Very useful, they collect and can supply packaging as well
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Parcel2Go.com<j.holmes-brown@...>
Date: 2008/10/1 Subject: Royal Mail Postal Strike - 12 Months On..... To: macpic91@...
Dear Ian
It was October last year when industrial action broke out at the Royal Mail, causing chaos for British business. Since the postal strikes 12 moths ago, we've seen huge numbers of customers move to Parcel2Go.com and away from using Post Office counters.
We saw a doubling in the volume of packages we were handling literally overnight during the postal strike. We have maintained that business partially because of Royal Mail price rises but also because people have realised that they can get better value and have parcels - big and small - collected from their door instead of having to take it to a post office themselves.
Parcel2Go.com handled 21,000 orders in September last year but that figure has shot up to more than 55,000 in September 2008. The strikes created dramatic overnight growth for the Parcel2Go service as it forced businesses and private individuals to reconsider how they send parcels.
Kind regards,
Steven Kramer
Sales Director Parcel2Go.com
Hi all recently Christian and I did an article for the November issue of Prima Magazine [out now] it contains photo's too some of you might want to take a look lol G
--- On Tue, 30/9/08, Pamela Pinder <pamshouse@...> wrote:
From: Pamela Pinder <pamshouse@...> Subject: [Carersforumuk] Psychiatric patients at risk of vitamin D deficiency To: Carersforumuk@yahoogroups.com Date: Tuesday, 30 September, 2008, 7:15 PM
Psychiatric patients at risk of vitamin D deficiency
A study has warned that psychiatric patients are vulnerable to vitamin D deficiency.
This could in turn put them at risk of serious health problems, including osteoporosis, muscle pain, or weakness.
Researchers are calling for all psychiatric inpatients to be routinely screened for vitamin D deficiency.
The small-scale study involved 17 male patients in a low security psychiatric service and was carried out by researchers from St Bernard's Hospital in Middlesex.
Blood tests revealed that none of the patients had enough vitamin D. Two had a borderline deficiency and the other 15 deficiency.
Seven of the patients had such low vitamin D levels that tests were unable to produce an accurate reading.
Of the 17 inpatients, 10 were African or African-Caribbean, two were of mixed ethnicity, one was Vietnamese.
Researchers said that psychiatric inpatients may be vulnerable to vitamin D deficiency because of a lack of exposure to sunlight, poor diet and physical health, the use of certain drugs and an over-representation of ethnic groups know to be at greater risk.
They recommend that mental health inpatients receive their recommended daily allowance of vitamins and minerals and adequate exposure to sunlight.
I agree with you in this, Pam. I didn't know the going rate for foster parents; thanks for that, it's a good starting point in arguing our case. One thing I'd alter is not to seem to argue that foster parents are overpaid (though I suspect it's a career choice for some), but that carers are underpaid. That's a tactic I used to deploy as a union rep; not to say that Team A were overpaid relative to Team B because that gave management a lever. Their simple answer was, OK, we'll drop team A's pay down to Team B's.' My opener was that Team B were underpaid as shown by Team A's pay. I threatened one team that I'd never represent them again if they used the 'They get more than us', argument. I think I threatened to thump them individually as well. Knowing my temper at the time, it's possible I threatened them en masse.
What we have to do is find local examples
of payment for 'caring' work in various sectors. It's all very well quoting the imaginary figures that such as CarersUK quote as the different pay rates for the job skills needed when caring, but these aren't taken seriously by service providers. You know the breakdown of how much a wife and mother is worth by reference to market pay rates. OK, it looks very smart but no one has ever had a rise on foot of that, have they?
I sent for an application form from one local company that advertised for 'carers'. I couldn't believe what they were offering, it was so good. Can't remember the details now but they were paying over £100 for an overnight duty form 8pm till 8am. Such as Christmas was £240 for overnight. The point is that if the agency were paying that much, they must have been paid a damn sight more by social services. If we do our own 'market research' in this sector, and back it up with documentary evidence, it means we have real
ammunition in our argument.
Something else that's never been stressed enough is that caring doesn't stop at pension age but Carer's Allowance does. The Benefits Agency wouldn't be drawn on this when I queried it. 'It's Government policy', was the (right) answer. It's no good blaming them as so many do; it's not their doing, and most of their staff are warm, understanding people hamstrung by not being allowed to volunteer information. If you know the right questions to ask, you will get the answers; if you don't, then you're left in ignorance. I've never had it because I'd tipped over the big 6 - 5 when Finbar came back here, I think. I know several women of pension age who are still running themselves into the ground looking after their charges. How the government can effectively say, 'Right, spend your pension on him,' enrages me.
I think I'm getting ready for telling Finbar's CPN that I'll not be capable of looking after him if he has
another breakdown. I doubt it'll start anything; it'll probably need a flat refusal from me before they pay attention.
I'm getting worked up now; I'd better say goodnight before I trip out on overload.
Mick

Of course you are right Mick, for most it goes without question that you would care for a family member. Can even make family members feel guilty for asking for financial help to do this, or should I say to enable them to do this. After all it's your own flesh and blood!
But what gets to me is, if a stranger took on this caring role they get paid more in a day than a family member receives in a week. Many family members loosing their homes and jobs. Just take for example foster carers taking more than one child in, many with mh difficulties. This warrants a sum of £180 - £200 per child per week! How come it warrants this much money when many families as a whole have to survive on what a foster carer gets for one child, they have to feed a family on?
These foster carers are sent on course upon course to help them in their caring role, there is someone there for them to consult with if they experience any difficulties, yet family members do this without any training or support. The paid carers are onto a good money spinner, I know someone who is a foster carer, caring for up to 4 teenagers at a time, the financial reimbursement is enough to buy 2 villas in Spain, one of which was built from scratch.
Some families have more than one person with a mental illness to care for and even if you do care for more than one person and claim c/a they only receive one lot of c/a and none that I know have a couple of villa up their sleeve!
I seem to remember that the first time 'carer' became part of the language was when people were being discharged from long-stay psych units and moving into their own (often poor standard) accomodation. People with other disabilities were 'cared for' under the same scheme. Various people who volunteered to 'look after' them, either by taking them into their own homes or visiting on a regular basis, suddenly became known as 'carers'. These 'volunteers' were paid an allowance (Carer's Allowance?) by the government; I'm not sure if that was national or local. The standard of care was often questionable to say the least; there were allegations of some of these 'carers' exploiting people.
My son had been ill and back living with me for a while when a friend said one night, 'I guess that makes you a carer then.' I was gobstruck; I'd never thought of it like that. He'd come back to live with me because he needed help, that's all. I suspect that's how it is for most of us, no matter what the disability. The most common description of what we do is, 'looking after my ...' Has anybody ever thought of themselves as a potential carer before they had to do it? There's nothing new or particularly moral about what we're doing, is there? It's a simple human reaction to our own family members, friends or neighbours. There's a point for discussion: if it takes a village to rear a child, what does it take to care for someone in trouble?
Earlier this year GP did a full blood count for my son after I made a noise about his practice's Severe Mental Illness Register not being in existence!
Son's Vit D. was at 25, being midway between 12.5 and 50 that is considered insufficient, when supplementation should be considered. (Son now takes a supplement.)
50 to 140 is considered adequate
Less that 12.5 is considered deficient.
