and
incidence is typical of most Western nations. It has been said that
this increase in cancer is just due to the fact that people now live
longer than their ancestors did, and that therefore the increase of
cancer is merely due to the fact that more people are living to be
older and thereby have a greater chance of contracting cancer.
However, this argument is disproved by the fact that cancer is also
increasing in younger age groups, as well as by the findings of
numerous population studies which have linked various life-style
factors of particular cultures to the particular forms of cancer
that are predominant there.

The Orthodox "War on Cancer" Has Failed:
"My overall assessment is that the national cancer program must
be judged a qualified failure" Dr. John Bailer, who spent 20 years
on the staff of the U.S. National Cancer Institute and was editor
of its journal. (3) Dr. Bailer also says: "The five year survival
statistics of the American Cancer Society are very misleading.
They now count things that are not cancer, and, because we are
able to diagnose at an earlier stage of the disease, patients
falsely appear to live longer. Our whole cancer research in the
past 20 years has been a total failure. More people over 30 are
dying from cancer than ever before . . . More women with mild or
benign diseases are being included in statistics and reported as
being 'cured'. When government officials point to survival figures
and say they are winning the war against cancer they are using
those survival rates improperly."

A 1986 report in the New England Journal of Medicine assessed
progress against cancer in the United States during the years
1950 to 1982. Despite progress against some rare forms of cancer,
which account for 1 to 2 per cent of total deaths caused by the
disease, the report found that the overall death rate had increased
substantially since 1950: "The main conclusion we draw is that
some 35 years of intense effort focussed largely on improving
treatment must be judged a qualified failure." The report further
concluded that ". . . we are losing the war against cancer" and
argued for a shift in emphasis towards prevention if there is to
be substantial progress. (4)

Most Cancer IS Preventable:
According to the International Agency for Research in Cancer "...80-
90 per cent of human cancer is determined environmentally and
thus theoretically avoidable." (5) Environmental causes of cancer
include lifestyle factors such as smoking, a diet high in animal
products and low in fresh fruit & vegetables, excessive exposure to
sunlight, food additives, alcohol, workplace hazards, pollution,
electromagnetic radiation, and even certain pharmaceutical drugs
and medical procedures. But unfortunately, as expressed by
medical historian Hans Ruesch, "Despite the general recognition
that 85 per cent of all cancers is caused by environmental
influences, less than 10 per cent of the (U.S.) National Cancer
Institute budget is given to environmental causes. And despite the
recognition that the majority of environmental causes are linked to
nutrition, less than 1 per cent of the National Cancer Institute
budget is devoted to nutrition studies. And even that small amount
had to be forced on the Institute by a special amendment of the
National Cancer Act in 1974." (6)

Prevention - Not Profitable to Industry:
According to Dr. Robert Sharpe, " . . . in our culture treating
disease is enormously profitable, preventing it is not. In 1985 the
U.S., Western Europe and Japanese market in cancer therapies
was estimated at over 3.2 billion pounds with the 'market' showing
a steady annual rise of 10 per cent over the past five years.
Preventing the disease benefits no one except the patient. Just as
the drug industry thrives on the 'pill for every ill' mentality, so
many of the leading medical charities are financially sustained by
the dream of a miracle cure, just around the corner." (7)

Desired: A State of No Cure:
In fact, some analysts consider that the cancer industry is
sustained by a policy of deliberately facing in the wrong direction.
For instance, in the late 1970s, after studying the policies,
activities, and assets of the major U.S. cancer institutions, the
investigative reporters Robert Houston and Gary Null concluded
that these institutions had become self-perpetuating organizations
whose survival depended on the state of no cure. They wrote, "a
solution to cancer would mean the termination of research
programs, the obsolescence of skills, the end of dreams of
personal glory, triumph over cancer would dry up contributions to
self-perpetuating charities and cut off funding from Congress, it
would mortally threaten the present clinical establishments by
rendering obsolete the expensive surgical, radiological and
chemotherapeutic treatments in which so much money, training
and equipment is invested. Such fear, however unconscious, may
result in resistance and hostility to alternative approaches in
proportion as they are therapeutically promising. The new therapy
must be disbelieved, denied, discouraged and disallowed at all
costs, regardless of actual testing results, and preferably without
any testing at all. As we shall see, this pattern has in actuality
occurred repeatedly, and almost consistently." (8) Indeed, many
people around the world consider that they have been cured by
therapies which were 'blacklisted' by the major cancer
organizations.

