Thanks to Dear Isabelle for raising this real life issue in our RECs and I want
to add: as REC ,

- Do you agree that having the ENREC as a forum , platform for such discussion
between these RECs involved in this project is a true beneficial idea and

- May be also submitting to one of these RECs (member of ENREC) will be enough
and not to submit to all RECs collaborating in the project?

- Also Standardization of the application package between these RECs will
effectively facilitate their work as well as the load faced by the investigators
teams in these different sites.

Let us think in the issue globally and try to find a solution to help
investigators and RECs to enhace and not hinder research,

Best and waiting for your valuable helpful replies,suggestions as we are facing
this issue right now :),

again thanks to Isabelle

Azza



--- In EGYPTIAN_RECS@yahoogroups.com, "inakhla1" <inakhla@...> wrote:
>
> Dear members of the group
> Welcome back after the mid-year holiday! Hope you all enjoyed it and had time
to relax and be with your families.
>
> This week's question is arising from real life situation that some RECs are
confronted with. Below is the situation, and for the coming weeks there will be
one question to discuss about different points within this scenario!
> "A foreign-national investigator writes an entire protocol and will sponsor
it. He approaches an Egyptian investigator for collaboration, where the Egyptian
collaborator's institute will be the site for participants' enrollment. The
study includes several sites and blood samples collected for the study will be
analyzed in one central laboratory."
> Question 1: You as REC, what documnets would you like the application package
presented to you from your Egyptian investigator to include?
>
> Thank you and looking forward to hear from you,
>
> Isabelle
>
>
> P.S. As an act of kindness to all the members please keep the use of this
group and its discussions to topics related Reseach Ethics and RE committees.
Chain emails should not be circulated here. We appreciate your help in this.
>