I am still, 5 months later, in correspondence with GP and psychiatrist asking them to sort out where responsibility lies for monitoring and acting on abnormal results. Yes, there were other results that were worrying...Liver, urea, parathyroid and LOW cholesterol....then of course there's the high BMI ....
Ann.
On Sep 30 2008, Pamela Pinder wrote:
Psychiatric patients at risk of vitamin D deficiency
http://www.nursingtimes.net/clinicalnews/2008/09/psychiatric_patients_at_risk_of_vitamin_d_deficiency.html;jsessionid=4DC6DF3198A1F4959927183EF0E342B3?tmcsTrackingInfo=$pW1YE-AYMGKhn3yv_8ziowrS6lLhodTLusZSGP1L8KB4V25KjdCeWNsoTbaUGEri6szDQs6LBaT$
a.. Published: 30 September 2008 15:17
b.. Author: Richard Staines
c.. More by this Author
d.. Last Updated: 30 September 2008 16:26
e.. Reader Responses
a.. Increase image
b.. View all images
A study has warned that psychiatric patients are vulnerable to vitamin D deficiency.
This could in turn put them at risk of serious health problems, including osteoporosis, muscle pain, or weakness.
Researchers are calling for all psychiatric inpatients to be routinely screened for vitamin D deficiency.
The small-scale study involved 17 male patients in a low security psychiatric service and was carried out by researchers from St Bernard's Hospital in Middlesex.
Blood tests revealed that none of the patients had enough vitamin D. Two had a borderline deficiency and the other 15 deficiency.
Seven of the patients had such low vitamin D levels that tests were unable to produce an accurate reading.
Of the 17 inpatients, 10 were African or African-Caribbean, two were of mixed ethnicity, one was Vietnamese.
Researchers said that psychiatric inpatients may be vulnerable to vitamin D deficiency because of a lack of exposure to sunlight, poor diet and physical health, the use of certain drugs and an over-representation of ethnic groups know to be at greater risk.
They recommend that mental health inpatients receive their recommended daily allowance of vitamins and minerals and adequate exposure to sunlight.
Psychiatric Bulletin (2008) 32:390-393
a.. Author: Richard Staines. Deputy news editor
b.. Nursing Times
c..
Website: www.pamshouse.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk
Message board: http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/Carersforumuk/
There are four kinds of people in this world... past carers - carers - future carers ....and those who will need to be cared for
A study has warned that psychiatric patients are vulnerable to vitamin D deficiency.
This could in turn put them at risk of serious health problems, including osteoporosis, muscle pain, or weakness.
Researchers are calling for all psychiatric inpatients to be routinely screened for vitamin D deficiency.
The small-scale study involved 17 male patients in a low security psychiatric service and was carried out by researchers from St Bernard's Hospital in Middlesex.
Blood tests revealed that none of the patients had enough vitamin D. Two had a borderline deficiency and the other 15 deficiency.
Seven of the patients had such low vitamin D levels that tests were unable to produce an accurate reading.
Of the 17 inpatients, 10 were African or African-Caribbean, two were of mixed ethnicity, one was Vietnamese.
Researchers said that psychiatric inpatients may be vulnerable to vitamin D deficiency because of a lack of exposure to sunlight, poor diet and physical health, the use of certain drugs and an over-representation of ethnic groups know to be at greater risk.
They recommend that mental health inpatients receive their recommended daily allowance of vitamins and minerals and adequate exposure to sunlight.
The closest to me is 40 miles away, but at least now these events are coming closer to the west country than they used to! I have moaned to csip and others enough about this in the past.
From: anoncarer <Ian.Griggs.1@googlemail.com> Subject: [Carersforumuk] Mental Health act Training To: Carersforumuk@yahoogroups.com Date: Tuesday, September 30, 2008, 8:04 AM
Hi All, Below is information on nationally available training for users and carers on Mental Health Act amendments coming in to force this year.
Regards Ian
FREE Training Workshop for Voluntary Groups The Mental Health Act is Changing! Are You Ready?
NIMHE is running a series of one day training workshops focussing on the changes introduced by the Mental Health Act 2007. These events are specifically aimed at voluntary sector staff, service users and carers - to provide them with knowledge and information about the changes to the Mental Health Act.
Objectives:
To provide a basic understanding of the main changes to the Act, including: • The five Guiding Principles • Appropriate treatment provision • Supervised Community Treatment • The Nearest Relative • Independent Mental Health Advocacy
Date options:
• London 11th November 2008 • Cambridge 18th November 2008 • Exeter 20th November 2008 • Stoke-on-Trent 25th November 2008 • Leeds 27th November 2008
All run 9.30am – 3.30pm (lunch provided)
Attendees should have a basic awareness of the 1983 Act. Service users and carers are directly involved in the planning and running of these events.
Please return the booking form below to marketa.mimonova@ ldc.org.uk. Places are limited. Preference will be given to voluntary sector staff, service users and carers who have roles sharing mental health information with others, and who want to share information with other members of their group. Places can only be requested using the booking form. You will receive confirmation by email, so please ensure that we have your correct email address.
If you would like to attend one of these training days, please complete and return the form using the contact details below. You will receive communication from us by email, so please ensure that we enter your correct email address.
First choice location
Second choice location (if any)
Name
Job title (if applicable)
Organisation (if applicable)
Address
Post code
Phone number Mobile number Email address
Please specify any access requirements or other needs below
Dietary requirements
Important! Places are strictly limited (45 per location). To help us maximise the reach of the training, preference will be given to those voluntary sector staff and service users/ carers who have roles sharing mental health information, and who want to share information with others. Please use the space below to tell us a little about how you would use the training to help empower service users and/or carers:
In 2007, the Aiming High for Disabled Children strategy was launched by the government to help improve outcomes for children with severe and complex needs. Since the beginning of 2008, new measures have been introduced by the government to support the strategy and help organisations develop their services over the next three years. £370m has been invested in short break development work across 21 pathfinder organisations and £35m of funding has been allocated to a pilot project exploring how to improve access to child care. Disabled children are now firmly on the social care agenda. Make sure you’re prepared to assist your organisation with the transformation of services for disabled children.
Benefits of attending: Be informed on how you can meet the requirements of Aiming High for Disabled Children Be prepared for transforming the lives of disabled children Hear directly from short break pathfinder organisations Receive practical advice from the pilots for increasing access to disabled children Establish how you can work with families to shape services
This message is intended only for the use of the person(s) ("Intended Recipient") to whom it is addressed. It may contain information, which is privileged and confidential. Accordingly any dissemination, distribution, copying or other use of this message or any of its content by any person other than the Intended Recipient may constitute a breach of civil or criminal law and is strictly prohibited. If you are not the Intended Recipient, please contact the sender as soon as possible.
Reed Business Information Limited. Registered Office: Quadrant House, The Quadrant, Sutton, Surrey, SM2 5AS. Registered in England under Company No. 0151537
The European Anti-Poverty Network: Fighting for a Social Europe Free of Poverty! EAPN FLASH
EU 2010 Year against poverty and social exclusion: EAPN puts forward concrete proposals in order to ensure a lasting legacy capable of delivering a decent life for all
The EU 2010 Year for combating poverty and social exclusion must be a catalyst to step up a gear in the fight against poverty and to ensure a decent life for all. This is the main message that came out of the EAPN's General Assembly (25-27 September, Bulgaria), where more than 200 Social NGOs representatives from all over Europe agreed on a set of concrete actions at EU level which should support this message.