Does this mean that ALL of the people who work in the cancer
research industry are consciously part of a conspiracy to hold back
a cure for cancer? Author G.Edward Griffin explains ". . . let's face
it, these people die from cancer like everybody else. . . [I]t's
obvious that these people are not consciously holding back a
control for cancer. It does mean, however, that the [pharmaceutical-
chemical] cartel's medical monopoly has created a climate of bias
in our educational system, in which scientific truth often is
sacrificed to vested interests . . . [I]f the money is coming from
drug companies, or indirectly from drug companies, the impetus is
in the direction of drug research. That doesn't mean somebody
blew the whistle and said "hey, don't research nutrition!" It just
means that nobody is financing nutrition research. So it is a bias
where scientific truth often is obscured by vested interest." (9)
This point is similarly expressed by Dr. Sydney Singer: "Researchers
are like prostitutes. They work for grant money. If there is no
money for the projects they are personally interested in, they go
where there is money. Their incomes come directly from their
grants, not from the universities. And they want to please the
granting source to get more grants in the future. Their careers
depend on it." (10)

Money Spent on Fraudulent Research:
A large portion of money donated to cancer research by the public
is spent on animal research which has, since its inception, been
widely condemned as a waste of time and resources. For instance,
consider the 1981 Congressional Testimony by Dr. Irwin Bross,
former director of the Sloan-Kettering, the largest cancer research
institute in the world, and then Director of Biostatistics at Roswell
Park Memorial Institute for Cancer Research, Buffalo, NY: "The
uselessness of most of the animal model studies is less well
known. For example, the discovery of chemotherapeutic agents for
the treatment of human cancer is widely-heralded as a triumph due
to use of animal model systems. However, here again, these
exaggerated claims are coming from or are endorsed by the same
people who get the federal dollars for animal research. There is
little, if any, factual evidence that would support these claims.
Indeed, while conflicting animal results have often delayed and
hampered advances in the war on cancer, they have never
produced a single substantial advance either in the prevention or
treatment of human cancer. For instance, practically all of the
chemotherapeutic agents which are of value in the treatment of
human cancer were found in a clinical context rather than in animal
studies." (11)

In fact, many substances which cause cancer in humans are
marketed as "safe" on the basis of animal tests. As expressed by
Dr. Werner Hartinger of Germany, in regard to cancer-causing
products of the pharmaceutical-petrochemical industry, "Their
constant consumption is legalized on the basis of misleading
animal experiments . . . which seduce the consumer into a false
sense of security." (12)

Imagine What Could Be Achieved:
The next time you are asked to donate to a cancer organization,
bear in mind that your money will be used to sustain an industry
which has been deemed by many eminent scientists as a qualified
failure and by others, as a complete fraud. If you would like to
make a difference, inform these organizations that you won't
donate to them until they change their approach to one which is
focussed on prevention and study of the human condition. We have
the power to change things by making their present approach
unprofitable. It is only through our charitable donations and taxes
that these institutions survive on their present unproductive path.

References:
1. d'Espaignet, E.T. et al., Trends in Australian Mortality 192
-1988, Australian Government Publishing Service (AGPS),
Canberra, 1991, p. 33

2. Australian Bureau of Statistics, Causes of Death,
Australia 1992, ABS, Canberra, 1993, p.1

3. Dr. Bailer, speaking at the Annual Meeting of the American
Association for the Advancement of Science in May 1985,
as quoted in Bette Overall, Animal Research Takes Lives -
Humans and Animals BOTH Suffer, NZAVS, 1993, p.132

4. Robert Sharpe, The Cruel Deception, Thorsons Publishing
Group, Wellingborough, U.K. 1988, p.47

5. Robert Sharpe, op. cit. 1988, p.47

6. Hans Ruesch, Naked Empress - the Great Medical Fraud,
CIVIS, Massagno/Lugano, Switzerland, 1992, p.77

7. Robert Sharpe, op. cit. 1988, p.65

8. as quoted in Hans Ruesch, op.cit. 1992, p.65-66

9. Edward Griffin, The Politics of Cancer, (audio cassette)
American Media, 1975 available from CAFMR $14.

10. Sydney Singer, Medical Demystification (M.D.) Report, Vol.1
No.1 p.5., Medical Demystification Crusade, 1992, CA, U.S.A.

11. Irwin Bross, as quoted in Robert Sharpe, op.cit., 1988 p.179

12. Dr. Werner Hartinger, in a speech given at the 2nd International
Scientific Congress of the Doctors in Britain Against Animal
Experiments (D.B.A.E.), London, 24 Sept. 1992.

Copyright 1997 by the Campaign Against Fraudulent Medical
Research, P.O. Box 234, Lawson NSW 2783, Australia. Phone
+61 (0)2-4758-6822. www.pnc.com.au/~cafmr

The above article may be downloaded, copied, printed or otherwise
distributed without seeking permission from CAFMR. However,
printed acknowledgment is required when this is done.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * *
4. Special Offer:

Mineral Tissue Analysis

EOO is pleased to offer mineral tissue testing at greatly
reduced prices. You'll be amazed at the indepth analysis.
Your Report will contain a four page personalized letter, plus
a 24 page personalized report detailing nutrient mineral ratios,
nutrient mineral levels, what toxic metals are present and ratios,
information on how to read your chart, along with information
about lifestyles, eating habits and more.

Tissue mineral analysis is a screening test, which measures the
mineral content of your hair. Mineral content of the hair reflects
the mineral content of the body's tissues. If a mineral deficiency
or excess exists in the hair, it usually indicates a mineral
deficiency or excess within the body as well. Minerals function
as essential components for enzyme systems which regulate virtually
every body function.

