Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
AmericanDUST · Depleted Uranium Study Team
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Real people. Real stories. See how Yahoo! Groups impacts members worldwide.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 2417 - 2446 of 2450   Newest  |  < Newer  |  Older >  |  Oldest
Messages: Show Message Summaries   (Group by Topic) Sort by Date v  
#2446 From: ancientwarrior67777@...
Date: Mon Sep 28, 2009 9:55 am
Subject: Beware of Roger Helbig:
ancientwarri...
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
Beware of Roger Helbig:
They've Sent Helbig After Me
A Dark Tale of How the Powers-That-Be
Try to Discredit Those who Oppose Their World View
FELICITY ARBUTHNOT / The Ecologist (UK) 1feb2007
http://www.mindfully.org/Nucs/2007/Roger-Helbig-DU1feb07.htm



More on Doug Rokke, Ph.D. and Leuren Moret

Disturbing Photos of Babies Deformed at Birth as a Result of Depleted Uranium
(DU) 2003



Roger Helbig, a man with an unhealthy obsession: he believes that depleted
uranium (DU) waste from the nuclear fuel cycle, which is used in munitions and
bullets – is safe.



I received an unsolicited email from him, entitled "The Real Doug Rokke" in
response to an article I had written for The Brussels Tribunal. It read: "I see
that you have been taken in by Doug Rokke, who really does not know much about
anything, let alone depleted uranium. It is sad that a Ph.D. has so little real
knowledge. I also see you claim to be a journalist. What newspapers, radio
stations or TV stations have you actually worked for, or are you like Bob
Nichols, a self-described journalist with no actual journalistic experience?"



His tirade continued: "Rokke's military records and part of his PhD thesis are
attached. You will note he has no real expertise in depleted uranium and his
claims about the Middle East are pure fantasy, yet you inflame the Arab street
with them. You ought to learn more about what is before telling the world all
about it."



I had written in the article: "Depleted uranium from shells fired by British and
American forces during the Balkan wars has found its way into the food chain and
has been detected amongst the civilian populations of Kosovo and Bosnia. A study
of the local population in three locations in the two Balkan regions has found
samples of the highly radioactive particles in the urine of all those tested."



Helbig had highlighted the excerpt, commenting: "This is pure bullshit and you
know it. Where are the actual test results? I presume you don't choose to read
the United Nations Environmental Programme report – it is only about 300 pages,
well documented instead of scientific myth!"



Lieutenant Colonel Roger Helbig, USAF, Rtd (it appears) is one of a small
Pentagon-inspired group devoted to denigrating and undermining the efforts of
those drawing attention to the dangers of DU, which three UN Sub-Committees have
designated a weapon of mass destruction. Rokke is just the latest in a long line
of Helbig targets.



  Journalist Bob Nichols, Project Censored award winner for his DU coverage,
writes, 'Individuals on web sites throughout the United States have complained
about the abusive and aggressive actions of an Air Force Lieut. Colonel named
Roger Helbig'.

David Lindorff, another award winner and the (UK) Observer's David Rose, have
also suffered a barage of abuse for stories exposing the dangers of DU, which
poisons the environment, thus entire food chain regionally where used, for
four-and-a-half billion years.



Nichols cites Helbig "attacking hundreds of sites and harrassing web
moderators." Informative DU sites (such as www.Pandoraproject@yahoogroups.com
and www.notinkansas.us – the latter's meticulously researched alerts included
the chilling warning of US military in Iraq regarding bathing in shower water
taken from Tigris river: 'GI's Beware Radioactive Showers') are also victims.



Researcher, John Ervin, posted on www.apfn.net: "They've already sent Lt.
Colonel Roger Helbig after me."



Leuren Moret, President of Scientists for Indigenous Peoples and City of
Berkeley (Ca) Environmental Commissioner states: 'Helbig has been harassing me
nonstop for two to three years.' Moret travels the world warning on the dangers
of DU, working with a group of independent scientists (www.radiation.org) and
submitted a paper on DU to a UN Sub-Committee, one of the ones which led to DUs
designation as a weapon of mass destruction.



The picture Helbig paints of his latest target Rokke is unrecognisable from the
truth. Major (Dr) Doug Rokke, Former Director of the US Army Depleted Uranium
Project (www.traprockpeace.org), principal author of the Pentagon regulations
and procedural guidelines (US Army Regulation 700-48 And US Army PAM 700-48) on
the dangers and handling of DU affected areas: tanks, structures, terrain,
equipment and personnel, civilian and military.



Rokke, whose team led the (impossible) clean up in Kuwait in 1991 after the
first Gulf War, was so horrified by what he found, he finally spoke out – at
cost. Sick from DU poisoning himself, he has suffered ongoing 'physical,
psychological and economic threats' from Helbig and other US government
representatives since.



Rokke has crucial, credible, hands-on knowledge, thus, writes David Lindorff,
the effort to discredit him, label him 'a fraud', demote him to 'Lt.' by Helbig,
has been vicious and tenacious.



This is the same Doug Rokke whose Army evaluation report, dated July 30th 1994,
cites the then Captain Rokke as being Project Director and primary technical
expert and specialist adviser to US Army major commands, the US Army Chemical
School and contractors during training, development and test implementation. In
1995 he was cited for a 'meritorious service' medal, for work on DU. He left the
army when none of his health warning reached the troops.



Rokke and another former Pentagon advisor, Dr Asav Durakovic, whose CV and list
of peer reviewed papers runs to 52 pages, Canadian expert Professor Hari Sharma
(who wrote to NATO and world leaders of the dangers of DU), Dr Garth Nicholson
and others have demanded appropriate testing and treatment of all affected –
soldiers and civilians – and rigorous DU clean up, where used or tested 'as
already required by the US Department of Defence regulations...', states Rokke.
The polluter pays. But the cost would be stratospheric; so Helbig's group stalk
the internet to insult and intimidate.



'The use of uranium munitions is an act of terror,' Rokke says. In context, the
United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority 'selfinitiated' a report for the British
government on DU shortly after the 1991 war. If 50 tonnes of the residual DU
dust remained, they estimated that there wiuld be in excess of half a million
cancer deaths in the region by the year 2000. The Pentagon admits to 325 tonnes
remaining and other estimates are as high as 900 tonnes. In 2003 a further two
thousand tonne DU burden has been admitted to.



Iraq and the region's cancers have become a tragedy equalling Chernobyl. Oddly,
when the US/UK military allowed the looting of every Iraqi State building, all
medical records of this unique war crime was destroyed.



Helbig is excercised by a memo from Los Alamos National Laboratories, New
Mexico, from a Lt. Colonel Larson to a Major Ziehman. It is dated the day after
the 1991 onslaught on Iraq ended (1st March 1991.) Headed 'The Effectiveness of
Depleted Uranium Penetrators', it reads: 'There is a relatively small amount of
lethality data for uranium penetrators... The recent war has likely multiplied
the DU rounds fired at targets by orders of magnitude...



'There has been and continues to be a concern regarding the impact of DU on the
environment. Therefore, if no one makes a case for the effectiveness of DU on
the battlefield, DU rounds may become politically unacceptable and thus, be
deleted from the arsenal.' Thus, 'we should assure their future existence'
otherwise may stand to lose them. He continues, 'I believe we should keep this
sensitive issue in mind, when, after action, reports are written.'



US tanks damaged by DU rounds in 1991 were taken to a nuclear decontamination
plant at Barnwell, North Carolina, reportedly constructed the previous year
solely for this purpose. Those beyond decontamination were buried in specially
licensed landfill sites.

In June 1995 the US Army Environmental Policy Institute wrote of DU: 'DU is a
radioactive waste and therefore should be deposited in a licensed repository'.
The poisoned chalice of breaking the news that Kuwait had been turned in to an
unlicensed one, fell to the luckless British Ambassador.



Helbig's email cites the United Nations Environment Agency Report. There were
two UNEP Reports on Balkans contamination. The first was cut – under alleged
US/UK pressure – from 72 pages, to two. An impeccable source on the second, to
which Helbig refers, stated that in spite of considerable obstacles placed in
their way, a list of the most contaminated sites to sample was compiled. On
arrival, the multinational forces excluded visits to those sites. As Professor
Malcolm Hooper, Emeritus Professor of Medicinal Chemistry at Sunderland
University (UK) writes in his article 'Most Toxic War in Western Military
History', regarding Iraq in 1991: 'at every level, investigation into illness,
birth defects, contamination has been blocked and bedevilled by ... a pervasive
myopia which sees lack of evidence as proof.'



Last September, Lieutenant Colonel Helbig, of Richardson, California, was in
Court. Complex, inter-connected cases, heard also in June and July, due to
resume in December, involve Helbig's neighbour, Jamahl Feres, of Syrian origin
and his Swiss wife Katherine. They allege suffering three years of harrasment
including the last year, in which Helbig covered all windows in his house which
faced theirs, with Israeli flags. Leuren Moret and Bob Nichol will be witnesses
for the Feres's.



It now transpires that Helbig (whose scorn for on-line journalists and journals
is boundless) has posted varying rants on www.inthesetimes.com in the name of
'Natalie.' You have been warned.

Felicity Arbuthnot is a freelance journalist.

source: 4oct2007

http://www.mindfully.org/Nucs/2007/Roger-Helbig-DU1feb07.htm

#2445 From: Morton Skorodin <MortonSkorodin@...>
Date: Tue Sep 22, 2009 6:58 pm
Subject: Fw: Privatizing America's Nuclear Safety
morton_skorodin
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
Cathy,

You've logically and cogently scared the bejeezuz out of me. Big thanks for the heads-up. I think everyone should be aware of this!

Thinking only of profits clouds many men's minds. With this cloudiness they could, as a legal defense, claim lack of intentionality - were any of us to be alive subsequently....No, that won't work - these crazies must be stopped preemptively. Their planned recklessness may be "civilization-ending".

Thanks for your sanity and far-sightedness,
Mort

--- On Tue, 9/22/09, Cathy Garger <savorsuccesslady3@...> wrote:

From: Cathy Garger <savorsuccesslady3@...>
Subject: Privatizing America's Nuclear Safety
To: No-New-Nukes-Yall@yahoogroups.com, EarthU@yahoogroups.com, NucNews@yahoogroups.com
Date: Tuesday, September 22, 2009, 12:36 PM


Dear Friends in OK and TX (and all over the US, Mexico, and Canada, too),
 
I have come across very disturbing information that applies mostly to TX and OK. But this is actually a matter of concern for the entire nation.
 
I'm sure you've all heard of the 2 reactors at Comanche Peak, TX.
These are located 4 miles North of Glen Rose, TX.
 
Doing my best guesstimate, this is about 160 to 165 miles due south of Oklahoma City, OK.
 
As I'm sure you have also heard, there are 2 new reactors proposed to join Comanche Peak 1 and 2. They are of a new design called the USAPWR.
 
The Mitsubishi APWR is designed for use with Mixed Oxide (MOX) fuel. They say so in Section 3.1 right here:
Furthermore, the APWR allows the number of control rods to be set according to the quantity of loaded MOX fuel, so that the requirement for diverse operations, such as the use of a MOX core and high burnup can be met flexibly.
 
As you may know, in the US there are absolutely no plans for Mixed Oxide Fuel made from "recycled" or "reprocessed" nuclear fuel. The only type of MOX fuel that will be made in the US will come from the Savannah River Site and will be made from Bomb-Plutonium material. 
 
This is not the same type of Plutonium fuel as the MOX used in European nuclear reactors. Bomb-Plutonium is more volatile, unpredictable, and dangerous, both inside the reactor and out of the reactor in the (not-so-"spent") nuclear fuel pool.
 
Read what the NRC itself says about future US MOX fuel here:
 
Now all of this is bad enough of course. But the story gets worse still.
 
Before any new reactor design is approved by the NRC, it is supposed to go through a very rigorous approval process to ensure public safety.  I am not saying that the NRC is great... I am simply saying they are supposed to personally safeguard public health and safety, as well as give at least some measure of environmental protection [well, at least in theory, this is supposed to be true].
 
But here is where it goes from bad to worse. In the case of the USAPWR, the type of new reactor proposed for Units 3 and 4 at Comanche Peak?  The NRC is NOT doing the design certification. They have farmed it out!
 
Yes, you read that right. The NRC has PRIVATIZED - as in CONTRACTED OUT  the safety certification process to a private firm!
 
Let's put this another way. The NRC - the government agency in charge of your family's safety and mine with regard to all things nuclear and radiological... is *not* doing its own work with regard to certifying the safety of a reactor that will one day use the highly volatile Bomb-Plutonium "MOX" (I call it POX for Plutonium) fuel.
 
The NRC is apparently overworked. Here they write [whine] in the proposal, "NRO anticipates the filing of more than 20 COL applications in the next several years and the number is growing... Given the increased workload in new reactor licensing activities [awww poor baby!] NRC is seeking Contractor assistance in the preparation and review of these simultaneous applications."
 
If the NRC thinks they're stressed out now? Uh, just watch what happens the day they need to deal with the next catastrophic nuclear disaster caused by contracting out safety design certification measures to a private firm!
 
This should be a major concern for all people in TX and OK. No, make that a concern for everyone who lives in the US, Canada and Mexico, too.  I don't have to tell you what a "Chernobyl" in a Plutonium-fuel reactor might be like. If you live 160 miles or 260 or even 1,060 miles away from a Plutonium-fuel Chernobyl 
disaster?  Let's just say the aftermath won't be pretty! Experts say that a Bomb-Plutonium fuel "Chernobyl"-type accident would make Chernobyl look like a walk in the park!
 
Now, I have not even gotten into what the emissions into air, water and soil might be like when they run the lethal Bomb-Plutonium-239 (instead of Uranium) in the fuel used by these new Generation III US commercial nuclear reactors. Suffice it to say, using Bomb-Plutonium in reactors is not healthy for children and other living things!
 
Here is the page where you can read about how the design certification and pre-application activities for Comanche Peak Units 3 & 4 have been contracted out to a private firm called Information Systems Laboratories. 
or
 
Friends, this is a dark day indeed for the NRC - and for the good people of TX and OK. Actually, it's a very dark day for all Americans... who, sadly, don't even have a clue what's coming.
 
Who would have ever thought our federal government would privatize America's nuclear safety? If this is not the ultimate betrayal of our own by our own... then really, truly I don't know what is.
 
Folks, when the NRC sloughs off its responsibility for our safety - our very lives! - and dumps its workload off into the lap of some private company? I believe we can safely say it is the end of the world as we know it.
 
Now, with the privatization of our nuclear safety and Bomb-Plutonium fuel coming to a new reactor near you and near me... is there anyone still out there who can actually say America doesn't need an Anti-Nuke Movement in this country as of, like, yesterday?
 
I think it's high time we asked ourselves, why is all this information being kept from the public? Why are only a relative few of us speaking up and out?
 
 
Cathy Garger



#2444 From: Cathy Garger <savorsuccesslady3@...>
Date: Mon Oct 5, 2009 4:22 pm
Subject: "Preventing Future Deaths" - a Coroner acts
savorsuccess...
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
This court case from the UK - basically condemning its military for the wrongful radioactive death of one of its soldiers - has tremendous implications for not just soldiers, but for all of us here in the US, too.
 
Radiation poisoning is a concern for all Americans in general, and in particular, to those who live near facilities where Uranium and/or Plutonium is used. Some of these locations include nuclear weapons laboratory sites, "conventional" Uranium weapons facilities ("Depleted, it ain't!")* Uranium firing and explosion sites and proving grounds, open burn and demolition areas, and nuclear reactors, too.
 
Uranium and all other radioactive gasses are poisoning not *just* soldiers in battle and innocents in military conflict-ravaged nations overseas, but all of us just going about our daily lives right here in the US!
 
Radioactive poison gas weakens, sickens, and kills, whether it be Uranium weapons fired in Iraq, exploded in the open air outside San Francisco, New Mexico or Nevada, "test" fired at the Aberdeen, Maryland Proving Grounds, or purged out of a nuclear reactor vent in any one of 104 commercial nuclear reactors across the nation.
 
This UK case sets a precedent. Uranium in aerosol form kills. Period. It does not matter whether you explode it at Livermore near San Francisco, drop a Uranium missile or bomb, fire it out of an Abrams tank or an A-10 jet, or whether you operate a commercial nuclear reactor - as they all place radioactive Uranium 
decay products out into our air.
 
We need a ZERO TOLERANCE POLICY on the aerosolization of Uranium and its
by-products in the US. Period.
 
Weapons, missiles, bombs, nuclear reactors? Our cells do not know - or care - about the source of the Uranium poison gas!
 
Let us now take this UK court case, study it, and use it for all it is worth!
 
Just as one example, since those of us in the Balto-DC area live near two sites of Uranium radioactive gas generation - the Aberdeen military "test" site and the Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant- are we not all, too, at risk for radiation poisoning?
 
Once again, let's all thank and support the UK's Low Level Radiation Campaign for a job smashingly well done! www.llrc.org
 
Cathy Garger
Subject: "Preventing Future Deaths" - a Coroner acts
To: "info llrc" <info@...>
Date: Monday, October 5, 2009, 8:23 AM

"Preventing Future Deaths" - a Coroner acts

 

Following the 10th September '09 verdict on the death of Stuart Dyson, Robin Balmain, a Coroner in the Black Country Coroner's District in Smethwick, UK, has written to the Secretary of State for Defence, Bob Ainsworth MP.

 

The Jury in the inquest into Mr. Dyson's death found that he had been exposed to Uranium during his service in Iraq during 1991, and that the Uranium caused or contributed to the colon cancer which finally killed him in 2007 at the age of 39.

 

The expert witness at the inquest was Professor Chris Busby, Scientific Secretary of the European Committee on Radiation Risk, who presented evidence of the inadequacy of the radiation risk model advised by the International Commission on Radiological Protection. The Ministry of Defence failed to send either legal or scientific representatives.

 

Mr. Balmain writes that "action should be taken" since the use of Uranium weapons creates "an obvious risk to service personnel" which "equally applies to civilians in areas of conflict."

 

For over a decade the Low Level Radiation Campaign has stated that use of Uranium weapons is contrary to international law because of their indiscriminate effects.

 

Rule 43 of the Coroners Rules 2008 states:

"Where the evidence gives rise to a concern that circumstances creating a risk [that] other deaths will occur, or will continue to exist, in the future and in the coroner's opinion action should be taken to … eliminate or reduce the risk of death … the Coroner may report … to a person who the Coroner believes may have the power to take such action."

 

Rule 43A requires Bob Ainsworth to reply to Mr Balmain within 56 days.

 

Mr Balmain's letter is at http://www.nonuclear.se/dyson_coronor_rule43_20090918

 

Report on verdict at www.llrc.org/du/subtopic/dysonverdict.htm including full copies of written submissions from Professor Busby and MoD.

