Pediatricians

The International Medical Veritas Association









Pediatricians are the worst thing that ever happened to the human
race on vaccination issues, worse then the infectious diseases they love to
scare parents with. Worse then the oncologist whose passion is to poison and
profit from their patients, pediatricians prey on the newborn and young children
and attack anyone who even suggests that they might be doing something wrong.
Pediatricians make the most terrible mistake a doctor can make when they wrongly
assume that everything they do is right.



Present generations of pediatricians are mercury doctors who cannot
stand the light of medical reason or the basic science that clearly
shows how dangerous shooting thimerosal into children can be.



Britain's leading child health experts united this past weekend to
reassure parents that the use of multiple vaccines for children was safe,
calling claims to the contrary 'irresponsible'. Irresponsible does not quite
cover the behavior and attitudes of those who lead children to death and disease
via their constant attacks with toxic chemicals in their vaccines and drugs.
Only medically ignorant people would repeatedly dose children with antibiotics
and a host of other toxic drugs, exactly what most pediatricians' do in their
practices. Children, under the care of pediatricians are sicker emotionally and
physically then ever before. Children are having problems younger and they are
more seriously ill. For example the number of children getting Type 2 diabetes
has jumped 15-fold since 1990.



The number of children needing treatment for emotional problems is soaring
and it is not rising just in older children, such as troubled teens; it's also
showing a rapid increase in children age 3 and younger. "The children are
younger, and they are more ill," said Sandy Bryant, director of child and family
services. Bryant said the increasing Central Virginia Community Services
numbers are part of trend across the country. "One in every five children
suffers some sort of emotional/behavior problem," she said. "One in 20 have
serious emotional disturbance." "We are getting more and more referrals for
children who are extremely psychotic, who are suicidal, (have) a lot of cutting
behaviors, and are very challenging," said Bryant.[i]



Anti-immunization campaigners say too many jabs can overload a
child's immune system and lead to illness. But experts say the idea endangers
children's lives. These officials in Britain like their counterparts all over
the world practice their medical and pharmaceutical terrorism[ii] without even
the notion that they are themselves are endangering children's lives. They live
behind Lilly-white self-images that act as iron curtains between medical reality
and their dangerous beliefs and practices.[iii] Never has Christ's words been so
true, "Forgive them father for they know no what they do." They have erected
fortresses of rationalizations and images that nothing will breach not even
medical truth. Perhaps we should not blame them as individuals because they have
been trained in medical school to practice what can only be considered as
malevolent medical arts specifically targeted on the most vulnerable.



Cancer in childhood causes the most deaths, other than injuries and
accidents, among children 0-19 years of age. From the 1970s through the 1990s,
the rate of cancer for children in Europe increased by about 1 percent per year;
for the older teenagers, the rate increased by about 1.5 percent annually. By
the 1990s, there were about 140 cases of cancer for every 1 million children and
about 157 cases per 1 million teenagers, according to the report in the Dec. 11
2004 issue of The Lancet. And pediatricians have not a clue as to why.



'The idea of vaccine overload damaging our immune defenses is
rubbish," said Professor David Goldblatt, director of clinical research and
development at Great Ormond Street Children's Hospital, London. "It is a myth,
and those who spread it are doing immense harm. The public is beginning to doubt
the worth of vaccines and that has deeply worrying implications for their
health." Yet pediatricians are mute as asthma rates among children in North
America have increased. They are now approximately four times higher than they
were 20 years ago. Children are much sicker today then ever before and
pediatricians have not a clue as to why. Clearly they will not conceive of
themselves nor their drugs and vaccines as being part of the etiology in the
dramatic increases in childhood disease.



