Have a nice day Sir.

BYE!! If you are ever willing to have an open mind and discussion on our board please let me know.

Namaste!

 
--- Brother Shane <truebeliever_777@...> wrote:
 
From: Brother Shane <truebeliever_777@...>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 12:34:56 -0800 (PST)
To: RotiMan <majsingh@...>
Subject: Re: Message not approved: [persecuted_church_of_india] Historiam hits out at 'Hinduism Myth'

   Let me set you straught on some things now Sir.

 

First of all, Noah is in the history of just about every culture on Earth. He is not a "Bible based" character.

 

Also, before the Great Flood, there was no written Bible. There was only oral traditions and histories, and the stars and the Great Pyramid.

 

 By the way, Jesus is God. How can anyone teach God?

 

 Furthermore, all of what you said is mere speculation and opinion. There is no verifiable documentation to validate them. But there is plenty to invalidate them.

 

 Now take your carnal mis-interpretations, and go preach somewhere else.

RotiMan <majsingh@...> wrote:

Get your facts straight! Hinduism (and the Vedas) existed LONG
before Noah. The Vedas is the basis of Hinduism. The Vedas is the
oldest book known to mankind. There is no way Noah or anypart of
any other Bible-based religion could possibly effect the teachings
of Hinduism since it came before Noah's time.


Is it possible that Bible versus came from Hinduism??? Did you know
Jesus took time in India to learn under a HINDU guru?? Please get
your facts straight sir.


> Hinduism is nothing more than an intellectual (and perverted)
perception of the original true vedas...the Laws of Manu.
>
> The Laws of Manu
> http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/india/manu-full.html (try
comparing them to the Bible!)
>
> Which were obviously truths of God that were passed down from
Noah's descendants.
>
>
> "And it was up in the mountains where this great event taken
place, and they had a great temple up there in the mountains in
India. And they, each night, they would have their ceremonies and
their feasts, while they slept through the daytime. And in the late
evenings they would go out to the--on the plaza, and from there
climb up the steps of an observatory, and get way up in the watch
tower, and sit all night watching those bodies. And until it was
real dark, when the twilights of evening was still falling, they've
had a way of getting themself into the spirit of their astrology, or
astronomy, or astrology, I think was the right word. And as they
looked, they would read the old manuscripts of--and discuss things,
of the failures of their fathers, and the failures of the things.
And doing so, then they would worship one true God. They were not
idol worshippers. They believed in one true God."
> -William M. Branham His Wonders To Perform (click to read &
listen)
> 12th January 1958
>
> To find out more go here...
>
> Bible Truths For Believers
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bibletruths_forbelievers/
>
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bibletruths_forbelievers/message/3927
>
>
> grimgargantua wrote:
>
> Historian hits out at 'Hinduism myth'
>
>
> By Jhimli Mukherjee Pandey/TNN
>
>
>
> Santiniketan: Historian D N Jha, delivering his presidential
address
> at the 66th session of the Indian History Congress here on
Saturday,
> sought to provide a radically different definition of Hinduism and
> highlighted inherent contradictions in the Vedas.
>
> Flaying many accepted notions of Hinduism, he brought to the
fore
> the battle between Leftists and saffron historians. The Leftists
are
> dominating the Congress this time and Hindutva historians hardly
have
> a presence.
>
> Hindus, Jha said, weren't original inhabitants of this
> country. 'It's only a claim Hindutva votaries, such as the VHP,
make.
> Hinduism, as the concept we know today, emerged much later and was
> primarily the result of Christianity's encounters with the
prevalent
> religion here' Pre-colonial Sanskrit texts hardly mention the word
Hindu. Such terms didn't have a currency in Bhakti literature,
either. This indicates Indians didn't create a Hindu religious
identity for themselves' Jha argued.
>
> The British used this term for administrative gains and hence,
it
> was a creation of the colonial period. It is an irony that this
> timeless religion sanatanadharma had to wait for its first
> codification by a European Annie Besant.
>
> 'There is no reason to deify the Vedas either'Jha said, as
there
> are inherent contradictions in them and other Hindu
scriptures .He
> cited examples from the Mundaka Upanishads, which regard the Vedas
> as lower knowledge.In the Bhagvad Gita, Krishna tells Arjuna that
> those who believe in the Vedas are full of worldly desires. Modern-
> day preachers such as Ramakrishna also rejected the efficacy of
the
> Vedas'Jha pointed out.
>
> On the belief that Hinduism is a tolerant religion, he said: 'A
> religion that practices the caste system and untouchability is
> incapable of tolerance. History is replete with examples of
> Brahminical hostility towards the Jains and Buddhists. Kautilya in
> his Arthashashtra describes non-Hindus as pashandas.
>
> There is no reason to think the Brahmanas were untrained in
> martial arts, he argued, because there were hundreds of salais and
> ghatikas where they were given military training and this they
used
> systematically to rout people of other faiths wherever necessary.
>
> Also, Hinduism has been converting people of other faiths. The
> concept of diksha is etymologically linked to conversion. Jha gave
> examples of mass conversions from Jainsim to Hinduism.
>
> http://epaperdaily.timesofindia.com
>
>

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com