 

* http://onlinejournal.org/Commentary/053105Nichols/053105nichols.html

 



#2443 From: Bob Nichols <bob.bobnichols@...>
Date: Sat Sep 19, 2009 1:29 pm
Subject: Deal breaker for civilization itself
twrunner
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
The Italian Military, Secret Police and the Mafia weaponized the Curie Nostrum, forever. The enemies are is the People of Italy and the Curie Nostrum. The Curie Sea used to be known as the Mediterranean. Check this out:
http://tinyurl.com/nk6y4p

This action of the combined psychopaths in the military, the secret police and the mafia is a deal breaker on the scale of civilization itself.

This dumping includes are forms and isotopes of uranium. The forms readily dissolve in sea water.

Bob




#2442 From: Cathy Garger <savorsuccesslady3@...>
Date: Fri Aug 28, 2009 8:30 pm
Subject: WHT/ QUICK POLL: DO YOU BELIEVE THE ARMY? - DU at POHAKULOA
savorsuccess...
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 

Subject: WHT/ QUICK POLL: DO YOU BELIEVE THE ARMY? -
 
DU at POHAKULOA

To:
Date: Friday, August 28, 2009, 3:39 PM

aloha!
please take this quick poll! please forward!

3/4 down the page on right.

mahalo!
--
We cannot hope to end violence against each other until we end our violence against the earth.  Wendell Berry


#2441 From: "Bob Nichols" <bob.bobnichols@...>
Date: Mon Jun 22, 2009 9:41 pm
Subject: Re: Missouri man remembers nuclear blast--radiation was like sunning on the beach: First you burn, then you tan.
twrunner
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
What I would like to suggest is that these are not "tests," the physicists involved have known for years exactly what the outcome of their cute lil "tests" are going to be.

These are not "tests" but "executions" and "fatal maimings" done so they can watch us die.

And there is not a doubt in their mind.

When the US fascist military, politicians and high level scientists moved the "tests" or atmospheric detonations to the US after many South Pacific detonations, they had no doubt in their mind what the outcome would be.

The leaders specifically denied internal suggestions and demands to site the thermonuclear bombings in South Carolina and along the South East coast to spare citizens the traumas of radiation poisoning.

Instead, these psychopaths chose a site in the SW United States, in Nevada, to irradiate the entire United States for maximum exposure.

The same kind of people have enthusiastically placed 438 big nuclear reactors around the world. As a result, the birth rate is down and the death rate is up for a hundred miles in every direction. These reactors are just stationary nuclear weapons.

The fascist US Military has used thousands of tons of weaponized uranium aerosols in Central Asia, to kill and maim endlessly.

What kind of people do shit like this to other people?

Bob Nichols






--- In AmericanDUST@yahoogroups.com, James Nimmo <violadamore2@...> wrote:
>
> http://www.bnd.com/336/story/813781.html
>
> Missouri man remembers nuclear blast
>
> At the time, Robertson said, military brass believed a nuclear confrontation with the Soviets was likely. They were intent on developing a group of troops hardened by repeated exposure to radiation. They thought exposure to radiation was like sunning on the beach: First you burn, then you tan.
>  
> "Today, you think, 'How would you ever harden troops to that?' " Robertson said. "It's not something that you can become accustomed to or environmentally be exposed to and continue to go on. That's just not a fact.
>
> snip
>
> In the coming weeks, Robertson and his men from the First Battle Group, 12th Infantry observed 12 to 15 nuclear blasts. Typically they waited two to four hours after the shot before they went to ground zero for maneuvers. Each man was given a tiny "film badge" to record the level of radiation he encountered
>
> snip
>
> "Were we guinea pigs? Yes, very much so. If that's the vernacular you want to use," he said. He and others just trusted their government. "You know you're in harm's way, but you assume that they're not putting you out there to absolutely crucify you."
>
> snip
>

#2440 From: James Nimmo <violadamore2@...>
Date: Sun Jun 21, 2009 8:32 pm
Subject: Missouri man remembers nuclear blast--radiation was like sunning on the beach: First you burn, then you tan.
violadamore2
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
 
Missouri man remembers nuclear blast
 

At the time, Robertson said, military brass believed a nuclear confrontation with the Soviets was likely. They were intent on developing a group of troops hardened by repeated exposure to radiation. They thought exposure to radiation was like sunning on the beach: First you burn, then you tan.

 

"Today, you think, 'How would you ever harden troops to that?' " Robertson said. "It's not something that you can become accustomed to or environmentally be exposed to and continue to go on. That's just not a fact.

 
snip
 
In the coming weeks, Robertson and his men from the First Battle Group, 12th Infantry observed 12 to 15 nuclear blasts. Typically they waited two to four hours after the shot before they went to ground zero for maneuvers. Each man was given a tiny "film badge" to record the level of radiation he encountered
 
snip
 
"Were we guinea pigs? Yes, very much so. If that's the vernacular you want to use," he said. He and others just trusted their government. "You know you're in harm's way, but you assume that they're not putting you out there to absolutely crucify you."
 
snip
 
 
 
 

#2439 From: Bob Nichols <bob.bobnichols@...>
Date: Sun Jun 21, 2009 6:16 pm
Subject: Evidence is revealed (DU Rods and Sabots survived the inferno at Camp Doha)
twrunner
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
Dr. Doug Rokke, US Army Ret., is a well known researcher and investigator on uranium munitions.

I very highly recommend this article to all.

You will find the article useful in discussing the curse of uranium munitions with your friends and acquaintances.

Bob Nichols
Project Censored Award Winner
San Francisco Bay View newspaper

http://www.paltelegraph.com/middle-east/77-middle-east/1171-exclusive-3-evidence-is-revealed-du-rods-and-sabots-survived-the-inferno-at-camp-doha
Or, http://tinyurl.com/kt3a7l

Evidence is revealed (DU Rods and Sabots survived the inferno at Camp Doha)


E-mail Print PDF

diplated-uraniom-gaza-war-israel_copyLondon, June 21, (Pal Telegraph) - Doug Rokke earned his B.S. in Physics at Western Illinois University followed by his M.S. and Ph.D. in physics and technology education at the University of Illinois. His military career has spanned 4 decades to include combat duty during the Vietnam War and Gulf War 1.

Dr. Doug Rokke is a Depleted Uranium expert.

Doug served as a member of the 3rd U.S. Army Medical Command's Nuclear, Biological, and Chemical (NBC) teaching, medical response, and special operations team, the 3rd U.S. Army captured equipment project team, and with the 3rd U.S. Army Depleted Uranium Assessment team during Gulf War 1(Operation Desert Storm).

He was the U.S. Army's Depleted Uranium Project director from 1994 - 1995. He developed the congressionally mandated education and training materials and wrote U.S. Army Regulation 700-48, the U.S. Army PAM 700-48, and the U.S. Army's common task for DU incidents.

Dr. Rokke serves or has served as an advisor with the U.S. Centers of Disease Control; U.S. Department of Defense; U.S. National Academy of Sciences; U.S. Institute of Medicine; U.S Senate; U.S. House of Representatives; U.S. Department of Transportation; U.S.

Federal Aviation Administration; U.S. Department of Defense; U.S. General Accounting Office; U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs; British Royal Society; British House of Lords and House of Commons; United Nations; U.S. President William J. Clinton's Presidential Special Oversight Board; and local, state, and federal law enforcement, fire, and medical agencies

In 1991 he served in the Gulf. His work involved helping casualties and cleaning equipment contaminated with depleted uranium (DU), used in the war in tank-busting weapons because of its high density.

Some comments were made to the BBC during an interview "The shell would hit an armoured vehicle" "The uranium would catch fire and split into burning fragments". About 70% of the round vaporised into dust, as fine as talcum powder. "When we climbed into vehicles after they'd been hit, no matter what time of day or night it was, you couldn't see three feet in front of you. You breathed in that dust."

Dr Rokke once quoted "That the term 'depleted' implies it isn't particularly dangerous; in fact, this waste product of the nuclear industry is 'conveniently' disposed of by producing deadly weapons. Depleted uranium is chemically toxic. It is an extremely dense, hard metal, and can cause chemical poisoning to the body in the same way as can lead or any other heavy metal.

However, depleted uranium is also radio logically hazardous, as it spontaneously burns on impact, creating tiny aerosolised glass particles which are small enough to be inhaled. These uranium oxide particles emit all types of radiation, alpha, beta and gamma, and can be carried in the air over long distances.

Depleted uranium has a half life of 4.5 billion years, and the presence of depleted uranium ceramic aerosols can pose a long term threat to human health and the environment". Doug has taught nuclear, biological and chemical warfare, hazardous materials, and emergency medicine for over 20 years to both civilian and military personnel.

Although the British Ministry of Defence and the Pentagon insist that DU weapons pose no special risk, Dr Rokke and some other veterans believe the munitions have made them ill, and that they also threaten civilians. He wrote the following paper which was an updated version that was given to the British House of Commons, London, England on the 16th of December 1999 part of which is contained below:

What Adverse Health Effects Have Been Observed,
Recognized, Treated, And Documented?

The answer to this question is difficult. Deliberate denial and delay of medical screening and consequent medical care of not only U.S. friendly fire casualties who inhaled, ingested, and had wound contamination but all others with verified or suspected internalized exposure makes actually knowing what has occurred difficult.

Although I, physicians, scientists, and other medical personnel recommended immediate medical care during March, April, and May of 1991 and many times since then the United States Department of Defense, the British Ministry of Defense, and consequently the United States Department of Veterans Affairs are still reluctant to provide thorough medical screening and necessary medical care.

Dr. Bernard Rostker wrote to me in a letter dated March 1, 1999 that physicians and health physicists at the completion of the ground war decided that medical screening and care for uranium exposures was not required. Actual documents refute this! Today, individuals are sick and others are dead who were denied medical care even though I requested it in a letter dated May 21, 1997 which was sent to the Office of Surgeon U.S. Army Materiel Command and forwarded to Dr. Rostker by Dr. (LTC) Kelsey.

Verified adverse health effects from personal experience, physicians, and from personal reports from individuals with known DU exposures include:

1. Reactive airway disease
2. Neurological abnormalities
3. Kidney stones and chronic kidney pain
4. Rashes
5. Vision degradation and night vision losses
6. Gum tissue problems
7. Lymphoma
8. Various forms of skin and organ cancer
9. Neuro-psychological disorders
10. Uranium in semen
11. Sexual dysfunction, and
12. Birth defects in offspring.

As further evidence to conclude the Depleted Uranium (DU) story I would like to enter Dr Rokke entire report dated 23 July 2007 as follows:

Depleted Radioactive Waste From Iraq Wars Dumped in U.S.

Dr. Doug Rokke, Major, retired, U.S. Army
former Director, U.S. Army Depleted Uranium project
8 August 2008

During the summer of 1991, the United States military had collected artillery, tanks, Bradley fighting vehicles, conventional and unconventional munitions, trucks, etc at Camp Doha in Kuwait.

As result of carelessness, this weapons depot caught fire with consequent catastrophic explosions resulting in death, injury, illness and extensive environmental contamination from depleted uranium and conventional explosives.

Recently the emirate of Kuwait required the U.S. Department of Defense to remove the contamination. Consequently, over 6,700 tons of contaminated soil, sand and other residue was collected and shipped back to the United States for burial by American Ecology at Boise, Idaho.

When Bob Nichols, an investigative journalist, and I contacted American Ecology we found out that they had absolutely no knowledge of U.S. Army regulations and all of the medical orders dealing with depleted uranium contamination, environmental remediation procedures, safety and medical care.


They had never heard of Environmental Protection Agency guidelines for dealing with hazardous waste such as radioactive materials and conventional explosives by-products.

The trans-shipment across the ocean, unloading at Longview, Washington State port, transport by rail, and burial in Idaho not only endanger the residents of these areas, but pose a significant agricultural threat through introduction of pests, microbes etc. foreign to our nation.

Sadly, the known adverse health and environmental hazards from uranium weapons contamination are in our own backyard. The EPA has listed the former Nuclear Metals-Starmet uranium weapons manufacturing site in Concord, Mass. on the EPA's Superfund National Priority List because it poses a significant risk to public health and the environment.

Consequently, the community in which our nation was born on April 18, 1775, is now the location of America's own closed dirty bomb factory that will endanger the health and safety of the descendants of the Minutemen.

The previous delivery of at least 100 GBU 28 bunker buster bombs containing depleted uranium warheads by the United States and their use by Israel against Lebanese targets has resulted in additional radioactive and chemical toxic contamination with consequent adverse health and environmental effects throughout the Middle East. Israeli tank gunners are also using depleted uranium tank rounds, as photographs verify.

Today, U.S., British, and now Israeli military personnel are using illegal uranium munitions-America's and England's own "dirty bombs." The U.S. Army, Department of Energy, Department of Defense and British Ministry of Defense officials deny that there are any adverse health and environmental effects as a consequence of the manufacture, testing and/or use of uranium munitions. They do so to avoid liability for the willful and illegal dispersal of a radioactive toxic material - depleted uranium.

The use of uranium weapons is a crime against humanity. All governments must force cessation of uranium weapons use. Israel should provide medical care to all DU casualties in Lebanon and clean up all DU contamination.

U.S. and British officials have arrogantly refused to comply with their own regulations, orders and directives that require U.S. Department of Defense officials to provide prompt and effective medical care to all exposed individuals. They also refuse to clean up dispersed radioactive contamination as required by Army regulations.

In closing my report on DU I would like to thank those critics who remain so badly informed and no doubt have some other hidden agenda or reason for carrying out what can only be described as a very personal attack on me. For those that have read my many articles and seen me on TV I thank you sincerely for your kind words, support and your own courage in standing up against the establishment. We all know the truth and we all know that the manufacturing and use of DU weaponry will be stopped but it just takes time.

On of those attacks came from within a large NGO. I can only assume that it is receiving funds that must be protected and does not want people like me to rock the boat. To that person I say "you had better start swimming". The other two that have been extremely critical throughout my campaign are Roger Helbig and Nigel Lamb. To these propaganda machines I say your day will come.

Peter Eyre - Middle East Consultant and special writer for the Palestine Telegraph





#2438 From: savorsuccesslady3@...
Date: Wed Jun 17, 2009 12:05 am
Subject: Uranium-238 Dumped in Lake Superior
savorsuccess...
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
Uranium-238 Dumped in Lake Superior...
Just the Icing On the (Yellow) Cake
 
 
Cathy Garger
 
 
Uranium-238, the primary component of what is often called "Depleted Uranium," has been dumped, fired, burned, and/or exploded all over the US and in many US waters and our oceans, too. 
 
The following article brings to our attention the issue of the dumping of Depleted Uranium into a major US lake. But the sad truth is that this story is merely the "icing on the cake" of the entire US Radiation Nightmare as it exists today.
 
Yet what makes this article so very special is the simple fact that it's quite rare that such information is covered by the US mainstream media at all.
 
Uranium weapons use in the US has a rich history of deception and cover-up. Many people simply have no idea whatsoever that Uranium-238 in munitions is still, to this day, not "just" being dumped, produced, and manufactured, but it's also being fired and exploded in the open air in several states, such as California, New Mexico, Nevada, Arizona, Alaska, and Maryland.
 
Admittedly, while we can certainly not "un-do" decades of toxic and radioactive Uranium pollution and contamination in every one of our states, the more "mainstream" this news becomes, the more quickly the American public will 
begin to demand a swift and total end to *all* use of Uranium... and a complete and thorough remediation of all affected lands and bodies of water.
 
I say this often, almost as if an automatic refrain ... and then I pause, realizing I can not simply just stop right there if I am going to tell the entire truth.
 
The sad and candid reality is that it is simply not ever going to be possible to clean up all of the air, water, and soils that have been radioactively contaminated, as these invisible radioactive particles travel widely and are spread easily through water, air, and the earth... throughout our entire environment.
 
Man-made, health-destroying, ionizing radioactivity is everywhere. It is in everything... in all of the air, water, and soil throughout the US.
 
There is no escaping radioactivity in America today. We can not move to any state in the US and think we are "safe" there just because our state does not have Uranium munitions "testing," nuclear reactors, Uranium enrichment, Plutonium-processing plants, or just because no Uranium weapons productions "research" or mining or production or manufacturing or dumping or burning or exploding is taking place there.
 
From the start of the Manhattan Project in the early 1940s -  which resulted not "just" in the production of nuclear bombs but also in thousands of open air, radiological so-called "tests" (both large and smaller) still conducted to this very day, the entire American environment has been bombarded continuously with radioactive particles that will be with us for what is, quite literally, an eternity.
 
And while we can not un-do the past... what we *can* do is to now demand, in our loudest, most passionate, collectively assertive, unified voices: Americans say NO MORE to man-made, ionizing radiation!
 
We can - and we must - now stand up and publicly exclaim: Americans say NO MORE to nuclear reactors! No more to Uranium weapons!
 
As the Native American communities have been wisely, knowingly proclaiming for many years: Leave that deadly Uranium underground - where it belongs!
 
We need to adopt a no nonsense, zero tolerance for the dirty practices of removing Uranium from the ground and turning it into radioactive Uranium and Plutonium fuel for use in nuclear reactors and lethal weapons.
 
We need to put an end to this deadly use of these radioactive Uranium poison gases which sicken, weaken, and prematurely kill substantial populations of innocents.
 
Most people who possess a working conscience are highly upset to learn that weaponized Uranium gas has been used promiscuously as a lethal weapon in Afghanistan since 2001 and in Iraq since 1991. But we must never forget for a minute that it is has also been continuously used in our *own* environment, on our *own* people, right here inside the US since the early 1940s - and continuously ever since!
 
Most people I speak with out in public know little, if any, of this. Since the media is generally (kept) silent on Uranium poison gas use in America and, thus, *on* Americans... it is up to ordinary people like you and me to tell the rest of the United States people what our government and media refuse to say. 
 
Some websites about radiation follow this article. I urge you to share this far and wide with anyone you suspect may not yet know.
 
Uranium inside the human body wrecks DNA and genetic material for generations to follow. We must, for the sake of our kids, spread the word!  The need to put an end to radioactive Uranium use is just too important to keep to ourselves!
 
Our children ~ and their children forevermore ~ will be awfully glad you did.
 
Thank you for all you do!
 
 
Cathy Garger
 
  
News From 91.3 KUWS

Duluth Indian Commission hears case for testing DoD barrels in Lake Superior

 
Story posted Tuesday at 11:04 a.m.
 
6/16/2009
The environmental action group Nukewatch is accusing the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency of misleading the public about Department of Defense barrel dumpsites in Lake Superior. Rich Kremer reports.
 
Nukewatch Co-Chair John LaForge says the MPCA’s statements about the barrels dumped in Lake Superior during the Cold War years are inconsistent at best and wrong at worst.
 