“78 million people live in poverty in the EU, amongst whom 19 million are in employment. Despite these shameful figures and in the light of the current financial crisis, not enough is being done”, declared Ludo Horemans, the President of EAPN. “On the contrary, despite political declarations in many Member States and at EU level, the reality is that it has been more and more difficult to get serious political commitment and attention to the fight against poverty and social exclusion”.
In this context, EAPN puts it straight: the upcoming EU 2010 Year for combating poverty and social exclusion must not be another shiny event but ensure a lasting legacy capable of delivering a decent life for all.
“In order to do so, concrete actions are needed at EU level. These include the establishment of a Social Progress Pact to direct political attention to the need to put social cohesion and the fight against poverty at the top of the EU agenda and at the centre of the post Lisbon strategy”, said Fintan Farrell, the EAPN Director. “The EU must also ensure that all Member States make progress so that their Minimum income schemes are adequate for a dignified life”.
For EAPN, the implementation and enhancement of existing EU anti discrimination legislation as well as the establishment of ambitious targets at EU and Member State levels to eradicate poverty in the EU by 2020 are also key.
These ambitious measures should go along with the developing of a new EU Community Poverty and Social Inclusion programme capable of supporting the EU Inclusion Strategy, while at the same time ensuring that EU Structural Funds deliver on poverty and social inclusion objectives.
The EAPN members are already working in solidarity with other actors, to identify what could be the legacy from the 2010 year at local, regional, national and EU level. EAPN will be vigilant to make sure that the EU 2010 Year doesn’t resume to nice empty words but does make a difference for the millions of Europeans living in poverty.
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Campaign for Freedom of Information<admin@...>
Date: 2008/9/30 Subject: 1,000 FOI Stories from 2006 and 2007 To: Katherine Gundersen <katherine@...>
Dear Friend,
A new report by the Campaign for Freedom of Information summarises more than 1,000 press stories based on disclosures under the UK and Scottish FOI acts in 2006 and 2007. The stories demonstrate the enormous range of information being released under FOI and reveal the substantial contribution to accountability made by the acts.
In 2006, the government proposed to restrict the UK FOI Act, partly because of what it said was excessive use of the Act being made by journalists. The report shows how valuable the press's use of FOI has been. The proposals were dropped by Gordon Brown after he became prime minister in 2007.
If you no longer wish to receive news about additions to the Campaign for Freedom of Information's website please email the Campaign (admin@...) with the word 'Remove' in the subject.
OK, I applied and will be interested to see what the response time is via e-mail as CSIP (NIMHE) are not generally quick off the mark in communication - in my experience.
--- On Tue, 9/30/08, anoncarer <Ian.Griggs.1@...> wrote:
From: anoncarer <Ian.Griggs.1@...> Subject: [Carersforumuk] Mental Health act Training To: Carersforumuk@yahoogroups.com Date: Tuesday, September 30, 2008, 8:04 AM
Hi All, Below is information on nationally available training for users and carers on Mental Health Act amendments coming in to force this year.
Regards Ian
FREE Training Workshop for Voluntary Groups The Mental Health Act is Changing! Are You Ready?
NIMHE is running a series of one day training workshops focussing on the changes introduced by the Mental Health Act 2007. These events are specifically aimed at voluntary sector staff, service users and carers - to provide them with knowledge and information about the changes to the Mental Health Act.
Objectives:
To provide a basic understanding of the main changes to the Act, including: • The five Guiding Principles • Appropriate treatment provision • Supervised Community Treatment • The Nearest Relative • Independent Mental Health Advocacy
Date options:
• London 11th November 2008 • Cambridge
18th November 2008 • Exeter 20th November 2008 • Stoke-on-Trent 25th November 2008 • Leeds 27th November 2008
All run 9.30am – 3.30pm (lunch provided)
Attendees should have a basic awareness of the 1983 Act. Service users and carers are directly involved in the planning and running of these events.
Please return the booking form below to marketa.mimonova@ ldc.org.uk. Places are limited. Preference will be given to voluntary sector staff, service users and carers who have roles sharing mental health information with others, and who want to share information with other members of their group. Places can only be requested using the booking form. You will receive confirmation by email, so please ensure that we have your correct email address.
If you would like to attend one of these training days, please complete and return the form using the contact details below. You will receive communication from us by email, so please ensure that we enter your correct email address.
First choice location
Second choice location (if any)
Name
Job title (if applicable)
Organisation (if applicable)
Address
Post code
Phone number Mobile number Email address
Please specify any access requirements or other needs below
Dietary requirements
Important! Places are strictly limited (45 per location). To help us maximise the reach of the training, preference will be given to those voluntary sector staff and service users/ carers who have roles sharing mental health information, and who want to share
information with others. Please use the space below to tell us a little about how you would use the training to help empower service users and/or carers:
--- On Tue, 9/30/08, anoncarer <Ian.Griggs.1@...> wrote:
From: anoncarer <Ian.Griggs.1@...> Subject: [Carersforumuk] Mental Health act Training To: Carersforumuk@yahoogroups.com Date: Tuesday, September 30, 2008, 8:04 AM
Hi All, Below is information on nationally available training for users and carers on Mental Health Act amendments coming in to force this year.
Regards Ian
FREE Training Workshop for Voluntary Groups The Mental Health Act is Changing! Are You Ready?
NIMHE is running a series of one day training workshops focussing on the changes introduced by the Mental Health Act 2007. These events are specifically aimed at voluntary sector staff, service users and carers - to provide them with knowledge and information about the changes to the Mental Health Act.
Objectives:
To provide a basic understanding of the main changes to the Act, including: • The five Guiding Principles • Appropriate treatment provision • Supervised Community Treatment • The Nearest Relative • Independent Mental Health Advocacy
Date options:
• London 11th November 2008 • Cambridge
18th November 2008 • Exeter 20th November 2008 • Stoke-on-Trent 25th November 2008 • Leeds 27th November 2008
All run 9.30am – 3.30pm (lunch provided)
Attendees should have a basic awareness of the 1983 Act. Service users and carers are directly involved in the planning and running of these events.
Please return the booking form below to marketa.mimonova@ ldc.org.uk. Places are limited. Preference will be given to voluntary sector staff, service users and carers who have roles sharing mental health information with others, and who want to share information with other members of their group. Places can only be requested using the booking form. You will receive confirmation by email, so please ensure that we have your correct email address.
If you would like to attend one of these training days, please complete and return the form using the contact details below. You will receive communication from us by email, so please ensure that we enter your correct email address.
First choice location
Second choice location (if any)
Name
Job title (if applicable)
Organisation (if applicable)
Address
Post code
Phone number Mobile number Email address
Please specify any access requirements or other needs below
Dietary requirements
Important! Places are strictly limited (45 per location). To help us maximise the reach of the training, preference will be given to those voluntary sector staff and service users/ carers who have roles sharing mental health information, and who want to share
information with others. Please use the space below to tell us a little about how you would use the training to help empower service users and/or carers:
Hi All,
Below is information on nationally available training for users and
carers on Mental Health Act amendments coming in to force this year.
Regards Ian
FREE Training Workshop for Voluntary Groups
The Mental Health Act is Changing!
Are You Ready?