The Department of Health in England last week announced the
introduction of a new jab against the pneumococcal bug, which causes a deadly
strain of meningitis, in addition to a booster for Hib disease, which can cause
meningitis. This means that by the time a child is two he will have had 25
vaccinations, although some will be given in five-in-one or three-in-one
combinations. Groups like the anti-vaccine campaign Jabs, backed by several
tabloid newspapers, are arguing that so many vaccines put too much strain on
children's immune systems. They pointedly state that previous combinations of
vaccines had triggered serious side-effects in children.



"The claim was flatly rejected by scientists," reported the Observer
in England. It is clear that pediatricians will defend to their last breath
their right to attack children with simultaneous needles outdistancing their
distant cousins in the concentration camps who were able to do their dirty deeds
with one shot. It is a fact that the very pharmaceutical companies that were
involved in those dark days are the very same companies whose shadow dominates
all allopathic medical schools and thus the information fed to pediatricians.



The protest is alarming, say medical officials, because it has
already led parents to reject vaccination for their children. 'That can only
lead to deaths,' said Goldblatt. 'Diseases like measles and mumps can, in small
numbers of cases, cause serious disease and even kill.' What he will not admit
is that pediatricians are doing exactly that, causing serious illness in
children and even killing some of them with their vaccines and other drugs. So
fearful are pediatricians of the downside of the vaccines they administer it is
almost impossible in hospitals to see the cause of death listed as from
vaccines. Yet deaths do occur much more frequently then ever admitted as
government statistics clearly show. Pediatricians in England and the United
States even go as far as accusing parents of killing their kids, calling it
Shaken Baby Syndrome. Rather than admit that when a child dies after going home
after being stabbed repeatedly in a single session with many vaccines, they take
the vaccines as a coincidence and prosecute and throw parents in prison for
life.



Interesting enough the Telegraph in England reported this week that
eighteen babies and toddlers have died following childhood vaccinations in just
four years, a secret Government report reveals.[iv] Four deaths have been linked
to suspected adverse reactions to the measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) triple
jab, according to documents prepared for the Government's expert advisers on
immunization. The report, covering the period between 2001 and 2004, details how
one baby suffered a cot death following MMR vaccination in 2003. Two more
infants were reported to have died after having the MMR jab in 2001. Six
fatalities followed meningitis C vaccinations between 2001 and 2003. The deaths
of seven other babies were linked to combined vaccines against diphtheria,
tetanus and whooping cough and reported to the Medicines and Healthcare products
Regulatory Agency (MHRA). They include a baby who died from a heart attack.
Another died after a polio jab. Almost 800 other reports of suspected
complications of childhood vaccination - including convulsions and hyptonia, in
which the baby becomes floppy like a "rag doll" - were also made, including 160
for MMR.



Experts say that the true figures for suspected fatalities and
serious side effects could be much greater. Dr John Griffin, the former editor
of the medical journal Adverse Drug Reactions, said: "For fatalities, it is
probably only one in two which gets reported and for other side effects one in
10." This means that almost 40 baby deaths could have occurred in England
following jabs between 2001 and 2004, and 8,000 serious adverse reactions.



Researchers like Dr. Boyd Haley, a mercury toxicity expert at the
University of Kentucky, and Dr.Richard Deth, a pharmaceutical science researcher
at Northeastern University, say government officials dismiss the dangers of
vaccines (and the mercury they contain) because they don't want to take
responsibility. They say the government also doesn't want to undermine an
immunization policy that, according to them, has saved many lives even if they
are hurting lots of children. It is this abandonment of responsibility that is
criminally dangerous. And it is on the alter of their attachment to the concept
and theory that immunizations have saved so many lives that pediatricians fall
from rational medical thought into the pit of medical disgrace.





--------------------------------------------------------------------------




In the next email is a chapter from the IMVA's upcoming vaccine book
Poisoning of Generations. It deals deeply with the subject of multiple vaccines
and provides information and statistics from the western side of the Atlantic.
'The idea we are overloading the system is therefore utterly ridiculous," says
Dr David Elliman to the Observer. Read the essay on Multiple Vaccines and you
decide who is ridiculous, who is the terrorist, who the mean and cruel ones are
that are basking in the light of their arrogance. When it comes to protecting
our babies tough talk and deeds are required. The lioness is not passive in
protecting her cubs and neither should we be.