“We’d like them to clean up those internal contradictions on their website, where on one hand they say nothing hazardous was ever found in the barrels and on the very same website it lists the 17 toxic heavy metals and other chemicals that were found in the seven barrels that were recovered in 1994.”
 
That list includes known carcinogens like arsenic, benzene, barium and cadmium. Speaking to the Duluth American Indian Commission Monday night, LaForge says state and federal agencies are also covering up possible radioactive elements in the barrels. LaForge says he found documentation from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission that shows the company producing the waste was licensed to handle radioactive materials.
 
“They used uranium 238 for armor piercing projectiles and it’s our understanding that Honeywell, which is the source of these 1,500 barrels, was machining this uranium 238 to develop these depleted uranium shells back in the 50’s and 60’s before they were used in war. Our suspicion is that the radioactive emissions that were found by the EPA in 1990 are perhaps from some of these uranium parts that were being machined by Honeywell.”
 
MPCA and Honeywell officials have long denied that the barrels, dumped near French River near Duluth’s water intake, contain anything significant amounts of chemicals. They say amounts detected were too small to pose a public health threat.
 
Even so, American Indian Commission Co-Chair Rick DeFoe wanted to hear the allegations.
 
“I was grateful that he came here tonight to share the information that he did and I hope it can be dispensed in a way that will inspire and energize and awaken those folks that are wondering, that they wonder a little bit deeper and a little harder and that they care for this water that we have here.”
 
LaForge wants federal money to pay for water and sediment testing at the barrel sites. Meanwhile, the Red Cliff Band of Chippewa is working with the Department of Defense to remove 70 of those barrels for testing over the next two years.
 
Learn more about Uranium's effects from nuclear reactors, weapons, and so-called "testing":
 
 
 
 
 
 



#2437 From: James Nimmo <violadamore2@...>
Date: Wed Jun 3, 2009 2:21 pm
Subject: Plutonium "converted to a safe and stable form?!?!?!?
violadamore2
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
--[including long term CANCER CARE?  What's he thinking, besides being obviously desparate to work with nuclear waste?  This stuff is NEVER safe and stable!!  Who do they think they're kidding?  I guess a majority of Americans!]
 
snip---http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090528/ap_on_go_ot/us_stimulus_nuclear_cleanup
 
 

 For 32-year-old Robert Valdez, one of 400 new workers already added to the 10,000 who work on the cleanup, it's an opportunity he said was life-changing.

"I'm making pretty close to $10 an hour more here, just to start, plus the benefits," said Valdez, who has two children. 

 

 

The federal government now spends about $2 billion each year at Hanford, or roughly one-third of the total nuclear cleanup budget, to rid the site of radioactive and toxic waste.

 

Since 1989, 20 tons of leftover plutonium has been converted to a safe, stable form. About 2,300 tons of spent nuclear fuel has been moved away from the Columbia River. Five of nine nuclear reactors have been decommissioned and demolished to just shells, and liquid waste has been removed from 177 leaky underground tanks that threaten the river.


#2436 From: James Nimmo <violadamore2@...>
Date: Thu May 28, 2009 12:57 am
Subject: Fw: [MCM] "When We Almost Nuked Savannah"
violadamore2
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 


----- Forwarded Message ----
From: Mark Crispin Miller <mark.miller@...>
To: newsfromunderground@googlegroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2009 5:15:31 PM
Subject: [MCM] "When We Almost Nuked Savannah"

This is a hair-raising story--and reason enough to call for a ban on nuclear weapons; less reverential treatment of the US military by our press; and a recommitment to transparency in government (the Pentagon included).

There's some major "change" that we will not be getting soon, unless we scream about it unrelentingly (and more).

MCM

When We Almost Nuked Savannah
The Case of the Missing H-Bomb
By JEFFREY ST. CLAIR
Counter Punch
May 15-17, 2009
http://www.counterpunch.org/stclair05152009.html
Things go missing. It's to be expected. Even at the
Pentagon. Last October, the Pentagon's inspector general
reported that the military's accountants had misplaced a
destroyer, several tanks and armored personnel carriers,
hundreds of machine guns, rounds of ammo, grenade
launchers and some surface-to-air missiles. In all,
nearly $8 billion in weapons were AWOL.

Those anomalies are bad enough. But what's truly
chilling is the fact that the Pentagon has lost track of
the mother of all weapons, a hydrogen bomb. The
thermonuclear weapon, designed to incinerate Moscow, has
been sitting somewhere off the coast of Savannah,
Georgia for the past 40 years. The Air Force has gone to
greater lengths to conceal the mishap than to locate the
bomb and secure it.

On the night of February 5, 1958 a B-47 Stratojet bomber
carrying a hydrogen bomb on a night training flight off
the Georgia coast collided with an F-86 Saberjet fighter
at 36,000 feet. The collision destroyed the fighter and
severely damaged a wing of the bomber, leaving one of
its engines partially dislodged. The bomber's pilot,
Maj. Howard Richardson, was instructed to jettison the
H-bomb before attempting a landing. Richardson dropped
the bomb into the shallow waters of Wassaw Slough, near
the mouth of the Savannah River, a few miles from the
city of Tybee Island, where he believed the bomb would
be swiftly recovered.

The Pentagon recorded the incident in a top secret memo
to the chairman of the Atomic Energy Commission. The
memo has been partially declassified: "A B-47 aircraft
with a [word redacted] nuclear weapon aboard was damaged
in a collision with an F-86 aircraft near Sylvania,
Georgia, on February 5, 1958. The B-47 aircraft
attempted three times unsuccessfully to land with the
weapon. The weapon was then jettisoned visually over
water off the mouth of the Savannah River. No detonation
was observed."

Soon search and rescue teams were sent to the site.
Wassaw Slough was mysteriously cordoned off by Air Force
troops. For six weeks, the Air Force looked for the bomb
without success. Underwater divers scoured the depths,
troops tromped through nearby salt marshes, and a blimp
hovered over the area attempting to spot a hole or
crater in the beach or swamp. Then just a month later,
the search was abruptly halted. The Air Force sent its
forces to Florence, South Carolina, where another H-bomb
had been accidentally dropped by a B-47. The bomb's 200
pounds of TNT exploded on impact, sending radioactive
debris across the landscape. The explosion caused
extensive property damage and several injuries on the
ground. Fortunately, the nuke itself didn't detonate.

The search teams never returned to Tybee Island, and the
affair of the missing H-bomb was discreetly covered up.
The end of the search was noted in a partially
declassified memo from the Pentagon to the AEC, in which
the Air Force politely requested a new H-bomb to replace
the one it had lost. "The search for this weapon was
discontinued on 4-16-58 and the weapon is considered
irretrievably lost. It is requested that one [phrase
redacted] weapon be made available for release to the
DOD as a replacement."

There was a big problem, of course, and the Pentagon
knew it. In the first three months of 1958 alone, the
Air Force had four major accidents involving H-bombs.
(Since 1945, the United States has lost 11 nuclear
weapons.) The Tybee Island bomb remained a threat, as
the AEC acknowledged in a June 10, 1958 classified memo
to Congress: "There exists the possibility of accidental
discovery of the unrecovered weapon through dredging or
construction in the probable impact area. ... The
Department of Defense has been requested to monitor all
dredging and construction activities."

But the wizards of Armageddon saw it less as a security,
safety or ecological problem, than a potential public
relations disaster that could turn an already paranoid
population against their ambitious nuclear project. The
Pentagon and the AEC tried to squelch media interest in
the issue by a doling out a morsel of candor and a lot
of misdirection. In a joint statement to the press, the
Defense Department and the AEC admitted that
radioactivity could be "scattered" by the detonation of
the high explosives in the H-bombs. But the letter
downplayed possibility of that ever happening: "The
likelihood that a particular accident would involve a
nuclear weapon is extremely limited."

In fact, that scenario had already occurred and would
occur again.

That's where the matter stood for more than 42 years
until a deep sea salvage company, run by former Air
Force personnel and a CIA agent, disclosed the existence
of the bomb and offered to locate it for a million
dollars. Along with recently declassified documents, the
disclosure prompted fear and outrage among coastal
residents and calls for a congressional investigation
into the incident itself and why the Pentagon had
stopped looking for the missing bomb. "We're horrified
because some of that information has been covered up for
years," said Rep. Jack Kingston, a Georgia Republican.

The cover-up continues. The Air Force, however, has told
local residents and the congressional delegation that
there was nothing to worry about.

"We've looked into this particular issue from all angles
and we're very comfortable," said Major Gen. Franklin J.
"Judd" Blaisdell, deputy chief of staff for air and
space operations at Air Force headquarters in
Washington. "Our biggest concern is that of localized
heavy metal contamination."

The Air Force even has suggested that the bomb itself
was not armed with a plutonium trigger. But this
contention is disputed by a number of factors. Howard
Dixon, a former Air Force sergeant who specialized in
loading nuclear weapons onto planes, said that in his 31
years of experience he never once remembered a bomb
being put on a plane that wasn't fully armed. Moreover,
a newly declassified 1966 congressional testimony of
W.J. Howard, then assistant secretary of defense,
describes the Tybee Island bomb as a "complete weapon, a
bomb with a nuclear capsule." Howard said that the Tybee
Island bomb was one of two weapons lost up to that time
that contained a plutonium trigger.

Recently declassified documents show that the jettisoned
bomb was an "Mk-15, Mod O" hydrogen bomb, weighing four
tons and packing more than 100 times the explosive punch
of the one that incinerated Hiroshima. This was the
first thermonuclear weapon deployed by the Air Force and
featured the relatively primitive design created by that
evil genius Edward Teller. The only fail-safe for this
weapon was the physical separation of the plutonium
capsule (or pit) from the weapon.

In addition to the primary nuclear capsule, the bomb
also harbored a secondary nuclear explosive, or
sparkplug, designed to make it go thermo. This is a
hollow plug about an inch in diameter made of either
plutonium or highly enriched uranium (the Pentagon has
never said which) that is filled with fusion fuel, most
likely lithium-6 deuteride. Lithium is highly reactive
in water. The plutonium in the bomb was manufactured at
the Hanford Nuclear Site in Washington State and would
be the oldest in the United States. That's bad news:
Plutonium gets more dangerous as it ages. In addition,
the bomb would contain other radioactive materials, such
as uranium and beryllium.

The bomb is also charged with 400 pounds of TNT,
designed to cause the plutonium trigger to implode and
thus start the nuclear explosion. As the years go by,
those high explosives are becoming flaky, brittle and
sensitive. The bomb is most likely now buried in 5 to 15
feet of sand and slowly leaking radioactivity into the
rich crabbing grounds of the Wassaw Slough. If the
Pentagon can't find the Tybee Island bomb, others might.
That's the conclusion of Bert Soleau, a former CIA
officer who now works with ASSURE, the salvage company.
Soleau, a chemical engineer, said that it wouldn't be
hard for terrorists to locate the weapon and recover the
lithium, beryllium and enriched uranium, "the essential
building blocks of nuclear weapons." What to do? Coastal
residents want the weapon located and removed.
"Plutonium is a nightmare and their own people know it,"
said Pam O'Brien, an anti-nuke organizer from
Douglassville, Georgia. "It can get in everything--your
eyes, your bones, your gonads. You never get over it.
They need to get that thing out of there."

The situation is reminiscent of the Palomares incident.
On January 16, 1966, a B-52 bomber, carrying four
hydrogen bombs, crashed while attempting to refuel in
mid-air above the Spanish coast. Three of the H-bombs
landed near the coastal farming village of Palomares.
One of the bombs landed in a dry creek bed and was
recovered, battered but relatively intact. But the TNT
in two of the bombs exploded, gouging 10-foot holes in
the ground and showering uranium and plutonium over a
vast area. Over the next three months, more than 1,400
tons of radioactive soil and vegetation was scooped up,
placed in barrels and, ironically enough, shipped back
to the Savannah River Nuclear Weapons Lab, where it
remains. The tomato fields near the craters were burned
and buried. But there's no question that due to strong
winds and other factors much of the contaminated soil
was simply left in the area. "The total extent of the
spread will never be known," concluded a 1975 report by
the Defense Nuclear Agency.

The cleanup was a joint operation between Air Force
personnel and members of the Spanish civil guard. The
U.S. workers wore protective clothing and were monitored
for radiation exposure, but similar precautions weren't
taken for their Spanish counterparts. "The Air Force was
unprepared to provide adequate detection and monitoring
for personnel when an aircraft accident occurred
involving plutonium weapons in a remote area of a
foreign country," the Air Force commander in charge of
the cleanup later testified to Congress.

The fourth bomb landed eight miles offshore and was
missing for several months. It was eventually located by
a mini-submarine in 2,850 feet of water, where it rests
to this day.

Two years later, on January 21, 1968, a similar accident
occurred when a B-52 caught fire in flight above
Greenland and crashed in ice-covered North Star Bay near
the Thule Air Base. The impact detonated the explosives
in all four of the plane's H-bombs, which scattered
uranium, tritium and plutonium over a 2,000-foot radius.
The intense fire melted a hole in the ice, which then
refroze, encapsulating much of the debris, including the
thermonuclear assembly from one of the bombs. The
recovery operation, conducted in near total darkness at
temperatures that plunged to minus-70 degrees, was known
as Project Crested Ice. But the work crews called it
"Dr. Freezelove."

More than 10,000 tons of snow and ice were cut away, put
into barrels and transported to Savannah River and Oak
Ridge for disposal. Other radioactive debris was simply
left on site, to melt into the bay after the spring
thaws. More than 3,000 workers helped in the Thule
recovery effort, many of them Danish soldiers. As at
Palomares, most of the American workers were offered
some protective gear, but not the Danes, who did much of
the most dangerous work, including filling the barrels
with the debris, often by hand. The decontamination
procedures were primitive to say the least. An Air Force
report noted that they were cleansed "by simply brushing
the snow from garments and vehicles."

Even though more than 38 Navy ships were called to
assist in the recovery operation, and it was an open
secret that the bombs had been lost, the Pentagon
continued to lie about the situation. In one contentious
exchange with the press, a Pentagon spokesman uttered
this classic bit of military doublespeak: "I don't know
of any missing bomb, but we have not positively
identified what I think you are looking for."

When Danish workers at Thule began to get sick from a
slate of illnesses, ranging from rare cancers to blood
disorders, the Pentagon refused to help. Even after a
1987 epidemiological study by a Danish medical institute
showed that Thule workers were 50 percent more likely to
develop cancers than other members of the Danish
military, the Pentagon still refused to cooperate. Later
that year, 200 of the workers sued the United States
under the Foreign Military Claims Act. The lawsuit was
dismissed, but the discovery process revealed thousands
of pages of secret documents about the incident,
including the fact that Air Force workers at the site,
unlike the Danes, have not been subject to long-term
health monitoring. Even so, the Pentagon continues to
keep most of the material on the Thule incident secret,
including any information on the extent of the
radioactive (and other toxic) contamination.

These recovery efforts don't inspire much confidence.
But the Tybee Island bomb presents an even touchier
situation. The presence of the unstable lithium
deuteride and the deteriorating high explosives make
retrieval of the bomb a very dangerous proposition--so
dangerous, in fact, that even some environmentalists and
anti-nuke activists argue that it might present less of
a risk to leave the bomb wherever it is.

In short, there aren't any easy answers. The problem is
exacerbated by the Pentagon's failure to conduct a
comprehensive analysis of the situation and reluctance
to fully disclose what it knows. "I believe the
plutonium capsule is in the bomb, but that a nuclear
detonation is improbable because the neutron generators
used back then were polonium-beryllium, which has a very
short half-life," said Don Moniak, a nuclear weapons
expert with the Blue Ridge Environmental Defense League
in Aiken, South Carolina. "Without neutrons, weapons
grade plutonium won't blow.  However, there could be a
fission or criticality event if the plutonium was
somehow put in an incorrect configuration. There could
be a major inferno if the high explosives went off and
the lithium deuteride reacted as expected. Or there
could just be an explosion that scattered uranium and
plutonium all over hell."

This essay is featured in the forthcoming book, Loose
Nukes published by Count Zero Press.

Jeffrey St. Clair is the author of Been Brown So Long It
Looked Like Green to Me: the Politics of Nature and
Grand Theft Pentagon. His newest book, Born Under a Bad
Sky, is just out from AK Press / CounterPunch books. He
can be reached at: sitka@....

_____________________________________________

Portside aims to provide material of interest
to people on the left that will help them to
interpret the world and to change it.

Submit via email: moderator@...
Submit via the Web: portside.org/submit
Frequently asked questions: portside.org/faq
Subscribe: portside.org/subscribe
Search the archives: portside.org/archive


 


#2435 From: Bob Nichols <bob.bobnichols@...>
Date: Sat May 23, 2009 11:57 pm
Subject: The Brits
twrunner
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
All,

The Brits lie with such aplomb with that cute accent.

Bob

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/cumbria/8063372.stm

Staff contaminated at Sellafield

Sellafield
The HSE said the contractors are unlikely to suffer long-term effects

The operators of Sellafield are to be prosecuted after two contractors received a "higher than anticipated" dose of radiation.

The workers were refurbishing a floor at the site's plutonium finishing and storage plant in July 2007 when they were exposed to airborne contamination.

Sellafield Ltd is accused of failing to discharge its duty under Section 3 (1) of the Health and Safety Act 1974.

The case will be heard at Whitehaven Magistrates' Court on 24 July.

A spokeswoman for the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) said: "The two contractors were exposed during the decontamination of an area of concrete floor.

"As a result of this exposure the two contractor employees received an internal dose of radiation."

She added: "As far as we know the contractors have not shown any illness arising out of this incident. The level of dose received would indicate that the likelihood of adverse long-term effects is low."

Sellafield Ltd confirmed the incident took place, but said it would not comment further while a legal case was active.

Earlier this month, the company revealed that a low-level radioactive leak at the nuclear reprocessing plant had gone undetected for 14 months.

In that instance, no-one was contaminated.





#2434 From: Bob Nichols <bob.bobnichols@...>
Date: Sat May 23, 2009 9:45 pm
Subject: Public Service Announcement on Uranium Munition - Bullets, Shells and Missiles
twrunner
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
This Public Service Announcement has been viewed 14. 5 Million times.

It is all true. No Facts have been changed to protect War Criminals in the US Government.