NIMHE is running a series of one day training workshops focussing on
the changes introduced by the Mental Health Act 2007. These events are
specifically aimed at voluntary sector staff, service users and carers
- to provide them with knowledge and information about the changes to
the Mental Health Act.
Objectives:
To provide a basic understanding of the main changes to the Act,
including:
• The five Guiding Principles
• Appropriate treatment provision
• Supervised Community Treatment
• The Nearest Relative
• Independent Mental Health Advocacy
Date options:
• London 11th November 2008
• Cambridge 18th November 2008
• Exeter 20th November 2008
• Stoke-on-Trent 25th November 2008
• Leeds 27th November 2008
All run 9.30am – 3.30pm (lunch provided)
Attendees should have a basic awareness of the 1983 Act. Service users
and carers are directly involved in the planning and running of these
events.
Please return the booking form below to marketa.mimonova@....
Places are limited. Preference will be given to voluntary sector
staff, service users and carers who have roles sharing mental health
information with others, and who want to share information with other
members of their group.
Places can only be requested using the booking form. You will receive
confirmation
by email, so please ensure that we have your correct email address.
http://mhact.csip.org.uk Tel 020 7307 2431 Fax 020 7307 2432
If you would like to attend one of these training days, please
complete and return the form using the contact details below. You
will receive communication from us by email, so please ensure that we
enter your correct email address.
First choice location
Second choice location (if any)
Name
Job title (if applicable)
Organisation (if applicable)
Address
Post code
Phone number
Mobile number
Email address
Please specify any access requirements or other needs below
Dietary requirements
Important! Places are strictly limited (45 per location). To help us
maximise the reach of the training, preference will be given to those
voluntary sector staff and service users/ carers who have roles
sharing mental health information, and who want to share information
with others. Please use the space below to tell us a little about how
you would use the training to help empower service users and/or carers:
High Peak now has its own dedicated handy van service making it safer for older and vulnerable people to live in their own homes. This service offers householders fire risk assessments, security checks, energy efficiency advice and practical household tasks.
All handy van staff will be checked by the Criminal Records Bureau and the scheme has funding initially for two years. It will be free to people aged over 60 and those who have been referred because they are vulnerable or at risk. To ensure as many people as possible have a chance to use the handy van services, households will be restricted to two visits per year.
Whilst the County Council will oversee the Handy Van’s operation, agencies in each area in partnership with the district and borough councils, will run them on a day to day basis.
If you need the Handy Van services contact the Buxton Volunteer Centre on 01298 23970 or drop into the centre on the Market place, next door to Sainsburys.
Launch of LEADER Funding will Help Develop Rural Economy
£1.9m funding provided by the European Union and Defra is now available until 2013 to help develop the Rural Economy. Micro-enterprises and land based businesses within the Peak District Rural Action Zone (RAZ), covering large parts of Derbyshire Dales, Staffordshire Moorlands and High Peak, will be able to apply for funding to help them diversify their interests and become more sustainable thanks to the launch of Derby and Derbyshire Economic Partnership’s (DDEP) new LEADER funding.
LEADER will be co-ordinated by the Local Action Group (LAG), which comprises 15 public, private and voluntary sector representatives, all with local knowledge and expertise.
Over the next few months, the focus will be on helping the land-based sector to diversify into non-agricultural activities, particularly within the food and drink, creative industry and environmental sectors. Eligible projects will have a value of at least £7,000 and could include applications for funding towards the cost of feasibility studies, market research, start-up capital and revenue costs, product development and refurbishment projects.
Alongside this, LEADER funding will support the creation and development of micro-enterprises and social enterprises.
For further information about the LEADER project and grant eligibility, visit www.DDEP.co.uk. Alternatively e-mail Amanda.Brown@....
DDEP Grants
DDEP currently has Invitations to Apply for Grant Funding for both revenue and capital projects. These cover both DDEP’s main programme and the remaining allocation available to the Peak District Rural Action Zone (RAZ) up to March 2011. Whilst the priorities identified are relevant to the RAZ, projects will be prioritised which demonstrate clear fit with the specific actions in the RAZ Action Plan 2008-11 ( available on the website) and address gaps in current provision. Emphasis will be placed on developing rural-market town linkages and activity in Market Towns.
Woodland and Hedge Laying Course
Time is running out to apply for a place on a College of the Peak’s new Woodland Management course – and its autumn hedge laying courses.
The Woodland Management course runs from Friday 10 October to Sunday 12 October and costs just £165 for three days. The course will show you how to coppice, make charcoal, turn wood on a pole lathe and make willow hurdles.
There’s a choice of two hedge laying courses – a two day taster course for just £110, on Saturday 18 and Sunday 19 October or a five day accredited course from October 27 to 31, costing £250. The qualification will allow you to go out and work as a qualified hedge layer.
For further information and an application form contact: Vanessa Swetman, College of the Peak, Manor Barn, Over Haddon, Bakewell, Derbyshire DE45 1JE, or telephone 01629 815749 or visit the website at: www.collegeofthepeak.org.uk.
DCC Training for Youth Groups
DCC provides FREE training for groups/organisations that are working with or supporting children and young people.
Writing a Tender for Children & Young Adult Services
4 Nov 2008 - 10am-1pm at Bakewell Agricultural Centre
Tips on putting together a tender
Heard from a successful tenderer
Contact details of where to go for help
Speakers: Naomi Compton – Head of Service, Partnership & Commissioning Sandra Pink – Derbyshire CAN Sue Howard – Manager, Volunteer Centre Buxton
This new website aims to help you to: know where you are going and how well you are doing; grow by achieving even more for your users or cause; show your successes and communicate your plans.
Fairly basic but some useful stuff tucked away (although one or two missing links and it's slightly messy when browsing using our standard font size).
Social Enterprise Development Worker Vacancy at Age Concern
37 hours pw £28,000 pa (two year project) based in Heanor
To lead the development of a strategic partnership between Derbyshire County Council and Age Concern Derby and Derbyshire to support the creation of a thriving social enterprise sector delivering practical independent living services to vulnerable adults. This exciting work will involve strategic development, innovative work with existing and emerging social enterprises and ultimately to improve the quality of life for vulnerable adults.
For a job application pack please contact: Age Concern Derby and Derbyshire, 29A Market Place, Heanor, Derbyshire DE 75 7EG Tel: 01773 768240 Email: administration@...
Closing date 20th October
Vacancy: Director of Funding & Community Engagement
'Mediation: An Employer's Guide' is a new publication from the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development and Acas which champions mediation as an effective way of organisations avoiding ending up at employment tribunals. It draws on a comprehensive survey of CIPD members and case studies (which included Salisbury Cathedral as a small/medium-sized charity).
From Sandy Adirondack's Legal update: Under provisions of the Companies Act 2006 coming into effect on 1st October, there are statutory duties to avoid conflict of interest, not accept benefits from third parties and declare an interest in transactions with the company. Certain potential conflicts of interest would need to be approved by company members or the board of directors, which could include for instance a local authority councillor on the board of a local organisation. For companies in particular also subject to charity law, the implications are still a little unclear, but for preliminary information see www.sandy-a.co.uk/managing.htm#codir-conflict
NCVO Job Shop
www.ncvo-jobshop.org.uk is the first point of call for anyone looking for a job in the voluntary or social enterprise sectors. It provides a cost-effective recruitment solution for voluntary organisations, and NCVO members save 10% on advertising rates. To find out more visit www.ncvo-vol.org.uk/recruitment
Framing the Compact Debate
Compact Voice, the body charged with representing the voluntary and community sector in England on the agreement with government, has produced a pack to support participation in the debate on the Compact.
