Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
Autism-Mercury · To discuss current issues related to the increasing incidence of autism and the potential link between excessive mercury exposu
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Hear how Yahoo! Groups has changed the lives of others. Take me there.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Uncertainties in Hg-Hair analysis   Topic List   < Prev Topic  |  Next Topic >
Reply  |  Next Message > 
Re: Uncertainties in Hg-Hair analysis

Dear Dr. Hooker,

I see you are a PhD PE too! (chemistry and chemical engineering for
me).

Dr. Walsh refers to the problem that low hair mercury levels do not
exclude intoxication. This is the problem with hair element analysis
- MD's aren't capable of understanding the following boolean truth
table:

Not toxic Yes toxic

Low Hg ? (0) ? (0)

Hi Hg No (0) Yes (1)

This truth table applies to hair, urine and blood mercury levels.

It is possible to tell if someone has mercury poisoning from hair
element analysis if you look at the essential elements, since mercury
impairs mineral transport and they will not be appropriately
distributed (and this impairment of mineral transport sometimes leads
to misleadingly low levels of mercury in hair when it impairs its own
transport). The procedure for doing that is given in the 'counting
rules' Moria mentioned.

About 1/3 of people who are toxic have elevated levels on testing
blood, urine or hair. Most toxic people have deranged hair essential
minerals. Most toxic people also have abnormal results on
fractionated urine porphyrins and some other tests. The use of the
porphyrin test is discussed in another file available on this
listserver's website. The other tests are described in my book
Amalgam Illness: Diagnosis and Treatment, which has a website at
http://hometown.aol.com/nomamalgam.

Andy Cutler, PhD PE

--- In Autism-Mercury@y..., "Hooker, Brian S" <brian.hooker@p...>
wrote:
> Good Morning - I'm new to this group and have a 3 year old son with
Hg levels at
> 3.4 ug/g based on hair analysis. We are currently chelating with
DMSA. In a
> recent discussion with Bill Walsh (Pfeiffer Treatment Center), he
mentioned
> unrelabilities in hair Hg analysis. He did not expand on the
problem but I
> would imagine that it would go back to the relatively high
volatility of Hg
> metal. Does anyone concur with Dr. Walsh's findings? If so, what
is the best
> way to test Hg levels? Our specialist has recommended against
urinary metals
> analysis which also concerns me! Thanks very much for the
assistance and God
> Bless!
> Brian
>
> Brian S. Hooker, Ph.D., P.E.
> Director of Research
>
> PhytaGenics
> 902 Battelle Blvd., MSIN K2-10
> Richland, WA 99352
>
> Phone: 509-375-4420
> FAX: 509-372-4660
> Mobile: 509-366-2269





Mon Mar 12, 2001 9:43 pm

AndyCutler@...
Send Email Send Email

 |  Next Message > 
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

Good Morning - I'm new to this group and have a 3 year old son with Hg levels at 3.4 ug/g based on hair analysis. We are currently chelating with DMSA. In a ...
Hooker, Brian S
brian.hooker@...
Send Email
Mar 12, 2001
3:21 pm

Hi Brian, Welcome. I'm being briefer-than-I'd-like as I need to sign off.... The following text is quoted from "the counting rules" file, which is located at ...
Moria Merriweather
moriam@...
Send Email
Mar 12, 2001
3:32 pm

Dear Dr. Hooker, I see you are a PhD PE too! (chemistry and chemical engineering for me). Dr. Walsh refers to the problem that low hair mercury levels do not ...
AndyCutler@...
Send Email
Mar 12, 2001
9:43 pm
Advanced

Copyright © 2010 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help