Bob Nichols
Project Censored Award Winner
San Francisco Bay View newspaper

Depleted Uranium (My Public Service Announcement )

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QyX4307WgBc




#2433 From: CAMPAIGN <peace@...>
Date: Mon Jan 26, 2009 12:36 am
Subject: PLEASE GO TO DIGG.COM!! - Canada & DU weapons: 50,000 U.S. soldiers disabled in last 3 months
ecologynews
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
NOTE: Please take 1 minute & go to this URL at digg.com and "DIGG" this story.  This will drive the story into prominence under World News.  Thank you!

http://digg.com/world_news/Canada_DU_weapons_50_000_U_S_soldiers_disabled

Canada & DU weapons: 50,000 U.S. soldiers disabled in last 3 months

Canada & DU weapons: 50,000 U.S. soldiers disabled in last 3 months with illegal Canadian uranium in U.S. DU weapons. Expert witness Leuren Moret on depleted uranium (DU) weapons and 1,000,000 U.S. veterans (new Veteran's Administration statistics) from Iraq and Afghanistan, disabled by Canadian DU.

Listen now (MP3): http://tinyurl.com/c9fotv



--
_________________________________
Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd
3339 West 41 Avenue
Vancouver, B.C. V6N3E5 CANADA
TEL: 604-733-8134
FAX: 604-733-8135
Email: webre@...
EXOPOLITICS: http://www.exopolitics.com
STAR DREAMS INITIATIVE
http://www.peaceinspace.net
CAMPAIGN: http://www.peaceinspace.org
NUCLEAR FREE ZONE: http://peaceinspace.blogs.com/nuclear_free_zone/
9/11 War Crimes Tribunal: http://peaceinspace.blogs.com/911/


LISTEN TO EXOPOLITICS RADIO
http://www.exopoliticsradio.com


#2432 From: CAMPAIGN <peace@...>
Date: Sun Jan 25, 2009 10:12 pm
Subject: COOPRADIO.ORG: Canada & DU weapons: 50,000 U.S. soldiers disabled in last 3 months with illegal Canadian uranium in U.S. DU weapons - Update with independent scientist Leuren Moret
ecologynews
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 

COOPRADIO.ORG: Canada & DU weapons: 50,000 U.S. soldiers disabled in last 3 months with illegal Canadian uranium in U.S. DU weapons - Update with independent scientist Leuren Moret

When: Monday Jan. 26, 2009 @ Noon - 1 PM PT
Where: Vancouver Coop Radio CFRO 102.7 FM
Listen Live: http://www.coopradio.org

A conversation with expert witness Leuren Moret on depleted uranium (DU) weapons, and the impacts they have had on the 1,000,000 disabled U.S. veterans (new Veteran's Administration statistics) from Iraq and Afghanistan, caused largely by Canadian uranium illegally used in U.S. depleted uranium (DU) weapons.   This interview addresses the 50,000 new casualties in U.S. military personnel in Iraq/Afghanistan October-December (3 months) of 2008.  As of the end of 2008, there are over 400,000 officially medically disabled soldiers, with one expert estimate as high as 1,000,000 medically disabled U.S. soldiers.

Host: Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd

Listen to Audio Archive (MP3) now:

http://exopolitics.blogs.com/files/coopradio---moret-du-1-26-09.mp3

PROGRAM SUMMARY & REFERENCES:


INAUGURATION:  Will Obama Keep His Promises – close Gitmo, end Iraq war, medical care for soldiers/vets, more war in Afghanistan?

•    Veterans Ball canceled, organizer missing

•    Colonel with cancer in command at inauguration

•    Obama preparing order to close Gitmo

•    Diplomats, generals join Obama in war meeting

•    Obama team rejects Afghan peace plan, German expert reports

IRAQ/AFGHAN: 50,000 NEW CASUALTIES IN PAST 3 MONTHS

Mental Illness: PTSD, violence, murder, cannibalism

•    VA diagnosing higher rates of PTSD

•    VA confirms 18 vets commit suicide every day

•    US to pay $350,000 after suicide of Marine

•    2002: 4 Wives slain in 6 weeks at Fort Bragg

•    2008: Fort Bragg Murders (3 wives slain in short time)

•    2006: A grisly New Orleans Murder Mystery Takes Another Twist: Man accused of killing and mutilating his girlfriend before killing himself was an Iraq war hero (he also cooked and ate her)

•    Veteran with PTSD acquitted in robbery case

•    Ex-Carson GI pleads guilty in robbery, deaths

CANCER:

•    Oral cancer in US soldiers vs. oral sex and Gardasil

•    Doctors remove 45 tumours from 26-year-old Dutch Veteran

•    States and VA at odds on cancer data

HOMELESS VETS:

•    Study: 1 out of 4 homeless vets are veterans

DU CONTAMINATION OF TEXAS A&M FROM HELO CRASH:

•    Texas A&M Black Hawk crash kills 1, injures 4
•    Helo wreckage to remain at A&M into weekend
•    Second victim of helo crash at A&M dies

VETERANS ADMINISTRATION:

•    Shinseki's VA confirmation looks likely
General Shinseki issued DU mandates and orders, fired by Bush, now appointed head of VA – will he help the soldiers?

•    Bill seeks hospitals for vets in every state

•    Board finally to review disability ratings

UNDECLARED NUCLEAR WAR: 

AIR STRIKES SYNCHRONIZED WITH MONSOON FOR MAXIMUM RAINOUT IN MIDDLE EAST/C.ASIA

•    US airpower in Iraq and Afghanistan: 2004-2007

•    Radioactivity lingers longer in water blast

ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS:

•    Camel 'plague' puzzles scientists

•    Obesity levels in China rising fast, study finds

•    Uranium levels in Los Angeles drinking water double in 2007

•    Populations exposed to environmental uranium: Increased infertility and reproductive cancers

•    Uranium and diabetes

BUSH ARMY/VA LEADERS REGRET:

•    Pace offers regret for Iraq War mistakes

•    Former VA chief says Bush did right by vets

GUANTANAMO TO CLOSE, IRAQ WAR TO END:

•    Obama preparing to close Gitmo
•    Obama seeks halt to Guantanamo trials
•    Obama draft order calls for closing Guantanamo Bay

•    Diplomats, generals join Obama in war meeting

….AFGHANISTAN WAR TO ESCALATE

•    Military projects part of stimulus

•    AFGHANISTAN SEEKS CONTROL OVER NATO TROOPS

OBAMA TEAM REJECTS AFGHAN PEACE PLAN, GERMAN EXPERT REPORTS
JANUARY 19, 2009
 
The Obama transition team has already rejected out of hand a plan for a negotiated peace settlement in Afghanistan, which had been approved by the Karzai government as well as by its opponents. A leading mainstream German Afghanistan expert, Christoph Hörstel, who had attempted to play the role of a back channel between Afghan circles and the Obama team, reports that his approach with this peace plan was brusquely rejected by Obama's top Afghan advisor, who is not named in the report. This story is reported on the Swiss-German blog Alles Schall und Rauch.

According to Hörstel, Afghan mujaheddin circles also report that their efforts to negotiate with the incoming Obama regime have also been rejected, despite the fact that Kabul is now virtually surrounded and could fall to the Taliban at any time.

Hoerstel is the author of two recent books on Afghanistan.
The German language audio tape of the Hoerstel interview is available at the link given below.

Am 19. Januar hat Alles Schall und Rauch eine Interview mit einem der besten Kenner Afghanistans und der Taliban geführt. Herr Hörstel sagte zu mir, er hätte einen Friedensplan, der von den Taliban abgesegnet ist, den Sicherheitsberater des Obama-Team zugesandt, in Hinblick darauf, da die Taliban Kabul eingekesselt haben und 70% des Landes beherrschen, um weiteres Blutvergiessen zu verhindern Dieser Plan wurde von Obama vom Tisch gewischt. Hier der Link zum Interview:
 
http://alles-schallundrauch.blogspot.com/2009/01/interview-mit-christoph-r-hrstel.html

REFERENCES:   
COOP Radio Interview January 26, 2008: Leuren Moret on "DU Update"



INAUGURATION:  Will Obama Keep His Promises – close Gitmo, end Iraq war, medical care for soldiers/vets, more war in Afghanistan?

•    Veterans ball canceled, organizer missing
By Rick Maze - Staff writer
Posted : Monday Jan 19, 2009 14:15:20 EST
http://www.armytimes.com/news/2009/01/military_vetsball_missingorganizer_011909w/

•    Obama draft order calls for closing Guantanamo Bay
By DAVID ESPO, AP Special Correspondent
January 21, 2009
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090121/ap_on_go_pr_wh/obama_guantanamo

•    Colonel with cancer in command at inauguration
By Kevin Maurer - The Associated Press
Posted : Sunday Jan 18, 2009 9:25:42 EST
http://www.armytimes.com/news/2009/01/ap_cancer_colonel_011809/

•    Obama team rejects Afghan peace plan, German expert reports
By Webster Tarpley on Interview with Christoph Hörstel, published January 9, 2009
http://www.rense.com/general84/djjwe.htm
German interview tape: http://alles-schallundrauch.blogspot.com/2009/01/interview-mit-christoph-r-hrstel.html

IRAQ/AFGHAN: 50,000 NEW CASUALTIES IN PAST 3 MONTHS

MENTAL:
•    VA diagnosing higher rates of PTSD
By William H. McMichael - Staff writer
Posted : Sunday Jan 18, 2009 15:44:32 EST
http://www.armytimes.com/news/2009/01/military_veterans_carestats_011609w/

•    VA Confirms 18 Vets Commit Suicide Everyday
By Jason Leopold April 21, 2008
http://www.opednews.com/articles/genera_jason_le_080421_va_confirms_18_vets_.htm

•    U.S. to pay $350,000 after suicide of Marine
By William H. McMichael - Staff writer
Posted : Saturday Jan 17, 2009 6:57:58 EST
http://www.armytimes.com/news/2009/01/military_lucey_suicidelawsuit_011509w/

•    4 Wives Slain In 6 Weeks At Fort Bragg (2002)
Husbands Blamed For Deaths, 3 Of The Men Served In Afghanistan
FORT BRAGG, N.C., July 26, 2002 | by Dan Collins CBS News
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/07/31/national/main517033.shtml

•    The Fort Bragg Murders:
In Recent Months, Three Female Soldiers Have Been Killed—Allegedly by Their Military Husbands or Boyfriends. Is the Army Doing Enough to Protect Its Women? (2008)
By Nina Burleigh
PEOPLE December 15, 2008
http://www.people.com/people/archive/article/0,,20245668,00.html

•    [This veteran ate the girls parts – they were in a cooking pot on the stove]
A Grisly New Orleans Murder Mystery Takes Another Twist:  Man Suspected of Killing and Mutilating His Girlfriend Before Killing Himself Was an Iraq War Hero
By MARCUS BARAM Oct. 20, 2006
http://abcnews.go.com/US/Story?id=2590814&page=1

•    Veteran with PTSD acquitted in robbery case
The Associated Press
Posted : Tuesday Jan 13, 2009 22:04:19 EST
http://www.armytimes.com/news/2009/01/ap_ptsd_defense_011309/

•    Ex-Carson GI pleads guilty in robbery, deaths
The Associated Press
Posted : Tuesday Jan 13, 2009 22:11:19 EST
http://www.armytimes.com/news/2009/01/ap_bressler_011309/

CANCER:
•    Oral Cancer in US Soldiers vs Oral Sex and Gardasil
ALLIANCE FOR HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION, August 27, 2007
http://ahrp.blogspot.com/2007/08/oral-cancer-in-us-soldiers-soldiers-vs.html

•    Doctors remove 45 tumours from 26-year-old Dutch veteran
November 21, 2007
Original translation from http://www.ad.nl
http://web.bandepleteduranium.org/tools/print.php?id=150

•    States and V.A. at Odds on Cancer Data
By GINA KOLATA
New York Times, October 10, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/10/health/10cancer.html?_r=1&oref=slogin&ref=todayspaper&pagewanted=print

HOMELESS VETS:
•    Study: 1 out of 4 homeless are veterans
By KIMBERLY HEFLING, Associated Press Writer
Washington Post, Thursday November 8, 2007 11:41 AM ET
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/11/08/AR2007110800234.html

DU CONTAMINATION TEXAS A&M FROM HELO CRASH:
•    Texas A&M Black Hawk crash kills 1, injures 4
By Michelle Tan - Staff writer
Posted : Wednesday Jan 14, 2009 11:56:33 EST
http://www.armytimes.com/news/2009/01/ap_black_hawk_crash_011209/
•    Helo wreckage to remain at A&M into weekend
Posted : Thursday Jan 15, 2009 11:22:43 EST
http://www.armytimes.com/news/2009/01/ap_helocrash_update_011509/
•    Second victim of helo crash at A&M dies
The Associated Press
Posted : Friday Jan 16, 2009 13:53:56 EST
http://www.armytimes.com/news/2009/01/ap_helocrashcasualty2_011509/

VETERANS ADMINISTRATION:
•    Shinseki's VA confirmation looks likely
By Rick Maze - Staff writer
Posted : Wednesday Jan 14, 2009 20:52:34 EST
http://www.armytimes.com/news/2009/01/military_va_shinsekihearing_011409w/

•    Bill seeks hospitals for vets in every state
By Rick Maze - Staff writer
Posted : Thursday Jan 15, 2009 15:46:59 EST
http://www.armytimes.com/news/2009/01/military_veteranshealth_equity_011509w/

•    Board finally to review disability ratings
By Kevin Maurer - The Associated Press
Posted : Friday Jan 16, 2009 14:54:49 EST
http://www.armytimes.com/news/2009/01/ap_disabilityboard_011609/

UNDECLARED NUCLEAR WAR:

AIR STRIKES SYNCHRONIZED WITH MONSOON FOR MAXIMUM RAINOUT IN MIDDLE EAST/C.ASIA
•    US Airpower in Iraq and Afghanistan: 2004-2007
Anthony H. Cordesman
Center for Strategic and International Studies, Washington D.C., December 13, 2007
http://www.csis.org/media/csis/pubs/071213_oif-oef_airpower.pdf
TABLE and GRAPH: http://leninology.blogspot.com/2007/12/secret-air-war-confirmed.html

•    Radioactivity Lingers Longer in Water Blast
Tulsa Tribune
Tue. June 1, 1948
http://ussslcca25.com/forest07.htm

    ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS:
•    Camel 'plague' puzzles scientists
The Observer, Sunday December 23 2007
Robin McKie, science editor
http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2007/dec/23/animalbehaviour.scienceofclimatechange/print

•    Obesity levels in China rising fast, study finds
REUTERS July 9, 2008
http://www.reuters.com/article/healthNews/idUSPEK6139420080709

•    Populations Exposed to Environmental Uranium: Increased Infertility and Reproductive Cancers
By Leuren Moret
July 28, 2008, NAMASTE Magazine
http://www.namastepublishing.co.uk/Populations%20Exposed%20to%20Enviromental%20Uranium.htm

CROCODILE TEARS: BUSH ARMY/VA LEADERS REGRET:
•    Pace offers regret for Iraq War mistakes
By Lolita C. Baldor - The Associated Press
Posted : Wednesday Jan 14, 2009 18:45:36 EST
http://www.armytimes.com/news/2009/01/ap_pace_regrets_iraq_011309/

•    Former VA chief says Bush did right by vets
By Rick Maze - Staff writer
Posted : Saturday Jan 17, 2009 16:00:46 EST
http://www.armytimes.com/news/2009/01/military_va_nicholsonbush_011609w/

GUANTANOMO TO CLOSE, IRAQ WAR TO END:

•    Obama preparing order to close Gitmo
By Lara Jakes - The Associated Press
Posted : Wednesday Jan 14, 2009 11:56:42 EST
http://www.armytimes.com/news/2009/01/ap_guantanamo_obama_011209/

•    Obama seeks halt to Guantanamo trials
By Jane Sutton
Reuters 9:40 PM, January 20, 2009
http://www.reuters.com/article/latestCrisis/idUSN21442991

•    Obama draft order calls for closing Guantanamo Bay
By DAVID ESPO, AP Special Correspondent
January 21, 2009
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090121/ap_on_go_pr_wh/obama_guantanamo

•    Diplomats, generals join Obama in war meeting
By ANNE GEARAN, AP Military Writer, January 21, 2009
http://www.navytimes.com/news/2009/01/ap_obama_war_meeting_012109/

…AFGHANISTAN WAR TO ESCALATE

•    Military projects are popular part of stimulus
By Rick Maze – Army Times
January 16, 2009
http://armytimes.com/news/2009/01/military_defense_projects_stimulus_011609w/

•    Afghanistan seeks control over NATO troops
By Jason Straziuso and Amir Shah - The Associated Press
Posted : Tuesday Jan 20, 2009 9:34:08 EST
http://www.armytimes.com/news/2009/01/ap_afghancontrol_natotroops_012009/

•    Obama team rejects Afghan peace plan, German expert reports
By Webster Tarpley on Interview with Christoph Hörstel, published January 9, 2009
http://www.rense.com/general84/djjwe.htm
German interview tape: http://alles-schallundrauch.blogspot.com/2009/01/interview-mit-christoph-r-hrstel.html

VIEW/COMMENT ON THIS ARTICLE:

http://peaceinspace.blogs.com/nuclear_free_zone/2009/01/coopradioorg-leuren-morets-update-on-du-weapons-1000000-us-soldiers-disabled-with-illegal-canadian-u.html



--
_________________________________
Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd
3339 West 41 Avenue
Vancouver, B.C. V6N3E5 CANADA
TEL: 604-733-8134
FAX: 604-733-8135
Email: webre@...
EXOPOLITICS: http://www.exopolitics.com
STAR DREAMS INITIATIVE
http://www.peaceinspace.net
CAMPAIGN: http://www.peaceinspace.org
NUCLEAR FREE ZONE: http://peaceinspace.blogs.com/nuclear_free_zone/
9/11 War Crimes Tribunal: http://peaceinspace.blogs.com/911/


LISTEN TO EXOPOLITICS RADIO
http://www.exopoliticsradio.com




#2431 From: Cathy Garger <savorsuccesslady3@...>
Date: Sat May 16, 2009 10:12 pm
Subject: Is this Univ. the first?
savorsuccess...
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
Does anyone know if the University of Vermont is the first university that has done this?
 
And can the federally-funded universities - or better yet, the 50 states themselves - divest themselves from a federal government that doesn't just make or distribute such weapons, but actually USES them on innocents?
 
Cathy Garger


The budget committee also endorsed a proposal that UVM divest endowment funds from companies that make or distribute two controversial arms systems, cluster bombs and weapons that use depleted uranium.
 


#2430 From: Morton Skorodin <MortonSkorodin@...>
Date: Wed Apr 29, 2009 3:25 pm
Subject: Re: Depleted uranium train through Ruhr and Rhine
morton_skorodin
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
I'll tell you what - no stopping someone who abseils.

--- On Wed, 4/29/09, Bob Nichols <bob.bobnichols@...> wrote:
From: Bob Nichols <bob.bobnichols@...>
Subject: [AmericanDUST] Depleted uranium train through Ruhr and Rhine
To: "AmericanDUST" <AmericanDUST@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Wednesday, April 29, 2009, 10:12 AM

World famous Activist Cecile Lecomte stops uranium train.