Mark Sircus Ac., OMD
Director International Medical Veritas Association
http://www.MagnesiumForLife.com
http://www.imva.info
http://www.detoxchelationclinic.com
http://www.worldpsychology.net
+55-83-3252-2195
www.skype.com ID: marksircus

IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER: The communication in this email is intended for
informational purposes only. Nothing in this email is intended to be a
substitute for professional medical advice.





--------------------------------------------------------------------------




Response:



It is regarding parents in ____ who were being charged with killing their
15mo. old daughter, a case which ____ worked as a Crimes against Children
Investigator. The 15 mo. old had been to the ER and multiple family physicians
repeatedly because she was having seizures. One of these seizures led to her
death. The state's medical examiner ruled it a homicide-shaken baby syndrome.
Of course, the parents were charged immediately. Because _____ is an
extraordinary cop, he picked up immediately that these parents and caregivers
did not kill the child. So_____, being the extraordinary cop he is, started
researching, found some research which proved that this WAS NOT a case of
"shaken baby syndrome" because THERE WAS NO SOFT TISSUE NECK INJURY, which would
be present if it actually was SBS. The research came from Berkley, Royal London
Hospital, and Australia, where a doc believes SBS is caused by VACCINES! He did
a "Google" search for "shaken baby" and came up with the studies. (Yes, even
cops use Google to solve crimes....or the lack thereof!) For his extraordinary
detective work, he received a Certificate of Award from his department. At
least, one set of parents didn't go to jail for the supposed murder of their
child. I agree whole heartedly with the author of this post! The doctors and
pediatricians are the ones who ought to go to jail for life for murdering these
children!



--------------------------------------------------------------------------


[i]http://www.newsadvance.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=LNA/MGArticle/LNA_Basic\
Article&c=MGArticle&cid=1137834041526

[ii] A careful study of pharmaceutical terrorism entails taking a trip
into the darkest places that exist in humanity and it is no accident that when
we make the journey we find ourselves in places where doctors and scientists
work together as they did in Nazi Germany. This subject takes us to the bottom
cellars of hell, into the deepest and darkest dungeon, into a place and into a
type of person that defiles the very nature of beauty, love, a place where all
human heart is lost. The Nazi doctors offer us a view of even greater monsters
that have remained invisible, dressed as they are eternally in three-piece
suits. There is a direct line of continuity that can be traced between a group
of men and companies that arose to the heights of industrial power years before
Hitler, men and companies who existed and supported the rise of Nazi Germany,
and who continued on to the present day in comfortable corporate luxury and
power. (The personnel, infrastructure and technology of companies like Bayer,
for example, have flowed on continuously through 3 incarnations of corporate
name and structure.) The greatest criminals in the history of the world actually
were not these Nazi doctors; they were and still are the people who populate the
top hierarchies of the giant pharmaceutical and chemical companies of the world
and the men and woman who work for them shuffling back and forth between these
companies and the CDC and FDA in the United States. Yet most of these men, like
many before them, will plead complete ignorance to all harm that they are doing.

[iii] Imagination is the level of awareness, which is directly involved in
how we "see" things. When we "see" or imagine ourselves a certain way (or thing)
we lock ourselves into the parameters of what we see. Thus it becomes difficult
to "see" ourselves (or certain things) any other way than the way we see. It is
exactly our "fixed images" of medicine that lead to the fixed approaches and
ways of rigid thinking and practice that are literally killing millions of
people each year. Medical practice and especially the medical authorities are
sitting in their seats of power with very tightly controlled self-images (egos),
unassailable like a castle with all the parapets bristling with cannons, waiting
to be defensively aggressive when anyone challenges the status quo.

[iv]
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/02/12/nmmr12.xml&s


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]