Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
DocsFighting4HealthCareReform
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Real people. Real stories. See how Yahoo! Groups impacts members worldwide.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
No 'Constitutional Right' to Health Care   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #173 of 221 |
"No 'Constitutional Right' to Health Care"

To the Editor of the Philadelphia Inquirer:

"Rep. John Conyers is right. There's no more reason to link health insurance to
employment than there would be to link car or home-owner's insurance, and the
consequences are only bad. ( "At Jefferson, Conyers backs Obama health stand")

http://tinyurl.com/d4ktoo

The individual's choice of insurance plans is thus limited to those few options
offered by his employer, and he is frequently forced to stay at a job for fear
of losing his insurance.

Far better would be to revise the tax code to give the employee and the
self-employed the same tax break his or her employer currently enjoys, and thus,
more options to purchase, and out right own, his or her own plan- divorced from
a particular job.

However, Rep.Conyers is wrong when he says that an individual has a
constitutional or moral "right" to health care services.

A "right" refers to an individual's freedom of action – to produce or trade for
the needs, wants and values his or her life requires.

It is not an automatic entitlement to a good or service produced by other
people, whether it is a luxury item like a yacht, or a basic need like food or
shelter.

An individual has the "right" to work to earn his or her food and shelter- not
to take his neighbor's dinner or home without his permission. Doing so only
violates his neighbor's right to his own life and property.

Likewise, an individual has a "right" to medical services that he or she
purchases, is given voluntarily, or that others have entered into a legal
contract to provide or buy for him.

There is no "right", however, to force one's neighbor to pay for one's
appendectomy or tummy tuck. Nor do individuals have a "right" to force their
doctor – either with a gun, or through the power of government- to give such
services to them for free, bargain basement cost, or on any terms that are not
mutually and voluntarily agreed upon.

You can "do it" - but not without violating the rights of doctors."

Pennsylvania Supporter of Freedom and Individual Rights in Medicine (FIRM)

http://www.WeStandFirm.org

On Facebook:

http://tinyurl.com/c479fj




Tue Mar 10, 2009 2:09 am

emadianos
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #173 of 221 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

"No 'Constitutional Right' to Health Care" To the Editor of the Philadelphia Inquirer: "Rep. John Conyers is right. There's no more reason to link health...
emadianos
Offline Send Email
Mar 10, 2009
2:11 am
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help