"The train from Gronau was held up by two hours because a female French activist who lives in Germany, 27-year-old Cécile Lecomte, had abseiled over the tracks from a road overpass."

http://tinyurl. com/c5j65c

Depleted uranium train through Ruhr and Rhine


Diet Simon, adapting from Cecile Lecomte 29.04.2009 04:42 Themen: Atom Weltweit Ă–kologie
A 25-car train half a kilometre long has just carried 1,250 tonnes of depleted uranium through the most densely populated region of Germany – destination unknown, presumably France. The train left Germany’s only uranium enrichment plant at Gronau (52° 12', 160 km south of Hamburg) in the night from 27 to 28 April. Usually trains from the German-Dutch- British-owned enrichment plant close to the city of Münster and the Dutch border have taken depleted uranium to Rotterdam for shipment to Russia, where it’s been dumped in the open air.
The Urenco company is extremely secretive about the transports. This time journalists were told by federal police that the train headed for Duisburg and on to France.

That would have taken the dangerous cargo through the densely populated Ruhr and Rhineland areas – if the police information is correct.

Anti-nuclear activists say they can only speculate what’s to be done with the uranium waste in France.

They expect it will be processed into uranium oxide in the Pierrelatte nuclear centre to make it easier to store. Construction of an interim storage for uranium oxide has been approved. Activists say it could be decades before the waste is returned to Germany.
Very close to Pierrelatte are four pressurised water reactors at Tricastin, where uranium was found in ground water last summer.

The train from Gronau was held up by two hours because a female French activist who lives in Germany, 27-year-old Cécile Lecomte, had abseiled over the tracks from a road overpass. She and other climbers have made such a name for themselves in disrupting nuclear transports that police now always have climbing specialists along on the trains to take the protesters down.

In January last year Lecomte held up a train for nearly seven hours by abseiling over its rote. This most recent climbing action was her third in one and a half years on this non-electrified section of railway.

The protest a day after the Chernobyl anniversary got some public attention from a demonstration at MĂĽnster central station and near the abseiling overpass.

“The aim is to reveal the secret atomic transports from the Gronau uranium enrichment plant and to draw people’s attention to the policy of Urenco,” she writes. ( http://de.indymedia .org/2009/ 04/248604. shtml)

“Urenco does not inform people about these transports and the dangers connected with them. On the contrary, people only get to hear about them when atomic power opponents manage to expose the departure of atomic transports by days of precise observation. It was first thought [the most recent] consignment was going to Russia.”

Lecomte writes that she means her action to be a signal against atomic policy in general and expansion of the Gronau enrichment plant in particular.

“Radioactivity knows no borders. What kind of an end to atomic power is it if Gronau is expanded, thereby supporting the construction of new nuclear plants - such as the EPR in Flamanville, France – by supplying the product to power stations all over the globe.

“The waste is carted right across Europe in secret transports. That is no solution to the nuclear waste problem. On the contrary, the population is exposed to ever more dangers, the environment is polluted ever more.

“Atomic installations need to be switched off immediately,” Lecomte writes.

Pictures of the abseiling at  http://www.anti- atom-aktuell. de/fotos/ 2009-04-27_ uranzugstopp- haeger/. More about Lecomte’s climbing protests at  http://www.eichhoer nchen.ouvaton. org/deutsch/ anti-atom/ Luftakrobatik- Atomtransporte. html .
Creative Commons-Lizenzvertrag Dieser Inhalt ist unter einer
Creative Commons-Lizenz lizenziert.
Indymedia ist eine Veröffentlichungspla ttform, auf der jede und jeder selbstverfasste Berichte publizieren kann. Eine Überprüfung der Inhalte und eine redaktionelle Bearbeitung der Beiträge finden nicht statt. Bei Anregungen und Fragen zu diesem Artikel wenden sie sich bitte direkt an die Verfasserin oder den Verfasser.
(Moderationskriterie n von Indymedia Deutschland)


#2429 From: Bob Nichols <bob.bobnichols@...>
Date: Wed Apr 29, 2009 3:12 pm
Subject: Depleted uranium train through Ruhr and Rhine
twrunner
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 

World famous Activist Cecile Lecomte stops uranium train.

"The train from Gronau was held up by two hours because a female French activist who lives in Germany, 27-year-old Cécile Lecomte, had abseiled over the tracks from a road overpass."

http://tinyurl.com/c5j65c

Depleted uranium train through Ruhr and Rhine


Diet Simon, adapting from Cecile Lecomte 29.04.2009 04:42 Themen: Atom Weltweit Ökologie
A 25-car train half a kilometre long has just carried 1,250 tonnes of depleted uranium through the most densely populated region of Germany – destination unknown, presumably France. The train left Germany’s only uranium enrichment plant at Gronau (52° 12', 160 km south of Hamburg) in the night from 27 to 28 April. Usually trains from the German-Dutch-British-owned enrichment plant close to the city of Münster and the Dutch border have taken depleted uranium to Rotterdam for shipment to Russia, where it’s been dumped in the open air.
The Urenco company is extremely secretive about the transports. This time journalists were told by federal police that the train headed for Duisburg and on to France.

That would have taken the dangerous cargo through the densely populated Ruhr and Rhineland areas – if the police information is correct.

Anti-nuclear activists say they can only speculate what’s to be done with the uranium waste in France.

They expect it will be processed into uranium oxide in the Pierrelatte nuclear centre to make it easier to store. Construction of an interim storage for uranium oxide has been approved. Activists say it could be decades before the waste is returned to Germany.
Very close to Pierrelatte are four pressurised water reactors at Tricastin, where uranium was found in ground water last summer.

The train from Gronau was held up by two hours because a female French activist who lives in Germany, 27-year-old Cécile Lecomte, had abseiled over the tracks from a road overpass. She and other climbers have made such a name for themselves in disrupting nuclear transports that police now always have climbing specialists along on the trains to take the protesters down.

In January last year Lecomte held up a train for nearly seven hours by abseiling over its rote. This most recent climbing action was her third in one and a half years on this non-electrified section of railway.

The protest a day after the Chernobyl anniversary got some public attention from a demonstration at Münster central station and near the abseiling overpass.

“The aim is to reveal the secret atomic transports from the Gronau uranium enrichment plant and to draw people’s attention to the policy of Urenco,” she writes. ( http://de.indymedia.org/2009/04/248604.shtml)

“Urenco does not inform people about these transports and the dangers connected with them. On the contrary, people only get to hear about them when atomic power opponents manage to expose the departure of atomic transports by days of precise observation. It was first thought [the most recent] consignment was going to Russia.”

Lecomte writes that she means her action to be a signal against atomic policy in general and expansion of the Gronau enrichment plant in particular.

“Radioactivity knows no borders. What kind of an end to atomic power is it if Gronau is expanded, thereby supporting the construction of new nuclear plants - such as the EPR in Flamanville, France – by supplying the product to power stations all over the globe.

“The waste is carted right across Europe in secret transports. That is no solution to the nuclear waste problem. On the contrary, the population is exposed to ever more dangers, the environment is polluted ever more.

“Atomic installations need to be switched off immediately,” Lecomte writes.

Pictures of the abseiling at  http://www.anti-atom-aktuell.de/fotos/2009-04-27_uranzugstopp-haeger/. More about Lecomte’s climbing protests at  http://www.eichhoernchen.ouvaton.org/deutsch/anti-atom/Luftakrobatik-Atomtransporte.html .
Creative Commons-Lizenzvertrag Dieser Inhalt ist unter einer
Creative Commons-Lizenz lizenziert.
Indymedia ist eine Veröffentlichungsplattform, auf der jede und jeder selbstverfasste Berichte publizieren kann. Eine Überprüfung der Inhalte und eine redaktionelle Bearbeitung der Beiträge finden nicht statt. Bei Anregungen und Fragen zu diesem Artikel wenden sie sich bitte direkt an die Verfasserin oder den Verfasser.
(Moderationskriterien von Indymedia Deutschland)


#2428 From: savorsuccesslady3@...
Date: Thu Apr 2, 2009 6:11 pm
Subject: Nuking the NorthWest Coast Navy Training-This must be stopped!
savorsuccess...
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
Does the Navy have any right to destroy our oceans?
 
Below is an article on the new Navy plans for nuking and toxically contaminating the Pacific Ocean and all its creatures off the coasts of Oregon and Washington.
 
For those who wish to "cut to the chase" right to radioactivity and the use of Depleted Uranium weaponry on Flipper, other sea creatures, and our kids who swim in the Pacific, go to:  http://tinyurl.com/dmyzml or
 
 
We talk about stopping the new 81 nuclear reactors (i.e., 81,000 Megawatts of brand new nuclear power) and military testing and training via so-called "Depleted" Uranium munitions (such as is conducted in Alaska, Arizona, Nevada, New Mexico, and near me in Maryland), and we discuss the outdoor, open air explosions of Uranium at Livermore outside San Francisco and in NM and NV, too.
 
But can someone please tell me when are we all going to just start talking about the environmental radioactivity issue in general... i.e., the tremendous, deliberate, radioactive contamination of America- our air, water, soil, animals and aquatic life, plants, and people?
 
We are separated into different groups with these issues but it all boils down to the same thing, folks. The toxic and radioactive poison gases are destroying our environment and all forms of life in the US - including humans.
 
Only with massive outcries by outrageously large numbers of Americans can we hope to stop these nuke-happy madmen/women intent on continously blasting
these lethal gases out into our air, water, and soil... without any regard whatsoever to environmental and public health.
 
Cathy Garger
 
 
2/4/2009 3:11:00 PM  Email this article • Print this article 
Photo: Howard Garrett
Ruffles, the oldest known male orca in the world, swims past Fort Casey Lighthouse in October 2008. The U.S. Navy recently released its plans to increase operations in its Northwest Training Range Complex and the news has many people wondering what the impact will be to marine wildlife and the environment.
Justin Burnett / The Whidbey Examiner
Clinton resident John Hurd speaks at a public hearing in Oak Harbor concerning the U.S. Navy�s plans to expand activities at the Northwest Training Range Complex.
Public comment
Mail comments about the plan to Naval Facilities Engineering Command Northwest, Attn: Kimberly Kler, 1101 Tautog Circle, Silverdale WA 98315-1101, or submit comments online at the link at the bottom of this page. The deadline for comments has been extended to March 11.


Navy training expansion draws criticism

By Justin Burnett
Examiner Staff Writer

As many as 150 orcas are known to inhabit the waters of Puget Sound and the coast of Washington at various times of the year.

Among them is Ruffles. He belongs to a small family group called J-pod. At 57, he is the oldest known male orca in the world, according to Howard Garrett, president of Orca Network, a Whidbey Island based nonprofit group dedicated to raising awareness about whales in the Northwest.

Ruffles's exact age has been confirmed through photographic evidence. The characteristic ruffled back edge of his dorsal fin not only makes him easy to identify but also earned him his name.

He is usually spotted traveling on the outskirts of the pod. It may be that he is a loner or it may be that his position serves some special function within the group. It's one of the many mysteries about orcas that scientists have yet to discover, Garrett said.

The U.S. Navy recently released its plan to expand its training operations in Puget Sound and off the coasts of Washington and Oregon. With everything from missile and sonar testing to dumping depleted uranium included in the proposal, some environmentalists are concerned that Ruffles and J-pod may have given up the last of their secrets.

Strategic defense

The Navy's plan is to expand operations in its Northwest Training Range Complex, an area encompassing about 122,400 nautical miles of air, surface and subsurface space, which has been in operation since World War II.

The main purpose is to prepare for the wars of tomorrow, said Cmdr. Matt Miller, the executive officer at the Whidbey Island Naval Air Station, at a public hearing on the plan last week in Oak Harbor.

"Realistic training insures U.S. Navy personnel maintain the highest level of readiness in capability and is the single greatest asset the military has in preparing and protecting American service men and women to defend the nation," he said.

The Navy has spent the past year preparing an environmental impact statement, or EIS, which is a requirement of the National Environment Policy Act. According to the document, which contains more than 1,000 pages, current training exercises in the complex include everything from anti-air, anti-surface, and anti-submarine warfare to explosive ordnance disposal.

Besides a no-action option, the EIS outlines two main alternatives. The first calls for an increase in current training activities as well as testing new equipment such as new aircraft, guided missile submarines and unmanned aerial systems.

Alternative 2, the Navy's preferred option, includes all the changes outlined in alternative one but proposes increasing current training levels even more and enhancing the range by using new air and sea surface targets, and developing an underwater training minefield.

According to the EIS, Alternative 2 would allow the Navy to increase the number of missiles it fires by 470 percent, from 10 per year to 57 per year. The number of bombs dropped per year would increase 33 percent, from 108 to 144, and the number of shells fired would increase 106 percent, from 25,856 to 53,343.

That includes 20 mm cannon shells made from depleted uranium. Alternative 2 also would roughly double the number of sorties flown per year, from 2,499 to 4,998.

While most of these exercises would take place in coastal waters, some explosives testing is currently allowed within Puget Sound. Under Alternative 2, such activities would continue to be allowed.

Impact debated

Despite the Navy's proposals, the EIS concludes there will be no significant effect on marine life from any of the offered alternatives.

The claim has drawn significant skepticism from a number of local residents. Of the 30 people who attended the public hearing in Oak Harbor, not a single person voiced support for the Navy's plans. Instead, one attendee after another said the study's conclusions are hard to swallow - literally.

"How much depleted uranium do you want to eat in your fish?" asked Zimmer Morris, a South Whidbey teacher.

While the study acknowledges that some species listed under the Endangered Species Act - certain salmonid species, leatherback turtles, migratory mammals and birds - could be affected, it would not be enough to have lasting effects.

The EIS is also proposing mitigation measures to help reduce potential impacts. With marine mammals, such as whales, the plan is to use passive sonar and keep at least three "well-trained" lookouts on duty 24 hours a day. When the animals are present, and they come within 200 yards, certain training exercises would be halted until the animals move out of the area.

But several people at the hearing expressed their doubt about the effectiveness of the mitigation measures. The Orca Network's Garrett, for example, said he has been involved in observing and researching whales since 1981 and is aware of the difficulties of listening for "faint acoustic signals" that would indicate the presence of orcas.

"Recognition is highly problematic - even for experienced personnel," Garrett said.

Another common concern among speakers was a feeling of being blindsided by the Navy's plans. Although the EIS has been in the works for more than a year, Clinton resident Jerry Hurd said he didn't learn about the proposal until January, shortly after the public comment period started Dec. 29. The comment period has been extended to March 11.

He also complained that he found it difficult to submit comments on the plan. The document was available at the Oak Harbor library, but not at any of the other Island libraries. And he said the Navy's Web site, where the plan could be viewed online, wasn't working for several days during the comment period.

"I think it would be appropriate there be an extension" of the public comment period, he said.

People from environmental organizations such as Whidbey Environmental Action Network, Whidbey Audubon Society and People for Puget Sound reported they also hadn't learned about the plan until January.

"We just found out about this," said Mike Sato, spokesman for People for Puget Sound.

Garrett said he also is hoping for an extension to the public comment period. Washington residents need more time to comment on the proposal, and a delay could improve the chance that the Navy's plan will be noticed by Obama administration officials in Washington D.C., he said.

"The more time we can buy, the better," he said.


Related Stories:
• Navy extends public comment period on underwater testing
Related Links:
• Comment on the Navy proposal


Reader Comments


Posted: Sunday, March 15, 2009
Article comment by: Deborah Phelps

It just amazes me that the Navy thinks it has the right to do this testing. The Navy does NOT own the ocean. All species have an active part in the health of our oceans. Humanity seems to have forgotten that all species need one another to survive and the ocean should be our most valued and precious gift of life. Instead, I am reading that we are now going to drop bombs into it and ask our wildlife partners and help us do this and also endure the consequences. I don't know about anyone else but doesn't this all seem more than a little insane?

Posted: Friday, February 06, 2009
Article comment by: Alohabunny

Who is the enemy that is so threatening that the military has to endanger us all including our land sea and air?

The biggest threat to our health and resources IS THE MILITARY...they need to be stopped.
 
 





#2427 From: Bob Nichols <bob.bobnichols@...>
Date: Thu Apr 2, 2009 11:28 am
Subject: Fwd: Uranium deforms kids in Faridkot (Punjab), Pakistan
twrunner
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
My colleague Leuren Moret has found the the US Expeditionary Forces in Afghanistan greatly increase bombing with weaponized ceramic uranium oxide gas during the Monsoon.

That guarantees the genocidal ceramicized uranium aerosols will spread to India and indeed, the rest of the world.

There appears to be little reason for this except a war against civilians.

It remains a war crime that the US political and military leaders pursue to this day.

US Rep Dan Boren, D, Okla., brags that 99% of all munitions used in the US Central Asian Wars are shipped from the Army Ammunition Plant in McAlester, Oklahoma. The whole supply chain is guilty of War Crimes Against Humanity.

Bob Nichols
Project Censored Award Winner
Correspondent, San Francisco Bay View



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Leuren Moret <leurenmoret@...>
Date: Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 1:13 AM
Subject: Uranium deforms kids in Faridkot (Punjab), Pakistan
To: bob.bobnichols@...,



Uranium deforms kids in Faridkot
2 apr 2009
Wednesday, April 1, 2009 9:36 PM
From: "Sandhya Jain" <sandhya206@...>Add sender to Contacts
To: "Sandhya Jain" <jsandhya@...>
Cc: "Leuren Moret" <leurenmoret@...>
Uranium deforms kids in Faridkot: Doctors Baffled As There’s No Apparent Source Of The Toxic Metal In Punjab

Priya Yadav | TNN

Faridkot: Big heads, bulging eyes, twisted hands that don’t reach their mouths and bent legs that can barely support their frail frames. Intrigued by these abnormalities among children in a pocket of Faridkot, visiting South African toxicologist Dr Carin Smit had their hair samples sent to a German laboratory. The results, which have just come in, are shocking: the deformities were caused by alarmingly high levels of uranium. ‘‘The test results have left us baffled as there’s no apparent source of uranium in Punjab,’’ said Prithpal Singh, head of Baba Farid Centre for Special Children in Faridkot. More tests are now being organized among the 150 affected children with the help of a team of German and South African doctors to establish whether the traces found are from depleted uranium or natural sources.
  Dr Smit, a clinical metal toxicologist from Johannesburg who is here to collect more samples of children’s hair and urine, said, ‘‘When I first saw such overwhelming evidence of severe brain damage, I thought it was poisoning. I never suspected uranium.’’
  It was Smit’s liaison with a laboratory in Germany which specializes in toxicology that made the first tests possible. Now she, along with Vera Dirr, another specialist from Johannesburg, are here to collect urine samples. ‘‘Of the 149 children tested, 53 are likely to show more traces of uranium. We are now focusing on them to get more specific evidence,’’ Smit said. Since uranium severely harms the kidneys and liver, 53 kids are being tested for physical degeneration.
  Punjab health authorities, however, washed their hands of the issue. ‘‘This isn’t a health subject. We don’t know how children are showing such high concentration of uranium. Since it’s a global problem, it’s for the Centre to deal with it,’’ said Punjab health minister Laxmi Kanta Chawla.
  The affected children lead severely restricted lives, unable to communicate or carry out normal daily activities. ‘‘If they get hurt or are bitten by, say, ants, they don’t feel the pain,’’ said Dr Prithpal. Yuvraj Singh, 7, has no control over his body. He can barely stand, eat or speak. ‘‘He’s my only child. It’s agonizing to watch him make futile attempts to reach out for things,’’ says Davinder Singh, a farmer from Mallan Wala village about 60 km from Faridkot.
  Rajni, mother of 13-year-old Sarika, starts weeping when she speaks about her child. Sarika can’t hold her head up as it keeps falling sideways and it’s a daily struggle for her to eat. For most parents living in anxiety, the arrival of foreign doctors brought a flicker of hope. ‘‘We desperately hope that the treatment will help my four-year-old grandson stand on his feet,’’ said Paramvir Singh from Korakpura, a village 35km from Faridkot.
  Experts say the government must step in. ‘‘Of course, it’s a health issue as it deals with the damaging impact of heavy metals on people. This is a subject of serious research and we need financial support for scientific studies,’’ said Pratibha Singhvi, professor of paediatric neurology at PGI, Chandigarh.







