Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
Alternative_Medicine_Forum
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Message search is now enhanced, find messages faster. Take it for a spin.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Americans to Obama, "Stay off Biotech"   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #374 of 606 |
Re: << Alternative_Medicine_Forum >> Americans to Obama, "Stay off Biotech"

Thanks Mr. Chatterjee for posting such a nervechilling story on 'biotech
development.'
Sakti

On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 6:45 PM, Jagannath Chatterjee
<jagchat01@...>wrote:

> Don't be fooled by the 'Biotech Myth'
> Grand Forks Herald
> Published Monday, November 24, 2008
> http://www.grandforksherald.com/articles/index.cfm?id=94342&section=Opinion
> By Kristine Mattis
>
> GRAND FORKS — The new presidential administration would do well to ignore
> the not-very-impartial advice of Art Brandli ("Obama must lead on biotech,"
> Page A4, Nov. 15).
> Biotechnology may have produced exponential economic growth for large
> agribusiness corporations such as Monsanto, Cargill, DuPont and Dow, but it
> has done little to help people.
> There exists a world food crisis, but as Francis Moore Lappe and others
> have noted, we do not have a world food shortage. We have a problem of
> growers forced to produce monocultures for export while not being able to
> feed themselves and their own communities.
> We have enormous distribution problems and tremendous waste. The United
> Nations recently estimated that at least 50 percent of food produced ends up
> as garbage, while billions of people around the world go hungry.
> A three-year study by the University of Kansas showed that genetically
> modified soybeans produce 10 percent less yield than their non-GM
> counterparts. So, even if there were shortages, biotechnology is not the
> solution.
> Moreover, the safety claims of biotechnology are dubious at best. GM foods
> do not undergo comprehensive health studies before being released to the
> market. Dr. Arpad Pusztai of the United Kingdom conducted the world's most
> thorough research on the health effects of GM foods. He found evidence of
> autoimmune problems, allergic reactions, underdeveloped organ growth and
> cancer resulting from the ingestion of genetically modified food.
> Is it any wonder that farm animals and wildlife feeding on agricultural
> crops avoid GM crops at all costs?
> Furthermore, genetic modification of crops has the potential to alter the
> genes of, and consequently the health of, entire ecosystems. Pollen from GM
> plants can travel far and wide, creating a "genetic pollution." GM crops
> also create a seed dependence for farmers, which often ruins their
> prosperity and their lives. More than half a million farmers in India have
> committed suicide as a result of losing their livelihoods to the endless
> cycle of dependence on seeds and chemicals that biotechnology produces.
> Finally, the unknown and potentially irreversible consequences of such
> technology are innumerable. GM crops are treated with extreme caution in
> Europe.. Starving nations on the African continent even have banned the
> import of GM food aid from America.
> Another biotech example, recombinant bovine growth hormone, was introduced
> by Monsanto in 1994 to increase milk production in cows, even though America
> was already producing far too much milk. Monsanto hoped increased milk
> production would drive down milk prices, thereby putting small dairy farms
> out of business while huge agribusiness corporations could absorb the costs
> and take over the market.
> But the real results of rBGH use were not just financial. It produced
> severe impairment and infection in dairy cows. That infection and the
> antibiotics used to treat it are passed down to the milk consumer. Other
> health effects from ingesting dairy products made from rBGH: higher risk of
> colon, prostate and breast cancers, possible role in pediatric bone cancer
> and implication in lung cancer.
> No wonder countries such as Canada, New Zealand and all of the European
> Union have long ago banned rBGH from even being introduced.
> President-elect Obama should be curtailing the use of biotechnology and
> implementing the precautionary principle within our current regulations. The
> rest of the Western world is light years ahead in consumer protection and
> the use of sustainable agriculture, while the American government remains
> under the influence of agribusiness giants who are on a mission to control
> the entire world's food supply to the peril of us all.
>
> Mattis is a graduate student in Earth System Science and Policy at UND.
>
> Be the first one to try the new Messenger 9 Beta! Go to
> http://in.messenger.yahoo.com/win/
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




Sat Dec 6, 2008 4:19 am

sakti.dasgupta
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #374 of 606 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

Don't be fooled by the 'Biotech Myth' Grand Forks Herald Published Monday, November 24, 2008 ...
Jagannath Chatterjee
jagchat01
Offline Send Email
Dec 4, 2008
11:39 pm

Thanks Mr. Chatterjee for posting such a nervechilling story on 'biotech development.' Sakti On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 6:45 PM, Jagannath Chatterjee ... ...
Saktibrata Dasgupta
sakti.dasgupta
Offline Send Email
Dec 8, 2008
1:03 am
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help