The Commission for the Compact's discussion document (pdf, 47kb) is at www.thecompact.org.uk/shared_asp_files/GFSR.asp?NodeID=101783 It has also just published research findings, 'The State of Independence: A research study into independence and the Compact'. This finds that while The Compact has created an environment which encourages and supports central government departments to respect the independence of the third sector, there are still challenges ahead. News item.
Changes in Online Information on Charities
With the threshold for submitting annual accounts to the Charity Commission changing shortly to £25,000, the online database GuideStar UK has announced that it will continue to capture and display information from all Trustee Annual Reports and Financial Statements it receives, regardless of size. A simple method will be provided to voluntarily submit accounts electronically. Plaza Publishing news alert item www.charityfinance.co.uk/home/content.php?id=2221
Plaza Publishing also reports that the new format official online register of charities expected this autumn will have colour-coded highlighting of charities that file their accounts late. www.charityfinance.co.uk/home/content.php?id=2220
Social Enterprise Seen as Worthy but Inefficient
Research into current levels of understanding and awareness of social enterprise, carried out for the Office of the Third Sector, has revealed a high level of confusion. In those surveyed, when asked to pick out social businesses from a list of candidates the largest number chose Comic Relief or Childline, rather than the likes of Eden Project or Big Issue. And the sector is seen as vague, woolly, worthy, small and inefficient.
A publication for Co-operatives UK written by consultant Jim Brown 'Community Investment – using Industrial and Provident Society legislation' gives an overview and practical guide for activists, advisors and professionals on the use of community share issues. As the first paragraph says, communities investing capital in business ventures serving a social or community purpose is not a new phenomenon, but the Fairtrade movement saw the start of the modern use of IPS legislation.
A new booklet provides a snapshot of the PR and lobbying industry in the UK, documenting the tactics used by leading firms on such issues as nuclear power, science, food and local government. A section looks at the dangers of companies trying to co-opt voluntary groups – see Third Sector news item at www.thirdsector.co.uk/Article/846348/ (registration required). Published by Spinwatch, which monitors such activity, more information at www.spinwatch.org or download 'Spinning the Wheel' (pdf, 470KB) from www.spinwatch.org/images/spinning%20the%20wheels.pdf
Cracking the Sector Code
Voluntary Arts Network has a new Briefings sheet on 'Voluntary and community sector jargon', explaining some of the most common terms and acronyms used. Pdf, 171KB, www.voluntaryarts.org/uploaded/map7823.pdf
Charity Awards
Social Change Awards from Directory of Social Change. Individuals and organisations other than charities can also enter – Everyday Impact Award, the Influencer Award, Investing in Social Change Award and the Public Body Award. Nominations by 17th October, www.socialchangeawards.org.uk
Magazines
NCVO's bi-monthly members magazine VS is now Engage, with more pages and related web content. www.beengaged.org
Design and Print
Russell Press, started by the Bertrand Russell Peace Foundation in the 1960s, specialises in printing services for the not-for-profit sector. www.russellpress.com
Successful Fundraising - 8th October, NCVO, London
In these uncertain economic times, this one day conference will provide you with practical advice to help maximise your organisation's fundraising potential.
Subject: [Carersforumuk] Fwd: Fw: Important benefit changes. Benefit Bulletin by Newcastle Welfare Rights Service
FYI
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: DLA Help Group<dlahelpgroup@...>
Date: 2008/9/29 Subject: Fw: Important benefit changes. Benefit Bulletin by Newcastle Welfare Rights Service To: macpic91@...
Lone parents to come off Income Support earlier Employment and Support Allowance Winter fuel payment increases Cut to backdating Out of hours service cut More welfare to work measures A big change in 2009
Clive Davis Welfare Rights Officer Newcastle Welfare Rights Service Adult Services Directorate, Brian Roycroft Centre Newbiggin Hall, Newcastle, NE5 4BR
**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. All incoming and outgoing e-mails are monitored for the presence of profanity and racist remarks, pornographic, sexually explicit or obscene material, and unsolicited content or spam. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. www.mimesweeper.com City of Newcastle website:- http://www.newcastle.gov.uk
Newcastle Schools website:- http://www.newcastle-schools.org.uk Visit NewcastleGateshead:- http://www.newcastlegateshead.com Directgov:- http://www.directgov.gov.uk
The first issue of our new, quarterly newsletter will be on its way to you in the next couple of weeks, but for now we would like to update you about some exciting events that are coming up for Time to Change (formerly called Moving People).
Our campaign is piloting in Cambridge from this Wednesday, and will be running in the city for the whole of October in partnership with Cambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust. It's not launching nationally until January, but we thought you'd like to see a sneak preview of the campaign and hear about what's going on in Cambridge, so please have a look at the attached document to find out more.
There will be a launch of the Cambridge pilot on Wednesday 1st October at 11am on Parker's Piece, so if you live in or near Cambridge, we'd love to see you there!
Get Moving Week kicks off on Saturday 4th October with a bulb-planting event at the Eden project, and there are events all over the country all week, culminating in a mass walk in London's Battersea Park on World Mental Health Day, Friday 10 October at 10.30am. Go to www.getmovingweek.org.uk to find an event near you and to find out more about joining the London walk.
Finally, our new website will soon be up and running to coincide with the beginning of Get Moving Week, at www.time-to-change.org.uk.
We hope you're able to take part in one of our events. And remember to look out for our newsletter, coming soon!
Many thanks for your support,
The Time to Change team <<Cambridge campaign update.pdf>>
Venetia Boon Moving People - Portfolio Administrator Time to Change (Formerly Moving People)
Moving People has changed its name to Time to Change. Our new website will be launching in October. * Please note that my email address has changed to v.boon@...
Walk a mile for mental health! Get involved in Get Moving week from 4 to 12 October 2008; celebrating the benefits of physical activity to mental wellbeing. For more information see www.getmovingweek.org.uk
Of course you are right Mick, for most it goes without question that you would care for a family member. Can even make family members feel guilty for asking for financial help to do this, or should I say to enable them to do this. After all it's your own flesh and blood!
But what gets to me is, if a stranger took on this caring role they get paid more in a day than a family member receives in a week. Many family members loosing their homes and jobs. Just take for example foster carers taking more than one child in, many with mh difficulties. This warrants a sum of £180 - £200 per child per week! How come it warrants this much money when many families as a whole have to survive on what a foster carer gets for one child, they have to feed a family on?
These foster carers are sent on course upon course to help them in their caring role, there is someone there for them to consult with if they experience any difficulties, yet family members do this without any training or support. The paid carers are onto a good money spinner, I know someone who is a foster carer, caring for up to 4 teenagers at a time, the financial reimbursement is enough to buy 2 villas in Spain, one of which was built from scratch.
Some families have more than one person with a mental illness to care for and even if you do care for more than one person and claim c/a they only receive one lot of c/a and none that I know have a couple of villa up their sleeve!
I seem to remember that the first time 'carer' became part of the language was when people were being discharged from long-stay psych units and moving into their own (often poor standard) accomodation. People with other disabilities were 'cared for' under the same scheme. Various people who volunteered to 'look after' them, either by taking them into their own homes or visiting on a regular basis, suddenly became known as 'carers'. These 'volunteers' were paid an allowance (Carer's Allowance?) by the government; I'm not sure if that was national or local. The standard of care was often questionable to say the least; there were allegations of some of these 'carers' exploiting people.