#2426 From: James Nimmo <violadamore2@...>
Date: Wed Mar 25, 2009 1:02 am
Subject: Wasserman: People died at Three Mile Island
violadamore2
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 


--- On Tue, 3/24/09, The Free Press <webmaster@...> wrote:

From: The Free Press <webmaster@...>
Subject: Wasserman: People died at Three Mile Island


Greetings,

The following article was just posted to the website of The Free Press 
( http://freepress.org ).  Check it out today!
 
People died at Three Mile Island
by Harvey Wasserman
March 24, 2009

People died---and are still dying---at Three Mile Island.

As the thirtieth anniversary of America's most infamous industrial accident approaches, we mourn the deaths that accompanied
the biggest string of lies ever told in US industrial history.

As news of the accident poured into the global media, the public was assured there were no radiation releases.

That quickly proved to be false.

Read more:
http://www.freepress.org/columns/display/7/2009/1733

In peace...

________________________
The Free Press
http://www.freepress.org


#2425 From: James Nimmo <violadamore2@...>
Date: Mon Mar 23, 2009 6:31 pm
Subject: BALKANS: Fallout of Bombing â€Continues to Kill’
violadamore2
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
BALKANS: Fallout of Bombing â€Continues to Kill’
     By Vesna Peric Zimonjic
BELGRADE (IPS) - Ten years after the NATO bombing of Serbia, concern is rising over a rise in the number of reported cases of cancer.
http://www.ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=46176

#2424 From: savorsuccesslady3@...
Date: Sun Mar 22, 2009 7:15 pm
Subject: There is no "Humanitarian War" !!!
savorsuccess...
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
The US, UK, and Israeli militaries have wasted dozens of nations (our own included) with their illegal use of radioactive munitions. Brutally hit was the former Yugoslavia, bombed to pieces under Clinton and Gore's regime (they humor us by calling the effort NATO).  Now their filthy radioactive "dirty work" will last an eternity in the gene pool of all living things and in the environment of all these nations. Uranium from these weapons lasts quite literally forever!
 
Collon's film and Jovanovic's quote is correct - there is NO SUCH THING as a "humanitarian" war. It's an oxymoron. The words "war" and "humanitarian" are completely opposite in meaning and there is never a reason to justify radioactive contamination of a nation!
 
These wars of the 20th and 21st centuries permanently harm people, wildlife, and the environment. And now, with the use of Uranium weapons since the 1940s, 
dozens of nations' environments are bombarded with radioactivity (as well as chemical and bio-toxic chemicals). Air, water, and soil is eternally wasted by these Uranium (and NATO's) bombs dropped, stockpiles set on fire and exploded, and
missiles and tanks we've fired.
 
Yet, this barbaric insanity of War Madness marches forever on while the US media covers talk of a White House dog, an addiction to tobacco and a Blackberry, and the high couture gowns the new First Lady is wearing. As even the most die-hard Dem-supporters are now starting to discover, Obama is good-to-go with the further destruction of Afghanistan. He's lookin' for a few good men - give or take 400,000 -to continue waging radioactive war upon an innocent population. http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2009-03/21/content_11045735.htm
 
But did these current wars start with Afghanistan? No. NATO's involvement began with the dastardly 1990s Yugoslavia ghoulish bombing and imperialistic occupation under the guise of "humanitarian war."
 
What is often not mentioned, however, is that above and beyond the thousands of innocent civilians instantly killed during the bombings of the area formerly called Yugoslavia, the continued illnesses and deaths due to US (so-called NATO) Uranium munitions that remain forever in their environment... have been astronomical.
 
Please watch this short, hard-hitting video clip, of the last minister of foreign affairs of Yugoslavia, Zivadin Jovanovic ..................................................................
www.youtube.com/watch?v=WH1Xf4zFilE and be sure to read Collon's commentary below.
 
Cathy Garger
 
 Sent by www.michelcollon.info

"There is no humanitarian war"

This is said by Zivadin Jovanovic in the (see below) interview just made in Belgrade by Vanessa Stojilkovic for www.michelcollon.info. Tomorrow, 23rd of March, it will be ten years exactly, Nato (USA and Europe) started to bombard Yugoslavia. Some believe this was "the only good US war". But...
But can you imagine the USA since long time massacre Moslims in Iraq, Palestine and Afghanistan, and suddenly become their friends in the Balkans ?

But don't you need to think further when you know that the "Nato com" about these bombardments was prepared by Alastair Campbell, assistant of Tony Blair? The same Campbell invented the so called "weapons of mass destruction" against Iraq.

But ten years later, in this region, the multinationals have privatized everything, some people got very rich, the vast majority much poorer. And the USA got a super military basis (Camp Bondsteel) in Kosovo. And their same CIA agents, experts in provocation of separatism, are now active in Bolivia et Venezuela. Among others.

An aniversary that make us think... Yugoslavia disappeared. Who's next ?

MICHEL COLLON
22nd of March 2009

PLEASE WATCH THIS VIDEO :
"There is no humanitarian war"
Zivadin Jovanovic


1999 - 2009
Ten years after Nato bombardments against his country, Zivadin Jovanovic, last Foreign affairs minister of Yugoslavia, is interviewed in Belgrade by Vanessa Stojilkovic for www.michelcollon.info


English version : 
Jovanovic English
French version : 
Jovanovic French
Spanish version : Jovanovic Spanish

If you want to get more, see also :
Michel Collon and Vanessa Stojilkovic - Film The Damned of Kosovo (77')
Kosovo

Michel Collon - Book Media Lies and the Conquest of Kosovo
Media Lies

(About US made separatism in Latin America)
Michel Collon - My impressions of Bolivia
Separatism in Bolivia



#2423 From: Cathy Garger <savorsuccesslady3@...>
Date: Tue Mar 17, 2009 1:50 pm
Subject: Inhumane weapons
savorsuccess...
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 

Dear Lara,
 
What I believe is very important to know is that the US and many other nations are truly good to go with the spread of these Uranium poison gases - in terms of the Uranium munitions (both DU and even more deadly forms of Uranium) as well as in the explosions they are doing in our open air in CA, NM, NV and also the so-called "test" use of Uranium in MD, AZ, AK, NM, NV, etc.
 
PLUS on top of that, the nuclear power plants emit these deadly gases PLUS they are also released in the nuclear re-processing plants, and in the various stages of the use of Uranium for reactors and weapons, like mining, million, fabrication, production, manufacturing - every step of the way this Uranium is contaminating the US and the rest of the world, too.
 
We need to leave Uranium under the ground where it was found in nature since the beginning of the earth... and never bring any more of it above the earth's surface for any purpose whatsoever.
 
And when we fire it or explode it or burn it or use it inside a reactor? That is when the stuff becomes far more deadly still. We don't even have to inhale it. Some of it is soooo tiny that it travels right through the pores of our skin!
 
Is there any wonder why 1 out of 2 American males and 1 out of 3 females will come down with Cancer in our lifetime?
 
Uranium gas in every form and variety must be stopped. Period. Bottom line.
 
We are a Nation-Gone-Wild over Uranium since the early 1940s - that is more than 6 decades. And the only thing that can possibly stop the Uranium Lovers holding the power and control in our state and federal government (and many counties, too)? It's us, Lara.  Just ordinary people like you and me and others on this group. We are our kids' descendants' only hope, Lara. I truly mean that, too.
 
If we each did something every day to spread the word about these toxic and radioactive Uranium poison gases continuously bombarding our environment? I have no doubt eventually that we can stop this radiation madness.
 
It is simple common sense. Human creatures and animals were able for many, many centuries to live with the tiny bits of natural radiation from the sun's rays and the soil itself. But when you bring up all that radioactive Uranum from under the ground and cook it up inside tanks and nuclear reactors, etc.... It is just a No Brainer that the stuff is going to kill off all living species "real quick like."
 
It's just a No Brainer for anyone possessing even half a brain.
 
Thanks so much, Lara, for joining us in this fight. I call it a fight because we are truly in the fight for our kids' and grand kids' lives.
 
Cathy Garger
Living outside the belly of the beast near Wash DC



________________________________________________________________________
1a. Re: Welcome, Lara!
Posted by: "Lara Ancientwarrior67777"
ancientwarrior67777@... ancientwarrior67777
Date: Mon Mar 16, 2009 3:55 am ((PDT))
 Thank you for the Welcome Cathy, I hope to learn what I need to know about
the destruction of these inhumane weapons that are made that is killing our
human race and our planet called Mother Earth .  peace Lara  
Listen to the Voices, learn from the Past
Mold your future, while time yet Last.
Author  unknown, but it is Ancient words
 
 
________________________________
From: savorsuccesslady3 <savorsuccesslady3@...>
To: AmericanDUST@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, March 13, 2009 6:03:27 AM
Subject: [AmericanDUST] Welcome, Lara!
Dear Lara,
Welcome to the group!
When weapons containing Uranium are fired, they are pyrophoric.. . immediately
they ignite, creating a chemically toxic and radioactive poison gas. Forget
about "dust." Uranium weapons use creates lethal gases and these can
not only be inhaled but are absorbed right through the skin as well!
Yes, Israel is using Uranium weapons. I do not say "DU" much any
longer but simply Uranium weapons. There are two reasons for this. One is
because the term is a misnonmer. "DU" is not actually depleted of
anything. Another reason is because some of the munitions contain a slightly
different isotope mixture - even MORE deadly than "DU."
I want to refer you to the works of Dr. Rosalie Bertell. On her website are
many important articles that teach us *exactly* how deadly Uranium weapons are
to the human body: www.iicph.org/
Dirty bombs? Well, yes, the Uranium bombs and missiles we used could be called
"dirty," absolutely! They do kill indiscriminately and they are
illegal under many international laws, treaties, protocols.
The US and Israel COULD stop the use of these radioactive weapons if they
wanted to. They do not want to. They seem to prefer using lethal gases that stay
around forever, contaminating the water and soil for an eternity. This weakens
and sickens the population.
YES, by using these weapons on the Palestinian- occupied areas, and in Lebanon
and Syria, too... the psychopathological power holders in Israel have indeed
effectively "cooked" their own people. I know someone in Israel who
told me breast cancer is rampant there.
Lara, are you from the US? The reason I ask is because Uranium weapons are
fired in the US (so called "testing" and military training) and
Uranium is exploded inside this country, too (under the guise of so-called bomb
"testing"). Yes, they use Uranium munitions inside the US! It is Uncle
Sam's best-kept "dirty secret."
The US government has been radioactively poison gassing its own people since
the 1940s... and continuously ever since.
Our nuclear power plants emit toxic and radioactive poison gases as well. We in
the US have been called the most-nuked nation in the world. And yes, this has
been done by those supposedly on "our own side."
Best,
Cathy Garger
Maryland
--- In AmericanDUST@ yahoogroups. com, "ancientwarrior6777 7"
<ancientwarrior6777 7@...> wrote:
>
> Hello Everyone, > > A friend from another group told me ahead of time about this group which
talks about the dangers of DU and I want to thank Bob for the invite. > > My name is Lara and I was wondering how dangerous is the DU that is
refined to almost a powder can be? cause I have read that USA still use that
fine powder to make weapons and its most of the weapons that is used against the
Palenstine people and is it true that weapons were made by the fined powder of
DU...? I think it is what they called Junk or dirty bombs ?
> > I think these DU should not be used to make weapons because it harms to
many people and innocent children. I wish it could be stop from producing it. > > Peace > > Lara
>
Messages in this topic (3)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AmericanDUST/
<*> Your email settings:
Digest Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AmericanDUST/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:AmericanDUST-normal@yahoogroups.com mailto:AmericanDUST-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
AmericanDUST-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
------------------------------------------------------------------------


#2422 From: Lara Ancientwarrior67777 <ancientwarrior67777@...>
Date: Mon Mar 16, 2009 5:02 am
Subject: Re: Welcome, Lara!
ancientwarri...
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
 Thank you for the Welcome Cathy, I hope to learn what I need to know about the destruction of these inhumane weapons that are made that is killing our human race and our planet called Mother Earth .
 
 peace Lara
 
Listen to the Voices, learn from the Past
Mold your future, while time yet Last.
Author  unknown, but it is Ancient words
 
 
 



From: savorsuccesslady3 <savorsuccesslady3@...>
To: AmericanDUST@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, March 13, 2009 6:03:27 AM
Subject: [AmericanDUST] Welcome, Lara!

Dear Lara,

Welcome to the group!

When weapons containing Uranium are fired, they are pyrophoric.. . immediately they ignite, creating a chemically toxic and radioactive poison gas. Forget about "dust." Uranium weapons use creates lethal gases and these can not only be inhaled but are absorbed right through the skin as well!

Yes, Israel is using Uranium weapons. I do not say "DU" much any longer but simply Uranium weapons. There are two reasons for this. One is because the term is a misnonmer. "DU" is not actually depleted of anything. Another reason is because some of the munitions contain a slightly different isotope mixture - even MORE deadly than "DU."

I want to refer you to the works of Dr. Rosalie Bertell. On her website are many important articles that teach us *exactly* how deadly Uranium weapons are to the human body: www.iicph.org/

Dirty bombs? Well, yes, the Uranium bombs and missiles we used could be called "dirty," absolutely! They do kill indiscriminately and they are illegal under many international laws, treaties, protocols.

The US and Israel COULD stop the use of these radioactive weapons if they wanted to. They do not want to. They seem to prefer using lethal gases that stay around forever, contaminating the water and soil for an eternity. This weakens and sickens the population.

YES, by using these weapons on the Palestinian- occupied areas, and in Lebanon and Syria, too... the psychopathological power holders in Israel have indeed effectively "cooked" their own people. I know someone in Israel who told me breast cancer is rampant there.

Lara, are you from the US? The reason I ask is because Uranium weapons are fired in the US (so called "testing" and military training) and Uranium is exploded inside this country, too (under the guise of so-called bomb "testing"). Yes, they use Uranium munitions inside the US! It is Uncle Sam's best-kept "dirty secret."

The US government has been radioactively poison gassing its own people since the 1940s... and continuously ever since.

Our nuclear power plants emit toxic and radioactive poison gases as well. We in the US have been called the most-nuked nation in the world. And yes, this has been done by those supposedly on "our own side."

Best,

Cathy Garger
Maryland

--- In AmericanDUST@ yahoogroups. com, "ancientwarrior6777 7" <ancientwarrior6777 7@...> wrote:
>
> Hello Everyone,
>
> A friend from another group told me ahead of time about this group which talks about the dangers of DU and I want to thank Bob for the invite.
>
> My name is Lara and I was wondering how dangerous is the DU that is refined to almost a powder can be? cause I have read that USA still use that fine powder to make weapons and its most of the weapons that is used against the Palenstine people and is it true that weapons were made by the fined powder of DU...? I think it is what they called Junk or dirty bombs ?
>
> I think these DU should not be used to make weapons because it harms to many people and innocent children. I wish it could be stop from producing it.
>
> Peace
>
> Lara
>



#2421 From: raul max <raulmax@...>
Date: Sat Mar 14, 2009 7:36 pm
Subject: Vieques, Puerto Rico
raulmax
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
March 11, 2009
Contacts: Dr. Cruz MarĂ­a Nazario (787)675-1486
                Dr. Jorge L. ColĂłn (787)402-2015

Echoes of Vieques bombing present in Congressional hearing about the Agency
for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR)

SAN JUAN – Former members of the Health and Environment Commission of the
Technical and Professional Support Group for the Sustainable Development of
Vieques sent a letter today to the House of Representative’s Committee on
Science and Technology, Subcommittee on Investigation & Oversight,
critizicing the biased and unscientific nature of the Agency for Toxic
Substances and Disease Registry’s (ATSDR) Public Health Assessments about
the U.S. Navy bombing in Vieques, Puerto Rico and its health effects on the
residents of Vieques. The Subcommittee on Investigation & Oversight will
hold the hearing “ATSDR: Problems in the Past, Potential for the Future?”
tomorrow Thursday March 12, 2009.

In 2001 ATSDR published Public Health Assessments about the groundwater and
drinking water contamination exposure pathway and about the soil
contamination exposure pathway in Vieques. ATSDR conducted its assessments
since in 1999 a Vieques resident asked the agency to find out if the U.S.
Navy’s training exercises on the island of Vieques might have been exposing
the residents to unhealthy levels of contaminants as part of the Navy
bombing exercises at the Live Impact Area (LIA) at the east end of Vieques.

In 2001 scientists in the areas of public health, chemistry, ecology,
epidemiology, among others, which were members of the Health and Environment
Commission of the Technical and Professional Support Group for the
Sustainable Development of Vieques, evaluated drafts of the water and soil
documents and sent critical analyses with extensive comments to the ATSDR
where they concluded that the agency made biased and unscientific based
assessments of the actual contamination in Vieques and the exposure pathways
to the residents of Vieques. In addition, the critical analyses concluded
that the ATSDR had no scientific justification for reaching its conclusion
that the groundwater, drinking water, and soil in Vieques were not dangerous
for the health of the residents of Vieques. The scientists alerted the
Vieques residents that the ATSDR was not fulfilling its mission of
preventing harm to human health from exposure to hazardous substances
present in the environment.

