Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
BBS_Open_Discussion · Big Book Study - *Open Discussion*
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Real people. Real stories. See how Yahoo! Groups impacts members worldwide.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Big Book Study Post - #4   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #3212 of 18626 |
Big Book Study Post - #4

Good morning everyone!

We're still on page xvii of the foreword to the second edition. They describe two centers of activity around 1936. AA's group number 3 was founded in Cleveland, Clarence S. was a major factor in the success of AA in Cleveland (he started the first group to use the name "Alcoholics Anonymous"), and by late 1937 there were 40 members sober in this nameless group of drunks. Bill returned to Akron and, with 18 others, decided to: (1) open a chain of hospitals, (2) use paid missionaries to spread the word, and (3) write a book.

Up until this time the society was nameless. In the process of writing the book and naming it (1938), our Fellowship received its name. There were several titles being considered for the book: "The Way Out," "100 Men," "Comes the Dawn," among others. (We could have been known as "Way Outs" instead of AAs!) They settled on "Alcoholics Anonymous" and our society took the title of the book to be the name of our fellowship.

Turning to page xix, paragraph 1, the evolution of the 12 Traditions is described and confirmed in 1950. At the top of page xx we see the statistics of success: "50% got sober at once and remained that way; 25% sobered up after some relapses...". Can we boast of such numbers today?

The Doctor's Opinion - page xxiii (Page xxv in the 4th Edition) was originally found on page 1 of the main text in 1939 when the first edition of the book was published. It was moved to the section preceding the main section of the text in the second edition because of comment from literary figures. The patient described in paragraph 2 of the letter is Bill Wilson in November of 1934 at Towns Hospital. The doctor is William D. Silkworth, "the little doctor who loved drunks," who treated cocaine addicts and alcoholics.

"We of Alcoholics Anonymous believe that the reader will be interested in the medical estimate of the plan of recovery described in this book. Convincing testimony must surely come from medical men who have had experience with the sufferings of our members and have witnessed our return to health. A well known doctor, chief physician at a nationally prominent hospital specializing in alcoholic and drug addiction, gave Alcoholics Anonymous this letter:

To Whom It May Concern:
I have specialized in the treatment of alcoholism for many years.

In late 1934 I attended a patient who, though he had been a competent business man of good earning capacity, was an alcoholic of a type I had come to regard as hopeless.

In the course of his third treatment he acquired certain ideas concerning a possible means of recovery. As part of his rehabilitation he commenced to present his conceptions to other alcoholics, impressing upon them that they must do likewise with still others. This has become the basis of a rapidly growing fellowship of these men and their families. This man and over one hundred others appear to have recovered.

I personally know scores of cases who were of the type with whom other methods had failed completely.

These facts appear to be of extreme medical importance; because of the extraordinary possibilities of rapid growth inherent in this group they may mark a new epoch in the annals of alcoholism. These men may well have a remedy for thousands of such situations.

You may rely absolutely on anything they say about themselves.

Very truly yours,

(Signed) - - - - -M.D."

At the end of the letter on page xxiv, Dr. Silkworth DID NOT SIGN the letter in the first edition of the book. With our next post we'll go into why he didn't sign that letter.

Tomorrow we'll start from the end of that letter on page xxiv (Page xxvi in the 4th Edition) and probably finish the Doctor's Opinion.

Jim


Watch as we renovate a 1945 Hamptons Cottage visit: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Hamptons_Cottage
 
For a weekly chuckle visit:


Looking to buy a house? Get informed with the Home Buying Guide from MSN House Home.

Wed Jun 2, 2004 12:26 pm

sottovoice
Online Now Online Now
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #3212 of 18626 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

Good morning everyone! We're still on page xvii of the foreword to the second edition. They describe two centers of activity around 1936. AA's group number 3...
Jim K
sottovoice
Online Now Send Email
Apr 6, 2004
1:10 pm

Good morning everyone! We're still on page xvii of the foreword to the second edition. They describe two centers of activity around 1936. AA's group number 3...
Jim K
sottovoice
Online Now Send Email
Jun 2, 2004
12:27 pm

I am looking at an original First Edition copy right here on my desk. It stands "taller" from top to bottom, seems a lot bulkier, yet has fewer pages than my...
Danny S
frunobulax57
Offline Send Email
Jun 3, 2004
3:09 pm

Good morning everyone! We're still on page xvii of the foreword to the second edition. They describe two centers of activity around 1936. AA's group number 3...
Jim K
sottovoice
Online Now Send Email
Jul 29, 2004
11:37 am

Good morning everyone! We're still on page xvii of the foreword to the second edition. They describe two centers of activity around 1936. AA's group number 3...
Jim K
sottovoice
Online Now Send Email
Sep 24, 2004
12:15 pm

The first letter stunk on ice anyway. I can picture the conversation between Bill Wilson and Silkworth possibly going something like this: "Hey Silky, thanks...
Danny S
frunobulax57
Offline Send Email
Sep 24, 2004
1:00 pm

"cojones" Danny S <dschwarzhoff@...> wrote:The first letter stunk on ice anyway. I can picture the conversation between Bill Wilson and...
lorri snyder
workngrl50
Offline Send Email
Sep 24, 2004
2:00 pm

thanks for the clarification... I've always wondered how that was spelled ! ... __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New and Improved Yahoo! Mail...
Jocelyn Monacelli
prpllady51
Online Now Send Email
Sep 24, 2004
2:13 pm

I don't care how you spell it.....Tell me what the heck it is???? I don't think have any of them thar thins' in Indiana! HA! But seriously, what is it? w/...
Tammy Cook
tomatolcook
Offline Send Email
Sep 24, 2004
6:33 pm

I'm sure you have an even number of them in Indiana, Tammy. However, I can't elaborate and remain a gentleman. Tammy Cook <tomatolcook@...> wrote: I...
JW
ebow2525
Offline Send Email
Sep 24, 2004
7:48 pm

Tammy C. wrote: " I don't think have any of them thar thins' in Indiana! HA! " Don't let the likes of Larry Bird hear you say that!!! :) They are called...
Larry C.
onewaythere
Offline Send Email
Sep 24, 2004
7:50 pm

Ooopsie! "Larry C." <onewaythere@...> wrote:Tammy C. wrote: " I don't think have any of them thar thins' in Indiana! HA! " Don't let the likes of Larry...
Tammy Cook
tomatolcook
Offline Send Email
Sep 24, 2004
8:44 pm

It's not a word I get to type very often. Thanks. I know you know what I meant. :) Peace, Danny S ... anyway. I can picture the conversation ... Service....
Danny S
frunobulax57
Offline Send Email
Sep 24, 2004
10:57 pm

I was waiting to see who would give the definition. I lived in New Mexico for 10 years and spoke mainly Spanish while I was there. Made me chuckle tonite. ...
Irishrose
irishrose_93
Offline Send Email
Sep 25, 2004
4:38 am
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help