Nutritional metabolism takes place at the cellular level, not within
the blood or any other location. What you eat is not as important
as what is reaching your body cells. Tissue mineral analysis is
unique in that it inexpensively provides information directly about
cellular activity, which is the main site of nutritional metabolism.

Since the structure of hair remains unchanged, the minerals are
fixed in the hair. The levels in hair are not subject to change once
that portion of hair has grown, so the analysis accurately provides
concentrations of minerals that have accumulated in the hair tissue
over the hair growth period, approximately the last three months.

Minerals:
Tissue mineral analysis is especially accurate in identifying
mineral imbalance and deficiency which may lead to blood sugar
imbalance, glandular imbalance, stress imbalance and
abnormalities in biochemical energy production.

All essential minerals must be supplied either in our food or from
supplements. The analysis of minerals in the blood is both difficult
and costly. A urine sample tells us what the body is eliminating,
not what is stored. The concentration of minerals in the hair is ten
to fifteen times that of the blood. It gives an accurate picture of
the mineral status over a period of approximately three months.

Toxic Metals:
Tissue mineral testing is considered by the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) as an excellent method for detecting
toxic metals, because these metals are stored and concentrated in
body tissues such as hair. Removal of these metals through a
properly designed nutrition program often brings about an
improvement in one's health. For various reasons, mainly an
adrenal insufficiency, toxic metals may not be revealed until the
second or third test, when they begin to be eliminated through the
hair.

Time factor:
Balancing an imbalanced body chemistry requires time. In many
cases, normal, everyday minerals have been replaced in the body
tissues with toxic metals, i.e. lead, cadmium, mercury, etc. These
toxic metals are often so tightly bound in the tissues that they may
not show up on a trace mineral analysis until the third or fourth re-
test. The process of undoing and rebuilding may require six months
to even years depending on your condition at the beginning of
cleansing. Also diet, lifestyle, stress, medications, etc, can all
alter mineral levels and affect the rate of improvement.

Hair analysis clearly shows individual deficiencies or excesses as
well as the presence of toxic metals. There is a biological
opposition that exists between certain nutrients. "Nutrient Ratios"
highlight the interrelationships of the various nutrients. This is
why ratios are important and are reported in a good analysis profile.
It is important for these ratios to be in the expected ranges so that
one mineral excess or deficiency does not affect the metabolism of
another.

Vitamins:
As important as vitamins are they can do nothing for the body
without proper mineral intake. Vitamins cannot function and are
unable to be assimilated without the aid of minerals. Though the
body can synthesize some vitamins, it cannot manufacture a
single mineral.

Testing Frequency:
After your first test and once you change your diet to balance your
mineral profile, it is recommended that a follow-up hair analysis be
completed after a three month period. This will tell you if the
changes made have affected any deficiencies or excess. By
completing two or three tests a year, you will have a tailor made
dietary maintenance program that fits your lifestyle and nutritional
requirements.

Tissue Analysis Profile Cost:
LynnGroup Int'l has made arrangements with a non-profit entity
to offer Tissue Mineral Analysis for a donation of $49.99. Most
medical clinic labs charge $120 for this same service, so you
are encouraged to take advantage of this very generous offer.
Due to professional courtesy, we are not able to mention the
source that will conduct the analysis. However, the work is done
by a reputable laboratory, long known for their work in this area.

What the Tissue Mineral Analysis Contains:
Your Report will contain a four page personalized letter, plus a 24
page personalized report detailing nutrient mineral ratios, nutrient
mineral levels, what toxic metals are present and ratios, inform-
ation on how to read your chart, along with information about
lifestyles, eating habits and more.

How to Proceed:
If interested in an analysis, first contact me (see below) by email,
telephone or snail-mail providing your full name and postal address
requesting a self explanatory kit. I will mail you the following:

- Order Form
- Questionnaire related to your health and life-style
- Cardboard balance, and directions for getting approximately
two tablespoons, or one gram of hair.

Once you have received the kit, fill out the order form, check off any
statements that relate to your health and lifestyle, and hair sample
following instructions provided. When you have completed the
above, enclose the hair sample, order form and payment in the
envelope provided and mail. It's very simple, and you will obtain
valuable information that can change your life. Test results will be
mailed directly from the lab back to you.

Donation Payment Methods: $69.00
By check made payable to: Logos Center
By PayPal: http://www.x.com
PayPal Account name: email@...

LynnGroup's role is to provide you with the testing kit.
Do not send LynnGroup any money.

To obtain the Tissue Mineral test Kit, contact:

LynnGroup Int'l
2395 New Milford School Rd.
Rockford, IL 61109

Phone: 815-874-3358
Email: Jim@...

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Read The Christian Healer

The Christian Healer is a free, monthly Ezine devoted
to healing from the Christian Perspective. Find the one
true source of all healing. Subscribe address:
TheChristianHealer-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
This ends Essential Oils Online for February, 2001

Jim
LynnGroup Int'l
Publisher EOO
Email: Jim@...