The scientists alerted the ATSDR that the agency’s assessments of
groundwater and drinking water and soil were incorrect by design and that
the agency failed to provide scientific evidence supporting its conclusions
that there is no danger to the residents of Vieques from these exposure
pathways. The ATSDR based its assessments almost entirely on data provided
by the U.S. Navy, without making any attempt at an independent study and
assessment. The ATSDR selected for review only those documents supporting
the position that the U.S. Navy held that their bombing exercises caused no
harm to the Vieques residents, and even those documents were not properly
analyzed by the agency.

The errors in the ATSDR Public Health Assessments in Vieques were so gross
that the scientists and community leaders concluded that these errors can
only be explained by a lack of professional expertise or by a deliberate
intention of concealing evidence, the second possibility being more
plausible.

In their letter to the Congressional Subcommittee, the scientists expressed
their concerns about the effects on the health of the residents of Vieques
from the current manner in which the U.S. Navy is removing bombs on the
ground in Vieques (by open detonation) and the Navy’s plan of conducting
extensive burning of the vegetation to recover bombs.

The residents of Vieques have a cancer incidence rate 15% higher, and a
statistically significant excess risk of 26% of dying from cancer, when
compared to the people living in the main island of Puerto Rico.

Copies of the letter to the Congressional Subcommittee, and the comments
sent to the ATSDR, are included.

For further information, please contact:

Dr. Cruz MarĂ­a Nazario (787) 671-6230

Dr. Jorge L. ColĂłn (787) 402-2015



>¡Sé el Bello 51 de People en Español!
¡Es tu oportunidad de Brillar! br>Sube tus fotos ya http://www.51bello..com/

#2420 From: Cathy Garger <savorsuccesslady3@...>
Date: Fri Mar 13, 2009 12:06 pm
Subject: HAWAII Geologist: ARMY DU STUDIES "FALL FAR SHORT"
savorsuccess...
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
As a word of background, on two military bases in Hawaii, the US Army has admitted only to using toxic and radioactive Uranium in "spotting rounds" with an old Davy Crockett nuke bomb back in the 1960s. Many have good reason to believe that Uranium weapons were used in military training/testing throughout the decades in weapons other than just the Davy Crockett alone. 
 
In the following paper, however, a geologist living in Hawaii gives the US Army the most extremely generous benefit of the doubt, assuming for the purposes of this analysis they are being totally on the "up and up" with its use of DU limited to use in spotting rounds in connection with the Davy Crockett back in the 60s. 
 
Even giving the Army this courtesy, however? The geologist explains why the US military's testing of Uranium contamination has been inappropriate in terms of testing techniques. In other words, the US military does the *wrong tests* when it evaluates and reports on the impact of Uranium munitions use upon human health and the environment. The geologist also expresses his concerns for the health of Hawaiians - both civilians and the soldiers stationed there.
 
Why would the military do the wrong tests when measuring radioactivity in Hawaii?  Why, it stands to reason the Hawaiian tourist industry wouldn't exactly flourish if news about excessive radiation levels were to get out! Furthermore, with increased use of Hawaii as the military's sexiest playground for war games, it is unlikely many military families would consider it very desirable to be stationed at radioactive bases on the Hawaiian Islands.
 
It is actually quite understandable why Uncle Sam would choose to use the wrong tests when measuring its weaponized Uranium sins in the land of Hawaiian Paradise. It really wouldn't do very well if the international community were to find out it wasn't just Japan and its Pearl Harbor blitz alone that has essentially "nuked" the lush, formerly pristine Land of Aloha, now would it? 
 
Cathy Garger

 
 
From: shannon rudolph <shannonkona@...>
Subject: JUST AS WE SUSPECTED: ARMY DU STUDIES "FALL FAR SHORT"
To:
Date: Friday, March 13, 2009, 4:29 AM

PLEASE FORWARD

Dr. Pang and Dr. Busby agree with Dr. Reimer:
....Wrong testing being used to correctly measure depleted uranium on our island.

"I am particularly concerned that what is proposed by the U.S. Army for future (DU) studies at PTA will fall far short of providing the best information possible at this time, or for that matter, provide any information that can be used to develop a real rather than a speculative risk assessment."  from Mike Reimer, PhD, Kona geologist, retired
 

Michael Reimer

75-6081 Ali`i Drive RR-103

Kailua-Kona, HI  96740

March 6, 2009

 

Colonel Howard Killian, Deputy Director

U.S. Army Installation Management Command

Pacific Region

132 Yamanaga Street

Fort Shafter, Hawaii 96858-5520

 

Dear Colonel Killian:

 

I have had an opportunity to review the reports released from DU studies at Schofield Barracks and Pohakuloa Training Area.  I also spoke with Dr. Lorrin Pang, some members of the Community Advisory Group, and met contractor Dr. Jeff Morrow.

 

I agree with your statement that you mentioned in a previous communication we had, and that is to let the science speak. 

 

In that light, I am particularly concerned that what is proposed by the U.S. Army for future studies at PTA will fall far short of providing the best information possible at this time, or for that matter, provide any information that can be used to develop a real rather than a speculative risk assessment.

 

DU is an issue of evolving study results and knowledge.  There are some points that are immutable fact.  We know that DU is present at Schofield and Pohakuloa.   As I recall, the Army does not dispute the point of potential health risk.  Therefore, we must take the best information we obtain today and use it to address the concerns about the level of health risks from potential exposure to DU. 

 

The citizens of the Big Island are concerned.  This is a natural, often fearful, reaction anytime the word radiation is mentioned in our society.  Yet, we live in a world with ubiquitous and unavoidable natural radiation, from cosmic rays to the foodstuffs that provide our sustenance.  According to the position of the U.S. EPA, any and all ionizing radiation has the potential of causing cancer.  Thus, there has to be a reasoned balance between unavoidable exposure and elective exposure.

 

The past use of DU on the Big Island places exposure to that type of radioactive material in the “unavoidable exposure” category.  This brings forth the question then of how much additional risk does it pose to the people of the Big Island including the military personnel stationed and working at Pohakuloa.

 

I believe that with adequate study, this question can be answered with reasonable assurance.  As I mentioned, I do not believe the currently planned study has the capacity to answer that question.  The reason for my belief is that the study design is to measure total uranium and to show that it is below standards set by World Agencies for regulated exposures.  This may present itself as a feel-good approach, but it is unfortunately misleading even with the rudimentary information we have today about the form and occurrence of uranium in the natural environment.  In other words, the study as currently planned still leaves the door wide open on determining excess health risks, if any.

 

The attached commentary contains suggestions on what additional information could be collected to help determine the risk.  It is fair to assume that the information about the use of DU is as accurate as it can be.  That is, the only use was in the Davy Crockett spotting rounds, no use of penetrating munitions occurred, that is the 20mm or 30 mm rounds from various Gatling configurations, smaller caliber rounds, or larger caliber armor penetrating munitions.  It assumes that DU does not remain from any breach of containment if used as ballast or armor reinforcement, or any other possible presentation of DU. 

 

My comments are intended for a reasonably informed individual about DU issues; it is not overpoweringly technical but does use various standard abbreviations, chemical, isotopic, and radiological inferences and acronyms.   For example, I use DU for depleted uranium and its various components, and natural uranium or NU for naturally occurring uranium.  I am not suggesting that the uranium has a chemical, physical, or radiological difference.  However, it is different in form and that is a significant difference for risk assessment.  In addition, unless specifically mentioned, I do not separate radioactive decay into the three common particles, alpha, beta, and gamma radiation.  Of special note is my use of the term “form” in describing uranium.  Unlike the Hawaii Department of Health presentation (November 2007), I use form not to refer to the element uranium (and isotopes) but to describe its occurrence in a matrix – natural, alloy DU, or oxidized DU.

 

This is a commentary; it is not a formal, peer-reviewed technical report although it may in some instances give the appearance of a peer review for the program.  I do not duplicate information that can be found elsewhere and except in unusual or compelling circumstances, I do not provide references.   For detail not presented here, I am sure various contractors you have will be able to address and clarify the concepts more fully.  However, I am also willing to further explain my commentary for those issues that might be seen as some in a gray area of meaning.

 

Sincerely,

 

 

 

Michael Reimer, Ph.D., geologist, retired

GeoMike5@...

 

Distribution:  Sherry Davis, Corey Hardin, Hawaii County Council, Pete Hendricks, J. Morrow, Ph.D., L. Pang, M.D., LTC Richardson, S. Troute

 

 

Advisory Commentary of Michael Reimer on PTA Depleted Uranium Studies

 

Overview

Uranium in the natural environment occurs as an element within a mineral matrix.  This is true for the oceanic basalts that comprise the bulk of the volcano building material or even uranium mineralization associated with economically recoverable uranium deposits.  This is in contrast with DU used as munitions.  There, uranium is in a metallic form commonly alloyed with another metal or as a component derived from that metallic form.  Regardless of physical form or chemistry, uranium is radioactive.  In addition, uranium is a heavy metal and can cause heavy metal toxicity if ingested in sufficient quantities.

Any analysis of airborne materials that reveals uranium does not necessarily distinguish between metallic or matrix-included uranium.  DU used at Pohakuloa is reportedly 92 percent uranium alloyed with 8 percent molybdenum.  Other alloy materials of DU munitions not known to have been used in Hawaii included titanium, cobalt, and nickel.  Molybdenum as a heavy metal also has associated toxicity.

There is a major difference in potential cellular radiation damage if exposed to metallic uranium (or any particle with high uranium content, such as the 92 percent DU) versus exposure to oceanic basalt dust or aerosols where the uranium content may be 0.1 to 1 part per million (0.00001 to 0.0001 percent).  The reason for this is quite intuitive.  The more closely packed the uranium is, if embedded in tissue, the greater the likelihood that its radioactive alpha particles can provide multiple transits of the same cell during the cell’s lifetime.

Chemical form is also important to consider.  DU and its alloys oxidize.  Oxidized uranium (commonly valence VI) is more mobile in the environment that reduced uranium (IV).  DU oxidizes as seen from the photographs of yellow residues on spotting round assemblies.  The rate of oxidation is highly dependent on the local environment in which the metallic alloy is deposited.  One estimate from DU in soils indicated a 30 year time span before the DU would be completely oxidized.  I find such a time frame incredibly quick and would need conforming evidence to reinforce its validity.  From suspected oxidized fragments found on Oahu, it does appear that the oxidization process may be rapid in a moister environment.  The oxidization process of DU has been observed for spotting rounds in Hawaii and while it occurs, it seems to be at a much slower rate of progression as it has been perhaps over 40 years since the munitions were fired on the Big Island.

In effect, there is a mixed scenario regarding the transport and migration of DU, in both metallic and oxidized forms and there is a different health response from both radioactive and heavy metal exposures.  Background surveys at Schofield seemed to indicate that surface U radioactivity was less than that found with samples taken from depth.  This is not unusual when you consider that weather (leaching) of uranium and other metals can occur from surface materials and it can be redeposited in lower horizons.  Migration of oxidized DU could follow the same path but on a more rapid time frame.  I point this out so that it may be considered as a mechanism for either form of uranium.

In response to finding DU at Schofield and Pohakuloa, the military performed various scoping surveys and analyses to determine the probable extent of the distribution of the DU munitions.  These surveys included soil sampling, plant sampling, controlled burn of vegetation with ash collection and analysis, ground surveys, aerial photographic surveys, and airborne fly-overs with a helicopter fitted with sophisticated radiation detectors, and walk-overs with scintillometers looking for spent rounds that have a rather unique shape.

 

DU, because of it purity of uranium, is difficult to find using common radioactive detectors.  Its primary decay is through alpha particle emission.  These alpha particles, have very limited range in air, perhaps 5 cm and even less within any matrix material or soil cover.  There are limited emissions of beta and low energy gamma rays from the decay and progeny, again with limited range before all energy is transferred to the surrounding medium.  That medium can be any combination of mineral matrix, soil, water, or air.  The progeny of uranium decay are also radioactive until the end member is reached (Pb-206 in the case of U-238).  Thus the radioactivity of purified U-238 begins to provide greater radioactivity with the in-growth of progeny than that uranium immediately after purification and the progeny can be detected just a few months after pure uranium is cast.  In fact, within about 6 months after purification, the radioactivity increases from about 50 percent that of natural uranium (depending on the extent of U-235 separation) to about 75 percent.

If the DU was obtained from reprocessed fuel rods, the possibility of other isotopes is real and they could include significant radiation emitters even in trace quantities.  While one might be tempted to state factually that the radiation of DU is less than natural uranium, it is the total radiation of the spotter round that should be addressed.

 

The paper “Depleted Uranium, Natural Uranium and Other Naturally Occurring Radioactive Elements in Hawaiian Environments” by Dr. Kenneth Rubin, of at University of Hawaii (May 30, 2008) is an excellent overview paper covering many details of uranium in the natural environment.  It is unfortunate that the copy I read did not contain references.

 

Analysis

Uranium can be analyzed chemically and the surveys used ICP-MS that could even provide isotopic analyses.  DU typically contains the naturally occurring isotopes, U-238, U-235, and U-234.  If processed from spent fuel rods, it may also contain U-232, U-233, and U-236, and nano-traces of other isotopes, as well.  Typically, the presence of U-236 is an indicator of fuel rod processing.  The energy of the alpha particle release is also indicative of the particular isotopes.  Those energies can be resolved using alpha spectrometry. 

All analytical measurements have detection limits.  That is, they have a limiting number (concentration) below which the element of interest cannot be detected.  The methods used in the scoping surveys probably provide the lowest possible detection limit available by analytical instrumentation today.  For example, if enough of the sample is available, ICP-MS can measure one part of the element of interest in 1,000,000,000,000,000 parts of the other material; that is 1 part in a million billion.  An advantage of the ICP-MS is that it can measure isotopes of some elements, if enough material of the element of interest is present.

Alpha spectrometry is another analytical means of detecting uranium isotopes and was used for some sample analysis at Schofield.   It is capable of measuring the alpha decay of individual atoms and the energy released is often characteristic of the isotope!  Some care must be used in selecting a calibrating isotope for this system so as to not interfere with the energy of the particle of interest.

This is, of course, high praise for the potential of the analytical capability but if not used properly in a well designed program, the analytical results can be incorrect or misleading.

For example, if the analytical results are close to the minimum detection level of the instrument, there is great uncertainty in the precision of the results.  In other words, the standard deviation of the analysis can be so great that the uncertainty (often shown as a plus or minus number indicating a range of the result or expressed as standard deviation) pushes the analysis into a region less than the minimum detection level. 

 

A note is in order here.  There is another limit commonly used, identified as the reporting limit or RL.  It is typically higher than the minimum detection level (MDL), often by an order of magnitude, just to avoid the great uncertainty that accompanies analyses close to the MDL.  I would have to carefully check Figure 3.1 on the Final Report of the ICM-MS results for total suspended air filters to see if the RL is properly placed.

 

Analysis on the edge of the detection limit is particularly bothersome when attempting to use the uranium isotope ratios from ICP-MS analyses to determine if they are representative of natural or depleted uranium. 

Typically, U-235 and U-234 are lower in DU than in natural uranium.  U-236 does not occur in natural uranium.  An isotopic analysis of uranium and comparison of ratios of isotopes can reveal whether or not it is likely to be natural or depleted uranium.  In addition, the presence of U-236 is nearly confirmatory that DU is present.  Thus, the analysis of uranium isotopes presents many internal controls for determining the possible existence of depleted uranium.  In short, we know depleted uranium is there.  The question to be resolved is if it has an airborne mobility vector.

From typical analytical results reported so far especially from the Schofield studies, the total uranium concentrations are going to be between the MDL and the RL.  Isotopic analysis if performed may not present any useful (resolvable) information.

 

Next Sampling Phase

As I understand, the design of the continuing program to monitor airborne particulates, I believe the results are going to be inconclusive whether DU has mobility through an airborne vector.  I believe only ICP-MS is going to be used for the analyses of particulates on the air filters.

Minimal modifications could enhance the monitoring to provide results that have a better chance of revealing if DU is transported in the air.  I shall outline them here with a brief explanation as to why they should be incorporated into the study.

 

 

Recommendations

Alpha spectrometry.  Alpha spectrometry should be applied to all the samples collected.  The alpha spectrometry is an important component to the overall comprehension of the sample makeup.  It should detect U-234, U-235, and U-236.  It could reveal U-236 if present that would be a clear indicator of  depleted uranium and the sample should be counted long enough to detect any Po and Ra, progeny of  U that could help distinguish between DU and naturally occurring U.  I understand from Dr. Morrow when we met on March 3, 2009, that alpha spectrometry is not part of the future studies.  I believe at least some minimal number of samples should be designated for alpha spectrometry.  The reason is that it might be able to detect the presence of isotopes characterizing DU.  This may require extended sampling time or greater pumping speeds.  Alpha spectrometry was performed at Schofield and should be continued at PTA.  A total uranium analysis will not distinguish DU from NU.

 

ICP-MS.  ICP-MS should be continued and additional elements included.  In fact, there may be a suite of elements included that come as an analytical packet for a minimal fixed cost.  Mo should definitely be included in the analysis.  There is very little in Hawaiian basalts and larger quantities may be an indicator of DU.  Additional analyses would be Ni, Co, and Ti.  Ti, a later alloy of DU munitions might have a fairly high background in Hawaii as it occurs in the percent range in some Hawaiian basalts.  Phosphorous may indicate the use of fertilizer in the case where high uranium values are seen.  Although ideally every sample should have a full analysis, I believe for at least 25 percent of the samples, a full suite of commonly run ICP-MS analyses should be made.

The partial digestion analysis of a standing dust sample from Waiki`i ranch is interesting in that it strains the analytical detection limits and vaguely hints at the possibility of DU in airborne dust.  We have no information on the quantity of the sample, counting times, particulate size distribution or calibration and standards.  It is reasonable to suspect however that a rather large quantity of sample was available for this ICP-MS analysis to include U-236 detection.

 

Duplicate, background, standards, and blank samples.  I recommend that duplicate field samples be collected at certain times, even if this means running two filters in parallel.  The issue of standards, blanks, backgrounds, and replicates was poorly covered in the scoping reports.  Some indication of reasonable measurement error range should be obtained and reported.  The samples should be given to the laboratory unidentified as to whether they are special category samples.  Typically, these samples represent 10 percent of all samples.  Blanks are self explanatory; standards are those made by the lab to calibrate the equipment and those prepared by the party submitting the samples.  For background, see Sampling Frequency, below.

 

Particle observation.  I recommend that some of the filters be photographed using an electron microscope to observe the particles that have been collected.  Such photographs may indicate the nature of the particulate matter, if it is amorphous or crystalline, organic (pollen) or inorganic.  It would also be worthwhile to get some idea of the particle size distribution from a range of 10 nanometers to 100 micrometers.  For some samples, I recommend that an analysis be made of post-filter collections. There are multiple ways of obtaining this information, including post-filter large surface area collectors, that the contractor can recommend.