My son had been ill and back living with me for a while when a friend said one night, 'I guess that makes you a carer then.' I was gobstruck; I'd never thought of it like that. He'd come back to live with me because he needed help, that's all. I suspect that's how it is for most of us, no matter what the disability. The most common description of what we do is, 'looking after my ...' Has anybody ever thought of themselves as a potential carer before they had to do it? There's nothing new or particularly moral about what we're doing, is there? It's a simple human reaction to our own family members, friends or neighbours. There's a point for discussion: if it takes a village to rear a child, what does it take to care for someone in trouble?
They all start with one signature, Rob. John Hancock earned fame in the US because he was the first to sign the Declaration of Independence when the others hesitated. Don't give up because you're in a minority.
I guess not either, and perhaps won't be on this E-Petition as only 85 names are on it (as I type) and it expires (Deadline to sign by) on 14th November 2008.
> > > > > > > The following is an email sent to you by an administrator of "National > > Carers Forum - Campaigning for Carers Rights". If this message is spam, > > contains abusive or other comments you find offensive please contact the > > webmaster of the board at the following address: > >
> > admin@...
> > > > Include this full email (particularly the headers). > > > > Message sent to you follows: > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ > > > > Petition created by one of our CarerWatch colleagues, please sign and > > spread the word. > > > > Paula xx > > > > > > > > http://petitions. pm.gov.uk/ caringiswork/ > > > > We the undersigned petition the Prime Minister to withdraw the > > proposal to transfer carers on carers allowance and income > > support to job seekers allowance and to recognise carers' > > valuable social input by keeping carer benefits separate from > > the rest of the benefit system. > > > > In the Welfare Green Paper No One Written Off:
Reforming > > Welfare to Reward Responsibility the Government proposes to > > transfer working age carers on Carers Allowance and Income > > Support to Job seekers Allowance. Carers are amongst the most > > responsible members of society. Without their contribution our > > NHS and social care systems would collapse. Transferring carers > > to job seekers allowance , a benefit that suggests carers are > > not working, are not contributing to society and are available > > for work is an insult and a contradiction of the government's > > claim to 'recognise' carers' 'immense contribution' to society > > (estimated to be worth £87 billion a year). Carers' valuable > > social input should be recognised by keeping carer benefits > > separate from the rest of the benefit system. > > >
Subject: [Carersforumuk] Fwd: Fw: Important benefit changes. Benefit Bulletin by Newcastle Welfare Rights Service
FYI
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: DLA Help Group<dlahelpgroup@aol.com> Date: 2008/9/29 Subject: Fw: Important benefit changes. Benefit Bulletin by Newcastle Welfare Rights Service To: macpic91@gmail.com
Lone parents to come off Income Support earlier Employment and Support Allowance Winter fuel payment increases Cut to backdating Out of hours service cut More welfare to work measures A big change in 2009
Clive Davis Welfare Rights Officer Newcastle Welfare Rights Service Adult Services Directorate, Brian Roycroft Centre Newbiggin Hall, Newcastle, NE5 4BR
********************************************************************** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. All incoming and outgoing e-mails are monitored for the presence of profanity and racist remarks, pornographic, sexually explicit or obscene material, and unsolicited content or spam. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. www.mimesweeper.com City of Newcastle website:- http://www.newcastle.gov.uk Newcastle Schools website:- http://www.newcastle-schools.org.uk Visit NewcastleGateshead:- http://www.newcastlegateshead.com Directgov:- http://www.directgov.gov.uk
I guess not either, and perhaps won't be on this E-Petition as only 85 names are on it (as I type) and it expires (Deadline to sign by) on 14th November 2008.
> > > > > > > The following is an email sent to you by an administrator of "National > > Carers Forum - Campaigning for Carers Rights". If this message is spam, > > contains abusive or other comments you find offensive please contact the > > webmaster of the board at the following address: > >
> > admin@...
> > > > Include this full email (particularly the headers). > > > > Message sent to you follows: > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ > > > > Petition created by one of our CarerWatch colleagues, please sign and > > spread the word. > > > > Paula xx > > > > > > > > http://petitions. pm.gov.uk/ caringiswork/ > > > > We the undersigned petition the Prime Minister to withdraw the > > proposal to transfer carers on carers allowance and income > > support to job seekers allowance and to recognise carers' > > valuable social input by keeping carer benefits separate from > > the rest of the benefit system. > > > > In the Welfare Green Paper No One Written Off: Reforming > > Welfare to Reward Responsibility the Government proposes to > > transfer working age carers on Carers Allowance and Income > > Support to Job seekers Allowance. Carers are amongst the most > > responsible members of society. Without their contribution our > > NHS and social care systems would collapse. Transferring carers > > to job seekers allowance , a benefit that suggests carers are > > not working, are not contributing to society and are available > > for work is an insult and a contradiction of the government's > > claim to 'recognise' carers' 'immense contribution' to society > > (estimated to be worth £87 billion a year). Carers' valuable > > social input should be recognised by keeping carer benefits > > separate from the rest of the benefit system. > > >
I'm not sure that society actively condones wilful neglect of carers. The majority of people don't know about it because they're not informed. None of the political parties have ever included carers' rights in their manifestos in any meaningful way.
And those well-off investors didn't put their money in unwise investments; they put it where it would gain them the most, regardless of ethics (let alone morality). I've not checked the price of BAE shares lately; I bet they've not dropped since they got the Get Out of Jail Free Card from HM Government. It's the less well-off investor I feel sorry for, myself excepted. Those who bought their shares in the rash of new banks have taken a hiding. I have too but, since I got the shares for doing no more than owing the Halifax money, I'm not complaining. I talked about cashing them in earlier this year but decided to hang on till they reached £10 again. More fool me...
--- On Mon, 29/9/08, mac pic <macpic91@...> wrote:
From: mac pic <macpic91@...> Subject: Re: [Carersforumuk] Carers Allowance To: Carersforumuk@yahoogroups.com Date: Monday, 29 September, 2008, 12:19 AM
Quite right Mick, there is very little recognition of what Carers do on a regular basis for long hours and with no pay in many instances.
I think that the government cynically take advantage of this because they know that people will always look after their loved ones and relatives.
I was shocked when i researched the oft quoted 2001 census figures, I found that there were (in 2001) over 4,000 Carers aged 90 or over who did more than 50 hours per week actually caring for someone.
Any society that actively condones this type of blatant exploitation must have something wrong with it, eg a government that believes its more important to compensate well off investors who put their money into unwise investments than it is to look after their sick and injured.
I seem to remember that the first time 'carer' became part of the language was when people were being discharged from long-stay psych units and moving into their own (often poor standard) accomodation. People with other disabilities were 'cared for' under the same scheme. Various people who volunteered to 'look after' them, either by taking them into their own homes or visiting on a regular basis, suddenly became known as 'carers'. These 'volunteers' were paid an allowance (Carer's Allowance?) by the government; I'm not sure if that was national or local. The standard of care was often questionable to say the least; there were allegations of some of these 'carers' exploiting people.