 

Sampling frequency.  I believe the sampling of aerosols is scheduled for pumping 24 hours, once a week.  I would recommend that the sampling occur every 6 days or more frequently to obtain coverage for days of the week when different scheduled activities may occur.  I also would like to see sampling stations set up around the island.  *I understand from Dr. Morrow that such sampling has already occurred as part of other, non-military sponsored monitoring, and some information from those collections will be included in this study.  In addition, the present sampling program is following a random day, US EPA protocol.

 There should be some samples that are included as background.  These could be upwind samples.  There are several air sampling programs in effect on the Island, from government to university studies.  These monitor air quality for a number of reasons, including particulates and elements related to volcanic emissions and VOG.  I would suggest exploring the feasibility of including air sampling for uranium as part of these ongoing operations and to have several stations operating for several years in the quest for airborne DU.  A collection and comparison of data from these other monitoring stations and their ongoing analyses would be a good addition to discussion in a final report.  This possibility of cooperation has been mentioned in various reports and I encourage it as part of this survey.  For example, I highly recommend discussions and data exchange (past, present and future) with researchers at the Mauna Loa observatory.  They have been measuring particulates and radioactivity as part of many different programs over the years.

 

Training.  Personnel who traverse PTA should be given training in the appearance of spotter rounds and potential fragments.  If seen, they should be noted and reported for recovery.  I have seen that this training is included in the license application to the NRC.

 

Aerosolization.  In spite of determined attempts to locate spent spotter rounds, they were largely unsuccessful.  Only one round was located at PTA. There could be many reasons for this.  One is the difficulty in finding DU via radiometric surveys. 

The helicopter over-flights are another example of minimal detection capabilities.  The helicopter flew at just feet off the ground but even that small distance is equivalent to the inches of soil cover for attenuating ionizing radiation.

There may have been several hundred to over 2,000 rounds fired.  The fact that only one was recovered points out the difficulty of locating the rounds.  If a suspicious material is found, that is physically located and recovered, alpha particle detection can be used to determine if it is uranium.

Speculation can present a few additional scenarios besides inadequacies of detection techniques that could provide explanation why more DU rounds are not found.  The probable impact area is larger than the area being searched; upon impact (and we do not know the target material), the rounds fragment highly, including partial aerosolization; the rounds have mostly oxidized; the spotter round impact area has been highly impacted by other activities including exploding ordinance or vehicular traffic.  It should be pointed out that the oxidized form is highly friable and can be dislodged easily from the host metallic form.  It could be carried to deeper horizons by surface precipitation and leaching or aerosolized more readily by mechanical means.   I doubt that there is only one mechanism at work making the finding of rounds difficult.

 

Special sampling events.  Anytime there is a special event at the training area, such as road construction or a firepower demonstration, sampling should be done.  It is too bad that the helicopter did not include a dust sampling device when it was searching for spotter rounds.  Such activities have the capability of  placing aerosols and dust into the air and DU may be a part of that release.  *I understand from Dr. Morrow that this is planned.

 

Minimum detection level or limit (MDL). There should be a concerted effort to raise the analytical threshold above the MDL.  I recognize the difficulty of this suggestion.   If this means collecting a sample for longer than 24 hours or using multiple filters to collect more sample, it should be considered. 

As it currently stands, the reported concentrations of material analyzed is about the same as the MDL.  This indicates that the concentrations of materials are low and a conclusion is drawn that because the uranium is low, and below the various exposure limits set by various health organizations, there is no threat from exposure.  This is an inadequate approach, convenient, but inadequate.

As argued before, the form of the material is of great importance.  If a 10 nanometer diameter of DU is embedded in the lung, it will present a radiation hazard even though it may only register as a small part of total uranium collected on a filter.

 

Aerosol characterization.  These suggestions are made to enhance the characterization of the aerosol sampling program.  The addition will impart increased costs but it is needed to say with certainty what any increased health risk might be if DU is present.  Aerosols can be created even when a spotter round fragments.  This is noted from the dust released when any brittle object is broken.  Of course, it is much less than burning an object and changing the form into smoke or ash.  I have no information on whether or not the spotter rounds were fired at a target and what that target might be.  Simple impact and fragmentation will create aerosols.  The extent of this might be seen by measuring the alloy metals (molybdenum) that would be part of the aerosol.

 

Health risk determination.  There are several means by which health risk from exposure to DU can be determined.  Various models and worse case scenarios can be used but the primary question is whether people were or are exposed to DU.  For this, one hopes to have actual data for input.  The difficulty of obtaining this for DU is discussed but I believe some modification to the sampling program, also discussed, can obtain data that can be useful.   The selection of risk determination can take many forms; the one used recently by the US EPA for relative risk was particularly understandable by the public.  For soldiers and contractors at Pohakuloa, the chance of being exposed to DU is greater than for someone more distant from the site, but the risk is not negligible and the magnitude of that risk will not be determined until data are available from the aerosol monitoring.

For the Big Island, if you are exposed to SO2, you have an increased health risk.  It is likely that most residents in their living locations are exposed to very little SO2, so they do have an increased risk, albeit minimal, but an increased risk nonetheless.  If it can be measured, it should be reported.

I depart here from my intent of making this a commentary and include some web sites that may be of interest.  I mentioned that I feel sample collection must be modified in order to determine if airborne DU is present.  Dust-size particles are likely to be localized as they have a high settling velocity, meaning they drop out of the air pretty quickly when the wind that carries them decreases below a certain speed.  We know of course that dust can be carried hundreds and even thousands of miles if it is elevated to high enough altitudes but local winds do not appear to have the convective action to carry the dust high to the altitudes needed for long-distance transport.  Aerosols, the smaller particles, can be airborne for rather large distances.  They are smaller and utilize the buoyancy effect for transport.  These are also the particle sizes that are most likely to become inhaled to the deeper regions of the lung.

Noting that various statements about radiation risk are attributed to the US EPA, especially their position developed from radon that one ionizing particle intercepting a single cell increases the cancer or mutation risk, I feel it is prudent to use the EPA’s risk models.  They are pretty well developed and even available on line. 

The reason for this approach is that DU has a different form than oxidized DU or natural uranium.  It is possible that the aerosol particle is DU, 92 percent uranium (920,000 ppm) rather than basalt with 1 part per million uranium.  This potentially has a very different impact from alpha particles with cells in the lung.   There are analogies to plutonium risk models and radon risk models.  The use of a radon risk model has been independently suggested (Albright and Barbour, 1999).  http://www.isis-online.org/publications/rp1.html

            The US EPA models and calculator are also available on-line.  These were developed for Superfund sites and I would hope these would be considered when developing the health risk determination of DU at PTA.  The equivalent of U, Pu, and Rn can be run.

http://www.epa.gov/superfund/health/contaminants/radiation/pdfs/introglos.pdf

http://epa-prgs.ornl.gov/radionuclides

 

Historical input.  There are uncertainties dealing with the DU use at Pohakola.  There is still time for contact to be made with individuals who were stationed there at the time of the firing.  With luck, one might find a range fire control officer.  They may know if there were 200 or 2,000 rounds fired, if the testing was done in confined areas, and even if there were any hardened targets involved.  In addition, perhaps a minor ecological health study could be conducted using those stationed soldiers at the time before, during and after firing, could be performed to see if there is a suggestion to conduct a case controlled epidemiological study.  I include under this topic the historical data and samples collected previously and available from archives.  I learned from Dr. Morrow that these samples are available and predate the recent recognition of DU use on the Big Island.

 

NRC license application.    The license application identifies at least 12 sites in the country that potentially have depleted uranium on site.  These are very diverse ecologically and it may enhance the application if each was discussed separately.  I make this suggestion in lieu of suggesting that a separate application be filed for each area. 

The concept of providing training is sound but training must be an ongoing program for as long or longer than there is DU at these sites.  The $1.9 million sought may be insufficient to accomplish and maintain this goal.  This training goes along with the commentary I provided in the brief training section above.

I believe the license application should make it perfectly clear that if DU is found, it will be removed.  The license application includes a discussion of detecting depleted uranium and talks about the quantity needed to be seen on scintillometer devices.  I would restructure this section as it basically states that unless a rather complete spotter round is found lying on the surface, it will not be detected.  This comes from the calculation in the application of the amount of DU needed to be detected and the weight of the DU present in a spotter round.  Let me provide the example of this.  In the application to the NRC for a license to handle, store and dispose of DU at various military facilities, it is stated that a sophisticated radiometric detection system will be assembled and used.  It further states that it will be capable of detecting surface fragments 6 cubic centimeters of volume and those buried 2 inches deep that contain 10 cubic centers volume of DU.  As the density of U is 19 g/cm3 and the weight of DU in a spotter round is 190 grams, this highly sophisticated instrument will likely detect nothing.  Anything, particularly fragments buried a few inches below the surface avoids detection completely. 

 

 

Summary

The present method proposed for air monitoring has very little chance of revealing depleted uranium.  Several slight modifications to the sampling program are recommended.  The major changes are to include alpha spectrometry (U-233, 234, 235, 236, 238, Po, Ra), and additional ICP-MS elements such as typical alloy compounds, Mo, Ti, Co, Ni, Cr, and even Pb.  Quantity of samples should be sufficient to move the analysis above the RL level.  An attempt to characterize size distribution from millimeter to nanometer should be made on a few samples.  Sampling periods should be varied, every six days for example, and include background, duplicate, replicate, and blanks.  Ideally, the air monitoring sampling at the perimeter of the training area should be monitored continuously.  The sampling program should include special events at PTA such as those that may create a lot of dust and monitoring stations around the Big Island should be set up with monitoring continuing for several years.

 

 





#2419 From: "savorsuccesslady3" <savorsuccesslady3@...>
Date: Fri Mar 13, 2009 11:03 am
Subject: Welcome, Lara!
savorsuccess...
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
Dear Lara,

Welcome to the group!

When weapons containing Uranium are fired, they are pyrophoric... immediately
they ignite, creating a chemically toxic and radioactive poison gas. Forget
about "dust." Uranium weapons use creates lethal gases and these can not only be
inhaled but are absorbed right through the skin as well!

Yes, Israel is using Uranium weapons. I do not say "DU" much any longer but
simply Uranium weapons. There are two reasons for this. One is because the term
is a misnonmer. "DU" is not actually depleted of anything. Another reason is
because some of the munitions contain a slightly different isotope mixture -
even MORE deadly than "DU."

I want to refer you to the works of Dr. Rosalie Bertell. On her website are many
important articles that teach us *exactly* how deadly Uranium weapons are to the
human body: www.iicph.org/

Dirty bombs? Well, yes, the Uranium bombs and missiles we used could be called
"dirty," absolutely! They do kill indiscriminately and they are illegal under
many international laws, treaties, protocols.

The US and Israel COULD stop the use of these radioactive weapons if they wanted
to. They do not want to. They seem to prefer using lethal gases that stay around
forever, contaminating the water and soil for an eternity. This weakens and
sickens the population.

YES, by using these weapons on the Palestinian-occupied areas, and in Lebanon
and Syria, too... the psychopathological power holders in Israel have indeed
effectively "cooked" their own people. I know someone in Israel who told me
breast cancer is rampant there.

Lara, are you from the US? The reason I ask is because Uranium weapons are fired
in the US (so called "testing" and military training) and Uranium is exploded
inside this country, too (under the guise of so-called bomb "testing"). Yes,
they use Uranium munitions inside the US! It is Uncle Sam's best-kept "dirty
secret."

The US government has been radioactively poison gassing its own people since the
1940s... and continuously ever since.

Our nuclear power plants emit toxic and radioactive poison gases as well. We in
the US have been called the most-nuked nation in the world. And yes, this has
been done by those supposedly on "our own side."

Best,

Cathy Garger
Maryland

--- In AmericanDUST@yahoogroups.com, "ancientwarrior67777"
<ancientwarrior67777@...> wrote:
>
>  Hello Everyone,
>
>  A friend from another group told me ahead of time about this group which
talks about the dangers of DU and I want to thank Bob for the invite.
>
>  My name is Lara  and I was wondering how dangerous is the DU that is refined
to almost a powder can be? cause I have read that USA still use that fine powder
to make weapons and its most of the weapons that is used against the Palenstine
people and is it true that weapons were made by the fined powder of DU...? I
think  it is what they called Junk or dirty bombs ?
>
>  I think these DU should not be used to make weapons because it harms to many
people and innocent children. I wish it could be stop from producing it.
>
>  Peace
>
>  Lara
>

#2418 From: "ancientwarrior67777" <ancientwarrior67777@...>
Date: Fri Mar 6, 2009 6:46 am
Subject: New Member
ancientwarri...
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
Hello Everyone,

  A friend from another group told me ahead of time about this group which talks
about the dangers of DU and I want to thank Bob for the invite.

  My name is Lara  and I was wondering how dangerous is the DU that is refined to
almost a powder can be? cause I have read that USA still use that fine powder to
make weapons and its most of the weapons that is used against the Palenstine
people and is it true that weapons were made by the fined powder of DU...? I
think  it is what they called Junk or dirty bombs ?

  I think these DU should not be used to make weapons because it harms to many
people and innocent children. I wish it could be stop from producing it.

  Peace

  Lara

#2417 From: desdinova <desdinovatheluckyone@...>
Date: Fri Feb 20, 2009 12:57 am
Subject: Re: "Barack Obama Administration Continues U.S. Military Global Dominance," by Prof. Peter Phillips, Sonoma State University, California
desdinovathe...
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 
Nothing changes if nothing changes!

--- On Thu, 2/19/09, Supreme Law Firm <paulandrewmitchell2004@...> wrote:
From: Supreme Law Firm <paulandrewmitchell2004@...>
Subject: [AmericanDUST] "Barack Obama Administration Continues U.S. Military Global Dominance," by Prof. Peter Phillips, Sonoma State University, California
To: "Peter Phillips" <peter.phillips@...>
Date: Thursday, February 19, 2009, 6:24 PM

Thank you very much, Prof. Phillips!

Cc:  The Internet


Sincerely yours,
/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964(a)
http://www.supremel aw.org/decs/ agency/private. attorney. general.htm
Criminal Investigator and Federal Witness: 18 U.S.C. 1510, 1512-13
http://www.supremel aw.org/reading. list.htm
http://www.supremel aw.org/index. htm (Home Page)
http://www.supremel aw.org/support. policy.htm (Support Policy)
http://www.supremel aw.org/guideline s.htm (Client Guidelines)
http://www.supremel aw.org/support. guidelines. htm (Policy + Guidelines)

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice

--- On Thu, 2/19/09, Peter Phillips <peter.phillips@ sonoma.edu> wrote:
From: Peter Phillips <peter.phillips@ sonoma.edu>
Subject: We wish it wasn't true but the facts show that the Barack Obama Administration Continues US Military Global Dominance
To: mliaresearch@ gmail.com, "Ed Pearl" <laamn@yahoogroups. com>
Date: Thursday, February 19, 2009, 2:45 PM

Barack Obama Administration Continues US Military Global Dominance
 
By Peter Phillips
 
The Barack Obama administration is continuing the neo-conservative agenda of US military domination of the world— albeit with perhaps with a kinder-gentler face.  While overt torture is now forbidden for the CIA and Pentagon, and symbolic gestures like the closing of the Guantanamo prison are in evidence, a unilateral military dominance policy, expanding military budget, and wars of occupation and aggression will likely continue unabated.
 
The military expansionists from within the Reagan, George H. W. Bush, Clinton, G. W. Bush administrations all put into place solid support for increased military spending. Clinton’s model of supporting the US military industrial complex was hold steady defense spending and to increase foreign weapons sales from 16% of global orders to over 60% by end of his administration.
 The neo-conservatives, who dominated the most recent Bush administration, amplified this trend for increased military spending. The neo-cons laid out their agenda for military global dominance in the 2000 Project for a New American Century (PNAC) report Rebuilding America's Defenses. The report called for the protection of the American Homeland, the ability to wage simultaneous theater wars, to perform global constabulary roles, and to control space and cyberspace. The report claimed that in order to maintain a Pax Americana, potential rivals — such as China, Iran, Iraq, and North Korea — needed to be held in check. Their military global dominance agenda required forward deployment of US forces worldwide and increasing defense/war spending well into the 21st century. The result was a doubling of the US military budget to over $700 billion in the last eight years. The US now spends as much on war/defense as the rest of the world combined making American taxpayers the highest war tax providers in the world.
 Barack Obama’s election brought a moment of hope for many. However, the Obama administration is not calling for deceased military spending, or a reversal of US military global dominance. Instead, Obama retained Robert Gates, thus making Obama the first president from an opposing party, in US history, to keep in place the outgoing administrations’ Secretary of Defense/War. Additionally, Obama is calling for an expanded war in Afghanistan and only minimal long-range reductions in Iraq.


 The US military industrial complex is deeply embedded inside the Washington beltway. According to the most recent reports from OpenSecrets. org, 151 members of Congress in 2006 had up to $195.5 million invested in defense companies.

 Major defense contractors were seriously involved in the 2008 elections. Lockheed Martin gave $2,612,219 in total political campaign donations with 49% to Democrats ($1,285,493) and 51% to Republicans  ($1,325,159) . Boeing gave $2,225,947 in 2008 with 58% to Democrats and General Dynamics provided $1,682,595 to both parties.  Northrop Grumman spent over $20 million in 2008 hiring lobbyists to consult to Congress, and Raytheon spent $6 million on lobbyists in the same period. Nancy Pelosi received more money from registered lobbyists than any other House candidate in the recent election cycle.


 The International Monetary Fund's prediction for global economic growth in 2009 is 0.5 percent—the worst since World War II. The United Nations' International Labor Organization estimates that some 50 million workers will lose their jobs worldwide this year. There are an estimated 62,000 U.S. companies expected to close this year, and while official unemployment is at 7 percent in the US, when you add people no longer looking for jobs and part-time workers, it is closer to 14 percent. The military-industrial -political elite are worried about the potential of increasing global insecurity. The answer inside the Obama Administration is to continue high defense/war spending to insure military control of both domestic and foreign instabilities.

 
The military, industrial, congressional, and administrative elite profit from defense spending, both financially and ideologically.  Insider profit taking from pentagon spending is widespread in Washington. But perhaps more important is the belief that this global military machine is seen as necessary for the protection of US corporate interests and the American upper classes in a increasingly destabilized world. Given that belief, the Obama administration is unlikely to change the established defense spending policies of the previous US administrations. 
 
 
Peter Phillips is a Professor of Sociology at Sonoma State University and Director of Project Censored a media research organization. His 2006 study on the Global Dominance Group in the US is available on line at: http://www.projectc ensored.org/ articles/ story/the- global-dominance -group/ 
 
 
 
 
 



Messages 2417 - 2446 of 2450   Newest  |  < Newer  |  Older >  |  Oldest
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help