My son had been ill and back living with me for a while when a friend said one night, 'I guess that makes you a carer then.' I was gobstruck; I'd never thought of it like that. He'd come back to live with me because he needed help, that's all. I suspect that's how it is for most of us, no matter what the disability. The most common description of what we do is, 'looking after my ...' Has anybody ever thought of themselves as a potential carer before they had to do it? There's nothing new or particularly moral about what we're doing, is there? It's a simple human reaction to our own family members, friends or neighbours. There's a point for discussion: if it takes a village to rear a child, what does it take to care for someone in trouble?
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: DLA Help Group<dlahelpgroup@...>
Date: 2008/9/29 Subject: Fw: Important benefit changes. Benefit Bulletin by Newcastle Welfare Rights Service To: macpic91@...
Lone parents to come off Income Support earlier Employment and Support Allowance Winter fuel payment increases Cut to backdating Out of hours service cut More welfare to work measures A big change in 2009
Clive Davis Welfare Rights Officer Newcastle Welfare Rights Service Adult Services Directorate, Brian Roycroft Centre Newbiggin Hall, Newcastle, NE5 4BR
**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. All incoming and outgoing e-mails are monitored for the presence of profanity and racist remarks, pornographic, sexually explicit or obscene material, and unsolicited content or spam. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. www.mimesweeper.com City of Newcastle website:- http://www.newcastle.gov.uk Newcastle Schools website:- http://www.newcastle-schools.org.uk Visit NewcastleGateshead:- http://www.newcastlegateshead.com Directgov:- http://www.directgov.gov.uk
I guess not either, and perhaps won't be on this E-Petition as only 85 names are on it (as I type) and it expires (Deadline to sign by) on 14th November 2008.
> > > > > > > The following is an email sent to you by an administrator of "National > > Carers Forum - Campaigning for Carers Rights". If this message is spam, > > contains abusive or other comments you find offensive please contact the > > webmaster of the board at the following address: > >
> > admin@...
> > > > Include this full email (particularly the headers). > > > > Message sent to you follows: > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ > > > > Petition created by one of our CarerWatch colleagues, please sign and > > spread the word. > > > > Paula xx > > > > > > > > http://petitions. pm.gov.uk/ caringiswork/ > > > > We the undersigned petition the Prime Minister to withdraw the > > proposal to transfer carers on carers allowance and income > > support to job seekers allowance and to recognise carers' > > valuable social input by keeping carer benefits separate from > > the rest of the benefit system. > > > > In the Welfare Green Paper No One Written Off:
Reforming > > Welfare to Reward Responsibility the Government proposes to > > transfer working age carers on Carers Allowance and Income > > Support to Job seekers Allowance. Carers are amongst the most > > responsible members of society. Without their contribution our > > NHS and social care systems would collapse. Transferring carers > > to job seekers allowance , a benefit that suggests carers are > > not working, are not contributing to society and are available > > for work is an insult and a contradiction of the government's > > claim to 'recognise' carers' 'immense contribution' to society > > (estimated to be worth £87 billion a year). Carers' valuable > > social input should be recognised by keeping carer benefits > > separate from the rest of the benefit system. > > >
Quite right Mick, there is very little recognition of what Carers do on a regular basis for long hours and with no pay in many instances.
I think that the government cynically take advantage of this because they know that people will always look after their loved ones and relatives.
I was shocked when i researched the oft quoted 2001 census figures, I found that there were (in 2001) over 4,000 Carers aged 90 or over who did more than 50 hours per week actually caring for someone.
Any society that actively condones this type of blatant exploitation must have something wrong with it, eg a government that believes its more important to compensate well off investors who put their money into unwise investments than it is to look after their sick and injured.
I seem to remember that the first time 'carer' became part of the language was when people were being discharged from long-stay psych units and moving into their own (often poor standard) accomodation. People with other disabilities were 'cared for' under the same scheme. Various people who volunteered to 'look after' them, either by taking them into their own homes or visiting on a regular basis, suddenly became known as 'carers'. These 'volunteers' were paid an allowance (Carer's Allowance?) by the government; I'm not sure if that was national or local. The standard of care was often questionable to say the least; there were allegations of some of these 'carers' exploiting people.
My son had been ill and back living with me for a while when a friend said one night, 'I guess that makes you a carer then.' I was gobstruck; I'd never thought of it like that. He'd come back to live with me because he needed help, that's all. I suspect that's how it is for most of us, no matter what the disability. The most common description of what we do is, 'looking after my ...' Has anybody ever thought of themselves as a potential carer before they had to do it? There's nothing new or particularly moral about what we're doing, is there? It's a simple human reaction to our own family members, friends or neighbours. There's a point for discussion: if it takes a village to rear a child, what does it take to care for someone in trouble?
I seem to remember that the first time 'carer' became part of the language was when people were being discharged from long-stay psych units and moving into their own (often poor standard) accomodation. People with other disabilities were 'cared for' under the same scheme. Various people who volunteered to 'look after' them, either by taking them into their own homes or visiting on a regular basis, suddenly became known as 'carers'. These 'volunteers' were paid an allowance (Carer's Allowance?) by the government; I'm not sure if that was national or local. The standard of care was often questionable to say the least; there were allegations of some of these 'carers' exploiting people.
My son had been ill and back living with me for a while when a friend said one night, 'I guess that makes you a carer then.' I was gobstruck; I'd never thought of it like that. He'd come back to live with me because he needed help, that's all. I suspect that's how it is for most of us, no matter what the disability. The most common description of what we do is, 'looking after my ...' Has anybody ever thought of themselves as a potential carer before they had to do it? There's nothing new or particularly moral about what we're doing, is there? It's a simple human reaction to our own family members, friends or neighbours. There's a point for discussion: if it takes a village to rear a child, what does it take to care for someone in trouble?
Probably not Rosemary, but I would rather my son lived with me than be locked up in an asylum for 50 years! In fact it depends upon what you view as care in the community, I think of it as friends and families....families more so than friends But if you think of it as services then my answer would be no, people are left to their own devices.... As are families.
I have met so many carers, whose physical health has been affected by years of stress caused by the lack of support to their selves and loved ones. The very likely reason why some families give up, people either stand and fight the corner of their loved one or turn and run.
I was out last evening for a few hours and met up with an old school friend of Pete's, he had a few to many. But he kept on asking me how Pete was doing, he knows he is ill, I lost count of how many times he asked me to tell Pete he asked after him and that he would like to meet up. I phoned Pete, as I rebreed this lad and how much time they spent together, said Joe was asking after him and would like to meet. I had a short curt reply, I'm staying in I don't want to meet him!
I asked Pete again this morning and his reply was "my head is F****d I cant do socialising" and I guess friends will only try for so long, so ultimately it falls onto to family or nobody.
No, none of it is meaningful, but maybe if people like us keep beating the drum it might be for future generations. You never know, we may even see pigs flying yet!
Has any one of these E-Petitions actually changed anything, other than highlight the subject of the Petition itself ?
--- In Carersforumuk@yahoogroups.com, "Pamela Pinder" <pamshouse@...> wrote: > > > > > > > The following is an email sent to you by an administrator of "National > > Carers Forum - Campaigning for Carers Rights". If this message is spam, > > contains abusive or other comments you find offensive please contact the > > webmaster of the board at the following address: > > > > admin@... > > > > Include this full email (particularly the headers). > > > > Message sent to you follows: > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > > Petition created by one of our CarerWatch colleagues, please sign and > > spread the word. > > > > Paula xx > > > > > > > > http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/caringiswork/ > > > > We the undersigned petition the Prime Minister to withdraw the > > proposal to transfer carers on carers allowance and income > > support to job seekers allowance and to recognise carers' > > valuable social input by keeping carer benefits separate from > > the rest of the benefit system. > > > > In the Welfare Green Paper No One Written Off: Reforming > > Welfare to Reward Responsibility the Government proposes to > > transfer working age carers on Carers Allowance and Income > > Support to Job seekers Allowance. Carers are amongst the most > > responsible members of society. Without their contribution our > > NHS and social care systems would collapse. Transferring carers > > to job seekers allowance , a benefit that suggests carers are > > not working, are not contributing to society and are available > > for work is an insult and a contradiction of the government's > > claim to 'recognise' carers' 'immense contribution' to society > > (estimated to be worth £87 billion a year). Carers' valuable > > social input should be recognised by keeping carer benefits > > separate from the rest of the benefit system. > > >
Has any one of these E-Petitions actually changed anything, other than highlight the subject of the Petition itself ?
--- In Carersforumuk@yahoogroups.com, "Pamela Pinder" <pamshouse@...> wrote: > > > > > > > The following is an email sent to you by an administrator of "National > > Carers Forum - Campaigning for Carers Rights". If this message is spam, > > contains abusive or other comments you find offensive please contact the > > webmaster of the board at the following address: > > > > admin@... > > > > Include this full email (particularly the headers). > > > > Message sent to you follows: > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > > Petition created by one of our CarerWatch colleagues, please sign and > > spread the word. > > > > Paula xx > > > > > > > > http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/caringiswork/ > > > > We the undersigned petition the Prime Minister to withdraw the > > proposal to transfer carers on carers allowance and income > > support to job seekers allowance and to recognise carers' > > valuable social input by keeping carer benefits separate from > > the rest of the benefit system. > > > > In the Welfare Green Paper No One Written Off: Reforming > > Welfare to Reward Responsibility the Government proposes to > > transfer working age carers on Carers Allowance and Income > > Support to Job seekers Allowance. Carers are amongst the most > > responsible members of society. Without their contribution our > > NHS and social care systems would collapse. Transferring carers > > to job seekers allowance , a benefit that suggests carers are > > not working, are not contributing to society and are available > > for work is an insult and a contradiction of the government's > > claim to 'recognise' carers' 'immense contribution' to society > > (estimated to be worth £87 billion a year). Carers' valuable > > social input should be recognised by keeping carer benefits > > separate from the rest of the benefit system. > > >
>
>
>
> >
> > The following is an email sent to you by an administrator
of "National
> > Carers Forum - Campaigning for Carers Rights". If this message is
spam,
> > contains abusive or other comments you find offensive please
contact the
> > webmaster of the board at the following address:
> >
> > admin@...
> >
> > Include this full email (particularly the headers).
> >
> > Message sent to you follows:
> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >
> > Petition created by one of our CarerWatch colleagues, please sign
and
> > spread the word.
> >
> > Paula xx
> >
> >
> >
> > http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/caringiswork/
> >
> > We the undersigned petition the Prime Minister to withdraw the
> > proposal to transfer carers on carers allowance and income
> > support to job seekers allowance and to recognise carers'
> > valuable social input by keeping carer benefits separate from
> > the rest of the benefit system.
> >
> > In the Welfare Green Paper No One Written Off: Reforming
> > Welfare to Reward Responsibility the Government proposes to
> > transfer working age carers on Carers Allowance and Income
> > Support to Job seekers Allowance. Carers are amongst the most
> > responsible members of society. Without their contribution our
> > NHS and social care systems would collapse. Transferring carers
> > to job seekers allowance , a benefit that suggests carers are
> > not working, are not contributing to society and are available
> > for work is an insult and a contradiction of the government's
> > claim to 'recognise' carers' 'immense contribution' to society
> > (estimated to be worth £87 billion a year). Carers' valuable
> > social input should be recognised by keeping carer benefits
> > separate from the rest of the benefit system.
> >
>
Has any one of these E-Petitions actually changed anything, other than highlight the subject of the Petition itself ?
--- In Carersforumuk@yahoogroups.com, "Pamela Pinder" <pamshouse@...> wrote: > > > > > > > The following is an email sent to you by an administrator of "National > > Carers Forum - Campaigning for Carers Rights". If this message is spam, > > contains abusive or other comments you find offensive please contact the > > webmaster of the board at the following address: > > > > admin@... > > > > Include this full email (particularly the headers). > > > > Message sent to you follows: > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > > Petition created by one of our CarerWatch colleagues, please sign and > > spread the word. > > > > Paula xx > > > > > > > > http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/caringiswork/ > > > > We the undersigned petition the Prime Minister to withdraw the > > proposal to transfer carers on carers allowance and income > > support to job seekers allowance and to recognise carers' > > valuable social input by keeping carer benefits separate from > > the rest of the benefit system. > > > > In the Welfare Green Paper No One Written Off: Reforming > > Welfare to Reward Responsibility the Government proposes to > > transfer working age carers on Carers Allowance and Income > > Support to Job seekers Allowance. Carers are amongst the most > > responsible members of society. Without their contribution our > > NHS and social care systems would collapse. Transferring carers > > to job seekers allowance , a benefit that suggests carers are > > not working, are not contributing to society and are available > > for work is an insult and a contradiction of the government's > > claim to 'recognise' carers' 'immense contribution' to society > > (estimated to be worth £87 billion a year). Carers' valuable > > social input should be recognised by keeping carer benefits > > separate from the rest of the benefit system. > > >
Has any one of these E-Petitions actually changed anything, other
than highlight the subject of the Petition itself ?
--- In Carersforumuk@yahoogroups.com, "Pamela Pinder" <pamshouse@...>
wrote:
>
>
>
> >
> > The following is an email sent to you by an administrator
of "National
> > Carers Forum - Campaigning for Carers Rights". If this message is
spam,
> > contains abusive or other comments you find offensive please
contact the
> > webmaster of the board at the following address:
> >
> > admin@...
> >
> > Include this full email (particularly the headers).
> >
> > Message sent to you follows:
> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >
> > Petition created by one of our CarerWatch colleagues, please sign
and
> > spread the word.
> >
> > Paula xx
> >
> >
> >
> > http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/caringiswork/
> >
> > We the undersigned petition the Prime Minister to withdraw the
> > proposal to transfer carers on carers allowance and income
> > support to job seekers allowance and to recognise carers'
> > valuable social input by keeping carer benefits separate from
> > the rest of the benefit system.
> >
> > In the Welfare Green Paper No One Written Off: Reforming
> > Welfare to Reward Responsibility the Government proposes to
> > transfer working age carers on Carers Allowance and Income
> > Support to Job seekers Allowance. Carers are amongst the most
> > responsible members of society. Without their contribution our
> > NHS and social care systems would collapse. Transferring carers
> > to job seekers allowance , a benefit that suggests carers are
> > not working, are not contributing to society and are available
> > for work is an insult and a contradiction of the government's
> > claim to 'recognise' carers' 'immense contribution' to society
> > (estimated to be worth £87 billion a year). Carers' valuable
> > social input should be recognised by keeping carer benefits
> > separate from the rest of the benefit system.
> >
>